Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
padding: 14px 16px; | padding: 14px 16px; | ||
text-decoration: none; | text-decoration: none; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | h2 { | ||
+ | text-align: center; | ||
} | } | ||
Line 33: | Line 37: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<div class="column full_size"> | <div class="column full_size"> | ||
− | <h1> | + | <h1><b>Modelling</b></h1> |
− | <p> | + | <p> |
+ | <b>Introduction</b> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | According to Green et al., the optimal length of RNA to be detected by a toehold switch is around 30 bp. In other words, a target RNA with 1000 bp in length can have 970 possible switches. However, the performances of each possible switch will be different, since switches that target different region will have different thermodynamic characteristic and structure, which can affect the performance of the switch. Therefore, we modeled the thermodynamic and structure of our toehold switch during designing stage and simulate the expression of activated switch in silico. Our modelling helped us a lot in gaining insight. | ||
+ | |||
+ | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="column full_size"> | ||
+ | <h2><b>RNA thermodynamic modeling</b></h2> | ||
+ | <center>Background</center><br> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Toehold switch structure:<br> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
<div class="clear"></div> | <div class="clear"></div> | ||
Revision as of 09:31, 28 September 2017