|
|
Line 153: |
Line 153: |
| | | |
| <div class="inner" > | | <div class="inner" > |
− | <div class="top" ><div class="title" >Science Communication </div></div> | + | <div class="top" ><div class="title" >Science Communication</div></div> |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 262: |
Line 262: |
| <div class="inner" id="experts"> | | <div class="inner" id="experts"> |
| | | |
− | </br></br><center><h2><font color= "#C1D35D">Talking with Experts</font></h2></center></br> | + | <h1><font color= "#C1D35D">Introduction</font></h1></br> |
− | <img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/5a/Suling.jpg" style=" padding:10px;" height="30%" width="30%"align=left >
| + | |
− | </br><b><font color= "#C1D35D">Su-Ling Brooks, PhD, Department of Process Engineering and Applied Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada</font></b></br>
| + | |
− | Dr. Brooks’ research revolves around bioprocessing, food engineering,
| + | |
− | fermentation, extraction of natural products, and waste utilization and
| + | |
− | treatment. For this reason, we eagerly wanted to speak to her about the
| + | |
− | biofuel component of our project, and our ideas surrounding bioreactor
| + | |
− | construction. We presented her with two bioreactor ideas (see images
| + | |
− | below). The first option involved two bioreactors, one specifically for E. coli to
| + | |
− | degrade cellulose into glucose, and another for yeast to convert glucose into
| + | |
− | ethanol. The second option involved one bioreactor and a E. coli-yeast co-culture.
| + | |
− | During the course of our presentation, Dr. Brooks
| + | |
− | posed many insightful questions primarily surrounding the logistics of co-cultures, and the requirements of
| + | |
− | our organisms. At the end of the meeting we came away realizing that we still had a lot to learn
| + | |
− | about bioreactors. It was at this meeting that we began drawing up plans for future shake flask
| + | |
− | experiments. </br></br></br>
| + | |
| | | |
− | <img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/80/Dube.jpg" style=" padding:10px;" height="35%" width="35%"align=right ></br>
| + | <font color= "#C1D35D">What is scientific communication?</font></br> |
− | <b><font color= "#C1D35D">Mark Dubé, Port Hawkesbury Paper, Cape Breton, Canada</font></b></br>
| + | |
− | Mark elaborated on the cellulose waste treatment at the Port Hawkesbury pulp and paper mill
| + | |
− | in Cape Breton and identified two main types of waste: bark chips and a mix of clay, cellulose,
| + | |
− | and organic phosphates. All this waste goes into a biomass boiler to produce the steam needed
| + | |
− | to dry the paper in downstream processes. “We have looked into biofuel production, but it is
| + | |
− | too expensive…the technology isn’t efficient enough.” Currently, Port Hawkesbury Paper buys
| + | |
− | wood waste from surrounding companies to fill it’s need for steam.
| + | |
− | </br></br>
| + | |
| | | |
− | <img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/75/Dalrubin.jpg" style=" padding:10px;" height="25%" width="25%"align=left ></br></br></br></br>
| + | Scientists who work in a laboratory for a career are often shielded from contact with the public. Barriers are set up unintentionally that prevent communication between the two sides. Scientific language, knowledge, and research techniques are some factors that contribute to this divide. However, it is important for the scientists to share their findings with the public, because that is why researches are even conducted in the first place – to generate knowledge that can be applied to benefit the society. In essence, scientific communication is presenting scientific concepts to an average person who does not have the expertise in the field. This often involves explaining in “layman’s” term, and use analogies to refer to more relatable elements of the daily life for the public to understand science.</br></br> |
− | <b><font color= "#C1D35D">Dr. Eddy Rubin, Chief Science Officer, Metabiota, San Francisco, USA</font></b></br>
| + | |
− | Dr. Rubin has years of metagenomics under his belt, so we asked him which was better:
| + | |
− | sequencing-based or functional metagenomics? “Well, functional is great but I’m a sequencing
| + | |
− | guy... I’m interested in scalable things.” Dr. Rubin’s argument was with the advent of next
| + | |
− | generation sequencing and better DNA synthesis, you can produce terabytes of data and
| + | |
− | synthesize whatever you want from it. This is a much more scalable process, you don’t have to
| + | |
− | spend years designing functional assays.</br>
| + | |
− | See the rest of Dr. Rubin’s interview here. (link out)</br></br></br></br></br></br>
| + | |
| | | |
− | <img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/7c/Dallloyd.jpg" style=" padding:10px;" height="25%" width="25%"align=right ></br></br>
| + | <font color= "#C1D35D">Why is it important? </font></br> |
− | <b><font color= "#C1D35D">David Lloyd, Co-founder and Director, FREDsense, Calgary, Canada</font></b></br>
| + | |
− | David Lloyd was involved in iGEM during his undergraduate degree at University of Alberta and
| + | |
− | as a mentor during his Masters degree at University of Calgary. During his time at the University
| + | |
− | of Calgary he, and a team of students, developed a biosensor which morphed into the company
| + | |
− | FREDsense. We asked for his insight on how to develop an iGEM project into a company.
| + | |
− | “Spend your time really figuring out what the value your product is going to provide to that
| + | |
− | customer base. Picking up the phone and having those conversations is really important. It
| + | |
− | was through that process […] we ended up changing the sensor we were building to look at
| + | |
− | other market opportunities.”</br>
| + | |
− | See the rest of David Lloyd’s interview here. (link out)</br></br></br></br>
| + | |
| | | |
− | <img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/ea/DalScott.jpg" style=" padding:10px;" height="20%" width="20%"align=left ></br></br></br>
| + | So, why do people care about science? Maybe they don’t. But, science provides the means to evaluate a claim or an idea with evidences; it is good to have that skill on hand so we can understand how things work in the world. Unsurprisingly, we see scientific knowledge everywhere, from schools to social media, from work to TV shows. Gradually, science has manifested into interesting facts or explanations that we see everyday.</br></br> |
− | <b><font color= "#C1D35D">Scott Doncaster, Vice President, Manufacturing Technologies and Engineering, BioVectra, Charlottetown, Canada</font></b></br>
| + | |
− | BioVectra is a contract pharmaceutical fermentation plant that using bacteria and fungi to
| + | |
− | produce small molecule drugs or biologics. Being in charge of manufacturing and engineering,
| + | |
− | Scott is well versed in safety practices. Although BioVectra works with BSL-1 organisms, the
| + | |
− | volume of organisms they use requires them to treat the bacteria or fungi as if they were BSL-2.
| + | |
− | We asked Scott what safety mechanisms must be in place for large scale fermentation to work.
| + | |
− | “Containment is key! Rooms have slanted floors so [if a spill were to happen] it all goes into a
| + | |
− | contained grate, that would get autoclaved in emergencies. The building has been built with
| + | |
− | special air circulation, sterilization tools, air locks, temperature control and much more.”</br></br></br></br></br>
| + | |
| | | |
− | <img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/09/Stephen.jpg" style=" padding:10px;" height="30%" width="30%"align=right></br></br>
| + | <font color= "#C1D35D">Scienctific Literacy</font></br> |
− | <b><font color= "#C1D35D">Stephen Snobelen, PhD, Associate Professor of Humanities, University of King’s, Halifax, Canada</font></b></br>
| + | Nevertheless, one has to be mindful of the implications that arise with the incorporation of “science” in our lives. We might believe that every headline that presents itself as science on Facebook is “real science”. However, do we know where it comes from? Who published the article? Was the scientific methods used to generate credible results? Is it biased? Has it been altered or misinterpreted by the person who transcribes scientific data into writing? These are the questions that we should ask ourselves before we blindly believe in a claim. Because if we don’t, we might just be supporting pseudoscience, and this is extremely dangerous in an era where we can just click a button and share the “fake news” to millions across the globe. |
− | Some of Dr. Snobelen’s research interest include science in popular culture, and the
| + | |
− | popularization of science, therefore we knew we wanted to meet with him to discuss our
| + | |
− | science literacy survey. We did not have much previous survey planning experience to draw | + | |
− | upon, and thus it was great to get an expert opinion on how to form unbiased questions. Dr.
| + | |
− | Snobelen advised us not to use the phrase “science illiterate” as it could potentially polarize the
| + | |
− | audience. Furthermore, we discussed that people are not scientifically literate or illiterate. For
| + | |
− | instance, someone could be literate in biology, but have a poor understanding about physics.
| + | |
− | For this reason, we tried to instead paint the idea that science literacy is a spectrum.</br></br></br></br>
| + | |
| | | |
| | | |
Researching companies
There are five major biofuel companies in Canada each doing something slightly
different. Here are summaries of those five major companies.
Iogen Corporation is one of the longest withstanding biofuel companies in Canada. They
were founded in 1975, in East Ottawa, and have been producing cellulosic ethanol since 2004.
They focus on plant fiber and enzymatic hydrolysis in order to produce a dilute ethanol stream,
which is further concentrated to commercial-grade fuel.
The St. Clair ethanol plant from Suncor Company, has been producing 400 million tons
of biofuel per year. This facility in the Sarnia-Lambton region has been running since 2006, and
it has been named the largest ethanol plant in Canada. Suncor uses corn fiber to produce their
strain of ethanol. They have partnered with Petro-Canada to blend their ethanol with Petro-
Canada’s gasoline. Although this does not diminish greenhouse gases completely, the use of
blended ethanol-gasoline fuel has been reported to reduce CO 2 emissions by up to 300,000 tons
per year.
Evoleum Biofuel is located in Saint-Jean- sur-Richelieu, Quebec. It is a major producer
for biofuels from second generation raw material. At Evoleum, the second generation materials
used are exclusively vegetable oil. They have created 95% biodegradable biodiesel, that
produces no greenhouse gas emission. Since 2010, the use of the recycled materials for biofuel
in Montreal, from Evoleum, showed a decrease of 4.8 cents a liter on biodiesel.
In Nova Scotia, the CelluFuel Company uses low-value wood fiber to convert into
renewable diesel. They receive their wood fiber from Freeman’s Lumber in Greenfield, Nova
Scotia. The wood fiber undergoes a series of catalytic induced depolymerisation’s to produce
the renewable diesel. Today, CelluFuel is currently in its demonstration phase, and once they
have successfully completed this project they will begin producing commercial-grade fuel.
Another upcoming company for biofuel production in Canada, is Woodland Biofuel,
Incorporation. They are currently in their demonstrative phase with their start up plant located
in Sarnia, Ontario. Woodland is interested in cellulosic ethanol production, using agriculture
and forestry waste. The President, Greg Nuttal, states that it will be one of the lowest fuel
productive costs, not just for ethanol but other fuel industries, including gasoline. He suggests
the company will produce 200 million gallons per year. As of now, this company is looking into
another plant location in Merritt, British Columbia.
Clearly biofuel production is a popular industry sector with each of the aforementioned
companies carving out a particular niche for themselves. We believe that in this competitive
field, our project could have potential to hold its own. Firstly, our project would utilize
cellulose-containing waste from various industries and therefore our feedstock substrate would
not be limited to one particular area. This could be important in the future when certain
resources become scarce. As long as our substrate contained cellulose we could convert it!
Secondly, these companies still seem dependent on chemicals, water, or heat to aid in the
production process. Our project would utilize the enzymatic capabilities of microorganisms to
convert cellulose into glucose. Furthermore, we could modify this process to enhance for
production, for example, by modifying our organism. While we are a while away from making a
name for ourselves in the Canadian biofuel game, we have found our own niche within the
market.