Difference between revisions of "Team:Cornell/Engagement"

Line 177: Line 177:
 
                     <li><a href="#statefair">THE GREAT NY STATE FAIR</a></li>
 
                     <li><a href="#statefair">THE GREAT NY STATE FAIR</a></li>
 
                     <li><a href="#humansofsynbio">THE GREAT NY STATE FAIR</a></li>
 
                     <li><a href="#humansofsynbio">THE GREAT NY STATE FAIR</a></li>
                     <li><a href="#perception">PUBLIC PERCEPTION IN GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATIONS</a></li>
+
                     <li><a href="#perception">PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS SURVEY</a></li>
 
                      
 
                      
 
                 </ul>
 
                 </ul>
Line 303: Line 303:
 
  </div> <!--row-->
 
  </div> <!--row-->
 
                       </div>  <!--image wrapper grid-->
 
                       </div>  <!--image wrapper grid-->
                         <div class="content-title"><a id="perception">PUBLIC PERCEPTION IN GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATIONS</a></div>
+
                         <div class="content-title"><a id="perception">PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS SURVEY</a></div>
                        <p>In collaboration with Stony Brook iGEM, we conducted a survey to assess people’s thoughts on synthetic biology in New York state. We aimed to analyze whether there were differing perceptions of synthetic biology in two different regions of New York. Our survey had 92 participants, and. See the <a class="link" href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Cornell/Collaborations">Collaborations</a> page for more information.
+
<p> Synthetic biology is more powerful when we work together. For our collaboration, we worked with Stony Brook iGEM to understand people’s attitudes about synthetic biology in different parts of New York. Together, we wrote a survey to administer near our respective universities - us, in Ithaca and upstate New York, and them, in Long Island and New York City. We held weekly meetings over Skype to discuss where we wanted to go with our collaboration, focusing on using the strengths of both of our teams. We also developed skills in survey writing and distribution. We learned to ask questions that would improve the knowledge-base of our teams, and researched what we could uniquely investigate that could not be found online.
 +
 
 +
                        </p>
 +
                        <p>Through reflection, reviewing literature, and thoughtful dialogue, we chose to focus on the comparison of perceptions of synthetic biology in different geographic locations. As student researchers from STEM backgrounds, we recognized the bubble we could potentially be in. Conducting this survey helped us pop that bubble. Together, both of our teams went through several iterations of survey drafts which we constructed together. We tested our surveys on small sample populations, and brought back feedback to clarify or rephrase our questions. When the questions were finalized, both teams went out to collect responses.
 +
                        </p>
 +
                        <p>Cornell iGEM visited the Ithaca Farmers’ Market as well as the Ithaca Commons during our annual Apple Harvest Festival to collect survey responses. We also visited the Great New York State Fair in Syracuse to gather responses from people across the state of New York. Stony Brook collected responses at their campus and online. Altogether, we had 92 survey participants. Our survey questions can be found <a class="link" href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/ca/T--Cornell--CornelliGEMSurvey.pdf">here</a>. We hope that other iGEM teams will follow our lead and conduct similar analysis in their communities.
 +
                        </p>
 +
                      <div class="content-subtitle">Key Takeaways</div>
 +
                      <ol class="references">
 +
                        <li>A larger percentage of people in Stony Brook claim they know what synthetic biology is compared to people in Ithaca. This relationship is statistically significant (p = 0.01).</li>
 +
                        <li>A larger percentage of people in both Stony Brook and Ithaca believe that synthetic biology/genetic engineering has a positive impact on the world.</li>
 +
                        <li>However, many people still believe that synthetic biology should be limited to certain areas in future science.</li>
 +
                        <li>There is a negative perception of the term GMO compared to the term synthetic biology. This reveals that there is a stigma against the phrase “genetically modified organism” even if the idea of synthetic biology is actually not opposed. </li>
 +
                        <li>Demographics do not significantly affect perceptions of synthetic biology.</li>
 +
                      </ol>
 +
 
 +
                        <p>For analysis and discussion of the results, see the <a class="link" href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Cornell/Collaborations">Collaborations</a> page for more information.
 
                         </p>
 
                         </p>
 
                         <div class="content-title"><a id="labtours">LAB TOURS AND SYMPOSIUMS</a></div>
 
                         <div class="content-title"><a id="labtours">LAB TOURS AND SYMPOSIUMS</a></div>

Revision as of 17:46, 29 October 2017

<!DOCTYPE html> Bios