Difference between revisions of "Team:Tianjin/Demonstrate"

Line 1,039: Line 1,039:
 
                         <a href="#pic_seventy-five">
 
                         <a href="#pic_seventy-five">
 
                           <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b7/Heavy-metal-jiaotu.jpg"></a>
 
                           <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b7/Heavy-metal-jiaotu.jpg"></a>
<p style="font-size:15px;text-align:center"><br/>Figure 1. The results of PCR of our S.C-Cu. LIMT gene (length of 319bp) 、Cup1(length of 186bp) and complete sequence(length of 3114bp)have been amplified. which indicated that we succeeded in the construction of genetic circuit.</p>
+
<p style="font-size:15px;text-align:center"><br/>Figure 5-1. The results of PCR of our S.C-Cu. LIMT gene (length of 319bp) 、Cup1(length of 186bp) and complete sequence(length of 3114bp)have been amplified. which indicated that we succeeded in the construction of genetic circuit.</p>
 
                     </div>
 
                     </div>
 
                    
 
                    
 
                     </div>
 
                     </div>
 
                    
 
                    
                   <div id="pic_seventy-five" style="display:none;"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b7/Heavy-metal-jiaotu.jpg"><p style="font-size:15px;text-align:center"><br/>Figure 1. The results of PCR of our S.C-Cu. LIMT gene (length of 319bp) 、Cup1(length of 186bp) and complete sequence(length of 3114bp)have been amplified. which indicated that we succeeded in the construction of genetic circuit.</p></div>  
+
                   <div id="pic_seventy-five" style="display:none;"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b7/Heavy-metal-jiaotu.jpg"><p style="font-size:15px;text-align:center"><br/>Figure 5-1. The results of PCR of our S.C-Cu. LIMT gene (length of 319bp) 、Cup1(length of 186bp) and complete sequence(length of 3114bp)have been amplified. which indicated that we succeeded in the construction of genetic circuit.</p></div>  
  
<p>Fig.1 the results of PCR. We use <i>2k plus Ⅱ</i> as the marker. On four parallel lanes of the gel (number 1,2,3,4), run were four set of DNA molecules of known size ( 319bp for number 1, the <i>LIMT</i>; 186bp for number 2 and 3, the <i>Cup1</i>; 3114bp for number 4,the whole sequence contained <i>Cup1</i>). From the DNA band of number 1, we could analyze that <i>vika</i> has been expressed to delete the <i>Cup1</i> and its terminor, so we can get the <i>LIMT</i>. From the DNA band of number 2, 3 and 4, we could delightedly prove that the fragments (<i>TEF</i> promoter, <i>Cup1</i> and <i>ura3</i> terminator) have successfully transformed to synthetic chromosome <i>V</i>. </p>
+
<p>Fig.5-1 the results of PCR. We use <i>2k plus Ⅱ</i> as the marker. On four parallel lanes of the gel (number 1,2,3,4), run were four set of DNA molecules of known size ( 319bp for number 1, the <i>LIMT</i>; 186bp for number 2 and 3, the <i>Cup1</i>; 3114bp for number 4,the whole sequence contained <i>Cup1</i>). From the DNA band of number 1, we could analyze that <i>vika</i> has been expressed to delete the <i>Cup1</i> and its terminor, so we can get the <i>LIMT</i>. From the DNA band of number 2, 3 and 4, we could delightedly prove that the fragments (<i>TEF</i> promoter, <i>Cup1</i> and <i>ura3</i> terminator) have successfully transformed to synthetic chromosome <i>V</i>. </p>
  
 
<h4>Accumulation</h4>
 
<h4>Accumulation</h4>
Line 1,053: Line 1,053:
 
<p>In terms of the respective ability to adsorb copper and cadmium, we compare genetically-engineered yeast, SCRaMbLE yeast and original one.
 
<p>In terms of the respective ability to adsorb copper and cadmium, we compare genetically-engineered yeast, SCRaMbLE yeast and original one.
  
<p>As is illustrated in Fig.X1 and Fig.X2, engineered yeast significantly absorbs more ion than control group without any improvement. Furthermore, SCRaMbLE yeast also shows excellent adsorption capacity, comparable to genetically-engineered one. Fig.X1 reveals the adorption of copper ion, which relatively faster than cadmium, showed in Fig.X2.</p>
+
<p>As is illustrated in Fig.5-1 and Fig.5-2, engineered yeast significantly absorbs more ion than control group without any improvement. Furthermore, SCRaMbLE yeast also shows excellent adsorption capacity, comparable to genetically-engineered one. Fig.X1 reveals the adorption of copper ion, which relatively faster than cadmium, showed in Fig.X2.</p>
 
<div class="zxx_zoom_demo">
 
<div class="zxx_zoom_demo">
 
                     <div class="small_pic_demo" style="float:left;">
 
                     <div class="small_pic_demo" style="float:left;">
 
                         <a href="#pic_Seventy-six">
 
                         <a href="#pic_Seventy-six">
                             <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/1/17/Demonstrate.Cu.png"></a><p style="font-size:15px;text-align:center"><br/>The variations of copper(II) consumption with time for S.C-Cu、S8 and BY4741 at 430 mg/L copper(II) concentrations.
+
                             <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/1/17/Demonstrate.Cu.png"></a><p style="font-size:15px;text-align:center"><br/>Figure 5-2.The variations of copper(II) consumption with time for S.C-Cu、S8 and BY4741 at 430 mg/L copper(II) concentrations.
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
                     </div>
 
                     </div>
Line 1,088: Line 1,088:
 
<p>Moreover, it’s a pity that we have no time to combine our gene circuit and SCRaMbLE yeast. In subsequent experiments, it deserves a try to transform fragments into SCRaMbLE yeast, checking if it will double the absorption capacity or even better.</p>
 
<p>Moreover, it’s a pity that we have no time to combine our gene circuit and SCRaMbLE yeast. In subsequent experiments, it deserves a try to transform fragments into SCRaMbLE yeast, checking if it will double the absorption capacity or even better.</p>
 
<p>In the nutshell, we will be dedicated to improve the absorption efficiency and better our gene circuit.</p>
 
<p>In the nutshell, we will be dedicated to improve the absorption efficiency and better our gene circuit.</p>
 +
<h4>Reference</h4>
 +
<hr>
  
 
+
<p>Wang J, Chen C. Biosorption of heavy metals by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A review[J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2006, 24(5):427.</p>
 +
<p>C. Baumann, A. Beil, S. Jurt, M. Niederwanger, O. Palacios, M. Capdevila, S. Atrian, R. Dallinger, O. Zerbe, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 4617.</p>
  
  

Revision as of 06:44, 30 October 2017

/* OVERRIDE IGEM SETTINGS */

Demonstrate