Difference between revisions of "Team:Valencia UPV/Experiments"
| Line 308: | Line 308: | ||
<p><i>Figure 1. a) Graphic representation of the construct comprised by a promoter and a terminator in opposite directions flanked by ΦC31 attachment sites (attB and attP). It represents the negative control of our experiment. Only when ΦC31 inversion occurs, luciferase protein will be expressed, allowing the characterization of luciferase dynamic. b) Genetic construct that allows constitutive expression of phiC31 in the plant. c) Graphic representation of the construct comprised by a promoter and a terminator in opposite directions flanked by ΦC31 recombined attachment sites (attR and attL). In normal basis, the promoter is inverted, allowing the expression of luciferase protein. It represents the positive control of our experiment.</i></p> | <p><i>Figure 1. a) Graphic representation of the construct comprised by a promoter and a terminator in opposite directions flanked by ΦC31 attachment sites (attB and attP). It represents the negative control of our experiment. Only when ΦC31 inversion occurs, luciferase protein will be expressed, allowing the characterization of luciferase dynamic. b) Genetic construct that allows constitutive expression of phiC31 in the plant. c) Graphic representation of the construct comprised by a promoter and a terminator in opposite directions flanked by ΦC31 recombined attachment sites (attR and attL). In normal basis, the promoter is inverted, allowing the expression of luciferase protein. It represents the positive control of our experiment.</i></p> | ||
<h4><strong>Method</strong></h4> | <h4><strong>Method</strong></h4> | ||
| − | <p>An <u><a data-toggle="modal" data-target="#agroinfiltration">agroinfiltration</a></u> and subsequent <u><a data-toggle="modal" data-target="#luciferaseAssay">luciferase assay</a></u> were performed in order to study gene expression at transcriptional level. The final Optical Density of reporter constructs (Figure 1a and Figure 1c) was 0,02 and the optical density of PhiC31 construct (Figure 1b) was 0,05. A triplicate sampling of different plants was performed from 36h post infiltration onwards in order to take account for biological variability due to unknown or uncontrollable conditions</p> | + | <p class="jopesangria">An <u><a data-toggle="modal" data-target="#agroinfiltration">agroinfiltration</a></u> and subsequent <u><a data-toggle="modal" data-target="#luciferaseAssay">luciferase assay</a></u> were performed in order to study gene expression at transcriptional level. The final Optical Density of reporter constructs (Figure 1a and Figure 1c) was 0,02 and the optical density of PhiC31 construct (Figure 1b) was 0,05. A triplicate sampling of different plants was performed from 36h post infiltration onwards in order to take account for biological variability due to unknown or uncontrollable conditions</p> |
<h4><strong>Timeline</strong></h4> | <h4><strong>Timeline</strong></h4> | ||
| − | <p>Register assembly constructs (Fig. 1a and 1b) were agroinfiltrated on 12th August at 12:00h. After 48h post-infiltration (14th August), positive and negative control were sampled and the recombinase was agroinfiltrated. After 36h, leaves were sampled every eight hours finishing on 18th August at 16:00h. At this point, positive and negative controls were also sampled. Overall, six points of samples were taken in the assay after recombinase were agroinfiltrated.</p> | + | <p class="jopesangria">Register assembly constructs (Fig. 1a and 1b) were agroinfiltrated on 12th August at 12:00h. After 48h post-infiltration (14th August), positive and negative control were sampled and the recombinase was agroinfiltrated. After 36h, leaves were sampled every eight hours finishing on 18th August at 16:00h. At this point, positive and negative controls were also sampled. Overall, six points of samples were taken in the assay after recombinase were agroinfiltrated.</p> |
<div class="divider"><!-- divider --></div> | <div class="divider"><!-- divider --></div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 322: | Line 322: | ||
<p>Nicotiana benthamiana</p> | <p>Nicotiana benthamiana</p> | ||
<h4><strong>Parts</strong></h4> | <h4><strong>Parts</strong></h4> | ||
| − | <p>Figure 2. a) Graphic representation of the construct comprised by a promoter and a terminator in opposite directions flanked by ΦC31 recombined attachment sites (attR and attL). In normal basis, the promoter is inverted, allowing the expression of a fluorescent protein. It represents the negative control of our experiment. b) Genetic construct that allows constitutive expression of phiC31 in the plant. c) Graphic representation of the construct comprised by a promoter and a terminator in opposite directions flanked by ΦC31 attachment sites (attB and attP). It represents the positive control of our experiment. d) Genetic construct that allows constitutive expression of RDF under a strong promoter.</p> | + | <p><i>Figure 2. a) Graphic representation of the construct comprised by a promoter and a terminator in opposite directions flanked by ΦC31 recombined attachment sites (attR and attL). In normal basis, the promoter is inverted, allowing the expression of a fluorescent protein. It represents the negative control of our experiment. b) Genetic construct that allows constitutive expression of phiC31 in the plant. c) Graphic representation of the construct comprised by a promoter and a terminator in opposite directions flanked by ΦC31 attachment sites (attB and attP). It represents the positive control of our experiment. d) Genetic construct that allows constitutive expression of RDF under a strong promoter.</i></p> |
<h4><strong>Method</strong></h4> | <h4><strong>Method</strong></h4> | ||
| − | <p>An <u><a data-toggle="modal" data-target="#agroinfiltration">agroinfiltration</a></u> and subsequent <u><a data-toggle="modal" data-target="#luciferaseAssay">luciferase assay</a></u> were performed in order to study gene expression at transcriptional level. The final Optical Density of reporter constructs (F.2a and c) were 0,02, the optical density of PhiC31 construct (F.2b) was 0,1 and the optical density of gp3 construct (F.2d) was 0,05 and 0,15. A triplicate sampling of different plants was performed from 36h post infiltration onwards in order to take account for biological variability due to unknown or uncontrollable conditions.</p> | + | <p class="jopesangria">An <u><a data-toggle="modal" data-target="#agroinfiltration">agroinfiltration</a></u> and subsequent <u><a data-toggle="modal" data-target="#luciferaseAssay">luciferase assay</a></u> were performed in order to study gene expression at transcriptional level. The final Optical Density of reporter constructs (F.2a and c) were 0,02, the optical density of PhiC31 construct (F.2b) was 0,1 and the optical density of gp3 construct (F.2d) was 0,05 and 0,15. A triplicate sampling of different plants was performed from 36h post infiltration onwards in order to take account for biological variability due to unknown or uncontrollable conditions.</p> |
<h4><strong>Timeline</strong></h4> | <h4><strong>Timeline</strong></h4> | ||
| − | <p>Register assembly construct (Fig. 2a) was agroinfiltrated together with recombinase (Fig. 2c) on 21th August at 12:00h. Positive and negative controls (Fig. 2b and Fig. 2a) were also infiltrated. After 48h post-infiltration (23th August), positive and negative control were sampled and RDF (Fig. 2d) was agroinfiltrated. After 36h, leaves were sampled every eight hours finishing on 25th August at 08:00h. At this point, positive and negative controls were also sampled. Overall, ten points of samples were taken in the assay after recombinase were agroinfiltrated.</p> | + | <p class="jopesangria">Register assembly construct (Fig. 2a) was agroinfiltrated together with recombinase (Fig. 2c) on 21th August at 12:00h. Positive and negative controls (Fig. 2b and Fig. 2a) were also infiltrated. After 48h post-infiltration (23th August), positive and negative control were sampled and RDF (Fig. 2d) was agroinfiltrated. After 36h, leaves were sampled every eight hours finishing on 25th August at 08:00h. At this point, positive and negative controls were also sampled. Overall, ten points of samples were taken in the assay after recombinase were agroinfiltrated.</p> |
<div class="divider"><!-- divider --></div> | <div class="divider"><!-- divider --></div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 15:51, 15 October 2017
Home • Wet Lab •
EXPERIMENTS
PHIC31 PERFORMANCE
Objective
Testing the performance of phiC31 recombinase using the register assembly construct with the attachment sites PxB.
Plant Chassis
Nicotiana benthamiana
Parts
Figure 1. a) Graphic representation of the construct comprised by a promoter and a terminator in opposite directions flanked by ΦC31 attachment sites (attB and attP). It represents the negative control of our experiment. Only when ΦC31 inversion occurs, luciferase protein will be expressed, allowing the characterization of luciferase dynamic. b) Genetic construct that allows constitutive expression of phiC31 in the plant. c) Graphic representation of the construct comprised by a promoter and a terminator in opposite directions flanked by ΦC31 recombined attachment sites (attR and attL). In normal basis, the promoter is inverted, allowing the expression of luciferase protein. It represents the positive control of our experiment.
Method
An agroinfiltration and subsequent luciferase assay were performed in order to study gene expression at transcriptional level. The final Optical Density of reporter constructs (Figure 1a and Figure 1c) was 0,02 and the optical density of PhiC31 construct (Figure 1b) was 0,05. A triplicate sampling of different plants was performed from 36h post infiltration onwards in order to take account for biological variability due to unknown or uncontrollable conditions
Timeline
Register assembly constructs (Fig. 1a and 1b) were agroinfiltrated on 12th August at 12:00h. After 48h post-infiltration (14th August), positive and negative control were sampled and the recombinase was agroinfiltrated. After 36h, leaves were sampled every eight hours finishing on 18th August at 16:00h. At this point, positive and negative controls were also sampled. Overall, six points of samples were taken in the assay after recombinase were agroinfiltrated.
GP3 PERFORMANCE - REPORTER (L X R) - 1
Objective
Testing the performance of gp3 using the register assembly construct with the recombined attachment sites LxR.
Plant Chassis
Nicotiana benthamiana
Parts
Figure 2. a) Graphic representation of the construct comprised by a promoter and a terminator in opposite directions flanked by ΦC31 recombined attachment sites (attR and attL). In normal basis, the promoter is inverted, allowing the expression of a fluorescent protein. It represents the negative control of our experiment. b) Genetic construct that allows constitutive expression of phiC31 in the plant. c) Graphic representation of the construct comprised by a promoter and a terminator in opposite directions flanked by ΦC31 attachment sites (attB and attP). It represents the positive control of our experiment. d) Genetic construct that allows constitutive expression of RDF under a strong promoter.
Method
An agroinfiltration and subsequent luciferase assay were performed in order to study gene expression at transcriptional level. The final Optical Density of reporter constructs (F.2a and c) were 0,02, the optical density of PhiC31 construct (F.2b) was 0,1 and the optical density of gp3 construct (F.2d) was 0,05 and 0,15. A triplicate sampling of different plants was performed from 36h post infiltration onwards in order to take account for biological variability due to unknown or uncontrollable conditions.
Timeline
Register assembly construct (Fig. 2a) was agroinfiltrated together with recombinase (Fig. 2c) on 21th August at 12:00h. Positive and negative controls (Fig. 2b and Fig. 2a) were also infiltrated. After 48h post-infiltration (23th August), positive and negative control were sampled and RDF (Fig. 2d) was agroinfiltrated. After 36h, leaves were sampled every eight hours finishing on 25th August at 08:00h. At this point, positive and negative controls were also sampled. Overall, ten points of samples were taken in the assay after recombinase were agroinfiltrated.
GP3 PERFORMANCE - REPORTER (L X R) - 2
Objective
Testing the performance of gp3 using the register assembly construct with the recombined attachment sites LxR.
Plant Chassis
Nicotiana benthamiana
Parts
Figure 3. a) Graphic representation of the construct comprised by a promoter and a terminator in opposite directions flanked by ΦC31 recombined attachment sites (attR and attL). In normal basis, the promoter is inverted, allowing the expression of a fluorescent protein. It represents the negative control of our experiment. b) Genetic construct that allows constitutive expression of phiC31 in the plant. c) Graphic representation of the construct comprised by a promoter and a terminator in opposite directions flanked by ΦC31 attachment sites (attB and attP). It represents the positive control of our experiment. d) Genetic construct that allows constitutive expression of RDF under 35s promoter.
Method
An agroinfiltration and subsequent luciferase assay were performed in order to study gene expression at transcriptional level. The final Optical Density of reporter constructs (F. 3a and c) were 0,02, the optical density of PhiC31 construct (F.3b) was 0,05 and the optical density of gp3 construct (F.3d) was 0,20 and 0,35. A triplicate sampling of different plants was performed from 36h post infiltration onwards in order to take account for biological variability due to unknown or uncontrollable conditions.
Timeline
Register assembly construct (Fig. 3a) was agroinfiltrated together with recombinase (Fig. 3c) on 3th August at 12:00h. Positive and negative controls (Fig. 3b and Fig. 3a) were also infiltrated. After 48h post-infiltration (7th September), positive and negative control were sampled and RDF (Fig. 3d) was agroinfiltrated. After 36h, leaves were sampled every eight hours finishing on 11th September at 20:00h. At this point, positive and negative controls were also sampled. Overall, six points of samples were taken in the assay after recombinase were agroinfiltrated.
PHIC31 PERFORMANCE (P X B)
Objective
Testing the performance of phiC31 recombinase using the register assembly construct with the attachment sites PxB in order to characterize luciferase dynamics.
Plant Chassis
Nicotiana benthamiana
Parts
Figure 4. a) Graphic representation of the construct comprised by a promoter and a terminator in opposite directions flanked by ΦC31 attachment sites (attB and attP). It represents the negative control of our experiment. Only when ΦC31 inversion occurs, luciferase protein will be expressed. b) Genetic construct that allows constitutive expression of phiC31 in the plant under a strong promoter c) Graphic representation of the construct comprised by a promoter and a terminator in opposite directions flanked by ΦC31 recombined attachment sites (attR and attL). In normal basis, the promoter is inverted, allowing the expression of luciferase protein. It represents the positive control of our experiment.
Method
An agroinfiltration and subsequent luciferase assay were performed in order to study gene expression at transcriptional level. The final Optical Density of reporter constructs (Figure 4a and Figure 4c) was 0,02 and the optical density of PhiC31 construct (Figure 4b) was 0,1. A triplicate sampling of different plants was performed from 36h post infiltration onwards in order to take account for biological variability due to unknown or uncontrollable conditions.
Timeline
Register assembly constructs (Fig. 4a and 4b) were agroinfiltrated on 3th August at 12:00h. After 48h post-infiltration (7th September), positive and negative control were sampled and the recombinase was agroinfiltrated. After 36h, leaves were sampled every 24 hours finishing on 11th September at 20:00h. At this point, positive and negative controls were also sampled. Overall, four points of samples were taken in the assay after recombinase were agroinfiltrated.
PHIC31 PERFORMANCE UNDER DIFFERENT PROMOTERS
Objective
Testing the performance of phiC31 recombinase using the register assembly construct with the attachment sites PxB in order to characterize luciferase dynamics.
Plant Chassis
Nicotiana benthamiana
Parts
Figure 5. a) Graphic representation of the construct comprised by a promoter and a terminator in opposite directions flanked by ΦC31 attachment sites (attB and attP). It represents the negative control of our experiment. Only when ΦC31 inversion occurs, luciferase protein will be expressed. b) Genetic construct that allows constitutive expression of phiC31 in the plant under the control of a strong promoter c) Graphic representation of the construct comprised by a promoter and a terminator in opposite directions flanked by ΦC31 recombined attachment sites (attR and attL). In normal basis, the promoter is inverted, allowing the expression of luciferase protein. It represents the positive control of our experiment. d) Genetic construct that allows constitutive expression of phiC31 in the plant under the control of a weak promoter. e) Transcriptional unit for the expression of the Firefly Luciferase under the control of a strong promoter. f) Transcriptional unit for the expression of the Firefly luciferase under the control of a weak promoter.
Method
An agroinfiltration and subsequent luciferase assay were performed in order to study gene expression at transcriptional level. The final Optical Density of reporter constructs (Figure 5a and Figure 5c) was 0,02 and the optical density of PhiC31 construct (Figure 5b) was 0,01. A triplicate sampling of different plants was performed in order to take account for biological variability due to unknown or uncontrollable conditions.
Timeline
Register assembly constructs (Fig. 5a and 5b) and the controls (Fig. 5e and 5f) were agroinfiltrated on 19th September at 12:00h. After 54h post-infiltration (21th September), leaves were sampled at 18:00h. After 48h, all leaves were also sampled. Overall, two points of samples were taken in the assay.
CHARACTERIZATION OF PHIC31 PERFORMANCE
Objective
Testing the performance of phiC31 recombinase using the register assembly construct with the attachment sites PxB in order to characterize luciferase dynamics under a weak promoter.
Plant Chassis
Nicotiana benthamiana
Parts
Figure 6. a) Graphic representation of the construct comprised by a promoter and a terminator in opposite directions flanked by ΦC31 attachment sites (attB and attP). It represents the negative control of our experiment. Only when ΦC31 inversion occurs, luciferase protein will be expressed. b) Genetic construct that allows constitutive expression of phiC31 in the plant under the control of a weak promoter c) Graphic representation of the construct comprised by a promoter and a terminator in opposite directions flanked by ΦC31 recombined attachment sites (attR and attL). In normal basis, the promoter is inverted, allowing the expression of luciferase protein. It represents the positive control of our experiment. d) Transcriptional unit for the expression of the Firefly Luciferase under the control of a strong promoter. e) Transcriptional unit for the expression of the Firefly luciferase under the control of a weak promoter.
Method
An agroinfiltration and subsequent luciferase assay were performed in order to study gene expression at transcriptional level. The final Optical Density of reporter constructs (Figure 1a and Figure 1c) was 0,02 and the optical density of PhiC31 construct (Figure 1b) was 0,01 AND 0,005. A unique sampling of the same plant was performed.
Timeline
Register assembly constructs (Fig. 6a and 6c) and the controls (Fig. 6e and 6f) were agroinfiltrated on 29th September at 18:00h. After 12h post-infiltration (30th September), leaves were sampled every 6 hours finishing on 1st October at 08:00h.
