Line 220: | Line 220: | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center> | ||
+ | <h4>Light Filter Foils</h4> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | For filtering the emission and excitation light we used filter foils from LEE filters. The producer provides transmission | ||
+ | spectra for every filter foil. For the excitation filter we choose the filter color "TOKYO BLUE" and for the emission | ||
+ | filter we choose the filter color "RUST". We used our UV-Vis spectrometer to measure the spectra of different combinations | ||
+ | of filter foils. As shown in the figure bellow, a combination of one orange and two blue filter foils blocks | ||
+ | nearly all light up to 700 nm. This combination is therefore ideal for blocking the excitation light of the blue LED | ||
+ | from reaching the LDR. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center> | ||
+ | <h4>Filter Paper</h4> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | We choose glass fiber filter paper from Whatman Laboratory Products with type designation "934-AH" to detect | ||
+ | fluorescence on. In contrast, cellulose or nitrocellulose filter paper is auto fluorescent and causes a high background | ||
+ | signal. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center> | ||
+ | <h4>3D Printed Parts</h4> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | We intended to put the LED,the fluorescence sample and the LDR in direct proximity, to ensures a maximum use | ||
+ | of excitation light and emission light. We therefore chose a sandwich-like design for our sample holder that can be | ||
+ | placed into a slot where the detection system snaps in keeps the sample in position. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | In detail, two blue filter foils are stacked and glued with tape in front of two excitation windows of the upper half of | ||
+ | the sandwich. One orange filter foil is glued to the lower half of the sandwich. The two detection windows enable us | ||
+ | to measure a blank sample and an actual sample with the exact same set-up. We avoid using scotch tape to cover | ||
+ | the detection windows because tape is usually auto fluorescent and causes a high background signal. A piece of filter | ||
+ | paper is placed between the two halves of the sandwich. The upper and lower part of this sandwich are pressed | ||
+ | together with magnets to hold the filter paper in position and ensure an user-friendly exchange of filter papers. A | ||
+ | explosion drawing of the sample holder is shown in the figure bellow. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | The sandwich can now be inserted into the slot of the detection device. The LED and the LDR are mounted onto | ||
+ | beams at opposite sites of the detection device. The sandwich snaps in when the LED and the LDR are at the right | ||
+ | position under the excitation and over detection window. Four magnets apply an additional force to the beams and | ||
+ | press the LED and the LDR close together. This design ensures that the distance between filter paper, LED and | ||
+ | LDR is only limited by the thickness of the filter foils. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center> | ||
+ | <h4>List of materials and cost calculation</h4> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | We kept an eye on using only low cost and easy available items for the construction of our detector. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | |||
Revision as of 10:27, 19 October 2017
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|