Team:SDU-Denmark/test

PowerLeaf - a bacterial solar battery


ENERGY STORED IN CELLULOSE • LIGHT-SENSING DORMANCY SYSTEM • OPTIMISED NANOWIRES

Abstract

About Our Wiki

Introduction

Welcome to our wiki! We are the IGEM team from the University of Southern Denmark. We have been waiting with great anticipation, for the chance to introduce you to our project, and to tell you our story.
It all began with a meeting between a group of strangers, each with their own disciplinary origin. Despite our differences, we had one thing in common; a shared interest in synthetic biology. Soon after our first meeting, we were herded off to a weekend in a cottage - far away from our regular lives. It was a place to bond, and to discuss project ideas. It immediately became apparent, that being an interdisciplinary team, was going to be our strength. Each member had unique qualities, that enabled them to efficiently tackle different aspects of the iGEM competition. So we made it our goal to take advantage of these qualities.
We decided to make a proof-of-concept project. Specifically, we wanted to use bacteria as a novel and greener solution for solar energy storage. This project was later dubbed the PowerLeaf – a bacterial solar battery. There is so much to tell you about our bacterial solar battery and its’ amazing features.
Since it’s a one-page wiki, you will be taken on a journey, and introduced to our story throughout the wiki-page. Just keep scrolling, and we will gently guide you through our project.

Achievements


Bronze Requirements 4/4


Register and attend - Our team applied 2017-03-30 and got accepted 2017-05-04. We had an amazing summer and are looking very much forward to attending the Giant Jamboree!
Meet all the deliverables requirements - You’re reading the team wiki now, so that’s one down. You can find all attributions made to the project in the credits section of the wiki, here. The team poster and team presentation is all ready to go for the Giant Jamboree. We also filled the safety form(link), the judging form (link) and all our parts were registered and submitted (link) in time.
Clearly state the Attributions - All attributions made to our project has been clearly credited in our credits section at the end of the wiki.
Improve and/or characterize an existing Biobrick Part or Device - pending

Silver Requirements 3/3


Validated part/contribution - pending
Collaboration - We have collaborated with several teams through project discussions, meetups, answering questionnaires and even hosted our first meetup ever, for our fellow Danish teams. You will get to read all about it in the credits section of our wiki.
Human Practices - Our philosopher, historian and biologist have discussed the bioethical (link) aspect of our project in great detail. In extension to their work, we have been working extensively with public engagement and education (link).

Gold Requirements 4/4


Integrated Human Practices - We have been in close relationship with city planners from our hometown on the development and implementation of the device (link). This regards anything from size, shape, color, plastic types and locations to implement it.
Improve a previous part or project - pending
Model your project - There has been made extensive modelling of our light sensing system, which proved to be highly informative. Through this we learned that it was possible to control the bacterial dormancy, by insertion of both the toxin and the anti-toxin where only the anti-toxin is regulated. You can read all about the project modelling here.
Demonstrate your work - pending

World Situation


A Global Problem

The planet’s ecosystem is currently on a path out of balance, caused by our extreme abuse of its natural habitat and valuable resources, for the advancement of our society. An ecosystem in imbalance can have a severe impact on our everyday lives. The unique diversity of the Earth’s inhabitants, will not be the only consequence of such an imbalance. As a more extreme example; scientists believe that humankind, could go extinct, as our fervor drives us to further better our ways of life. Restoring this balance should be the highest priority, in the advancement of our civilization.
One of the most recognized approaches to restore this balance, is the advancement and implementation of technologies for renewable energy. However, there are currently certain limitations on the existing solutions for renewable energy; the intermittency- and the diluteness problem. The intermittency problem describes the discontinuous energy production, with inefficient storage. Whereas the diluteness problem is described as the resource demanding production of technical devices, such as solar cells and batteries.

In a Local Environment

We are a team of young adults, raised to be aware of climate changes and the potential limitations to the continuation of our way of life. We are also a generation that appreciates open source and shared information. A generation, that has been encouraged to constantly challenge the ideas of our peers. With this in mind, we decided the best solution to the eventual energy crisis, would be to seek out experts, the general public, even children, in order to rethink the current notion; That the only way to save our planet, is to compromise our living standards.
Thankfully, through interaction with local experts, we learned that a great deal of people share our belief; that we ought to pursue the advancement of low energy cities with a high quality of life. In fact, we even discovered that our own hometown – Odense – wants to be the greenest, most renewable city in Denmark by 2050 https://www.odense.dk/borger/miljoe-og-affald/klima.
We decided to pursue this goal, by taking on the challenge to create a truly green solution, which will provide both an environmentally friendly source of energy, as well as green aesthetics and naturalistic ambience to compliment a high quality of city-life.
Please keep scrolling if you wish to read more about our solution, or go straight to bioethics, if you wish to read about why we not only could, but ought to do something about the current energy crisis.

Inspiration

Our early ideas were reviewed after attending the Danish Science Festival, where we met several young minds with creative and inspiring ideas. The children would come to our booth with their parents to learn about bacteria, GMO, ethics and iGEM. After which, they would attend our “Draw-a-Bacteria”-competition. While drawing their own unique bacteria, they would present us with detailed stories about their design.



See a selection of their amazing drawings here.

Through this, we felt inspired and decided to revise our ideas. At this point, our project was starting to take shape. They even inspired the physical design for our final product; the PowerLeaf.

Our Solution


Our Solution

The bacterial solar battery we envision, is composed of an energy storing- and an energy converting unit. The energy storing unit is defined by a genetically engineered Escherichia Coli (E. Coli). The E. Coli uses solar energy for ATP production, to fixate carbon dioxide into the chemically stable polymer, cellulose, which essentially is the battery. A light sensing system activates dormancy during nighttime, in order to reduce energy lost by metabolism. The energy converting unit uses genetically engineered Geobacter Sulfurreducens to consume the stored cellulose, using an inducible switch. Retrieved electrons are transferred by optimised nanowires to an anode, resulting in an electrical current. The complete system will be combined into a single device containing a compartment for each of the two units. Details about the construction and device will be discussed in the Integrated Practices section.
The device is designed to resemble a plant leaf, which is meant to provide a nature-in-city ambience. This hypothetical implementation of the PowerLeaf in an urban environment, was developed through public engagement and collaborations. We even worked together with local city planners from our hometown, Odense.
Our vision was clear and ambitions were high, probably too high, considering the limited timeframe. So, at an early stage, we decided to focus on the following features:

  1. Light sensing system to regulate dormancy
  2. Converting CO2 to glucose
  3. Production and secretion of cellulose
  4. Converting cellulose to glucose
  5. Optimising the nanowires

It will then be up to prospective iGEM teams to continue on the development of the PowerLeaf. We would love to see our project become a reality one day, and have therefore created a special page for future iGEM teams. This page includes suggestions for further development of the project.

Project & Results

We have throughout the project worked on the development of 2 units for our device, an energy storing and an energy converting unit. Each of the systems we worked on for the units can be seen here:
Energy storing (E. Coli)

  • Light-sensing dormancy

  • CO2 fixation

  • Cellulose production and secretion


Energy converting (G. Sulfurreducens)

  • Breakdown of cellulose

  • Optimised nanowires

Once you reach each of the 5 systems in the 'Project Design'-section, you will first be given a short introduction to the underlying theory, which you will be able to expand on, by pressing “read more”. Which in turn will open a pop-up window with the additional information. After the theory, you will be given the approach used in each of the respective systems for the project. Before continuing on to the next system. To make things easier on you, we have developed icons to each of the above systems which will be used throughout the rest of the wiki.

Project Design


lets gooo

hello my friend

Light Sensing System

Theory


Cyanobacteria contain signal transduction systems, thereby making them capable of sensing and respond to light Bussell AN, Kehoe DM. Control of a four-color sensing photoreceptor by a two-color sensing photoreceptor reveals complex light regulation in cyanobacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110(31):12834-12839. doi:10.1073/pnas.1303371110.. This ability gives the organisms the opportunity, to adapt and optimize their metabolism to a circadian rhythm. Photoreceptors in the plasma membrane, of which phytochromes are especially abundant and well described, are responsible for this property http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084952100902064?via%3Dihub. In 2004 the Austin iGEM team made a light response system consisting of a photoreceptor combined with an intracellular indigenous regulator system https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16306980. EnvZ and OmpR makes up the two-component system naturally found in E. coli. The photoreceptor from phytochrome known as Cph1 was isolated from the cyanobacteria Synechocytis PCC6803. Cph1 has functional combination sites, which combined with the kinase EnvZ forms a two-domain receptor, known as Cph8. Activation of Cph8 is mediated by the phycocyanobilin, PCB that is sensitive to red light.
When not exposed to light the photoreceptor PCB activates the phytochrome Cph1, thereby promoting kinase activity through the EnvZ kinase. When the the transcription factor OmpR is phosphorylated by EnvZ, expression of genes regulated by the OmpR-regulated promoter is initiated. Excitation of PCB by red light, results in a situation where the transcription factor OmpR is not regulated. The absence of phosphorylated OmpR leads to no activation of the OmpR-regulated promoter, thereby preventing gene expression.


Using the photocontrol device to set up a A toxin-antitoxin system is a system composed of two gene products, of which one specifies a cell toxin and the other an antitoxin, which neutralizes the toxic effect caused by the toxin. In E. coli K-12 the cytotoxin RelE and antitoxin RelB comprise such a system https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9767574. Expression of the cytotoxin RelE inhibits translation in the cells, due to its ability to cleave mRNA found in the A-site of the ribosome. The indigenous cause of RelE expression is amino acid starvation https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12526800. Whether the cell lie dormant in response to expression of RelE depends on the ratio of antitoxin RelB and RelE present in the cell. Several studies have shown that RelB:RelE forms a complex with RelB:RelE stoichiometry of 2:1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19747491https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18532983. When the RelB:RelE stoichiometric-ratio is lowered to 1:1, studies show that RelB is not able to protect the cells against the RelE-caused translational inhibition https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18532983. Read more here


Approach


some amazing text about how to approach a pizza



CO2 fixation

Theory


#mr einstein


Approach


some amazing text about how to approach a pizza



Cellulose production and secretion

Theory


#mr einstein


Approach


some amazing text about how to approach a pizza



Breakdown of cellulose

Theory


#mr einstein


Approach


some amazing text about how to approach a pizza



Optimised nanowires

Theory


#mr einstein


Approach


some amazing text about how to approach a pizza


Modelling


lets gooo

hello my friend

lets goo

Experiments


lets gooo

hello my friend

lets goo

Demonstration and Results


lets gooo

hello my friend

lets goo

Parts & Procedures

In this section, you will find all the needed information to replicate our approach and experiments. Both the parts, notebook, SOPs and protocols will show in a pop-window, from which you can obtain all the needed information, should you be interested. An essential part of going to the lab is risk and safety assessments. This you will find at the end of the section, so just go ahead and keep on scrolling.

Parts


Notebook


Notebook

SOPs and Protocols


SOPs

Protocols

Safety


Jonas is cheering on Neergaard to try DMSO next

*insert picture of Neergaard drinking phenol*

Proper Risk Management

Biosafety and proper risk assessment are important aspects to consider before any handling of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). There are several concerns that must be properly addressed. The safety of the public as well as of the environment, is of the utmost importance, but the safety of the person in direct contact with the GMOs shouldn’t be compromised either. The risk associated with laboratorial work can be evaluated using the statement “Risk = Hazard x Probability” (link). To responsibly assess this inquiry, the entire team was given a mandatory lab safety course held by Lab Technician Simon Rose. In addition, we received a detailed handbook regarding lab safety. This ensured that all our team members were well equipped to work safely in the lab at all times. Throughout the project we have continuously been evaluating the safety of our work. These assessments can be found in the safety form (link).
Furthermore, our team participated in the 5th annual BioBrick workshop hosted by DTU BioBuilders. Here we engaged in a lab safety course before entering their lab. Both of these lab safety courses gave us the necessary knowledge to work safely with GMO, proper handling of waste and the according procedures in case of an emergency.
In the lab, we worked with several potentially harmful chemical agents such as DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide), ethidium bromide, chloroform, phenol, Congo red, antibiotics and autoclaved glycerol. These chemical agents were handled using gloves at all times, and, whenever deemed necessary, handled in a fume hood. We used a UV board to visualize bands in agarose gels. UV rays are carcinogenic when exposed frequently and for longer periods of time. To reduce the amount of exposure, several precautions were made; gloves, long sleeves and a facial screen were worn at all times and the time spend at the UV board was no longer than the necessary. GMOs were always handled wearing gloves, and all team members wore clean lab coats restricted to the laboratorial areas.

Public and Environmental Risk Assessment

The chassis organisms containing the system is meant to be contained within a container, which should be incorporated into an urban environment. While this device would be a safely enclosed container, it still possess the risk of physical breakage from violent acts or environmental disturbances. It is for this reason, that we consulted a plastics expert, who advised us to use the plastic known as Polycarbonate. This plastic is remarkably durable, with the ability to ward off most physical traumas. As such the plastics expert believe that the container would last in an urban environment for at least 20 years, and most likely more than that. To illustrate the durability of the plastics, he notified us of several devices from the 1970ies made of the same plastic, that still stand strong today.
One of the biggest concerns would be the release of GMOs into nature. While the GMOs used aren’t pathogenetic, they would be able to share the plasmids containing antibiotic resistance selectors to other pathogenic bacteria. Antibiotic resistance in pathogenic bacteria, complicates the treatment of an infected individual, and could in tragic cases be the line between life and death. However small this scenario is, it should be addressed properly. Furthermore, antibiotic resistant E. Coli strains could outmatch some of their fellow E. Coli strains through natural selection. This could negatively affect the natural balance, that we are aiming to restore with the development of the PowerLeaf.
To safely avoid these risks, there should be implemented several kill switch mechanisms into the final device. This could be performed by implementation of a light sensing system into the energy converting unit, which would turn on the kill switch if exposed to light. This would of course mean, that the energy converting unit’s container, would need to block all sunlight. A task that could easily be carried out by adding Carbon Black to the required areas of the container. The energy storing unit, which requires light to actively function, could then have a kill switch which makes it completely dependant on presence of the container. This could be accomplished by having harmless molecules not naturally found in nature circulate in the system. Which should be required for the survival of the energy converting unit. A similar effect could be accomplished by making the energy converting and the energy storing units codependent on each other for their survival. The implementation of such kill switch mechanisms, would tremendously improve the biosafety of the device, by opposing hazards related to any kind of physical breakage.

List of Assessed Items


Chassis Organisms
Escherichia coli strains: K12, TOP10, MG1655, KG22, BW25113, DF25663127
Geobacter Sulfurreducens strain: PCA
Vectors
pSB1A3: An iGEM plasmid backbone carrying an ampicillin resistance gene
pSB1C3: An iGEM plasmid backbone carrying a chloramphenicol resistance gene
pSB1K3: An iGEM plasmid backbone carrying a kanamycin resistance gene
Bacteriophages
P1 phage, using its site-specific recombinase for transduction of E. Coli

Practices

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam consequat sodales nisl at blandit. Suspendisse nisl tortor, dignissim vel ultricies ut, tincidunt eget nisi. Proin nec viverra erat. Vivamus commodo metus neque, non feugiat dolor viverra vel. Nullam sit amet elit luctus, interdum nisl fringilla, vestibulum libero. Nullam iaculis, purus non imperdiet vulputate, mi augue gravida lacus, eu sollicitudin lacus orci a ipsum. Aenean maximus porttitor viverra. Praesent sed fringilla mauris. Duis eu molestie orci, id pellentesque lorem. Interdum et malesuada fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus. Sed orci elit, sodales vel nibh sed, rhoncus ultrices dolor.
Vestibulum tincidunt ac nisl at mattis. Sed eu mollis nisi. In pulvinar mi velit, dictum congue sapien ornare vel. Integer euismod varius velit ac euismod. Curabitur dapibus eget neque hendrerit sollicitudin. Etiam nec consequat diam, interdum egestas purus. Nullam ultricies et augue at vestibulum. Proin ac velit ac nibh rutrum varius at id metus. Morbi vitae auctor arcu, eget pulvinar mi. Suspendisse potenti. Fusce ornare nisi a volutpat malesuada. Donec sed augue nisl. Vivamus et dui orci. Suspendisse potenti. Ut luctus, nisl in ullamcorper facilisis, purus tortor eleifend odio, nec efficitur erat nisl vel massa. Suspendisse sed velit molestie, tincidunt nulla in, consectetur ligula.

Bioethics


lets gooo

hello my friend

lets goo

Integrated Practices


lets gooo

hello my friend

lets goo

Education & Public Engagement


lets gooo

hello my friend

lets goo

Prospects

Our prospects section is aimed to expand on our visions regarding the PowerLeaf. A vision we would very much love to see become a reality. For this reason, we have concentrated on creating an overview of the project, for the benefit of future iGEM teams. Hopefully it can assist prospective teams on how to take the PowerLeaf to the next level. Lastly, we decided to list some of our project ideas to the teams wishing to create a completely new project. Perhaps some of these ideas can be used by prospective iGEM teams, or just help to kickstart their creative thinking.

Perspectives


Building a Product for a Better Future

The purpose of the PowerLeaf, is to provide a greener alternative to the currently available energy sources. An important aspect of such an undertaking, is to limit the use of depleting resources, such as silicon, in the construction of the device itself. This is accomplished through the use of the most common resources available. This will contribute to our dream of building a better future, where fear of reaching a critical shortage of natural resources has been eliminated. The production of the PowerLeaf itself is made easier too, as the device benefits from the bacteria's ability to self-replicate, if provided with essential nutrients.
As tools for genomic editing improves, the advancement of biological devices will conceivably become even more complex and independant. They will do so by introducing new metabolic pathways inspired from other organisms using genetic engineering. This could potentially allow the PowerLeaf to become completely independent through its self-replication, by producing their own essential nutrients directly from unwanted pollution in the environment. A process that would lead to cleaner cities, along with providing a natural solution to sustainable energy.
The PowerLeaf will be representing a natural leaf design, thus leading to a nature-in-city ambiance, which can have a soothing effect in the ever so stressful cities. Not only will the design represent a plant leaf, but some of the key functionality aspects of the device are inspired from those of a plant leaf. Hereby, we refer to photo synthesis and building cellulose as a biological product.

Genetic Code Expansions for Biological Engineering

Expanding beyond those technologies used in today's Synthetic Biology, many research groups are working on genetic code expansion. We had an interesting talk from post.doc Julius Fredens, about his work on genetic code expansion. Once a technology like this advances, it will completely revolutionize biological engineering, including that of the PowerLeaf. Genetic code expansion could be used for optimization of the systems in the PowerLeaf; optimization of nanowires, improvement of the light-sensing system and making the breakdown of cellulose inducible.

To Future iGEM Teams


Hello future iGEM’er and welcome to the section where you are the center of attention. First of all, congratulations on starting your iGEM journey, you are going to have a amazing summer with plenty of wonderful experiences and new friendships. In this section, there will be two main topics, improvement and further development of our project, the PowerLeaf, and some of our project ideas generated in the startup phase to use for your project or start your creative thinking.

Further Development of Our Project

For those of you, that found interest in our project this year and would like to continue on improving it; this is the section you were looking for. We have listed the systems and the related information on theses needed for the device we envisioned, however you should not be limited to those. You are more than welcome to contact any of us regarding questions to the project, you can find our email addresses to each of us in the Team section of the Credits.
Systems that did work:

  • Light sensing system, this is used by the energy storing unit to reduce metabolism during times of the day with low amounts of solar energy available for the energy production, i.e. night time. We had several failed attempts during the development and optimization of the system and have through this learned a lot about the system. Furthermore, the system was modelled to gain an even greater understanding about the regulation of its light sensitivity. You can read about the work we did regarding the light sensing system here.

  • Cellulose consumption, this was used by the energy converting unit to degrade cellulose to glucose from which electrons could be retrieved. This system is probably the most straightforward, but was also worked on very extensively. You can read about the work we did regarding cellulases here.

  • Optimisation of the nanowires, this system was heavily inspired by the following article (link). We did create the required BioBricks to make the system work, but still requires some extensive work to actually implement it. You can read more about the work regarding the nanowires here.

Systems that didn’t work:

  • CO2 fixation, we retrieved the parts from the Bielefeld 2014 iGEM team and worked on assembling their parts into one fully functional BioBrick. However, we had a lot of trouble assembling it, and it seems that Bielefeld 2014 didn’t succeed on combining all the components needed for CO2 fixation either. So be aware of this. It seems like a simple assembly, but has caused us lots of problems. Some of the larger BioBricks tend to do that when they reach a certain size. You can give it a go anyways, but make sure to have a backup-plan, or maybe even try to redo the CO2 fixation by using a system from a different organism. We essentially decided to let go of this system of the PowerLeaf to focus on some of the other components. You can still read about our work done regarding the CO2 fixation here.

  • Cellulose production and secretion from the fixated CO2. These parts were retrieved from the Imperial College London 2014 iGEM team, this, much like the CO2 fixation, gave us trouble when it came to the assembly of the large BioBricks. It did seem that Imperial College London 2014 made their system work, but in the end, they proved it to be very inefficient of producing cellulose. So, this part could be the very thing to improve. You can still read about our work regarding the cellulose production and secretion here.

Systems we didn’t work on, but should be implemented in the device:

  • ATP production from solar energy comes to mind as one of the most essential system needed for the PowerLeaf to actually work. We had to pick the some of the systems to work on, and at the end of the day, this was the project our supervisors recommended to cut, if we wanted to work on more than just one system. Instead, we had a great Skype call early in the project with the Australian Macquarie iGEM team, whom has been working for many years with the implementation of the photosynthetic systems in E. coli. You could always contact them regarding the photosynthetic systems, they are super nice.

  • Making the interaction between the cellulose and the cellulases a controllable element, so it could be controlled in the same way of an on/off switch. This is also a very crucial part of the PowerLeaf, since it would otherwise be generating an electrical current non-stop. Even when it is not needed, and thereby overthrow the potential for long term-storage of solar energy. We believe this can be solved either through precise gene circuit regulation or by physical compartmentalization, however there might be even more elegant ways to solve this issue.

  • Physical engineering of the hardware required to make the device work. It should be possible for the energy storing unit to convert CO2 to cellulose, which will produce O2, thus making its chamber aerobic. For the energy converting unit to effectively transfer retrieved electrons to an anode, it will need to be in an anaerobic chamber. This will be a very difficult obstacle to overcome and requires some out-of-the-box thinking, to come up with a novel idea without having to require more energy than produced by the system. Engineering of the hardware required, e.g. anode, chamber, circulation of important nutrients and use of the correct plastic, is really important to make a workable prototype of the PowerLeaf. We worked out the optimal type of plastic for the system with the help of local experts. You can read about our work regarding the plastic here.

Ideas from Our Idea Generation


List of ideas from our idea generation

Credits

Just like in movies, you get to meet the brilliant minds behind the project in the credits. Some might leave the cinema without reading the credits, but we hope you will continue to read ours, as it’s just as important and you will get to know us on a more personal level through this. We probably have more in common than you think. Behind every great team is a great amount of external attributions. The contributors have supported and inspired us, especially when things have been rough and deadlines near. Afterwards you can turn your attention to our collaborations, which was an amazing experience, this really shows of the true iGEM spirit.
Last but not least, don’t miss out on the ‘after-the-credits-clip’, which summarizes the fun we had during this wonderful iGEM experience. This is especially important, since you get the words ‘thank you for listening, we hope you enjoyed our wiki and project’ - we know you have been waiting impatiently to reach that part of the wiki.

Team


Welcome to the team page, here you get to know us on a more personal level. As a team, we are 12 students from 8 different majors. As friends, we experienced the most amazing summer together, filled with various fun activities, both in- and outside the lab. To mention a few; we had road trips, dinners, Game of Thrones night and we even celebrated Christmas in July! We shared all of this with our amazing supervisors, for which we are truly greatful.


Emil Bøgh Hansen


Study: Biology
E-mail: ehans15@student.sdu.dk
Howdy! I’m the first of many Emil’s, and the team's only biologist! I am a huge wolf enthusiast! This summer I put my boots in the closet, in order to put on a proper lab coat doing iGEM. Besides my time in the lab I’ve also looked into how GMOs can influence the environment.

Emil Søndergaard


Study: History
E-mail: emsoe09@student.sdu.dk
Ahoy thar! My name is Emil, and I want to be the next Indiana Jones. But before I can raid any tombs, I’ve decided to raid iGEM trophies. When I’m not cooking or travelling, I’m drawing on my background in history for communications and human practices.

Emil Vyff Jørgensen


Study: Physics
E-mail: ejoer15@student.sdu.dk
Mojn! I am yet another Emil! I might not be a model biochemist, so instead I am modelling biochemistry! My iGEM existence is a stochastic binary function between naps and extreme bursts of energy.

Ellen Gammelmark


Study: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
E-mail: elgam15@student.sdu.dk
Why, hello there! My name is Ellen, and I spend most of my waking hours either in the lab with a pipette in my hand, or just outside it with a computer on my lap. You know.. Learn iGEM, live iGEM, love iGEM!

Felix Boel Pedersen


Study: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
E-mail: feped15@student.sdu.dk
Aloha. My name is Felix and I bring joy to others by eating my daily ryebread with paté and wearing my magical red racer rain coat. Speaking of magic, I’m the team’s wiki lizard (get it?). I also do dry-lab and when the other miss me too much, I join them in the wet lab.

Frederik Bartholdy Flensmark Neergaard


Study: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
E-mail: frnee15@student.sdu.dk
Hey yo! I’m Frederik and I have worked day and night on iGEM, mostly drinking beers at night time, but that should count as well. When I’m not working in lab or on the PC, I make fun with the other teammates and tell bad dad jokes. Also I make crazy ideas come true, like celebrating christmas in July.

Frederik Mark Højsager


Study: Medicine
E-mail: frhoe14@student.sdu.dk
Heyah! I’m the other Frederik. I’m a green, lean, coffee-machine. I’ve been the steady supplier, and consumer of coffee on the team. My main focus has been on how to build a sustainable iGEM-project. I’ve been planting trees, eating green and lowering our team's carbon-footprint. Oh, and did I also mention I starred in our commercial? You can get autographs later.

Jonas Borregaard Eriksen


Study: Pharmacy
E-mail: jerik15@student.sdu.dk
Hey sup? I’m Jonas and used to like sports, partying, eating cake, hanging out with friends and such things most people like to do. During iGEM these interest has changed… I have been enslaved into the lab, and has realised that the only purpose of my life is to be in the lab.

Lene Vest Munk Thomsen


Study: Philosophy
E-mail: letho11@student.sdu.dk
Hey, is it solipsistic in here, or is it just me? When not wondering whether or not there is an external world, I’ve been busy working out how to implement our solar battery into our local community and what to gain from doing so. Oh, and imposing metaethics on my team members, but I Kant go into detail with this just yet.

Malte Skovsager Andersen


Study: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
E-mail: malta14@student.sdu.dk
Ey what up pimps, I’m Malte. I’ve mostly been working in the lab wrapped in the dankest of lab coats, doing the most exciting of experiments. All in the name of why the hell not. In the lab the utmost highest level of patience is needed, especially when tasked with testing if biobricks function as intended. This has, as seen in the image, caused me to pull out most of my hair.

Sarah Hyllekvist Jørgensen


Study: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
E-mail: sajo415@student.sdu.dk
Despite my favorite occupation being going into depth with theory, my main attribution to our project has primarily been running around in the lab. Luckily, there is a clear link between wet- and dry-lab. I am the smallest member of the SDU iGEM team, but I have definitely risen to the occasion.

Sofie Mozart Mortensen


Study: Biomedicine
E-mail: sofmo15@student.sdu.dk
Hi there! My name is Sofie, and I am the team mama! I am the one who makes sure everyone gets their fair share of cake. When I’m not in the kitchen, busy making cakes for my teammates, you can find me in the lab, where I’m working on enhancing our systems cellulose production.

Nothing can be done alone, so please scroll further to read about all the people contributing to our project, they help us greatly and without them our project would not have become what it is now.

Attributions


Nothing can be done alone, so please scroll further to read about the contributors, who helped make this project a reality.

Laboratory, Technical and General support


We would like to give a special thanks to our supervisors:

  • Assistant professor Mikkel Girke Jørgensen, for his general support and advice on the project, the laboratory, the fundraising and our team synergy.
  • Ph.D. student and former iGEM participant Patrick Rosendahl Andreassen, for his guidance and technical assistance in the laboratory.
  • Ph.D student and former iGEM participant Thøger Jensen Krogh, for his help in developing the wiki, as well as his laboratory guidance.
  • Cand.phil student and former iGEM participant Tim Munk, for his focus on team dynamics and advice for our human practices.

We would also like to thank:

  • Academic assistant Tina Kronborg, for her guidance in the lab, as well as for providing us with lab equipment.
  • Medical Laboratory Technician Simon Rose, for giving us a course in lab safety, risk assessment and general guidance in the lab.
  • Postdoc Oona Sneoyenbos-West, for providing us with Geobacter Sulfurreducens PCA and the necessary knowledge on how to grow this particular bacterial strain. Furthermore, she helped us greatly with helpful discussions regarding the advancement of our project. We would also like to thank her for lending us her laboratory, for the cultivation of Geobacter Sulfurreducens PCA.
  • Postdoc Satoshi Kawaichi, for his assistance in measuring the electrical conductivity of our nanowires, as well as providing us with knowledge on the Geobacter Sulfurreducens.
  • Business scout and PhD Ann Zahle Andersen, for presenting us with the necessary tools for the development of innovative business ideas.
  • Stud.scient Kristian Severin Rasmussen, for helping us use the oCelleScope for testing.
  • Stud.scient Brian Baltzar, for hosting a workshop regarding Adobe Illustrator, which has been a great help to the development of graphics for our wiki.
  • Ph.D student Richard Xavier Etienne Valli, for helpful discussions in the lab.
  • Software Developer Jonas Hartwig, for his help with some JQuery functionality on the wiki.
  • Stud.scient Birka Jensen, for general advice and suggestion on how to build an iGEM wiki.
  • Stud.med Ida Charlotte Hvam, for helpful discussions on the development of our wiki, helping with last minute figures to the wiki, as well as proof-reading of its content.
  • Ph.D student and current iGEM advisor of the team from Bielefeld, Boas Pucker, for providing us with BioBricks created by former iGEM teams from Bielefeld.
  • Our iGEM HQ Representative, Traci Haddock-Angelli, for her general guidance and assistance in registering our meetup to the official iGEM meetup page.
  • iGEM HQ Representative and Lab Technician, Abigail Sison, for her help in registering our meetup to the official iGEM meetup page.
  • Stud.polyt Oliver Klinggaard, for helpful discussions on the implementation of a pan-tilt system and for providing os with his project report on the subject.
  • DTU BioBuilders, for hosting their 5th Annual Biobrick Workshop. And for attending our meetup.
  • The UNIK Copenhagen iGEM team, for hosting the Nordic Meetup. And for attending our meetup.
  • The TU-Delft iGEM team, for hosting the European Meetup.
  • Mimo Antabi, for adding our adverts to the university info-screens preceding the Danish Research Festival.
  • Allan Haurballe Madsen, for helping us with our appearance at the Danish Science Festival.
  • Outreach Coordinator and PhD Lise Junker Nielsen, for for helping us with the Danish Science Festival as well as with the visit from the Academy for Talented Youth. We would also like to thank her for providing us with iPads for laboratory use.
  • The Danish Science Festival, for having us at their annual event. We would also like to thank all the visitors who attended our booth.
  • The high schools Odense Technical gymnasium, Mulernes Legatskole and Academy for Talented Youth, for letting us present our project.
  • The UNF Biotech Camp, for having us present our project to the attending students.
  • The elementary school, Odense Friskole, for letting us present our project for their 8th grade students.
  • All former iGEM participants from SDU, for attending our preliminary presentation and giving us feedback before the Giant Jamboree.
  • The following groups and associations, for helping us develop our human practices: SP-Moulding, Borgernes Hus, Kommunens bygninger, Bolbro - områdefornyelse, Odense Byudvikling.
  • Matlab user Nezar, for an easy implementation of the gillespie algorithm into matlab.

Sponsors


Thanks to:

  • The Faculty of Science at University Southern Denmark, for providing us with the fundamental funds required for our participation in the iGEM competition, and for providing us with lab benches and essential equipment.
  • The Faculty of Health Sciences at University of Southern Denmark, for their much needed funding of our project.
  • Integrated DNA Technologies, for providing us with 20 kilobases of gBlock gene fragments.
  • SnapGene, for providing our team with memberships to their software during the duration of the competition.
  • PentaBase, for sponsoring us with 10.000 DKK worth of oligos and a further 10% discount.
  • Eurofins Genomics, for providing us with an 80% discount on a Mix2Seq kit.
  • CO2NeutralWebsite, for attributing to green energy in our name, and thereby eliminating the carbon footprint our wiki makes.
  • Piktochart, for extending their student-offer to our mail aswell, providing us with easy access to great graphics.

Litterature


Project Synergism


We have all been working together in every aspect of our project. Nevertheless, some people have had to focus on some areas more than others. The main groups are listed as follows;

  • The group focusing on fixation of CO2, production of cellulose and light-sensing dormancy consisted of Sarah Hyllekvist Jørgensen, Ellen Gammelmark, Sofie Mozart Mortensen and Emil Bøgh Hansen.
  • The group focusing on the breakdown of cellulose to create an electrical current and optimisation of nanowires consisted of Felix Boel Pedersen, Frederik Bartholdy Flensmark Neergaard, Jonas Borregaard Eriksen and Malte Skovsager Andersen.
  • The group focusing on the implementation of the device in an urban environment, as well as our outreach consisted of Emil Søndergaard, Frederik Mark Højsager and Lene Vest Munk Thomsen.
  • The mathematical modelling of our project was single-handedly performed by Emil Vyff Jørgensen.
  • Coding and design of the wiki was performed by Felix Boel Pedersen and Frederik Mark Højsager.

Collaboration


‘Alone we can do so little; together we can do so much.’ The American author Helen Keller had it right! As an iGEM team, you can reach many goals, but as an entire community, we can aspire to achieve so much more. Thanks to all the people that made this iGEM experience so memorable, we truly enjoyed your companionship!

Danish ethics and wiki workshop at SDU

In the spirit of the iGEM community, we hosted a meetup in August for our fellow Danish iGEM teams: InCell from the University of Copenhagen (KU), and the Snakebite Detectives from the Technical University of Denmark (DTU). A total of seven members from these two teams joined us for breakfast and attended our meetup. This was the first ever iGEM meetup hosted by our university, so we decided to make it memorable. We decided to take advantage of our interdisciplinary team roster, and designed a wiki and ethics workshop to aid our fellow Danish teams.
We utilised the broad interdisciplinary profile of our team, to have Emil S. and Lene present the perception of science throughout the history and the bioethical aspects of GMO, respectively. Emil S. has a Bachelor of Arts in History, and Lene has a Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy. The ethical presentation was purposely turned into an ethical debate, where viewpoints of ethical conduct were exchanged and discussed. After the presentations and discussions on bioethics, it was time for the wiki workshop.
The SDU-Denmark iGEM teams have won the Best Wiki prize several times in the past. As such, we wanted to share the knowledge gained from our university's past. To facilitate this exchange of knowledge on wiki development, we recruited our current supervisor Thøger Jensen Krogh, to hold presentations on how to design a good wiki. He was qualified for this task through his role as the designer of the SDU iGEM 2013 and 2014 team wikis, which won the special prize on both occasions. During the presentation, Thøger had arranged several exercises where the attendees got to mingle, discuss and evaluate their wikis. This resulted in a steady flow of information and constructive feedback between all three teams.
After a long day of learning and discussing, we went for a tour around campus under the summer sun, which concluded in a visit to the roof terrace of the campus dormitory, followed by dinner. It was requested, by our fellow Danish teams, to make the SDU meetup a tradition. They suggested for all of us to meet again closer to the wiki deadline, to evaluate each team’s progress.

Attending meetups

Besides hosting our own meetup, we also attended several ones during our iGEM experience. The first of which, was the 5th Annual Biobrick Workshop in March, hosted by the Technical University of Denmark. This meetup not only gave us our first experience with Biobricks, but also worked as a foundation for friendships across the teams.
Our second meetup, the Nordic iGEM Conference, was hosted by the University of Copenhagen in June. The main focus of this meetup, was the traditional mini Jamboree. Participating in this gave us useful feedback from the judges, as well as from our fellow iGEM teams. This helped us greatly shape and develop our project for the better.
To celebrate the beginning of our iGEM summer, we went on a road trip to attend the European Meetup, hosted by the Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Here we discussed ideas regarding our project at a poster session, learned from all the other great iGEM projects, and made new friends from all over Europe.

Further collaboration

In our project, we have been in contact with the iGEM teams from Bielefeld and Imperial College, who helped us by sending crucial parts relevant to the execution of our project.
As our project revolves around global warming and green sustainable energy, we were thrilled to hear about the iGEM Goes Green initiative from the TU Dresden iGEM team. Following their guidelines, we have calculated the carbon footprint of our laboratory work and travelling. We have, in part, tried to make up for our carbon footprint, by changing our travelling and eating habits in our everyday lives. Furthermore, we have reduced our daily electricity consumption, our wiki became CO2 neutral and we made an effort to sort our waste. The full report can be scrutinized here.
We sought expertise from the Macquarie iGEM team, who has worked with the implementation of photosynthesis in E. coli since 2013. We had an interesting Skype call with their team, where we discussed the particular challenges the previous teams had experienced throughout their projects. During the skype conversation, we realised, that they could benefit from our knowledge on the electron transport pathways, that we used for our project.
We were also able to help the Stony Brook iGEM team by facilitating communication with members of the SDU iGEM team from 2016. Shortly after the European meetup, we received an email from the Cologne-Düsseldorf iGEM team regarding a postcard campaign, which we gave some feedback on.
During our project we received several questionnaires from fellow teams. We were delighted to help the teams by answering their questionnaires. The questionnaires were from:

  • Waterloo - regarding 3D printing of lab equipment
  • Dalhousie - regarding the common conception of science literature
  • University of Washington - regarding communication platforms used by teams
  • Vilnius-Lithuania - regarding cotransformation
  • Nanjing-China - regarding whole-cell sensor for formaldehyde
  • University of Sydney - regarding the use and accessibility of insulin
  • Georgia State - regarding disabilities
  • Greece - regarding modular RNAi-based logic circuits

Final Words


‘Thank you for your time, we hope you enjoyed our wiki and project’. Now you can sit back, relax, and be proud of your hard work. While you do so, feel free to enjoy some of the less serious pictures and snippets of stories from our amazing iGEM summer.

lots of fun stories and pictures


All the best,
SDU-Denmark 2017