Difference between revisions of "Team:Exeter/HP/Silver"

 
(37 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
<html>
 
<html>
 +
<script>
 +
 +
$(document).ready(function(){
 +
$('a[href^="#"]').on('click',function (e) {
 +
    e.preventDefault();
 +
 +
    var target = this.hash;
 +
    var $target = $(target);
 +
 +
    $('html, body').stop().animate({
 +
        'scrollTop': $target.offset().top - $('#top_menu_14').height() - $('#top_menu_14').height() - $('#navbar-top').height()
 +
    }, 900, 'swing');
 +
});
 +
});
 +
 +
</script>
  
 
<!-- Row & container for main content of the page -->
 
<!-- Row & container for main content of the page -->
Line 12: Line 28:
 
         <!-- <a class="navbar-brand" href="#navbar-top">Back to top</a> -->
 
         <!-- <a class="navbar-brand" href="#navbar-top">Back to top</a> -->
 
         <nav class="nav nav-pills flex-column">
 
         <nav class="nav nav-pills flex-column">
−
           <a class="nav-link" href="The A.R.E.A Framework">The A.R.E.A Framework</a>
+
           <a class="nav-link" href="#areaFramework">The A.R.E.A <br> Framework</a>
−
           <a class="nav-link" href="Anticipate">Anticipate</a>
+
           <a class="nav-link" href="#Anticipate">Anticipate</a>
−
           <a class="nav-link" href="Reflect">Reflect</a>
+
           <a class="nav-link" href="#Reflect">Reflect</a>
−
  <a class="nav-link" href="Engage">Engage</a>
+
  <a class="nav-link" href="#Engage">Engage</a>
−
  <a class="nav-link" href="Act">Act</a>
+
  <a class="nav-link" href="#Act">Act</a>
−
  <a class="nav-link" href="Implementation">Implementation</a>
+
  <a class="nav-link" href="#Implementation">Implementation</a>
−
           <a class="nav-link" href="#navbar-top">back to top</a>
+
           <a class="nav-link" href="#pageHeader">back to top</a>
 
         </nav>
 
         </nav>
 
       </nav>
 
       </nav>
Line 24: Line 40:
 
     <div class="col-10" id="pageContent">
 
     <div class="col-10" id="pageContent">
 
       <div>
 
       <div>
−
<h3 id="pageHeader">Responsible Research Innovation </h3>
+
    <img class="w-25 mx-auto d-block" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/8e/T--Exeter--Silver_Medal_Icon.png">
 +
    <h1 id="pageHeader">Responsible Research Innovation </h1>
  
  
−
         <h4 id="The A.R.E.A Framework">The A.R.E.A Framework</h4>
+
         <h2 id="areaFramework">The A.R.E.A Framework</h2>
 
<p>This year we have implemented the AREA framework created by Professor Richard Owen.  
 
<p>This year we have implemented the AREA framework created by Professor Richard Owen.  
 
The framework was introduced to us by Dr Sarah Hartley, a social scientist at the University of Exeter.
 
The framework was introduced to us by Dr Sarah Hartley, a social scientist at the University of Exeter.
 
We wanted to use it to ensure that our project incorporates RRI (Responsible Research and Innovation).
 
We wanted to use it to ensure that our project incorporates RRI (Responsible Research and Innovation).
 
<br> </br>
 
<br> </br>
−
AREA stands for Anticipate, Reflect, Engage and Act. This framework was designed to modify research and innovation in response to societal issues. The frame is both systematic and iterative to allow for continuously flexible decision making between stakeholders and innovators with a view on ethical acceptability, stainability and social desirability.
+
AREA stands for Anticipate, Reflect, Engage and Act. This framework was designed to modify research and innovation in response to societal issues. The framework is both systematic and iterative to allow for continuously flexible decision making between stakeholders and innovators with a view on ethical acceptability, sustainability and social desirability.
 
Initially we considered this framework to be a rigid structure and were following the steps in order of Anticipate,  
 
Initially we considered this framework to be a rigid structure and were following the steps in order of Anticipate,  
 
Reflect, Engage and Act. However, we realised that it may not be suitable to do this; a meeting with Dr Sarah Hartley
 
Reflect, Engage and Act. However, we realised that it may not be suitable to do this; a meeting with Dr Sarah Hartley
−
confirmed this. For our project, it was important to work fluidly with the framework depending on the outcome of
+
confirmed this. For our project, it was important to work fluidly with the framework depending on the purpose of
 
meetings and the progression of the project.
 
meetings and the progression of the project.
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
  
−
         <h4 id="Anticipate">Anticipate</h4>
+
<img class="rounded mx-auto d-block w-50" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/7f/T--Exeter--Arealogo.png">
−
           <p> This involves continuous consideration of how you want the innovation you are designing and introducing into society to shape the future of society. Its important to question in what ways you want your research to change the future and pay close attention to the associated risk and implication on society and the environment.  
+
         
 +
 
 +
 
 +
         <h2 id="Anticipate">Anticipate</h2>
 +
           <p> This involves continuous consideration of how you want the innovation you are designing and introducing into society to shape the future of society. It's important to question in what ways you want your research to change the future and pay close attention to the associated risk and implications for society and the environment.  
 
 
 
<br> </br>
 
<br> </br>
 
It was important to gain information from  
 
It was important to gain information from  
−
stakeholders to help our understanding of the specific impacts and then have internal meetings to
+
stakeholders to help our understanding of the specific impacts of our project and then have internal meetings to
−
discuss how we can tackle these. It also served a useful starting point for reflection
+
discuss how we can act upon these. It also served a useful starting point for reflection. For example, interacting with Greenpeace allowed us to anticipate the issues surrounding the use of GM organisms in the field and the need for secure containment of any such organisms.
 +
We therefore began looking into methods for biosecurity. <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Exeter/HP/Gold_Integrated#Greenpeace_low_level">Click here for further information</a>
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
 
  
−
         <h4 id="Reflect">Reflect</h4>
+
         <h2 id="Reflect">Reflect</h2>
 
 
−
<p> Reflection is about considering the motivations behind our project to ensure the purpose  
+
<p> Reflection is about considering the motivations behind a project to ensure the purpose  
−
of the research is fully understood. Its where research thinking about how the evolution of the project has changed and most importantly ensure that the research and innovation is still in line with the societal issue you want it to solve.
+
of the research is fully understood. It involves thinking about the evolution of the project and most importantly ensuring that the research, and innovation, is still in line with the societal issue you want it to solve.
 
<br> </br>
 
<br> </br>
−
Meetings with stakeholders often stimulated reflection,  
+
Meetings with stakeholders often stimulated reflection, such as our meeting with a representative from Plymouth Marine Laboratory which allowed us to reflect on some of our initial ideas for our filtration system and refine them accordingly <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Exeter/HP/Gold_Integrated#PML_low_level">(Click here for further information)</a>.
−
however we generally found reflection was an internal process that allowed us to make educated decisions.
+
However, we generally found reflection was an internal process that allowed us to make educated decisions and allowed us to consider the broader questions surrounding our project. It also made it easier to identify the relevant stakeholders.
−
Reflection often allowed us to consider the broader questions surrounding our project. It also made it easier to identify the relevant stakeholders.
+
<br><br>
 +
 
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
−
<h4 id="Engage">Engage</h4>
+
<h2 id="Engage">Engage</h2>
 
<p> This part of the framework is about identifying and communicating with stakeholders who have  
 
<p> This part of the framework is about identifying and communicating with stakeholders who have  
−
expertise in the areas in required to influence your research. A wide range of stakeholders and publics should be involved to get a full range of perspectives.
+
expertise in the areas required to influence your research. A wide range of stakeholders and members of the general public should be involved to get a full range of perspectives.
 
<br> </br>
 
<br> </br>
 
We found it important to find out as much  
 
We found it important to find out as much  
Line 68: Line 91:
 
provide us with the knowledge we required. Maintaining a dialogue with stakeholders to ensure we continually  
 
provide us with the knowledge we required. Maintaining a dialogue with stakeholders to ensure we continually  
 
engaged with them to utilise their expertise to help shape our project.
 
engaged with them to utilise their expertise to help shape our project.
−
</p>
+
<br><br>
 +
Visiting the Veolia water treatment plant allowed us to engage with directly with the current stakeholders involved with tackling metal ion pollution from the Wheal Jane site. <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Exeter/HP/Gold_Integrated#Veolia_low_level">Click here for further information</a> </p>
  
−
<h4 id="act">Act</h4>
+
<h2 id="Act">Act</h2>
 
           <p>To act is to take on board advice from stakeholders and actively use this information to influence and make  
 
           <p>To act is to take on board advice from stakeholders and actively use this information to influence and make  
−
changes to the project. Its important for researchers to remain flexible in their response, considering all views before change the trajectory of the project
+
changes to the project. It's important for researchers to remain flexible in their response, considering all views before change the trajectory of the project
 
<br> </br>
 
<br> </br>
 
Throughout our project our decisions were highly influenced by direction gained from  
 
Throughout our project our decisions were highly influenced by direction gained from  
 
both academics and stakeholders.
 
both academics and stakeholders.
 +
<br></br>
 +
By giving our own RRI lectures to current Bioscience students we are enabling future research to be governed by the principles of RRI. <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Exeter/Engagement#RRI Lecture">Click here for further information</a>
 +
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
−
<h4 id="Implementation">Implementation of the framework in our project</h4>
+
 
−
<p>The first two weeks of our project were spent planning potential ideas for our project. The projects
+
<h2 id="Implementation">Implementation</h2>
−
we came up with were always related to solving a large scale issue, and the majority of these were environmental
+
<p> Struck by the information we gained through our work into <b>human practices</b> we were disappointed to find that approaches, such as RRI, were not emphasised in the Biosciences courses at the University. We felt a responsibility to communicate and share the knowledge we had gained over the summer to our peers and so organised to give lectures to both college students and Biosciences undergraduates, <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Exeter/Engagement#RRI Lecture">click here to read about it! 
−
issues caused by humanity. <b> Reflecting </b> on this we established that we are a team with members that would like to
+
</a></p>
−
devote their attention to improving the world. Further reflection led to us believing this may not be the case
+
<br><br>
−
as it was easier to think of ideas for solving issues from our own experience, which are dominated by issues we  
+
<p>To see how the use of the AREA framework into the project helped shape our project, see the pdf below which describes how it was continuously implemented in our stakeholder engagement and internal meetings.</p><p> <object class="mx-auto d-block w-75" height="600px" data="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/d/d2/T--Exeter--Use_of_AREA.pdf"></object> </p>
−
are exposed to. Whereas it was much harder to understand the issues faced within synthetic biology, due to our team
+
 
−
lack of exposure to this, which meant that we struggled to have confidence in any ideas that followed the foundational
+
 
−
advance or measurement tracks.
+
 
−
<br> </br>
+
−
While researching other projects by reading papers around the field and looking at previous iGEM teams, we engaged with
+
−
academics at the University of Exeter who are in fields we were interested in doing a project on. We would meet with each
+
−
academic as a group, first explaining who we are and then asking them questions about their work and the role a synthetic
+
−
biology project could have in this field. Doing this meant that we could anticipate the need for such a project and the
+
−
feasibility within the short time frame. Using this information we acted by making a judgement on whether the project idea
+
−
should be researched further. This led us to decide that we wanted to modify type I pili for the purpose of bioremediation
+
−
of contaminated water. Making this decision required reflection to ensure that the motivations of each team member was met
+
−
by the project. We decided that the project followed our motivations as it conformed with our desire to look for a solution
+
−
to an environmental issue. This was satisfied as we felt that the local issue surrounding the Consolidated Mines was a
+
−
typical situation faced by many abandoned mining sites around the world, so solving these issues could prove very rewarding
+
−
to us personally. The most important factor to ensure our individual motivations were met is that each member in our team
+
−
was satisfied that particular parts of the project would suit their skills set or provide the opportunity for learning the
+
−
skills they wanted to gain from iGEM.
+
 
</p>
 
</p>
  

Latest revision as of 11:32, 3 December 2017

Responsible Research Innovation

The A.R.E.A Framework

This year we have implemented the AREA framework created by Professor Richard Owen. The framework was introduced to us by Dr Sarah Hartley, a social scientist at the University of Exeter. We wanted to use it to ensure that our project incorporates RRI (Responsible Research and Innovation).

AREA stands for Anticipate, Reflect, Engage and Act. This framework was designed to modify research and innovation in response to societal issues. The framework is both systematic and iterative to allow for continuously flexible decision making between stakeholders and innovators with a view on ethical acceptability, sustainability and social desirability. Initially we considered this framework to be a rigid structure and were following the steps in order of Anticipate, Reflect, Engage and Act. However, we realised that it may not be suitable to do this; a meeting with Dr Sarah Hartley confirmed this. For our project, it was important to work fluidly with the framework depending on the purpose of meetings and the progression of the project.

Anticipate

This involves continuous consideration of how you want the innovation you are designing and introducing into society to shape the future of society. It's important to question in what ways you want your research to change the future and pay close attention to the associated risk and implications for society and the environment.

It was important to gain information from stakeholders to help our understanding of the specific impacts of our project and then have internal meetings to discuss how we can act upon these. It also served a useful starting point for reflection. For example, interacting with Greenpeace allowed us to anticipate the issues surrounding the use of GM organisms in the field and the need for secure containment of any such organisms. We therefore began looking into methods for biosecurity. Click here for further information

Reflect

Reflection is about considering the motivations behind a project to ensure the purpose of the research is fully understood. It involves thinking about the evolution of the project and most importantly ensuring that the research, and innovation, is still in line with the societal issue you want it to solve.

Meetings with stakeholders often stimulated reflection, such as our meeting with a representative from Plymouth Marine Laboratory which allowed us to reflect on some of our initial ideas for our filtration system and refine them accordingly (Click here for further information). However, we generally found reflection was an internal process that allowed us to make educated decisions and allowed us to consider the broader questions surrounding our project. It also made it easier to identify the relevant stakeholders.

Engage

This part of the framework is about identifying and communicating with stakeholders who have expertise in the areas required to influence your research. A wide range of stakeholders and members of the general public should be involved to get a full range of perspectives.

We found it important to find out as much as we could around our chosen research area before identifying the stakeholders who would be able to provide us with the knowledge we required. Maintaining a dialogue with stakeholders to ensure we continually engaged with them to utilise their expertise to help shape our project.

Visiting the Veolia water treatment plant allowed us to engage with directly with the current stakeholders involved with tackling metal ion pollution from the Wheal Jane site. Click here for further information

Act

To act is to take on board advice from stakeholders and actively use this information to influence and make changes to the project. It's important for researchers to remain flexible in their response, considering all views before change the trajectory of the project

Throughout our project our decisions were highly influenced by direction gained from both academics and stakeholders.

By giving our own RRI lectures to current Bioscience students we are enabling future research to be governed by the principles of RRI. Click here for further information

Implementation

Struck by the information we gained through our work into human practices we were disappointed to find that approaches, such as RRI, were not emphasised in the Biosciences courses at the University. We felt a responsibility to communicate and share the knowledge we had gained over the summer to our peers and so organised to give lectures to both college students and Biosciences undergraduates, click here to read about it!



To see how the use of the AREA framework into the project helped shape our project, see the pdf below which describes how it was continuously implemented in our stakeholder engagement and internal meetings.