Difference between revisions of "Team:Calgary/SolidLiquidSeparation"

 
(16 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
<a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Calgary/PHB_Fermentation"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/97/Calgary2017_RightArrowButton.png"></a>
 
<a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Calgary/PHB_Fermentation"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/97/Calgary2017_RightArrowButton.png"></a>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
 
<h2>Overview </h2>
 
<h2>Overview </h2>
<p>In the second stage of the process, solid partices from human feces are separated to obtain a sterile, VFA-rich liquid stream that can be passed to the next stage of the process. Sterility is essential, since genetically engineered <i>E. coli</i> in the next stage of the process, where PHB is produced, might be outcompeted if other types of bacteria are present. The separation of solids is achieved using centrifugation, which removes large solid particles, followed by filtration, which removed remaining small particles. </p>
+
<p>In the second stage of the process, solid particles are separated from human feces to obtain a sterile, VFA-rich liquid stream that can be passed to the next stage of the process. Sterility is essential since our PHB-producing <i>E. coli</i> in the next stage of the process might be out-competed if other types of bacteria are present. The separation of solids is achieved using centrifugation, which removes large solid particles, followed by filtration, which removes remaining small particles and bacteria. </p>
 +
 
 +
<br>
  
 
<h2>Design options considered</h2>
 
<h2>Design options considered</h2>
  
<p> Considering limited availability of resources on Mars including power, the initial experiments focused on mechanical and gravity-driven separation process: </p>
+
<p> Considering the limited availability of resources on Mars including power, the initial experiments focused on mechanical and gravity-driven separation process: </p>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
 
<li>Gravity-driven filtration</li>
 
<li>Gravity-driven filtration</li>
Line 26: Line 29:
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
  
<p>Laboratory experiments (see "Gravity driven filtration" and "Gravity driven sedimentation" on the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Experiments">experiments </a> page) provided insufficient sterility and insufficient water recovery. Under 55% of water was recover for all, even diluted trials, though dilution did improve the water recovery efficiency. <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Experiments">Staged filtration experiment </a> was a modification to the original experiments and provided sufficient sterility (the sample was passed through a 0.2 micron filter paper), yet insufficient water recovery - only 10% of initial water in the sample was recovered highlighting the need for more energy intensive methods.</p>
+
<p>Laboratory experiments (see the Gravity Driven Filtration and Gravity Driven Sedimentation protocols on the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Experiments">Experiments </a> page) provided insufficient sterility and water recovery. Under 55% of the initial water was recovered for undiluted and 1:1 dilution ratio trials, though dilution did improve the water recovery efficiency. Please visit <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Results">results</a> page to find more data. The <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Experiments">Staged Filtration for Solid-Liquid Separation</a> experiment was a modification to the original experiments and provided sufficient sterility (the sample was passed through a 0.2 micron filter paper), yet insufficient water recovery - only 10% of the initial water in the sample was recovered (see <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Results">results</a> page for summary and comments). It was concluded that there exists a need for more energy-intensive methods.</p>
  
 
<p>More advanced solid-liquid separation techniques were then considered: </p>
 
<p>More advanced solid-liquid separation techniques were then considered: </p>
Line 35: Line 38:
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
  
<p>Initially, <i>torrefaction </i>appeared to be the best solution due to it's ability to recover natural and pyrolytic water, production of sterile and VFA-rich output stream and production of solid by product - char, which can in turn be a used as a building material, radiation shielding, and as a food subtract (A. Serio, E. Cosgrove & A. Wojtowicz, 2016). However, the product stream leaving the torrefaction processing unit contains only water and VFA resulting in low pH and low amount of nutrients. We have conducted the "PHB synthesis using pure VFAs as feedstock" <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Experiments">experiment</a>to evaluate weather or not <i>E coli</i> can survive in the following conditions (condition 5). The experiment showed that <i>E coli</i> it is unable to produce PHB in the VFA rich liquid, meaning that torrefaction can't be used as a primary technique for solid liquid separation.</p>  
+
<p>Initially, <b>torrefaction </b>appeared to be the best solution due to its ability to recover natural and pyrolytic (chemically bound) water, the production of sterile and VFA-rich output stream and the production of solid byproduct known as char. Char can be a used as a building material, radiation shield, and as a food supplement (A. Serio <i>et al.</i>, 2016). However, the product stream leaving the torrefaction processing unit contains only water and VFAs, resulting in a low pH and a low amount of nutrients. We have conducted an experiment (<a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Experiments">PHB Synthesis using Pure VFAs as Feedstock</a>) to evaluate whether or not <i>E. coli</i> can survive in the previously mentioned conditions. The experiment showed that <i>E. coli</i> it is unable to produce PHB in the VFA-rich liquid, meaning that torrefaction cannot be used as a primary technique for solid-liquid separation.</p>  
  
<p><i>Screw-press dewatering system</i> required consumption of a large number of consumables as well had the largest mass when combined with the EXM parameters for multi-filtation ((Jones, Fisher, Delzeit, Flynn & Kliss, 2016). This lead to a very high ESM value which meant that despite low power consumption the technology is not feasible for implementation on space.</p>
+
<p>The <b>screw-press dewatering system</b> required a large number of consumables, and had the largest mass when combined with the ESM parameters for multi-filtration (Jones <i>et al.</i>, 2016). This led to a very high ESM value which meant that despite low power consumption, the technology is not feasible for implementation on Mars.</p>
  
<p>Finally we conducted experiments to test the liquid recovery efficiency using a centrifuge and found 75% liquid recovery using the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Experiments"> "Centrifugation for solid liquid separation" experiment </a>. Literature search on the application of centrifugal separators showed that it would be a good match for the required task. We have further contacted Russel Finex Company to get their advice on the application of their centrifugal separators to our process and received a confirmation of applicability. We have also received required ESM parameters from the Russel Finex representative.</p>
+
<p>Finally, we conducted experiments to test the liquid recovery efficiency using a <b>centrifuge</b> and found 75% liquid of initial water was recovered using the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Experiments">Centrifugation for Solid-Liquid Separation</a> experiment. A literature search on the application of centrifugal separators showed that it would be a good match for the required task on Mars. We have further contacted the Russel Finex Company to obtain their advice on the application of their centrifugal separators to our process and received their confirmation of applicability. We have also received required ESM parameters from the Russel Finex representative.</p>
<p> Estimated ESM parameters for these process designs are summarized in Table 1. </p>
+
 
 +
<p> After evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed designs and considering the ESM analysis, centrifugation followed by filtration was chosen as the preferred method for the solid-liquid separation step. In addition, the team proposes to adapt torrefaction to treat the solid byproducts after solid-liquid separation and the sludge from wastewater management on Mars to recover additional water and produce reusable char.</p>
  
 
<div id="Caption"><b>Table 1: </b> ESM analysis for different process designs for the solid/liquid separation stage of the process.</div>
 
<div id="Caption"><b>Table 1: </b> ESM analysis for different process designs for the solid/liquid separation stage of the process.</div>
Line 46: Line 50:
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
 
     <th></th>
 
     <th></th>
     <th>Screw-press dewatering system</th>
+
     <th>Screw-Press Dewatering System</th>
 
     <th>Multifiltration</th>
 
     <th>Multifiltration</th>
 
     <th>Torrefaction</th>
 
     <th>Torrefaction</th>
Line 95: Line 99:
 
</table>
 
</table>
  
<p> After evaluating advantages and disadvantages of the proposed designs and considering the ESM analysis, centrifugation followed by filtration was chosen as the preferred method for the solid-liquid separation step. In addition, the team proposes to adapt torrefaction to treat the solid by-products after solid-liquid separation and the sludge from wastewater treatment on Mars to recover additional water and produce char.</p>
+
<br>
 
+
  
 
</html>
 
</html>
 
|REFERENCES=
 
|REFERENCES=
 
<html>
 
<html>
<!-- If you want to included references, please include a heading (h2) titles "Works Cited" followed by all your references in separate paragraph tags -->
+
<!-- If you want to include references, please include a heading (h2) titles "Works Cited" followed by all your references in separate paragraph tags -->
 
+
<h2>Works Cited</h2>
 +
<p>A. Serio, M., E. Cosgrove, J., & A. Wojtowicz, M. (2016). Torrefaction Processing for Human Solid Waste Managment. Presented at the 46th International Conference on Environmental Systems (pp. 1-18). East Hartford: Advanced Fuel Research, Inc.</p>
 +
<p>Jones, H., Fisher, J., Delzeit, L., Flynn, M., & Kliss, M. (2016). Developing the Water Supply System for Travel to Mars. Presented at the 46th International Conference on Environmental Systems.</p>
 
</html>
 
</html>
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 19:06, 1 November 2017

Header

Solid-Liquid separation

Overview

In the second stage of the process, solid particles are separated from human feces to obtain a sterile, VFA-rich liquid stream that can be passed to the next stage of the process. Sterility is essential since our PHB-producing E. coli in the next stage of the process might be out-competed if other types of bacteria are present. The separation of solids is achieved using centrifugation, which removes large solid particles, followed by filtration, which removes remaining small particles and bacteria.


Design options considered

Considering the limited availability of resources on Mars including power, the initial experiments focused on mechanical and gravity-driven separation process:

  • Gravity-driven filtration
  • Settling
  • Pressure filtration

Laboratory experiments (see the Gravity Driven Filtration and Gravity Driven Sedimentation protocols on the Experiments page) provided insufficient sterility and water recovery. Under 55% of the initial water was recovered for undiluted and 1:1 dilution ratio trials, though dilution did improve the water recovery efficiency. Please visit results page to find more data. The Staged Filtration for Solid-Liquid Separation experiment was a modification to the original experiments and provided sufficient sterility (the sample was passed through a 0.2 micron filter paper), yet insufficient water recovery - only 10% of the initial water in the sample was recovered (see results page for summary and comments). It was concluded that there exists a need for more energy-intensive methods.

More advanced solid-liquid separation techniques were then considered:

  • Torrefaction (mild pyrolysis)
  • Centrifugation followed by filtration
  • Screw-press dewatering system followed by multi-filtration

Initially, torrefaction appeared to be the best solution due to its ability to recover natural and pyrolytic (chemically bound) water, the production of sterile and VFA-rich output stream and the production of solid byproduct known as char. Char can be a used as a building material, radiation shield, and as a food supplement (A. Serio et al., 2016). However, the product stream leaving the torrefaction processing unit contains only water and VFAs, resulting in a low pH and a low amount of nutrients. We have conducted an experiment (PHB Synthesis using Pure VFAs as Feedstock) to evaluate whether or not E. coli can survive in the previously mentioned conditions. The experiment showed that E. coli it is unable to produce PHB in the VFA-rich liquid, meaning that torrefaction cannot be used as a primary technique for solid-liquid separation.

The screw-press dewatering system required a large number of consumables, and had the largest mass when combined with the ESM parameters for multi-filtration (Jones et al., 2016). This led to a very high ESM value which meant that despite low power consumption, the technology is not feasible for implementation on Mars.

Finally, we conducted experiments to test the liquid recovery efficiency using a centrifuge and found 75% liquid of initial water was recovered using the Centrifugation for Solid-Liquid Separation experiment. A literature search on the application of centrifugal separators showed that it would be a good match for the required task on Mars. We have further contacted the Russel Finex Company to obtain their advice on the application of their centrifugal separators to our process and received their confirmation of applicability. We have also received required ESM parameters from the Russel Finex representative.

After evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed designs and considering the ESM analysis, centrifugation followed by filtration was chosen as the preferred method for the solid-liquid separation step. In addition, the team proposes to adapt torrefaction to treat the solid byproducts after solid-liquid separation and the sludge from wastewater management on Mars to recover additional water and produce reusable char.

Table 1: ESM analysis for different process designs for the solid/liquid separation stage of the process.
Screw-Press Dewatering System Multifiltration Torrefaction Centrifugation
Power (kW) 0.3 1.8 0.9 5
Weight (kg) 179 232 378 5
Volume (m^3) 2 1.8 3.2 0.014
Spares & Consumables (kg/day) 0.0084 0.4 0 0
Spares & Consumables (m^3) 0.01 0.005 0 0
ESM Estimation 1810 1560 1150 443

Works Cited

A. Serio, M., E. Cosgrove, J., & A. Wojtowicz, M. (2016). Torrefaction Processing for Human Solid Waste Managment. Presented at the 46th International Conference on Environmental Systems (pp. 1-18). East Hartford: Advanced Fuel Research, Inc.

Jones, H., Fisher, J., Delzeit, L., Flynn, M., & Kliss, M. (2016). Developing the Water Supply System for Travel to Mars. Presented at the 46th International Conference on Environmental Systems.