Difference between revisions of "Team:ColumbiaNYC/Design"

 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
   <div class="jumbotron">
 
   <div class="jumbotron">
 
     <div class="container">
 
     <div class="container">
       <h1>Project Description</h1>
+
       <h1>Proof of Concept</h1>
       <p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Sint, explicabo dolores ipsam aliquam inventore corrupti.</p>
+
        
 +
 
 +
 
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
 
   </div>
 
   </div>
Line 16: Line 18:
 
   <div class="container">
 
   <div class="container">
  
    <h3>
+
<p> SilenshR was borne from an identified shortcoming in chemotherapy. Systemic administration of cytotoxic agents leads to death even in healthy cells causing diarrhea, vomiting, temporary sterility and hair loss(1). Additionally, our SilenshR innovation works in tandem with radiotherapy, the efficacy of which is diminished when the solid tumor microenvironment becomes hypoxic. Diatomic oxygen assists in radiotherapy by forming free radicals that damage DNA, causing apoptosis within solid tumor cancers. In fact, cells that are anoxic at the time of irradiation are 3 times more resistant to the radiotherapy than cells under normoxic conditions(2). However, when the cancer cells preferentially adopt an aerobic glycolysis metabolism over aerobic respiration, the intratumoral pH decreases along with the oxygen content of the cancer. This is one significant limitation of radiotherapy.  </p>
      <strong>Background</strong>
+
 
    </h3>
+
<p> SilenshR is able to pick up the slack where radiotherapy is limited, as bacteria have been known to innately colonize and proliferate within the hypoxic and immune-privileged cores of tumors(3). Assuming SilenshR bacteria can grow within tumors, would this therapy be otherwise effective? Would the metabolic burden of shRNA production be too much for the bacteria, given the shRNA sequence is in a high-copy number pUC plasmid? Could the shRNA transcribed within the SilenshR vector quantifiably reduce gene expression in a host-mammalian cell? Will the quorum sensing invasiveness circuit reliably promote bacterial uptake by cancer cells? </p>
    <p>Cancer is a global scourge; it strikes without regard to age, race, gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic class. Fortunately,
+
 
      such treatment options as radiation therapy and chemotherapy have dramatically improved patient outcomes, prolonging
+
<p> Through characterization of the growth of SilenshR bacteria in a BL21(DE3) chassis, it was determined that the metabolic burden of shRNA production would not interfere with the growth and proliferation of the SilenshR bacteria. The shRNA was transcribed from the high copy number pUC plasmid under a T7 promoter. For these proof of concept experiments, the shRNA targeted expression of GFP and contains a sequence complementary to the mRNA of GFP in the CellBioLabs HeLa line. The SilenshR bacteria induced to express the T7 polymerase grew comparably to bacteria that were not induced to express T7 polymerase, reaching a similar stationary phase cell density in a similar amount of time. Both induced and non-induced populations grew at 37°C in a shaking incubator in LB media; cell densities and OD600 were evaluated every 30 minutes. At each time point, 5uL of culture was plated and the number of colony forming units (CFU) per mL was calculated.</p>
      life in most patients and offering a cure to others. While radiotherapy has achieved sub-millimeter1 precision in targeting
+
 
      solid tumor cancers, chemotherapy is administered systemically, resulting in off-target effects in healthy dividing
+
       <div style="text-align:center">
       cells, often with considerable disruption to quality of life. Loss of white blood cell progenitors leads to a broken
+
          <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/be/T--ColumbiaNYC--curve1.png" alt="" style="width:80%;">
       immune system. Death of cells lining the digestive tract causes vomiting and diarrhea. Damage to cells of the hair
+
          <h6> <strong> Fig 1: </strong> Normal bacteria growth, used as a comparison to growth curve with IPTG induction. </h6>
      follicle brings baldness and the immense toll on one’s body image.</p>
+
       </div>
    <br>
+
   
    <h3>Interesting Cancer graphs</h3>
+
    <div style="text-align:center">
    <p> SilenshR is a synthetic biology solution that leverages the innate capacity of bacteria to colonize the hypoxic and immune-privileged
+
          <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/6f/T--ColumbiaNYC--curve2.png" alt="" style="width:80%;">
      cores of tumors, conferring specificity to a systemic therapeutic approach. Once the SilenshR E. coli reach a cell
+
          <h6> <strong> Fig 2: </strong>The two graphs above are a comparison of bacteria growth without IPTG induction (without shRNA production) and with IPTG induction (with shRNA production). The shRNA produced is designed to inhibit eGFP. Since the two growth curves are virtually identical, this shows that production of the designed shRNA is not toxic to the bacteria. </h6>
      density of 2*10<sup>11</sup> colony forming units (cfu) per milliliter within the tumor, genetic circuits are activated allowing
+
      </div>
      SilenshR recombinants to invade cancer cells and release a short hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting an expressed oncogene
+
 
      thereby halting the unchecked cellular proliferation of cancer. By circumventing the need for systemic delivery of
+
<h3> <strong> Quorum Sensing </strong> </h3>
      chemotherapy and the inevitable off-target cytotoxicity, SilenshR keeps the immune system intact, spares the digestive
+
<p> While current experiments are seeking to install the genes Invasin and HlyA under the quorum inducible Lux promoter from Aiivibrio fischeri, the quorum sensing circuit was evaluated using GFP as a reporter. The bacteria in an E. coli Nissle chassis were grown in M9 media (see protocols for precise formulation) and OD600 absorbance and fluorescence were measured every 10 minutes, as shown by the 2 graphs below. At an OD600 value of 0.418, sufficient cell density was achieved for expression of GFP. </p>
      epithelial lining from damage and relieves anxiety surrounding hair loss.
+
 
    </p>
+
<div style="text-align:center">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/thumb/b/b9/T--ColumbiaNYC--od_time.png/800px-T--ColumbiaNYC--od_time.png" alt="" />
 +
<h6> <strong>Fig 3: </strong> Optical Density (OD) measurements for <em> E.coli </em> Nissle bacteria with quorum sensing circuit. </h6>
 +
</div>
 +
 
 +
<br />
 +
 
 +
<div style="text-align:center">
 +
<img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/thumb/d/da/T--ColumbiaNYC--GFP_time.png/800px-T--ColumbiaNYC--GFP_time.png" alt="" />
 +
<h6> <strong>Fig 4: </strong> GFP Fluorescence of <em> E.coli </em> Nissle bacteria with quorum sensing circuit. The orange data points represent fluorescence over time in <em> E.coli </em> Nissle without quorum sensing circuit and the blue data points represent <em> E.coli </em> Nissle bacteria with the quorum inducible circuit.</h6>
 +
</div>
 +
 
 +
<h3> <strong> Knockdown via Liposome Transfection </strong> </h3>
 +
 
 +
<p>Finally, the GFP shRNA was isolated from the induced BL21 (DE3) cells with an miRNeasy Kit (Qiagen) and assessed by gel electrophoresis to verify presence of the shRNA transcript. Following, the shRNA was complexed with cationic liposomes and transfected into GFP-expressing HeLa cells (CellBioLabs) using the lipofectamine 2000 protocol. GFP expression from HeLa cells was quantified 48 hours following transfection of liposomes with PBS, positive control siRNA against GFP (CellBioLabs) and the induced SilenshR shRNA for GFP. The shRNA targeting GFP produced in the SilenshR bacteria showed a significant reduction in GFP expression within the HeLa cells, as quantified by flow cytometry. </p>
 +
<br />
 +
 
 +
<div style="text-align:center">
 +
<img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/thumb/8/8b/Columbia_university_biobrickgraph.jpg/725px-Columbia_university_biobrickgraph.jpg" alt="" />
 +
<h6><strong> Fig 5: </strong> Bar plot showing GFP knockdown in HeLa cells. The experiment was performed in triplicate. The error bars represent the standard deviation of the samples</h6>
 +
</div>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<h3> <strong> References: </strong></h3>
 +
<ol>
 +
<li> Dunnill et. al. (2017). A Clinical and Biological Guide for Understanding Chemotherapy‐Induced Alopecia and Its Prevention.” Oncologist, doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0263</li>
 +
<li> Rockwell, S., Dobrucki, I. T., Kim, E. Y., Marrison, S. T., & Vu, V. T. (2009). Hypoxia and radiation therapy: Past history, ongoing research, and future promise. Current Molecular Medicine, 9(4), 442–458. </li>
 +
<li>Kathrin Westphal, Sara Leschner, Jadwiga Jablonska, Holger Loessner and Siegfried Weiss
 +
Cancer Res April 15 2008 (68) (8) 2952-2960; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2984 </li>
 +
 
 +
</ol>
  
    <br>
 
    <p>In this project, we optimize and expand the applications of this mechanism. We will use quorum sensing as an additional
 
      safeguard to make sure that this mechanism only attacks cancer cells. With quorum sensing, this mechanism will only
 
      be activated when a certain bacterial cell density is reached. This density is only possible in very anaerobic environments,
 
      which is characteristic of tumors. Challenges to this include the natural anaerobic environment in the gut and whether
 
      the bacteria will proliferate in a healthy gut as well. To resolve this, we are working to put the quorum sensing circuit
 
      under the control of a nitric oxide promoter. Since nitric-oxide rich environments are only characteristic of areas
 
      of inflammation and are highly characteristic of cancer, having the quorum sensing circuit under the control of a nitric-oxide
 
      promoter that is only activated in nitric-oxide rich environments would prevent the bacteria from invading healthy
 
      gut cells even when quorum is reached. A synthetic alternative to this mechanism that would be simpler to test in the
 
      laboratory is to control the quorum circuit with a tet (tetracycline) on system where a tet repressor represses the
 
      expression of the invasion circuit when tetracycline and/or doxycycline is not present. When doxycycline/tetracycline
 
      is synthetically introduced to the environment, the tet repressor is repressed by the rtTA (reverse tetracycline-controlled
 
      transactivator), and transcription of the invasion circuit occurs. The doxycycline/tetracycline can only be introduced
 
      to cancer sites.</p>
 
    <br>
 
    <p>We are targeting cervical cancer and prostate cancer. We will determine the effectiveness of this mechanism in each of
 
      these cancers using proof-of-concept experiments by inhibiting eGFP. We will then target oncogenes in these cancers.</p>
 
 
   </div>
 
   </div>
  

Latest revision as of 02:44, 2 November 2017

Proof of Concept

SilenshR was borne from an identified shortcoming in chemotherapy. Systemic administration of cytotoxic agents leads to death even in healthy cells causing diarrhea, vomiting, temporary sterility and hair loss(1). Additionally, our SilenshR innovation works in tandem with radiotherapy, the efficacy of which is diminished when the solid tumor microenvironment becomes hypoxic. Diatomic oxygen assists in radiotherapy by forming free radicals that damage DNA, causing apoptosis within solid tumor cancers. In fact, cells that are anoxic at the time of irradiation are 3 times more resistant to the radiotherapy than cells under normoxic conditions(2). However, when the cancer cells preferentially adopt an aerobic glycolysis metabolism over aerobic respiration, the intratumoral pH decreases along with the oxygen content of the cancer. This is one significant limitation of radiotherapy.

SilenshR is able to pick up the slack where radiotherapy is limited, as bacteria have been known to innately colonize and proliferate within the hypoxic and immune-privileged cores of tumors(3). Assuming SilenshR bacteria can grow within tumors, would this therapy be otherwise effective? Would the metabolic burden of shRNA production be too much for the bacteria, given the shRNA sequence is in a high-copy number pUC plasmid? Could the shRNA transcribed within the SilenshR vector quantifiably reduce gene expression in a host-mammalian cell? Will the quorum sensing invasiveness circuit reliably promote bacterial uptake by cancer cells?

Through characterization of the growth of SilenshR bacteria in a BL21(DE3) chassis, it was determined that the metabolic burden of shRNA production would not interfere with the growth and proliferation of the SilenshR bacteria. The shRNA was transcribed from the high copy number pUC plasmid under a T7 promoter. For these proof of concept experiments, the shRNA targeted expression of GFP and contains a sequence complementary to the mRNA of GFP in the CellBioLabs HeLa line. The SilenshR bacteria induced to express the T7 polymerase grew comparably to bacteria that were not induced to express T7 polymerase, reaching a similar stationary phase cell density in a similar amount of time. Both induced and non-induced populations grew at 37°C in a shaking incubator in LB media; cell densities and OD600 were evaluated every 30 minutes. At each time point, 5uL of culture was plated and the number of colony forming units (CFU) per mL was calculated.

Fig 1: Normal bacteria growth, used as a comparison to growth curve with IPTG induction.
Fig 2: The two graphs above are a comparison of bacteria growth without IPTG induction (without shRNA production) and with IPTG induction (with shRNA production). The shRNA produced is designed to inhibit eGFP. Since the two growth curves are virtually identical, this shows that production of the designed shRNA is not toxic to the bacteria.

Quorum Sensing

While current experiments are seeking to install the genes Invasin and HlyA under the quorum inducible Lux promoter from Aiivibrio fischeri, the quorum sensing circuit was evaluated using GFP as a reporter. The bacteria in an E. coli Nissle chassis were grown in M9 media (see protocols for precise formulation) and OD600 absorbance and fluorescence were measured every 10 minutes, as shown by the 2 graphs below. At an OD600 value of 0.418, sufficient cell density was achieved for expression of GFP.

Fig 3: Optical Density (OD) measurements for E.coli Nissle bacteria with quorum sensing circuit.

Fig 4: GFP Fluorescence of E.coli Nissle bacteria with quorum sensing circuit. The orange data points represent fluorescence over time in E.coli Nissle without quorum sensing circuit and the blue data points represent E.coli Nissle bacteria with the quorum inducible circuit.

Knockdown via Liposome Transfection

Finally, the GFP shRNA was isolated from the induced BL21 (DE3) cells with an miRNeasy Kit (Qiagen) and assessed by gel electrophoresis to verify presence of the shRNA transcript. Following, the shRNA was complexed with cationic liposomes and transfected into GFP-expressing HeLa cells (CellBioLabs) using the lipofectamine 2000 protocol. GFP expression from HeLa cells was quantified 48 hours following transfection of liposomes with PBS, positive control siRNA against GFP (CellBioLabs) and the induced SilenshR shRNA for GFP. The shRNA targeting GFP produced in the SilenshR bacteria showed a significant reduction in GFP expression within the HeLa cells, as quantified by flow cytometry.


Fig 5: Bar plot showing GFP knockdown in HeLa cells. The experiment was performed in triplicate. The error bars represent the standard deviation of the samples

References:

  1. Dunnill et. al. (2017). A Clinical and Biological Guide for Understanding Chemotherapy‐Induced Alopecia and Its Prevention.” Oncologist, doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0263
  2. Rockwell, S., Dobrucki, I. T., Kim, E. Y., Marrison, S. T., & Vu, V. T. (2009). Hypoxia and radiation therapy: Past history, ongoing research, and future promise. Current Molecular Medicine, 9(4), 442–458.
  3. Kathrin Westphal, Sara Leschner, Jadwiga Jablonska, Holger Loessner and Siegfried Weiss Cancer Res April 15 2008 (68) (8) 2952-2960; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2984