Difference between revisions of "Team:Example/HP/Silver"
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | + | <div class="clear"></div> | |
<div class="column half_size"> | <div class="column half_size"> | ||
| − | < | + | <h3>Silver Medal Criterion #3</h3> |
| − | + | <p>Convince the judges you have thought carefully and creatively about whether your work is safe, responsible and good for the world. You could accomplish this through engaging with your local, national and/or international communities or other approaches. Please note that standard surveys will not fulfill this criteria.</p> | |
| − | <p>You | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 52: | Line 44: | ||
<div class="column half_size"> | <div class="column half_size"> | ||
<h5>What should we write about on this page?</h5> | <h5>What should we write about on this page?</h5> | ||
| − | <p>On this page, you should write about the Human Practices topics you considered in your project, and document any special activities you did (such as visiting experts, talking to lawmakers, or doing public engagement). Details for your Gold medal work and/or work for the two Human Practices special prizes should be put on those specified pages.</p> | + | <p>On this page, you should write about the Human Practices topics you considered in your project, and document any special activities you did (such as visiting experts, talking to lawmakers, or doing public engagement). This should include all of the work done for the Silver Medal Criterion #3. Details for your Gold medal work and/or work for the two Human Practices special prizes should be put on those specified pages.</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 19:58, 14 February 2017
Example
★ ALERT!
This page is used by the judges to evaluate your team for the medal criterion or award listed above.
Delete this box in order to be evaluated for this medal criterion and/or award. See more information at Instructions for Pages for awards.
iGEM teams are leading in the area of Human Practices because they conduct their projects within a social/environmental context, to better understand issues that might influence the design and use of their technologies.
Teams work with students and advisors from the humanities and social sciences to explore topics concerning ethical, legal, social, economic, safety or security issues related to their work. Consideration of these Human Practices is crucial for building safe and sustainable projects that serve the public interest.
For more information, please see the Human Practices page.
Silver Medal Criterion #3
Convince the judges you have thought carefully and creatively about whether your work is safe, responsible and good for the world. You could accomplish this through engaging with your local, national and/or international communities or other approaches. Please note that standard surveys will not fulfill this criteria.
Some Human Practices topic areas
- Philosophy
- Public Engagement / Dialogue
- Education
- Product Design
- Scale-Up and Deployment Issues
- Environmental Impact
- Ethics
- Safety
- Security
- Public Policy
- Law and Regulation
- Risk Assessment
What should we write about on this page?
On this page, you should write about the Human Practices topics you considered in your project, and document any special activities you did (such as visiting experts, talking to lawmakers, or doing public engagement). This should include all of the work done for the Silver Medal Criterion #3. Details for your Gold medal work and/or work for the two Human Practices special prizes should be put on those specified pages.
