Difference between revisions of "Team:Hong Kong HKUST/HP/Gold Integrated"

Line 80: Line 80:
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<div class="body">
 
<div class="body">
<p>We attended a conference held by the CUHK iGEM team and a biosafety conference held by HKU iGEM team. This gave us an opportunity to gather feedbacks during the Q&A session after our project description.
+
<p></p>
</p>
+
<p>Q1: Is there a chance where random homologous recombination occur within your cell?
+
</p>
+
<p>Q2: Is there any enzymes that can digest your engineered plasmids instead of using these recombinases?</p>
+
<p>Q3: How can you eliminate the plasmid after it’s recombined?</p>
+
<p>Q4: How would you use construct in particular scenarios. For example, how will your construct help if you accidentally spill the GM bacteria into environment?</p>
+
 
<img src="http://placehold.it/1000x500" alt="Graphic">
 
<img src="http://placehold.it/1000x500" alt="Graphic">
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 16:11, 2 October 2017

HKUST iGEM Team 2017

Flexbox Timeline Layout

Integrated Human Practices Timeline

Hong Kong University of Science & Technology iGem Team 2017

01

Technology

For a proof-of-concept purpose, our Cre-lox system is intended to illustrate how recombinase can excise the gene of interest at a certain time we desire, starting with a simple DH10b E.coli bacteria that are easy to grow and safe to use in laboratory. We were inspired by the application of recombinases in eukaryotes where only a specific gene inside the cell was knocked out without harming the organismal cell per se.

Having received feedbacks from people joining our organized activities in Hong Kong Science Park, where majority is parents, it surprisingly shows that our samples view GMOs to be more safe if the genetically modified gene within an organism has been knocked out before the consumption. We, therefore, directed our focus on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs).

Graphic
02

Towards our application

The introduction of GMOs varies between countries in terms of regulation and stringency. In order to explore current GMOs in Hong Kong, we were introduced to the interview with Dr. Terence Lau, a biosafety expert from Hong Kong government. Dr. Lau shared with us the current regulation and control of GMOs. To our surprise, there is yet no measure in preventing or mitigating the risks of GMOs being accidentally released in Hong Kong. The government only emphasizes on the control of genetically modified organism in some products such as vaccine and GM papaya, but they cannot cover the examination of all GM crops. In addition, industries will take risk to benefit ratios into account before considering GMOs as their profit-based business. Throughout this interview, the issue raised has inspired us to pursue deeper into the application of Genetic Containment Strategy.

Furthermore, we looked up some past IGEM teams’ researches and ideas on how to make their construct safe prior to the release. Besides from the consideration of kill switch as their genetic containment strategy, there is no practical implementation and standardization of the strategy.

Graphic
03

What is Genetic Containment Strategy? How is it different from Bio-containment?

Genetic (Biological) Containment Strategy is a measure to safeguard recombinant DNA in microorganism such that it can only be used in lab experiment but not outside. If accidental release happens, growth of modified microbes and rDNA replication should be immediately inhibited.

On the other hand, biocontainment is a prevention of risk of genetically engineered microorganism (GEM) release by using physical containment. Due to the demand for scaling up GEM, biocontainment may not be sufficient to contain large scale of GEM. Thus, genetic safeguards can potentially prevent the escape of microbes from proliferating. (ref1)

Graphic
04

The Positive Feedback Loop

Dr. Lau not only shared with us some knowledge regarding biosafety. He also raised questions concerning how we can achieve the purpose of knocking out in large population of cells.

We have considered using feedback loop to amplify signals such that sufficient receiver cells can be knocked out at time bound. The propagation of AHL signals can be simulated by modeling the rate of diffusion from the senders to the receivers and the rate of AHL being amplified again to affect peripheral cells. You may look for our modeling execution in the ‘Modeling’ section.

Graphic
05

Some insights from the meetup

Graphic
06

Subtitle Conversion

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Soluta reiciendis deserunt doloribus consequatur, laudantium odio dolorum laboriosam.

Graphic


Footer