Difference between revisions of "Team:WLC-Milwaukee/Background"
JackBechtel (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<h2> Bacteriophage Based Biosensors </h2> | <h2> Bacteriophage Based Biosensors </h2> | ||
| − | <p> While the use of bacteriophages or their receptor binding proteins (RBPs) as a biosensor is not a novel technique, our bacteriophage tail biosensor is essential because it allows for the detection of <i>E. coli</i> using a colorimetric assay. Some previous studies using bacteriophages as a biosensor have required the use of fluorescence and portable flow-cytometry for detection [1]. While techniques such as these are highly sensitive, the instruments required for such detection are rarely accessible to the average person. Derda et.al. developed a technique which requires that the bacteria be infected with the bacteriophage before detection can take place [2]. However, our concept does not require and indeed it is incapable of infection. Thus, if any <i>E. coli</i> is present in sample, our sensor won’t affect the potential signal. In addition, our sensor will rely on a substrate and the use of horse radish peroxidase (HRP) to produce a detectable color change. This color change could either be observed with the naked eye at a testing site or quantified in a laboratory using photospectroscopy. Ultimately, there is a wide variety of bacteriophage based biosensor techniques that have been documented in the scientific literature [3]. However, very few of these diagnostic techniques have made any major impacts either in water testing or in other applicable fields such as medicine, agricultural, and food science [3]. Our project simply aims to provide a fast and easy to use alternative. <p> | + | <p> While the use of bacteriophages or their receptor binding proteins (RBPs) as a biosensor is not a novel technique, our bacteriophage tail biosensor is essential because it allows for the detection of <i>E. coli</i> using a colorimetric assay. Some previous studies using bacteriophages as a biosensor have required the use of fluorescence and portable flow-cytometry for detection [1]. While techniques such as these are highly sensitive, the instruments required for such detection are rarely accessible to the average person. Derda et.al. developed a technique which requires that the bacteria be infected with the bacteriophage before detection can take place [2]. However, our concept does not require and indeed it is incapable of infection. Thus, if any <i>E. coli</i> is present in sample, our sensor won’t affect the potential signal. In addition, our sensor will rely on a substrate and the use of horse radish peroxidase (HRP) to produce a detectable color change. This color change could either be observed with the naked eye at a testing site or quantified in a laboratory using photospectroscopy. Ultimately, there is a wide variety of bacteriophage based biosensor techniques that have been documented in the scientific literature [3]. However, very few of these diagnostic techniques have made any major impacts either in water testing or in other applicable fields such as medicine, agricultural, and food science [3]. Our project simply aims to provide a fast and easy to use alternative. </p> |
<p> [1] http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0131466 <p> | <p> [1] http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0131466 <p> | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <h2> Water contamination</h1> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <p> Two billion people worldwide are utilizing contaminated drinking water (3). Water can be easily contaminated, so the importance of testing drinking water is crucial. Contaminated water, namely polluted with fecal matter, is a critical issue because it is a source of bacteria which can cause serious diseases. | ||
| + | Water can be contaminated with untreated waste in a variety of different ways. Storms can cause sewers to overflow, allowing untreated matter to run off into rivers. The Journal Sentinel reported that last year, “109.4 million gallons of untreated wastewater spilled into local waterways and Lake Michigan in overflows of combined sanitary and storm sewers during two heavy rain storms,” (4). Heavy rainfall can also cause runoff in fields fertilized with manure. Pollution can also come from wild animals (2). Because flooding and the instincts of wild animals cannot always be controlled, contaminated water is an issue. | ||
| + | Fecally contaminated water contains lots of bacteria. Since not every single type of bacteria can be monitored effectively, it is helpful to use an indicator. In the United States, testing for indicators is used for a variety of reasons: seeing if drinking water is safe from a microbiological standpoint, making sure the water was treated correctly, making sure that the water maintains its status of treatment as it is distributed, and making sure that recreational water is safe (6). E. coli is an example of an indicator of pathogenic fecal matter in water (2). These pathogenic bacteria can cause a number of diseases, which can even lead to death. One common side effect of polluted water is diarrhea. According to the head of the World Health Organization’s health department, 500,000 deaths are caused by diarrhea from contaminated water every year (3). More serious diseases include Cholera, Dysentery, Typhoid, Hepatitis A, Bacterial Gastroenteritis, and Polio (2, 3). Some different diseases can be caused by contaminated water in tropical areas, such as Intestinal Worms, Schistosomiasis, and Trachoma (3). There are vaccines available for some of these diseases, but being aware of the cleanliness of the water people are drinking is a better prevention measure. | ||
| + | |||
| + | (1) https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?dirEntryId=196784 | ||
| + | (2) http://www.water-research.net/index.php/e-coli-in-water | ||
| + | (3) http://www.dw.com/en/new-who-report-raises-alarm-on-dirty-water/a-38408329 | ||
| + | (4) http://www.jsonline.com/story/news/local/milwaukee/2017/01/05/mmsd-treated-998-wastewater-2016/96197894/ | ||
| + | (5) https://www.mmsd.com/what-we-do/wastewater-treatment/overflows | ||
| + | (6) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK215658/ | ||
| + | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> <!-- #content_wrapper --> | </div> <!-- #content_wrapper --> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
{{WLC-Milwaukee/Footer}} | {{WLC-Milwaukee/Footer}} | ||
Revision as of 02:55, 29 October 2017
Background
Bacteriophage Based Biosensors
While the use of bacteriophages or their receptor binding proteins (RBPs) as a biosensor is not a novel technique, our bacteriophage tail biosensor is essential because it allows for the detection of E. coli using a colorimetric assay. Some previous studies using bacteriophages as a biosensor have required the use of fluorescence and portable flow-cytometry for detection [1]. While techniques such as these are highly sensitive, the instruments required for such detection are rarely accessible to the average person. Derda et.al. developed a technique which requires that the bacteria be infected with the bacteriophage before detection can take place [2]. However, our concept does not require and indeed it is incapable of infection. Thus, if any E. coli is present in sample, our sensor won’t affect the potential signal. In addition, our sensor will rely on a substrate and the use of horse radish peroxidase (HRP) to produce a detectable color change. This color change could either be observed with the naked eye at a testing site or quantified in a laboratory using photospectroscopy. Ultimately, there is a wide variety of bacteriophage based biosensor techniques that have been documented in the scientific literature [3]. However, very few of these diagnostic techniques have made any major impacts either in water testing or in other applicable fields such as medicine, agricultural, and food science [3]. Our project simply aims to provide a fast and easy to use alternative.
[1] http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0131466
[2] http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ac400961b
[3] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3442824/
Water contamination
Two billion people worldwide are utilizing contaminated drinking water (3). Water can be easily contaminated, so the importance of testing drinking water is crucial. Contaminated water, namely polluted with fecal matter, is a critical issue because it is a source of bacteria which can cause serious diseases. Water can be contaminated with untreated waste in a variety of different ways. Storms can cause sewers to overflow, allowing untreated matter to run off into rivers. The Journal Sentinel reported that last year, “109.4 million gallons of untreated wastewater spilled into local waterways and Lake Michigan in overflows of combined sanitary and storm sewers during two heavy rain storms,” (4). Heavy rainfall can also cause runoff in fields fertilized with manure. Pollution can also come from wild animals (2). Because flooding and the instincts of wild animals cannot always be controlled, contaminated water is an issue. Fecally contaminated water contains lots of bacteria. Since not every single type of bacteria can be monitored effectively, it is helpful to use an indicator. In the United States, testing for indicators is used for a variety of reasons: seeing if drinking water is safe from a microbiological standpoint, making sure the water was treated correctly, making sure that the water maintains its status of treatment as it is distributed, and making sure that recreational water is safe (6). E. coli is an example of an indicator of pathogenic fecal matter in water (2). These pathogenic bacteria can cause a number of diseases, which can even lead to death. One common side effect of polluted water is diarrhea. According to the head of the World Health Organization’s health department, 500,000 deaths are caused by diarrhea from contaminated water every year (3). More serious diseases include Cholera, Dysentery, Typhoid, Hepatitis A, Bacterial Gastroenteritis, and Polio (2, 3). Some different diseases can be caused by contaminated water in tropical areas, such as Intestinal Worms, Schistosomiasis, and Trachoma (3). There are vaccines available for some of these diseases, but being aware of the cleanliness of the water people are drinking is a better prevention measure. (1) https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?dirEntryId=196784 (2) http://www.water-research.net/index.php/e-coli-in-water (3) http://www.dw.com/en/new-who-report-raises-alarm-on-dirty-water/a-38408329 (4) http://www.jsonline.com/story/news/local/milwaukee/2017/01/05/mmsd-treated-998-wastewater-2016/96197894/ (5) https://www.mmsd.com/what-we-do/wastewater-treatment/overflows (6) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK215658/
