Difference between revisions of "Team:ColumbiaNYC/Design"

Line 8: Line 8:
 
   <div class="jumbotron">
 
   <div class="jumbotron">
 
     <div class="container">
 
     <div class="container">
       <h1>Proof of Concept</h1>
+
       <h1>Project Description</h1>
        
+
       <p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Sint, explicabo dolores ipsam aliquam inventore corrupti.</p>
 
+
 
+
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
 
   </div>
 
   </div>
Line 18: Line 16:
 
   <div class="container">
 
   <div class="container">
  
<p> SilenshR was borne from an identified shortcoming in chemotherapy. Systemic administration of cytotoxic agents leads to death even in healthy cells causing diarrhea, vomiting, temporary sterility and hair loss(1). Additionally, our SilenshR innovation works in tandem with radiotherapy, the efficacy of which is diminished when the solid tumor microenvironment becomes hypoxic. Diatomic oxygen assists in radiotherapy by forming free radicals that damage DNA, causing apoptosis within solid tumor cancers. In fact, cells that are anoxic at the time of irradiation are 3 times more resistant to the radiotherapy than cells under normoxic conditions(2). However, when the cancer cells preferentially adopt an aerobic glycolysis metabolism over aerobic respiration, the intratumoral pH decreases along with the oxygen content of the cancer. This is one significant limitation of radiotherapy.  </p>
+
    <h3>
 
+
      <strong>Background</strong>
<p> SilenshR is able to pick up the slack where radiotherapy is limited, as bacteria have been known to innately colonize and proliferate within the hypoxic and immune-privileged cores of tumors(3). Assuming SilenshR bacteria can grow within tumors, would this therapy be otherwise effective? Would the metabolic burden of shRNA production be too much for the bacteria, given the shRNA sequence is in a high-copy number pUC plasmid? Could the shRNA transcribed within the SilenshR vector quantifiably reduce gene expression in a host-mammalian cell? Will the quorum sensing invasiveness circuit reliably promote bacterial uptake by cancer cells? </p>
+
      </h2>
 
+
      <p>The idea of using bacteria as a therapeutic for cancer has been around for about 150 years, beginning with William
<p> Through characterization of the growth of SilenshR bacteria in a BL21(DE3) chassis, it was determined that the metabolic burden of shRNA production would not interfere with the growth and proliferation of the SilenshR bacteria. The shRNA was transcribed from the high copy number pUC plasmid under a T7 promoter. For these proof of concept experiments, the shRNA targeted expression of GFP and contains a sequence complementary to the mRNA of GFP in the CellBioLabs HeLa line. The SilenshR bacteria induced to express the T7 polymerase grew comparably to bacteria that were not induced to express T7 polymerase, reaching a similar stationary phase cell density in a similar amount of time. Both induced and non-induced populations grew at 37°C in a shaking incubator in LB media; cell densities and OD600 were evaluated every 30 minutes. At each time point, 5uL of culture was plated and the number of colony forming units (CFU) per mL was calculated.</p>
+
        Coley, who gave cancer patients a mixture of heat-inactivated Streptococcus pyogenes and Serratia marcescens, known
 
+
        as “Coley’s toxin,” to destroy tumors. This idea gradually evolved into reprogramming bacteria to fight cancer using
      <div style="text-align:center">
+
        recombinant DNA. The two most popular vectors for bacterial cancer therapy are Salmonella and E. coli. E. coli that
          <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/be/T--ColumbiaNYC--curve1.png" alt="" style="width:80%;">
+
        produced shRNA can knockdown an oncogene in colorectal cancer. The mechanism in which the bacteria silences the oncogene
          <h6> <strong> Fig 1: </strong> Normal bacteria growth, used as a comparison to growth curve with IPTG induction. </h6>
+
        relies on transkingdom RNA interference, encoded in the bacteria's transkingdom RNAi plasmid (TRIP) (Xiang et al.
       </div>
+
        2006). The TRIP plasmid contains three major sections, the shRNA-producing gene, the invasin gene, and the hlyA gene.
   
+
        The shRNA-producing gene produces shRNA that corresponds to the mRNA sequence of the targeted oncogene. The invasin
    <div style="text-align:center">
+
        gene allows the bacteria to invade the cancer cell and get encapsulated in an endosome. The bacteria lyse inside
          <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/6f/T--ColumbiaNYC--curve2.png" alt="" style="width:80%;">
+
        the endosome, and the hlyA gene encodes for listeriolysin O, which produces holes (pores) in the endosome so that
          <h6> <strong> Fig 2: </strong>The two graphs above are a comparison of bacteria growth without IPTG induction (without shRNA production) and with IPTG induction (with shRNA production). The shRNA produced is designed to inhibit eGFP. Since the two growth curves are virtually identical, this shows that production of the designed shRNA is not toxic to the bacteria. </h6>
+
        the shRNA produced by the bacteria can get out of the endosome to reach the mammalian cell’s cytoplasm. The released
      </div>
+
        shRNA is then cleaved by the enzyme Dicer in the mammalian cell’s cytoplasm to become siRNA. The siRNA then associates
 
+
        with other proteins in the cytoplasm to form the RISC complex. The RISC complex then binds the corresponding target
<h3> <strong> Quorum Sensing </strong> </h3>
+
        mRNA in the cytoplasm and cleaves it, silencing the gene that the mRNA encodes. This mechanism has been proven to
<p> While current experiments are seeking to install the genes Invasin and HlyA under the quorum inducible Lux promoter from Aiivibrio fischeri, the quorum sensing circuit was evaluated using GFP as a reporter. The bacteria in an E. coli Nissle chassis were grown in M9 media (see protocols for precise formulation) and OD600 absorbance and fluorescence were measured every 10 minutes, as shown by the 2 graphs below. At an OD600 value of 0.418, sufficient cell density was achieved for expression of GFP. </p>
+
        be an effective inhibitor of a cancerous protein that has been very difficult to target with drugs.</p>
 
+
       <br>
<div style="text-align:center">
+
      <p>In this project, we optimize and expand the applications of this mechanism. We will use quorum sensing as an additional
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/thumb/b/b9/T--ColumbiaNYC--od_time.png/800px-T--ColumbiaNYC--od_time.png" alt="" />
+
        safeguard to make sure that this mechanism only attacks cancer cells. With quorum sensing, this mechanism will only
<h6> <strong>Fig 3: </strong> Optical Density (OD) measurements for <em> E.coli </em> Nissle bacteria with quorum sensing circuit. </h6>
+
        be activated when a certain bacterial cell density is reached. This density is only possible in very anaerobic environments,
</div>
+
        which is characteristic of tumors. Challenges to this include the natural anaerobic environment in the gut and whether
 
+
        the bacteria will proliferate in a healthy gut as well. To resolve this, we are working to put the quorum sensing
<br />
+
        circuit under the control of a nitric oxide promoter. Since nitric-oxide rich environments are only characteristic
 
+
        of areas of inflammation and are highly characteristic of cancer, having the quorum sensing circuit under the control
<div style="text-align:center">
+
        of a nitric-oxide promoter that is only activated in nitric-oxide rich environments would prevent the bacteria from
<img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/thumb/d/da/T--ColumbiaNYC--GFP_time.png/800px-T--ColumbiaNYC--GFP_time.png" alt="" />
+
        invading healthy gut cells even when quorum is reached. A synthetic alternative to this mechanism that would be simpler
<h6> <strong>Fig 4: </strong> GFP Fluorescence of <em> E.coli </em> Nissle bacteria with quorum sensing circuit. The orange data points represent fluorescence over time in <em> E.coli </em> Nissle without quorum sensing circuit and the blue data points represent <em> E.coli </em> Nissle bacteria with the quorum inducible circuit.</h6>
+
        to test in the laboratory is to control the quorum circuit with a tet (tetracycline) on system where a tet repressor
</div>
+
        represses the expression of the invasion circuit when tetracycline and/or doxycycline is not present. When doxycycline/tetracycline
 
+
        is synthetically introduced to the environment, the tet repressor is repressed by the rtTA (reverse tetracycline-controlled
<h3> <strong> Knockdown via Liposome Transfection </strong> </h3>
+
        transactivator), and transcription of the invasion circuit occurs. The doxycycline/tetracycline can only be introduced
 
+
        to cancer sites.</p>
<p>Finally, the GFP shRNA was isolated from the induced BL21 (DE3) cells with an miRNeasy Kit (Qiagen) and assessed by gel electrophoresis to verify presence of the shRNA transcript. Following, the shRNA was complexed with cationic liposomes and transfected into GFP-expressing HeLa cells (CellBioLabs) using the lipofectamine 2000 protocol. GFP expression from HeLa cells was quantified 48 hours following transfection of liposomes with PBS, positive control siRNA against GFP (CellBioLabs) and the induced SilenshR shRNA for GFP. The shRNA targeting GFP produced in the SilenshR bacteria showed a significant reduction in GFP expression within the HeLa cells, as quantified by flow cytometry. </p>
+
      <br>
<br />
+
      <p>We are targeting cervical cancer and prostate cancer. We will determine the effectiveness of this mechanism in each
 
+
        of these cancers using proof-of-concept experiments by inhibiting eGFP. We will then target oncogenes in these cancers.</p>
<div style="text-align:center">
+
<img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/thumb/8/8b/Columbia_university_biobrickgraph.jpg/725px-Columbia_university_biobrickgraph.jpg" alt="" />
+
<h6><strong> Fig 5: </strong> Bar plot showing GFP knockdown in HeLa cells. The experiment was performed in triplicate. The error bars represent the standard deviation of the samples</h6>
+
</div>
+
 
+
 
+
<h3> <strong> References: </strong></h3>
+
<ol>
+
<li> Dunnill et. al. (2017). A Clinical and Biological Guide for Understanding Chemotherapy‐Induced Alopecia and Its Prevention.” Oncologist, doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0263</li>
+
<li> Rockwell, S., Dobrucki, I. T., Kim, E. Y., Marrison, S. T., & Vu, V. T. (2009). Hypoxia and radiation therapy: Past history, ongoing research, and future promise. Current Molecular Medicine, 9(4), 442–458. </li>
+
<li>Kathrin Westphal, Sara Leschner, Jadwiga Jablonska, Holger Loessner and Siegfried Weiss
+
Cancer Res April 15 2008 (68) (8) 2952-2960; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2984 </li>
+
 
+
</ol>
+
 
+
 
   </div>
 
   </div>
  

Revision as of 00:39, 2 November 2017

Project Description

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Sint, explicabo dolores ipsam aliquam inventore corrupti.

Background

The idea of using bacteria as a therapeutic for cancer has been around for about 150 years, beginning with William Coley, who gave cancer patients a mixture of heat-inactivated Streptococcus pyogenes and Serratia marcescens, known as “Coley’s toxin,” to destroy tumors. This idea gradually evolved into reprogramming bacteria to fight cancer using recombinant DNA. The two most popular vectors for bacterial cancer therapy are Salmonella and E. coli. E. coli that produced shRNA can knockdown an oncogene in colorectal cancer. The mechanism in which the bacteria silences the oncogene relies on transkingdom RNA interference, encoded in the bacteria's transkingdom RNAi plasmid (TRIP) (Xiang et al. 2006). The TRIP plasmid contains three major sections, the shRNA-producing gene, the invasin gene, and the hlyA gene. The shRNA-producing gene produces shRNA that corresponds to the mRNA sequence of the targeted oncogene. The invasin gene allows the bacteria to invade the cancer cell and get encapsulated in an endosome. The bacteria lyse inside the endosome, and the hlyA gene encodes for listeriolysin O, which produces holes (pores) in the endosome so that the shRNA produced by the bacteria can get out of the endosome to reach the mammalian cell’s cytoplasm. The released shRNA is then cleaved by the enzyme Dicer in the mammalian cell’s cytoplasm to become siRNA. The siRNA then associates with other proteins in the cytoplasm to form the RISC complex. The RISC complex then binds the corresponding target mRNA in the cytoplasm and cleaves it, silencing the gene that the mRNA encodes. This mechanism has been proven to be an effective inhibitor of a cancerous protein that has been very difficult to target with drugs.


In this project, we optimize and expand the applications of this mechanism. We will use quorum sensing as an additional safeguard to make sure that this mechanism only attacks cancer cells. With quorum sensing, this mechanism will only be activated when a certain bacterial cell density is reached. This density is only possible in very anaerobic environments, which is characteristic of tumors. Challenges to this include the natural anaerobic environment in the gut and whether the bacteria will proliferate in a healthy gut as well. To resolve this, we are working to put the quorum sensing circuit under the control of a nitric oxide promoter. Since nitric-oxide rich environments are only characteristic of areas of inflammation and are highly characteristic of cancer, having the quorum sensing circuit under the control of a nitric-oxide promoter that is only activated in nitric-oxide rich environments would prevent the bacteria from invading healthy gut cells even when quorum is reached. A synthetic alternative to this mechanism that would be simpler to test in the laboratory is to control the quorum circuit with a tet (tetracycline) on system where a tet repressor represses the expression of the invasion circuit when tetracycline and/or doxycycline is not present. When doxycycline/tetracycline is synthetically introduced to the environment, the tet repressor is repressed by the rtTA (reverse tetracycline-controlled transactivator), and transcription of the invasion circuit occurs. The doxycycline/tetracycline can only be introduced to cancer sites.


We are targeting cervical cancer and prostate cancer. We will determine the effectiveness of this mechanism in each of these cancers using proof-of-concept experiments by inhibiting eGFP. We will then target oncogenes in these cancers.