Difference between revisions of "Team:UESTC-China/result"

Line 378: Line 378:
 
<p class="mid">d.piGEM2017-004 for Dha31A e.piGEM2017-004 for EchA f.piGEM2017-005 for Dha31A g.piGEM2017-005 for HheC</p>
 
<p class="mid">d.piGEM2017-004 for Dha31A e.piGEM2017-004 for EchA f.piGEM2017-005 for Dha31A g.piGEM2017-005 for HheC</p>
 
<p class="mid">(M: DL2000 DNA marker; Line 1, positive control (plasmid),Line 2, negative control (wild-type tobacco)</p>
 
<p class="mid">(M: DL2000 DNA marker; Line 1, positive control (plasmid),Line 2, negative control (wild-type tobacco)</p>
<br /><br />
+
<br />
 
 
 
<p class="subHead"><span class="glyphicon glyphicon-send"></span><b> RT-PCR detection of transgenic plants</b></p>
 
<p class="subHead"><span class="glyphicon glyphicon-send"></span><b> RT-PCR detection of transgenic plants</b></p>

Revision as of 03:12, 10 October 2017

Team:UESTC-China/Result

1.Plasmid Construct


Vector construction for the expression of DhaA31, HheC-W249P, EchA in tobacco


In order to express the three enzymes (DhaA31 isolated from Rhodococcus rhodochrous , HheC-W249P and EchA isolated from Agrobacterium radiobacter AD1) in tobacco, we firstly did the codon-optimized of the three enzymes in dicotyledonous plants. And then the genes of DhaA31, HheC-W249P and EchA were commercially synthesized. Finally, with the application of 2A peptide and Golden Gate strategy, we successfully introduced DhaA31, HheC-W249P and EchA into the plant expression vector piGEM2017-backbone which contained a kanamycin resistance gene (NptII) (Fig 1). The expression of these three enzymes were driven by the common constitutive promoter pCaMV35s in plants.


Figure 1. The introduction of piGEM2016-001 to piGEM2016-007


Before DNA sequencing, those vectors were verified by restriction enzyme digestion. After electrophoresis analysis, the samples which contained all desired bands were selected and sent for sequencing. The sequencing results showed that all the above constructed vectors were successful (Fig 2).



Figure 2. The image of agarose gel electrophoresis by double enzyme digestion.

  • (a)piGEM2017-001 (Line1,enzyme digested by PstI+BamHI; Line2,enzyme digested by ScaI)
  • (b)piGEM2017-002 (Line1,enzyme digested by PstI+BamHI; Line2, enzyme digested by ScaI)
  • (c) piGEM2017-003 (Line1,enzyme digested by EcoNI+BamHI; Line2,enzyme digested by ScaI)
  • (d) piGEM2017-004 (Line 1, enzyme digested by EcoRI+BamHI; Line 2, enzyme digested by PstI+BamHI)
  • (e) piGEM2017-005 (Line 1, enzyme digested by EcoRI+BamHI; Line 2, enzyme digested by ScaI)
  • M: DNA marker

Vector construction for the root expression of DhaA31, HheC-W249P, EchA in tobacco


Considering that TCP mainly existed in the soil and groundwater, we chose the plant root specific expression promoter pYK10 from Arabidopsis thaliana to replace the constitutive promoter pCaMV35s in order to obtain better degradation efficiency of TCP by enriching these three enzymes at the root of the plants.


At the same time, in order to strengthen the root growth of tobacco, a gene that coded the expression of the cytokinin, CKX3, was also introduced into piGEM2017-backbone after the codon optimization of dicotyledonous plants (Fig 3).


Figure 3. The introduction of piGEM2017-021 and piGEM2017-024


Before DNA sequencing, those vectors were verified by restriction enzyme digestion. After electrophoresis analysis, the samples which contained all desired bands were selected and sent for sequencing. The sequencing results showed that all the above constructed vectors were successful (Fig 4).


Figure 4. The image of agarose gel electrophoresis by double enzyme digestion.

(a) piGEM2017-021 (b) piGEM2017-024

(M: DNA marker; Line 1, enzyme digested by PstI; Line 2, enzyme digested by EcoRI +BamHI)


Vector construction for the extracellular expression of DhaA31, HheC-W249P, EchA in tobacco


In order to trpansport the three enzymes out of tobacco to play their functions, we chose AO-S, a plant cell wall localization peptide, to help achieve this goal. Besides, AO-S can also stabilize the expression of the proteins. Based on this, the vectors which can fulfil the fusion expression of AO-S and the three enzymes were constructed.


Finally, in order to intuitively confirm whether the multi-gene plant expression vectors we designed can play their roles, GUS reporter gene was also introduced into the piGEM2017-backbone (Fig 5).


Figure 5. The introduction of piGEM2017-022 023 025 026 and 027


Before DNA sequencing, those vectors were verified by restriction enzyme digestion. After electrophoresis analysis, the samples which contained all desired bands were selected and sent for sequencing. The sequencing results showed that all the above constructed vectors were successful (Fig 6).


Figure 6. The image of agarose gel electrophoresis by double enzyme digestion.

a) piGEM2017-022 (b) piGEM2017-023 (c) piGEM2017-025 (d) piGEM2017-026 (e) piGEM2017-027

(M: DNA marker; Line 1, enzyme digested by PstI; Line 2, enzyme digested by EcoRI +BamHI)

2.Tobacco Transformation


In order to introduce foreign genes into tobacco and achieve the stable expression of the exogenous proteins in tobacco, Agrobacterium mediated transformation which was a common transgenic method for dicotyledonous plants was used.


We firstly transferred our plasmids into Agrobacterium EHA105 and then the T-DNA fragment which contained the target genes of the Agrobacterium EHA105 was integrated into the chromosome of tobacco through the Agrobacterium mediated transformation.


For obtaining the transgenic tobacco, the whole steps can be divided into the following eight parts. Seed germination, pre-culture, infection, co-culture, resistance screening, calli induction, root culture, transplanting. The cycle of obtaining a transgenic tobacco was about ten weeks (Fig 7).


Figure 7. The steps for obtaining transgenic tobacco

3.PCR and RT - PCR Detection of Transgenic Plants


PCR detection of transgenic plants


After Agrobacterium mediated transformation, we successfully obtained the callis which have the resistance of kanamycin from the leaves of tobacco. The callis began to sprout in about 3 weeks. Another 3 weeks later, we obtained several transgenic tobacco. In order to verify whether the transgenic tobacco was false positive or not, we extracted the genomic DNA of T0 generation tobacco and designed pairs of primers to do PCR amplification of DhaA31, HheC-W249P, EchA, CKX3. Compared with wild type, we successfully amplified the target bands in T0 transgenic tobacco, which indicated that our multi-gene expression system worked successfully and we obtained the positive transgenic tobacco (Fig 8).






Figure 8. The image of agarose gel electrophoresis by PCR detection

a.piGEM2017-001 for Dha31A b.piGEM2017-002 for HheC-W249P c.piGEM2017-003 for EchA

d.piGEM2017-004 for Dha31A e.piGEM2017-004 for EchA f.piGEM2017-005 for Dha31A g.piGEM2017-005 for HheC

(M: DL2000 DNA marker; Line 1, positive control (plasmid),Line 2, negative control (wild-type tobacco)


RT-PCR detection of transgenic plants


In order to confirm whether DhaA31, HheC-W249P, EchA and CKX3 can be normally transcribed in tobacco, and determine the transcription level of these genes in tobacco, we extracted the RNA from the leaves and roots of the transgenic tobacco. And then RT- PCR was used to detect. Actin, a common used endogenous gene of the tobacco was selected as internal reference. Compared with the wild type, the cDNA of transgenic tobacco amplified the corresponding band of target genes, indicating that the above four exogenous genes were successfully transcribed in tobacco. At the same time, the cDNA of genes expressed by pYK10 promoter amplified a clearly band in root tissue than in leaves or other tissues, indicating that pYK10 promoter successfully drove DhaA31, HheC-W249P, EchA and CKX3 these four exogenous genes expressed in the root of tobacco (Fig 9).



Figure 9. The image of agarose gel electrophoresis by RT-PCR detection

a.piGEM2017-001 for Dha31A b.piGEM2017-002 for HheC-W249P c.piGEM2017-003 for EchA

(M: DL2000 DNA marker; Line 1, positive control (plasmid),Line 2, negative control (wild-type tobacco, Tubulin was an internal control in tobacco )

4.GUS staining


β-D - glucuronidase (encoding GUS gene) was an acidic hydrolase isolated from the E. coli K-12 strain that catalyzed the hydrolysis of many beta-glucoside esters. In the histochemical staining with X-gluc, the plants containing the GUS gene will appear blue. Based on this, transgenic tobacco (piGEM2017-02X) which had GUS gene and wild type tobacco were identified after the histochemical staining with X-gluc for 24h at the same time. Compared with wild type tocacco, the transgenic tobacco was dyed blue, proved that the multi-gene expression system in tobacco worked as we expected again. Besides, the expression of GUS drove by pYK10 observed dark blue in roots while in leaves and other tissues was significantly weaker compared with pCaMV35s after the histochemical staining with X-gluc for 24h. It was proved that pYK10 could achieve the root-specific expression of genes (Fig 10).

5.CKX3对植株影响的观察


在全株植物细胞中过表达CKX系列基因会使细胞分裂素生产增多,从而促进根部生长,但相应的它会抑制茎的分化,影响植株正常发育。为了避免上述情况发生,我们选择应用植物根特异性表达启动子特异启动CKX3基因,将其表达在烟草根部,既促进烟草根部发育又可以减弱对烟草生长发育的影响。我们选取长势相同的四种转基因植株piGEM2017-0XX以及野生型烟草同时开始培养,给予相同的环境及营养,培养一段时间发现,pCaMV35s启动的含CKX3基因的烟草长势弱,而由pYK10启动的含CKX3基因的烟草长势良好且根部同野生型相比明显更为粗壮,说明CKX3确实达到了我们预期的效果。

6.气相色谱


为了证明三种酶在植物体内能正常表达,我们利用气相色谱法检测了三种酶的酶活。色谱柱ZB-FFAP 30 m x 0.25 mm x 0.25 Gm (Phenomenex, USA)能够检测到此三酶链式反应中5种反应物,因此在酶活检测中,能够得到底物随时间减少以及产物随时间增加的折线图,从而证明转基因植株正常工作。


我们首先在35S启动子的三种单基因植株中分别检测了三种酶的酶活,得到的产物生成曲线如下,这证明了三种单基因植株都能正常工作(???),为后来三基因植株及根部表达和其他优化的正常工作打好了基础。(转化效率的问题)


接下来我们进行双基因和三基因植株的酶活检测,在研磨液中加入底物TCP,通过气相色谱检测中间产物的变化,来确定转基因植株正常工作,得到的曲线如下。(待完善)


对于根部特异性启动子,由于只在根部表达相关酶,叶片研磨的方法不再适用,所以我们采用水培的方法。在含有一定量TCP的培养液中培养转基因植株,定期从培养液中取样,用气相色谱进行检测,得到了中间产物随时间变化的曲线,如下图。


最后,对于三酶降解TCP的终产物甘油,我们使用色谱柱DB-5 column (L60 m×i.d. 0.25 mm and df0.25 _m thin coating film) (Supelco,Bellefonate, PA, USA).进行专门的检测。对35S启动的三基因植株,我们使用叶片研磨的方法,最终在反应体系中检测到了甘油的生成,得到甘油随时间变化的曲线如图。


(注:每个株系各有三组重复,进行统计分析)

7.水培及土培






8.Work Going On