Difference between revisions of "Team:Toronto/Collaborations"
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
<h3>UBC</h3> | <h3>UBC</h3> | ||
<p>We incorporated their sgRNA into the final switch of our CRISPR/Cas9 system to better minimize off target hits and provided experimental data to help validate their model. They shared the results of energy released by our original sgRNA using their model.</p> | <p>We incorporated their sgRNA into the final switch of our CRISPR/Cas9 system to better minimize off target hits and provided experimental data to help validate their model. They shared the results of energy released by our original sgRNA using their model.</p> | ||
| − | <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:British_Columbia"><button class="btn-primary dark-cyan"> | + | <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:British_Columbia"><button class="btn-primary dark-cyan">iGEM British_Columbia</button></a> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<!-- subsection 2 END --> | <!-- subsection 2 END --> | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
<h3>Waterloo</h3> | <h3>Waterloo</h3> | ||
<p>We incorporated their sgRNA into the final switch of our CRISPR/Cas9 system to better minimize off target hits and provided experimental data to help validate their model. They shared the results of energy released by our original sgRNA using their model.</p> | <p>We incorporated their sgRNA into the final switch of our CRISPR/Cas9 system to better minimize off target hits and provided experimental data to help validate their model. They shared the results of energy released by our original sgRNA using their model.</p> | ||
| − | <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Waterloo"><button class="btn-primary dark-cyan"> | + | <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Waterloo"><button class="btn-primary dark-cyan">iGEM Waterloo</button></a> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<!-- subsection 2 END --> | <!-- subsection 2 END --> | ||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
<a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Uppsala"><button class="btn-primary dark-cyan">iGEM Uppsala</button></a> | <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Uppsala"><button class="btn-primary dark-cyan">iGEM Uppsala</button></a> | ||
| − | < | + | <h3>Estonia</h3> |
<p>We invited the Estonia team to participate on our Synversations podcast after meeting up with one of our leads in Tartu. They discussed their project and possible developments and real world applications in the future. We provided feedback, advice, and areas of improvement regarding their project development.</p> | <p>We invited the Estonia team to participate on our Synversations podcast after meeting up with one of our leads in Tartu. They discussed their project and possible developments and real world applications in the future. We provided feedback, advice, and areas of improvement regarding their project development.</p> | ||
<a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Tartu_TUIT"><button class="btn-primary dark-cyan">iGEM Tartu_TUIT</button></a> | <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Tartu_TUIT"><button class="btn-primary dark-cyan">iGEM Tartu_TUIT</button></a> | ||
Revision as of 16:57, 31 October 2017
Collaborations
A sincere thank you to all the iGEM teams that helped us out by providing development points, feedback, and a diverse range of voices (literally) to our project. We hope working with us was as fulfilling and uplifting as it was for our team working with all of you!
Wet Lab
UBC
We incorporated their sgRNA into the final switch of our CRISPR/Cas9 system to better minimize off target hits and provided experimental data to help validate their model. They shared the results of energy released by our original sgRNA using their model.
Dry Lab
Waterloo
We incorporated their sgRNA into the final switch of our CRISPR/Cas9 system to better minimize off target hits and provided experimental data to help validate their model. They shared the results of energy released by our original sgRNA using their model.
Human Practices
Dalhousie
We invited the Dalhousie iGEM team to participate on our podcast Synversations and talk about their project and experiences. They had us provide feedback on a questionnaire about science communication that was a follow up from a previous survey.
Waterloo
We featured them on our podcast to talk about their project and afterwards we formed a Slack channel to provide each other with advice and feedback regarding our projects. They hosted the oGEM meetup.
Sweden?????Uppsala
We participated in their webinar on intellectual property along with some other iGEM Teams and they participated on our podcast.
Estonia
We invited the Estonia team to participate on our Synversations podcast after meeting up with one of our leads in Tartu. They discussed their project and possible developments and real world applications in the future. We provided feedback, advice, and areas of improvement regarding their project development.
References
- Canadian Biosafety Standards and Guidelines - https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/canadian-biosafety-standards-guidelines.html
- Biosafety Team in the Office of Environmental Health and Safety - https://ehs.utoronto.ca/our-services/biosafety/
- NIH Guidelines - https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/laboratory-biosafety-biosecurity/pathogen-safety-data-sheets-risk-assessment.html
- iGEM Risk Groups - https://2017.igem.org/Safety/Risk_Groups
