Difference between revisions of "Team:KUAS Korea/Notebook"

 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 71: Line 71:
  
 
<h4>Week 1.</h4><ol>
 
<h4>Week 1.</h4><ol>
<li> We took <em>Shewanella</em> <em>oneidensis</em> MR-1 from our instructor, Seungwoo Baek,  and made pure culture of <em>Shewanella</em> in LB solid culture with Ampicillin.</li>
+
 
<li> We tested microbial fuel cell(MFC) device we've lent from GIST, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology. Our test was measured by Fluke 101 multimeter.</li>
+
 
<li>We got clones of agar degrading enzymes and TEV from our lab.</li></ol>
+
<li>We researched several gastrointesintal diseases and its causes.</li>
 +
<li>Additionally, we researched existing diagnostic methods used in detecting these diseases.</li></ol>
 
  <br>
 
  <br>
  
 
<h4>Week 2.</h4><ol>
 
<h4>Week 2.</h4><ol>
<li> We made a simple device using 50mL tube, aluminium foil, and agar salt bridge, which was improved than the last device.</li>
+
<li>We looked for gut microbiome distribution in the gut and bacterias that are currently verified and utilized in probiotics.</li>
<li> We connected our batteries in series. Whole voltage was lower than we expected, but it was same with sum of each batteries voltage.</li>
+
<li>Also, we chose heme, pH, bile salt as our target indicator, which could detect the diseases we previously researched on the first week.</li>
<li> Also, We bought an amperemeter and checked the batteries.</li>
+
 
<li> In addition, we made a hypothesis that current will be increased if we put more concentrated culture of <em>Shewanella</em>.</li>
+
<li> Diaphorase was cloned into pB3.</li>
+
 
</ol> <br>
 
</ol> <br>
  
 
<h4>Week 3.</h4><ol>
 
<h4>Week 3.</h4><ol>
<li> We tested last week's hypothesis. Different volume of cultured <em>Shewanella</em> was concentrated by centrifuge, and put into simple MFC.</li>
+
We designed a detector device based on analyzation of prior research about sensing heme, pH, and bile salt.
<li> Electric current was increased, but it remained same after certain concentration.
+
<li> We discussed that only <em>Shewanella</em> in biofilm will affect the electricity.</li>
+
<li> Electric current decreased after few seconds.</li>
+
 
</ol> <br>
 
</ol> <br>
  
 
<h4>Week 4.</h4><ol>
 
<h4>Week 4.</h4><ol>
<li> Cultured <em>Shewanella</em> did not grow. </li>
+
<li>We received <em>Lactobacillus plantarum</em> L67 from professor Se Jong Oh of Chunnam University, and cultured them in MRS media.</li>
<li> Our Instructor gave us an advice to newly streak <em>Shewanella</em> so we made a new <em>Shewanella</em> plate.</li>
+
<li>We collected single colony from them and cultured it.</li>
<li> We and instructor tried to turn on the multimeter which borrowed from GIST, but we did not know how to use it.</li>
+
<li>We then cultured these bacteria in culture medium that contain ampicillin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, gentamycin, rifampicin, streptomycin, kanamycin, and tested antibiotic resistance.</li>
<li> Multimeter needed an program based on excel.</li>
+
 
<li> We changed our electrode to carbon for accuate measurement because aluminium and iron electrode can affect the results.</li>
+
 
</ol> <br>
 
</ol> <br>
  
 
<h4>Week 5.</h4><ol>
 
<h4>Week 5.</h4><ol>
<li> We thought that we could run a scientific calculator if we gather enough electricity. </li><li>Caculator's mercury cell was 1.5V and 20mA.</li>
+
<li>Our Professor gave us a feedback on the experiment conducted in week 4. Based on the feedback, we revised the problematic part and conducted the experiment again.</li>
<li> I made a large MFC with 500mL water bottle, but it did not work.</li>
+
<li>We compared the test result and verified antibiotic resistance data of <em>L. plantarum</em>, and checked if the right bacteria was cultured.</li>
<li> Color of <em>Shewanella</em> looked strange. We thought it was contaminated, so we cultured it again.</li>
+
<li>We researched on transformation protocol of Lactobacillus transformation and referenced protocol of Eppendorf.</li>
 +
 
 
</ol><br>
 
</ol><br>
 
   
 
   
 
<h4>Week 6.</h4><ol>
 
<h4>Week 6.</h4><ol>
<li> For modeling, I made a growth curve of <em>Shewanella</em>.</li>
+
<li>We selected the gram positive-E. coli shuttle vector for the transformation of the <em>Lactobacillus Plantarum</em> L67</li>
<li> Whole Korea_U_Seoul members went to Gwangju, and opened a booth that introduces our project.</li>
+
<li>After taking the shuttle vector out from stock, heat-shock transformation to E. coli BW25113 was processed to amplify the vector. vector was extracted by mini-prep method.</li>
<li> In addition, we visited Energy & Biotechnology Lab in GIST. We asked for some advice about our project, and how to run the multimeter.</li>
+
<li>We measured the concentration and the checked the size of the outcome using gel electrophoresis.</li>
<li> Therefore, We succeeded in running our multimeter.</li>
+
 
</ol> <br>
 
</ol> <br>
 +
 
<h4>Week 7.</h4><ol>
 
<h4>Week 7.</h4><ol>
  
<li> We tested our multimeter with a 1.5V battery.</li>
+
<li><em>Lactobacillus Plantarum</em> L67 Electroporation competent cell was produced. (Eppendorf protocol was referred)</li>
<li> We could draw a I-V graph and time-V graph by using excel.</li>
+
<li>We tried to transform previously amplified vector to the competent cell at various voltages and amounts of vector.</li>  
<li> By that graph, we can calculate open circuit voltage(OCV) and inertial resistance.</li>
+
<li>Result was checked using the selective culture.</li>
 
</ol> <br>
 
</ol> <br>
  
 
<h4>Week 8.</h4><ol>
 
<h4>Week 8.</h4><ol>
<li> We made a new device. It is made out of 15mL and 50mL Falcon tube and cap.</li>
+
After the failure of transformation on the 7th week, we re-constructed competent cell and carried out another experiment.
<li> We studied a paper about coculture of <em>E. coli</em> and <em>Shewanella</em>.</li>
+
</ol><br>
<li> For the next experiment, we cultured <em>E. coli</em> DH10B in LB.</li>
+
</ol> <br>
+
  
 
<h4>Week 9.</h4><ol>
 
<h4>Week 9.</h4><ol>
<li> We did an experiment to know that coculture of <em>E. coli</em> and <em>Shewanella</em> raises electricity.</li>
+
 
<li> We could not see any differences in our experiment.</li>
+
<li>After the re-failure of transformation on the 8th week, we found out another protocol and constructed a new competent cell and performed an experiment once again.</li>
<li> Electrode of MFC is changed to a carbon paper.</li>
+
<li>Our professor revised the previously designed detecting device.</li>
<li> Carbon paper's back is laminated with coating paper.</li>
+
<li>We ordered forward and reverse primer for PCR of hssR and hssS from the IDT.</li>
 +
<li>We also ordered sequences of hrtR promoter and HrtR protein attached with iGEM prefix and suffix.</li>
 
</ol> <br>
 
</ol> <br>
  
 
<h4>Week 10.</h4><ol>
 
<h4>Week 10.</h4><ol>
<li> Carbon paper MFC's current is less than last MFC.</li>
+
We requested for <em>Bacillus cereus</em> ATCC from Korean Collection for Type Culture(KCTC) 14579.
<li> Inner solution of MFC was leaked.</li>
+
<li> So I made a new MFC with waterproof silicon adhesive, not glue gun.</li>
+
 
</ol> <br>
 
</ol> <br>
  
 
<h4>Week 11.</h4><ol>
 
<h4>Week 11.</h4><ol>
<li> I found that ferricyanide ion turn into ferrocyanide ion, and the color changed from yellow to blue.</li>
+
<li>We cultured freeze-drying <em>B. cereus</em> from KCTC on Nutrient Agar broth KCTC and got a single colony.</li>
<li> Therefore, the color of cathode changed to green.</li>
+
<li>We ordered psH71 replicon of Lactic Acid Bacteria from IDT.</li>
 
</ol> <br>
 
</ol> <br>
  
<h4>Week 12.</h4>
+
<h4>Week 12.</h4><ol>
No experiment due to seminar.
+
<li>gBlock and primer which we ordered from IDT at week 9 have arrived.</li>
  <br>
+
<li>gDNA of <em>B. cereus</em> was extracted.</li>
 +
<li>we processed the PCR, using gDNA and primer but the band corresponding to HssRS was not detected on gel electrophoresis.</li>
 +
  </ol><br>
  
<h4>Week 13, 14, 15</h4>
+
<h4>Week 13.</h4><ol>
No experiment due to hospitalization.
+
<li>Retried PCR but failed.</li>
  <br>
+
<li>We requested BBa_K1033282 to the iGEM Headquarter.</li>
 +
  </ol><br>
  
<h4>Week 16.</h4><ol>
+
<h4>Week 14.</h4><ol>
<li> We studied a paper that fixation of diaphorase onto electrodes.</li>
+
<li>We selected three preexisting part from the iGEM distribuition kit for
<li> But experiments were too complicated, so we gave up.</li>
+
Characterization.</li>
</ol> <br>
+
<li>BBa_K1033282 arrived from iGEM HQ.</li>
 
+
<li>We cultured <em>E. coli</em> Dh5alpha from our cell stock, and made heat-shock competent cell.</li>
<h4>Week 17, 18</h4><ol>
+
<li>We cloned hrtR gBlock in the pSB1C3 vector.</li>
<li> We did an MFC validation with <em>Shewanella</em>, phosphate buffer saline(PBS), and galactose.</li>
+
</ol><br>
<li> We did same experiment 3 times.</li>
+
</ol>.<br>
+
+
<h4>Week 19.</h4><ol>
+
<li> I changed the mulitimeter's circuit to test 5 fuel cell at the same time.</li>
+
<li> We did EFC test with 3 sample, <em>E. coli</em>(Diaphorase expressing), yeast, and <em>E. coli</em>(Diaphorase expressing) + yeast.</li>
+
<li> All cells was lysed by ultrasonication.</li>
+
</ol> <br>
+
  
<h4>Week 20.</h4><ol>
+
<h4>Week 15.</h4><ol>
<li> We did similar experiment with last week, but sample was treated with centrifuge.</li>
+
<li>We transformed four existing part in the DH5 alpha and confirmed that two parts, BBa_K1033282, BBa_K1696009 had succeeded transforming.</li>
<li> We thought that the agarase in anolyte can react with agar in salt bridge, so we paste cellophane membrane at anode part of salt bridge. Cellophane membrane was fixed by 15mL Falcon tube's cap.</li>
+
<li>The cloning of gBlock also succeeded.</li>
<li> Part cloning was done</li>
+
 
</ol><br>
 
</ol><br>
  
<h4>Week 21.</h4><ol>
+
<h4>Week 16.</h4><ol>
<li> I made 6 new device. The parts with pasted with glue gun was melted during autoclaving, so I changed it with waterproof silicon adhesive.</li>
+
<li>Seed culture of the DH5alpha which has BBa_K1033282(amilCP), was done.</li>  
<li> We did a MFC validation with <em>Shewanella</em>, <em>E. coli</em> BW25113, and a control group(No cells).</li>
+
<li>OD588 was measured at 20 min interval on preparatory experiments.</li>
<li> We did the experiment 3 times.</li>
+
<li>Although pSB1C3 was inserted, additional TA cloning was done since it was hard to sort colonies not having the gBlock.</li>  
 
</ol> <br>
 
</ol> <br>
  
<h4>Week 22.</h4><ol>
+
<h4>Week 17.</h4><ol>
<li> We did an EFC validation this week.</li>
+
<li>We cultured BBa_K1033282 inserted DH5alpha and measured absorbance of OD588(maximum absorbance) and OD800(cell concentration) in 30 minute interval.</li>
<li> Transformed <em>E. coli</em> treated with arabinose or IPTG induction depending on its function.</li>
+
<li>We drew graphs showing the change of OD588 in accordance to time, the change of OD588/OD800 ratio to time, and change of OD588 in accordance to OD800 value.</li>
<li> We did the experiment 3 times.</li>
+
<li>We uploaded these graphs and photos on the wiki main page of BBa_K1033282.</li>
</ol> <br>
+
<li>We acquired pSB1C3 with HrtR gblock inserted as a result of TA cloning.</li>
 +
<li>We digested this by restriction enzyme again, and confirmed the size of the digested DNA fragment.</li>
 +
<li>We submitted pSB1C3-hrtR to the iGEM HQ.</li>
  
<h4>Week 23.</h4><ol>
 
<li> The EFC validation graph looks strange.</li>
 
<li> Our professor told us that the amount of NADH might be too small.</li>
 
<li> So we did the experiment again with adding some NADH.</li>
 
</ol> <br>
 
 
<h4>Week 24.</h4><ol>
 
<li> We created the whole EMFC system, and we measure the voltage. External resistance was 1,000 Ohm.</li>
 
<li> We draw the graph of EMFC, and compared with contrast.</li>
 
 
</ol><br>
 
</ol><br>
 
  
 
</div></div></div></div>
 
</div></div></div></div>

Latest revision as of 09:36, 28 October 2017

Notebook

Notebook

Week 1.

  1. We researched several gastrointesintal diseases and its causes.
  2. Additionally, we researched existing diagnostic methods used in detecting these diseases.

Week 2.

  1. We looked for gut microbiome distribution in the gut and bacterias that are currently verified and utilized in probiotics.
  2. Also, we chose heme, pH, bile salt as our target indicator, which could detect the diseases we previously researched on the first week.

Week 3.

    We designed a detector device based on analyzation of prior research about sensing heme, pH, and bile salt.

Week 4.

  1. We received Lactobacillus plantarum L67 from professor Se Jong Oh of Chunnam University, and cultured them in MRS media.
  2. We collected single colony from them and cultured it.
  3. We then cultured these bacteria in culture medium that contain ampicillin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, gentamycin, rifampicin, streptomycin, kanamycin, and tested antibiotic resistance.

Week 5.

  1. Our Professor gave us a feedback on the experiment conducted in week 4. Based on the feedback, we revised the problematic part and conducted the experiment again.
  2. We compared the test result and verified antibiotic resistance data of L. plantarum, and checked if the right bacteria was cultured.
  3. We researched on transformation protocol of Lactobacillus transformation and referenced protocol of Eppendorf.

Week 6.

  1. We selected the gram positive-E. coli shuttle vector for the transformation of the Lactobacillus Plantarum L67
  2. After taking the shuttle vector out from stock, heat-shock transformation to E. coli BW25113 was processed to amplify the vector. vector was extracted by mini-prep method.
  3. We measured the concentration and the checked the size of the outcome using gel electrophoresis.

Week 7.

  1. Lactobacillus Plantarum L67 Electroporation competent cell was produced. (Eppendorf protocol was referred)
  2. We tried to transform previously amplified vector to the competent cell at various voltages and amounts of vector.
  3. Result was checked using the selective culture.

Week 8.

    After the failure of transformation on the 7th week, we re-constructed competent cell and carried out another experiment.

Week 9.

  1. After the re-failure of transformation on the 8th week, we found out another protocol and constructed a new competent cell and performed an experiment once again.
  2. Our professor revised the previously designed detecting device.
  3. We ordered forward and reverse primer for PCR of hssR and hssS from the IDT.
  4. We also ordered sequences of hrtR promoter and HrtR protein attached with iGEM prefix and suffix.

Week 10.

    We requested for Bacillus cereus ATCC from Korean Collection for Type Culture(KCTC) 14579.

Week 11.

  1. We cultured freeze-drying B. cereus from KCTC on Nutrient Agar broth KCTC and got a single colony.
  2. We ordered psH71 replicon of Lactic Acid Bacteria from IDT.

Week 12.

  1. gBlock and primer which we ordered from IDT at week 9 have arrived.
  2. gDNA of B. cereus was extracted.
  3. we processed the PCR, using gDNA and primer but the band corresponding to HssRS was not detected on gel electrophoresis.

Week 13.

  1. Retried PCR but failed.
  2. We requested BBa_K1033282 to the iGEM Headquarter.

Week 14.

  1. We selected three preexisting part from the iGEM distribuition kit for Characterization.
  2. BBa_K1033282 arrived from iGEM HQ.
  3. We cultured E. coli Dh5alpha from our cell stock, and made heat-shock competent cell.
  4. We cloned hrtR gBlock in the pSB1C3 vector.

Week 15.

  1. We transformed four existing part in the DH5 alpha and confirmed that two parts, BBa_K1033282, BBa_K1696009 had succeeded transforming.
  2. The cloning of gBlock also succeeded.

Week 16.

  1. Seed culture of the DH5alpha which has BBa_K1033282(amilCP), was done.
  2. OD588 was measured at 20 min interval on preparatory experiments.
  3. Although pSB1C3 was inserted, additional TA cloning was done since it was hard to sort colonies not having the gBlock.

Week 17.

  1. We cultured BBa_K1033282 inserted DH5alpha and measured absorbance of OD588(maximum absorbance) and OD800(cell concentration) in 30 minute interval.
  2. We drew graphs showing the change of OD588 in accordance to time, the change of OD588/OD800 ratio to time, and change of OD588 in accordance to OD800 value.
  3. We uploaded these graphs and photos on the wiki main page of BBa_K1033282.
  4. We acquired pSB1C3 with HrtR gblock inserted as a result of TA cloning.
  5. We digested this by restriction enzyme again, and confirmed the size of the digested DNA fragment.
  6. We submitted pSB1C3-hrtR to the iGEM HQ.