Template:UFlorida/SandG

Silver Medal Human Practices

We met with Dr. Jason Blackburn from the University of Florida to discuss the design of our project. Dr. Blackburn specializes in wildlife disease ecology and is the associate curator of amphibians and reptiles at the Florida Museum of Natural History. Dr. Blackburn was excited to hear about our project. He thought it would be a good idea to work with a singular antifungal compound in order to identify if the isolated bacterial metabolites have therapeutic potential against Chytridiomycosis. Dr. Blackburn pointed out that research has been conducted towards supplementing the amphibian skin microbiome with symbiotic bacteria to prevent the Chytridiomycosis infection. However bacterial metabolites synthesized from modified E. coli have not yet been tested. Dr. Blackburn discussed the potential of producing the bacterial metabolites on a larger scale for use in combating Chytridiomycosis because the bacterial metabolites do not come with the same health hazards that traditional antifungal treatments have for amphibians.

We also received feedback on our project design from Dr. Anna Savage from the University of Central Florida. Dr. Savage’s research focuses on the immunogenetics and disease ecology of Chytridiomycosis and Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd). Dr. Savage expressed her concern that we were not appropriately distinguishing between effective antifungal activity against Bd (or another fungus in the Chytridiomycota family) in the lab, and prevention or treatment of the Chytridiomycosis infection in the natural environment. Unfortunately we were not able to receive permissions to test on frogs over the duration of the iGEM competition, but this step would be necessary for future experimental verification that the bacteria are capable of preventing infection in the natural environment. Dr. Savage also suggested that we consider several other secondary metabolite compounds to diversify the antifungal activity of our bacteria and to therefore ensure maximum antifungal against Bd. We did initially consider using violacein in addition to tryptophol, however violacein is a broad antifungal that would ecologically impact natural fungal species other than Bd. We struggled to find another antifungal compound that would have a minimal impact on the greater ecosystem so we decided to just modify E. coli to produce tryptophol for this project.

We also started a community dialogue through events with the Florida Museum of Natural History and through presentations to classes at the University of Florida. Our public outreach can be seen here
  • Public Engagement
  • Silver Medal Criterion #3

    Convince the judges you have thought carefully and creatively about whether your work is safe, responsible and good for the world. You could accomplish this through engaging with your local, national and/or international communities or other approaches. Please note that standard surveys will not fulfill this criteria.

    Some Human Practices topic areas
    • Philosophy
    • Public Engagement / Dialogue
    • Education
    • Product Design
    • Scale-Up and Deployment Issues
    • Environmental Impact
    • Ethics
    • Safety
    • Security
    • Public Policy
    • Law and Regulation
    • Risk Assessment
    What should we write about on this page?

    On this page, you should write about the Human Practices topics you considered in your project, and document any special activities you did (such as visiting experts, talking to lawmakers, or doing public engagement). This should include all of the work done for the Silver Medal Criterion #3. Details for your Gold medal work and/or work for the two Human Practices special prizes should be put on those specified pages.

    Inspiration

    Read what other teams have done:



    ★ ALERT!

    This page is used by the judges to evaluate your team for the medal criterion or award listed above.

    Delete this box in order to be evaluated for this medal criterion and/or award. See more information at Instructions for Pages for awards.

    Gold Medal and Integrated Human Practices

    This page will contain information for your Gold medal Human Practices work, which you can also use to nominate your team for the Best Integrated Human Practices page. To make things easier, we have combined the Gold medal page with the Best Integrated Human Practices page since we expect the work to overlap considerably.

    iGEM teams are unique and leading the field because they "go beyond the lab" to imagine their projects in a social/environmental context, to better understand issues that might influence the design and use of their technologies.

    Teams work with students and advisors from the humanities and social sciences to explore topics concerning ethical, legal, social, economic, safety or security issues related to their work. Consideration of these Human Practices is crucial for building safe and sustainable projects that serve the public interest.

    For more information, please see the Human Practices page.

    Gold Medal Criterion #1

    Expand on your silver medal activity by demonstrating how you have integrated the investigated issues into the design and/or execution of your project.

    Best Integrated Human Practices Special Prize

    To compete for the Best Integrated Human Practices prize, please describe your work on this page and also fill out the description on the judging form.

    You must also delete the message box on the top of this page to be eligible for this prize.

    Inspiration

    Here are a few examples of excellent Integrated Human Practices work: