Difference between revisions of "Team:WPI Worcester/HP/Silver"

 
(20 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPI_Worcester}}
+
{{Team:WPI_Worcester/CSS}}
 
<html>
 
<html>
<div class="column full_size judges-will-not-evaluate">
+
<div class="column full_size">
<h3>★  ALERT! </h3>
+
<p>This page is used by the judges to evaluate your team for the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Judging/Medals">medal criterion</a> or <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Judging/Awards"> award listed above</a>. </p>
+
<p> Delete this box in order to be evaluated for this medal criterion and/or award. See more information at <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Judging/Pages_for_Awards"> Instructions for Pages for awards</a>.</p>
+
</div>
+
<div class="clear"></div>
+
  
 +
<h1> Human Practices: Silver Requirement</h1>
 +
<h3>Lead Contamination in Your Drinking Water (survey)</h3>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/fc/WPI_Worcester_2017_Lead_Survey_Photo.png" alt="Lead Survey" style="width:800px;height:317px;">
  
<div class="column full_size">
+
<p> Our team developed a survey to send out to other iGEM Teams and the public to evaluate the understanding people had of lead pollution in their area, and if the person had ever had their water tested. We received results from all over the world, and a total of 75 responses.
 +
<p>
 +
The results broken down by country are shown below:
 +
</p>
  
<h1>Silver Medal Human Practices</h1>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b1/WPI_Worcester_2017_Lead_Survey_Results_by_Country.png" alt="Lead Survey Results by Country" style="width:800px;height:499px;">
<p>iGEM teams are leading in the area of Human Practices because they conduct their projects within a social/environmental context, to better understand issues that might influence the design and use of their technologies.</p>
+
<p>
<p>Teams work with students and advisors from the humanities and social sciences to explore topics concerning ethical, legal, social, economic, safety or security issues related to their work. Consideration of these Human Practices is crucial for building safe and sustainable projects that serve the public interest. </p>
+
Figure 1
<p>For more information, please see the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Competition/Human_Practices">Human Practices page</a>.</p>
+
</p>
</div>
+
  
<div class="clear"></div>
+
<p>
 +
The results broken down by U.S. state are shown below:
 +
</p>
  
<div class="column half_size">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/57/T_WPI_Worcester_SurveyResponsebyState.png" alt="Lead Survey Results by State"
<h3>Silver Medal Criterion #3</h3>
+
style="width:794px;height:487px;">
<p>Convince the judges you have thought carefully and creatively about whether your work is safe, responsible and good for the world. You could accomplish this through engaging with your local, national and/or international communities or other approaches. Please note that standard surveys will not fulfill this criteria.</p>
+
<p>
</div>
+
Figure 2
 +
</p>
 +
 
 +
<h3>Communication with professionals</h3>
 +
<p>  
 +
Throughout the summer we communicated with various professionals regarding different aspects of our project. This included talking to various water testing companies, the FDA, and Dr. Scarlet Shell. The water testing companies contacted are listed below. The first company, Analytical Balance Corp. allowed us to visit and walked us through their lab and the different processes of testing for lead, as well as other contaminants. We asked all of the companies about how they tested water for lead contamination, how long testing took, and how expensive it was for the consumer. All tests used some sort of mass spectrometry because it detects lead below 1 part per billion, and it is an EPA approved test. The most common tests were inductively coupled plasma, or ICP, mass spectrometry, and flame test mass spectrometry. ICP is more efficient, and can test for multiple contaminants in a few hours. We learned that the reason colorimetric testing is not used because there is not a test accurate enough to be approved by the EPA, and because people see colors differently it can also lower accuracy. It usually takes companies between 3 and 14 days to get back to customers, and tests can range from $25 to over $150. In some cases we also asked what would be the response if they found a water sample contained lead. In this case, it depends on the state regulations, and where the lead contaminated sample came from.  
 +
<h5>Lead Detection</h5>
  
<div class="column half_size">
 
<h5>Some Human Practices topic areas </h5>
 
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li>Philosophy</li>
+
<li> Analytical Balance Corp. (personal visit) </li>
<li>Public Engagement / Dialogue</li>
+
<li> Barnstable County Health </li>
<li>Education</li>
+
<li> BHC Company </li>
<li>Product Design</li>
+
<li> Department of Public Health (DEP) </li>
<li>Scale-Up and Deployment Issues</li>
+
<li> Geo Labs, Inc. </li>
<li>Environmental Impact</li>
+
<li> Metropolitan District Hartford, CT </li>
<li>Ethics</li>
+
<li> New Britain Water Company </li>
<li>Safety</li>
+
<li> Northeast Environment Lab </li>
<li>Security</li>
+
<li> Regional Water Authority (CT) </li>
<li>Public Policy</li>
+
<li> STL Westfield </li>
<li>Law and Regulation</li>
+
<li>Risk Assessment</li>
+
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
</div>
 
 
 
<div class="column half_size">
 
<h5>What should we write about on this page?</h5>
 
<p>On this page, you should write about the Human Practices topics you considered in your project, and document any special activities you did (such as visiting experts, talking to lawmakers, or doing public engagement). This should include all of the work done for the Silver Medal Criterion #3. Details for your Gold medal work and/or work for the two Human Practices special prizes should be put on those specified pages.</p>
 
</div>
 
  
 +
<h5>Colorimetric Testing</h5>
 +
<p>
 +
Because our biosensor and lead assay consisted of colorimetric testing, Analytical balance Corp. recommended that we contact IDEXX. They make colorimetric tests to detect living organisms in water. Most of their tests colors were used to indicate if a test was positive or negative. They did not have many suggestions because the testing between microorganisms and lead is so different. They suggested we contact Hach which is another company that works a lot to develop colorimetric tests. Hach had many different tests kits, and we ended up using one of their lead test kits after it was determined that our other lead assay was too variable. 
  
<div class="column half_size">
 
<h5>Inspiration</h5>
 
<p>Read what other teams have done:</p>
 
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Dundee/policypractice/experts">2014 Dundee </a></li>
+
<li> IDEXX </li>
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:UC_Davis/Policy_Practices_Overview">2014 UC Davis </a></li>
+
<li> Hach </li>
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Manchester/HumanPractices">2013 Manchester </a></li>
+
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Cornell/outreach">2013 Cornell </a></li>
+
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
</div>
 
  
<div class="clear"></div>
+
<h5>Probiotic</h5>  
<div class="column full_size">
+
<h3>Lead Pollution in our Drinking Water: Can you guess WHERE? (Touch Tomorrow)</h3>
+
 
+
<h3>Lead Contamination in Your Drinking Water (survey)</h3>
+
 
+
<h3>Got Lead? (Poster Presentation at NEWIN)</h3>
+
 
+
<h3>Communication with professionals</h3>
+
<h5>Lead Detection</h5>
+
 
<p>
 
<p>
Analytical Balance Corp. (personal visit)
+
During the summer we also contacted the FDA to determine how our probiotic would be classified. We found that our probiotic would be classified as a Live Biotherapeutic Product, or LBP. This is because it would help treat and/or prevent disease, and its genetic material will have been purposefully modified. This would all be covered under investigational new drug (IND) guidelines as well. Pre-IND Meetings would need to be completed. The meetings are optional, but helpful in the approval process. After the meetings, the IND would need to be formally submitted to the FDA. A description of the drug substance, characterization, manufacturer information, and the final drug product information. Experiments in animals/in vitro should be done earlier in testing. The clinical trial can be formulated based on these conclusions. The study should address general toxicity, target organs or systems of toxicity, teratogenic, carcinogenic, or mutagenic potential of any ingredient in the product, and relationship of dosage and duration to toxic response and pharmacological activity.  For more information please see the FDA's page about <a href="https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/General/UCM292704.pdf">LBP's.</a>
Barnstable County Health
+
BHC Company
+
Department of Public Health (DEP)
+
Geo Labs, Inc.
+
Hach
+
Metropolitan District Hartford, CT
+
New Britain Water Company
+
Northeast Environment Lab
+
Regional Water Authority (CT)
+
STL Westfield
+
 
</p>
 
</p>
<h5>Colorimetric Testing</h5>
 
<p>
 
IDEXX
 
</p>
 
<h5>Probiotic</h5>
 
 
<p>
 
<p>
FDA: classification of probiotic; difference in classification
+
We also met with Dr. Scarlet Shell, a microbiologist and professor at WPI. More information about this meeting and its results are posted on the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:WPI_Worcester/HP/Gold_Integrated">Gold Requirement Page</a>.
Professor Shell: microbiologist
+
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<h5>Lead Poisoning Treatment</h5>
 
<h5>Lead Poisoning Treatment</h5>
 
<p>  
 
<p>  
Valeant Pharmaceutical
+
Many medical professionals were contacted in order to better understand the effects of lead poising. We focused on lead poising in children because of lead's long term effect on development. We learned that the cost of treatment is high, and the process of treating someone with lead poising, especially a child, is intense on the patient.
Lincoln Pediatrics
+
<ul>
Massachusetts Child Lead Poisoning Prevention Program
+
<li> Valeant Pharmaceutical </li>
Lead Clinic at Boston Children’s Hospital
+
<li> Lincoln Pediatrics </li>
</p>  
+
<li> Massachusetts Child Lead Poisoning Prevention Program </li>
 +
<li> Lead Clinic at Boston Children’s Hospital </li>
 +
</ul>  
  
 +
<p>
 +
A mystery diagnosis regarding lead poisoning and treatment was also written and published through WPI's newspaper (The Towers), and can be found
 +
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/2f/T_WPI_Worcester_LeadPoisoningCaseStudy.pdf"> here. </a>
 +
</p>
 +
<br><br>
 
</html>
 
</html>

Latest revision as of 21:17, 13 October 2017


Human Practices: Silver Requirement

Lead Contamination in Your Drinking Water (survey)

Lead Survey

Our team developed a survey to send out to other iGEM Teams and the public to evaluate the understanding people had of lead pollution in their area, and if the person had ever had their water tested. We received results from all over the world, and a total of 75 responses.

The results broken down by country are shown below:

Lead Survey Results by Country

Figure 1

The results broken down by U.S. state are shown below:

Lead Survey Results by State

Figure 2

Communication with professionals

Throughout the summer we communicated with various professionals regarding different aspects of our project. This included talking to various water testing companies, the FDA, and Dr. Scarlet Shell. The water testing companies contacted are listed below. The first company, Analytical Balance Corp. allowed us to visit and walked us through their lab and the different processes of testing for lead, as well as other contaminants. We asked all of the companies about how they tested water for lead contamination, how long testing took, and how expensive it was for the consumer. All tests used some sort of mass spectrometry because it detects lead below 1 part per billion, and it is an EPA approved test. The most common tests were inductively coupled plasma, or ICP, mass spectrometry, and flame test mass spectrometry. ICP is more efficient, and can test for multiple contaminants in a few hours. We learned that the reason colorimetric testing is not used because there is not a test accurate enough to be approved by the EPA, and because people see colors differently it can also lower accuracy. It usually takes companies between 3 and 14 days to get back to customers, and tests can range from $25 to over $150. In some cases we also asked what would be the response if they found a water sample contained lead. In this case, it depends on the state regulations, and where the lead contaminated sample came from.

Lead Detection
  • Analytical Balance Corp. (personal visit)
  • Barnstable County Health
  • BHC Company
  • Department of Public Health (DEP)
  • Geo Labs, Inc.
  • Metropolitan District Hartford, CT
  • New Britain Water Company
  • Northeast Environment Lab
  • Regional Water Authority (CT)
  • STL Westfield
Colorimetric Testing

Because our biosensor and lead assay consisted of colorimetric testing, Analytical balance Corp. recommended that we contact IDEXX. They make colorimetric tests to detect living organisms in water. Most of their tests colors were used to indicate if a test was positive or negative. They did not have many suggestions because the testing between microorganisms and lead is so different. They suggested we contact Hach which is another company that works a lot to develop colorimetric tests. Hach had many different tests kits, and we ended up using one of their lead test kits after it was determined that our other lead assay was too variable.

  • IDEXX
  • Hach
Probiotic

During the summer we also contacted the FDA to determine how our probiotic would be classified. We found that our probiotic would be classified as a Live Biotherapeutic Product, or LBP. This is because it would help treat and/or prevent disease, and its genetic material will have been purposefully modified. This would all be covered under investigational new drug (IND) guidelines as well. Pre-IND Meetings would need to be completed. The meetings are optional, but helpful in the approval process. After the meetings, the IND would need to be formally submitted to the FDA. A description of the drug substance, characterization, manufacturer information, and the final drug product information. Experiments in animals/in vitro should be done earlier in testing. The clinical trial can be formulated based on these conclusions. The study should address general toxicity, target organs or systems of toxicity, teratogenic, carcinogenic, or mutagenic potential of any ingredient in the product, and relationship of dosage and duration to toxic response and pharmacological activity. For more information please see the FDA's page about LBP's.

We also met with Dr. Scarlet Shell, a microbiologist and professor at WPI. More information about this meeting and its results are posted on the Gold Requirement Page.

Lead Poisoning Treatment

Many medical professionals were contacted in order to better understand the effects of lead poising. We focused on lead poising in children because of lead's long term effect on development. We learned that the cost of treatment is high, and the process of treating someone with lead poising, especially a child, is intense on the patient.

  • Valeant Pharmaceutical
  • Lincoln Pediatrics
  • Massachusetts Child Lead Poisoning Prevention Program
  • Lead Clinic at Boston Children’s Hospital

A mystery diagnosis regarding lead poisoning and treatment was also written and published through WPI's newspaper (The Towers), and can be found here.