Difference between revisions of "Template:Team:Utrecht/MainBody"

Line 974: Line 974:
 
<b>AsCpf1:</b>
 
<b>AsCpf1:</b>
 
<ol>
 
<ol>
<li>PCR was performed using the following plasmid and primers, to create a fragment containing Cpf1 with a C-terminal Histag and overlap region for the final backbone plasmid.<br>
+
<li>PCR was performed using the following plasmid and primers, to create a fragment containing Cpf1 with a C-terminal Histag and overlap region for the final backbone plasmid <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b4/Cpf1_PCR_protocol.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a>.<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Plasmid: Lenti-AsCpf1-Blast (from Addgene, nr: 84750)<br>
+
<pre style="margin-top: 10px;">Plasmid: Lenti-AsCpf1-Blast (from Addgene, nr: 84750)
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Fw primer 5’-3’: TCATCGAGGAGGACAAGGCCC<br>
+
Fw primer 5’-3’: TCATCGAGGAGGACAAGGCCC
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Rv primer 5’-3’: GCCGCTTACTTGTACTTAATGATGATGATGATGATGGCCG CCGCCGTTGCGCAGCTCCTGGATGTAG<br>
+
Rv primer 5’-3’: GCCGCTTACTTGTACTTAATGATGATGATGATGATGGCCG CCGCCGTTGCGCAGCTCCTGGATGTAG</pre><br>
Protocol: <a target=_BLANK href="" class="pdf"></a> Experimental\Protocols\Wiki ready\Cpf1 PCR protocol.pdf
+
 
</li>
 
</li>
<li>gBlock containing a kozak sequence, signal sequence and overlap regions with the backbone and Cpf1 was ordered from IDT. See snapgene file below for sequence</li>
+
<li>gBlock containing a kozak sequence, signal sequence and overlap regions with the backbone and Cpf1 was ordered from IDT. See snapgene file below for sequence.</li>
<li>In-Fusion Cloning was then performed using AgeI and BsrGI to linearize the backbone plasmid and the two previously created fragments.<br>
+
<li>In-Fusion Cloning was then performed using AgeI and BsrGI to linearize the backbone plasmid and the two previously created fragments <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/c9/UU_InFusion_protocol_v2.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a>.<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Plasmid: pCAGGS_eGFP
+
<pre style="margin-top: 10px;">Plasmid: pCAGGS_eGFP</per><br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Protocol: Experimental\Protocols\Wiki ready\InFusion protocol v2.pdf
+
 
</li>
 
</li>
 
</ol>
 
</ol>
Line 991: Line 989:
 
<b>Cas9:</b>
 
<b>Cas9:</b>
 
<ol>
 
<ol>
<li>PCR was performed using the following plasmid and primers, to create a fragment containing Cas9 with a C-terminal Histag and overlap region for the final backbone plasmid.<br>
+
<li>PCR was performed using the following plasmid and primers, to create a fragment containing Cas9 with a C-terminal Histag and overlap region for the final backbone plasmid <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/cd/UU_Cas9_PCR_protocol.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a>.<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Plasmid: Lenti-Cas9-Blast (from Addgene, nr: 52962)<br>
+
<pre style="margin-top: 10px;">Plasmid: Lenti-Cas9-Blast (from Addgene, nr: 52962)
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Fw primer 5’-3’: ATTCAAGGTGCTGGGCAACAC<br>
+
Fw primer 5’-3’: ATTCAAGGTGCTGGGCAACAC
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Rv primer 5’-3’: GCCGCTTACTTGTACTTAATGATGATGATGATGATGGCCG CCGCCGTCGCCTCCCAGCTGAGACA<br>
+
Rv primer 5’-3’: GCCGCTTACTTGTACTTAATGATGATGATGATGATGGCCG CCGCCGTCGCCTCCCAGCTGAGACA</pre><br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Protocol: Experimental\Protocols\Wiki ready\Cas9 PCR protocol.pdf
+
 
</li>
 
</li>
<li>PCR was performed to create a second fragment containing a kozak region, the signal sequence and the first part of Cas9 (without its methionine).<br>
+
<li>PCR was performed to create a second fragment containing a kozak region, the signal sequence and the first part of Cas9 (without its methionine) <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/81/UU_-_PCR_Cas9_gBlock.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a>.<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Plasmid: Lenti-Cas9-Blast (from Addgene)<br>
+
<pre style="margin-top: 10px;">Plasmid: Lenti-Cas9-Blast (from Addgene)
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Fw primer 5’-3’: CCCGGGATCCACCGGTGCCGCCACCATGGCGTGG ACCAGCCTGATTCTGAGCCTGCTGGCGCTGTGCAGCGGCGCGAGCAGCG ACAAGAAGTACAGCATCGGCCTG<br>
+
Fw primer 5’-3’: CCCGGGATCCACCGGTGCCGCCACCATGGCGTGG ACCAGCCTGATTCTGAGCCTGCTGGCGCTGTGCAGCGGCGCGAGCAGCG ACAAGAAGTACAGCATCGGCCTG
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Rv primer 5’-3’: CCCAGCACCTTGAATTTCTTGCTG<br>
+
Rv primer 5’-3’: CCCAGCACCTTGAATTTCTTGCTG</pre><br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Protocol: Experimental\Protocols\Wiki ready\PCR Cas9 gBlock.pdf
+
 
</li>
 
</li>
<li>In-Fusion Cloning was then performed using AgeI and BsrGI to linearize the backbone plasmid and the two previously created fragments.<br>
+
<li>In-Fusion Cloning was then performed using AgeI and BsrGI to linearize the backbone plasmid and the two previously created fragments <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/c9/UU_InFusion_protocol_v2.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a>.<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Plasmid: pCAGGS_eGFP<br>
+
<pre style="margin-top: 10px;">Plasmid: pCAGGS_eGFP</pre><br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Protocol: Experimental\Protocols\Wiki ready\InFusionprococol v2.pdf
+
 
</li>
 
</li>
 
</ol>
 
</ol>
Line 1,012: Line 1,007:
  
 
SECTION 2: TRANSFECTION INTO HEK293T CELLS<br>
 
SECTION 2: TRANSFECTION INTO HEK293T CELLS<br>
HEK293t cells were cultured according to cell culture protocol [Experimental\Protocols\Wiki ready\Cell culture protocol.pdf]. We transfected the cells with the midiprepped plasmids according to the Lipofectamine 2000 transfection protocol [Experimental\Protocols\Wiki ready\Lipofectamine 2000 transfection protocol.pdf].  
+
HEK293t cells were cultured according to the cell culture protocol <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/2e/UU_Cell_culture_protocol.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a>. We transfected the cells with the midiprepped plasmids according to the Lipofectamine 2000 transfection protocol [Experimental\Protocols\Wiki ready\Lipofectamine 2000 transfection protocol.pdf].  
 
For protein purification under denaturing conditions, HEK cells in 6 wellplate wells were transfected. For protein purification under native conditions, HEK cells in 10 cm petridishes were cotransfected (9:1 plasmid of interest : plasmid containing GFP).  
 
For protein purification under denaturing conditions, HEK cells in 6 wellplate wells were transfected. For protein purification under native conditions, HEK cells in 10 cm petridishes were cotransfected (9:1 plasmid of interest : plasmid containing GFP).  
  
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
 
SECTION 3: PROTEIN PURIFICATION UNDER DENATURING CONDITIONS<br>
 
SECTION 3: PROTEIN PURIFICATION UNDER DENATURING CONDITIONS<br>
Secreted and His-tagged Cas9 and Cpf1, which will be referred to as sCas9 and sCpf1, respectively, were purified from the medium using Ni-bead purification, according to protocol [Google Drive\iGEM 2017\Experimental\Protocols\Wiki ready\Purification of cells and medium secreted cpf1 and cas9.pdf]. Also, whole-cell lysates were made, following the same protocol, to check for possible accumulation of sCas9 or sCpf1 in HEK293t cells.
+
Secreted and His-tagged Cas9 and Cpf1, which will be referred to as sCas9 and sCpf1, respectively, were purified from the medium using Ni-bead purification, according to protocol <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/41/Purification_of_cells_and_medium_secreted_cpf1_and_cas9.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a>. Also, whole-cell lysates were made, following the same protocol, to check for possible accumulation of sCas9 or sCpf1 in HEK293t cells.
  
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
 
SECTION 4: VERIFYING THE PRESENCE OF HIS-TAGGED PROTEINS IN THE MEDIUM<br>
 
SECTION 4: VERIFYING THE PRESENCE OF HIS-TAGGED PROTEINS IN THE MEDIUM<br>
The presence of sCas9 and sCpf1 was verified using SDS-PAGE and Western Blots. Proteins were separated using SDS-PAGE using the following protocol [Google Drive\iGEM 2017\Experimental\Protocols\Wiki ready\General Protocol_ SDS-PAGE & Western Blot.pdf].  
+
The presence of sCas9 and sCpf1 was verified using SDS-PAGE and Western Blots. Proteins were separated using SDS-PAGE using the following protocol <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/ab/General_Protocol_SDS-PAGE_Western_Blot.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a>.  
10% acrylamide running gels, and stacking gels were made according to the following protocol [Google Drive\iGEM 2017\Experimental\Protocols\Wiki ready\Preparing SDS-PAGE gels.pdf]. Western Blots were carried out according to the same protocol as for the SDS-PAGE.  
+
10% acrylamide running gels, and stacking gels were made according to the following protocol <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b1/Preparing_SDS-PAGE_gels.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a>. Western Blots were carried out according to the same protocol as for the SDS-PAGE.  
The secreted proteins were incubated with mouse anti-His6x (using dilutions of 1:2000 and 1:5000) and rabbit anti-Cas9 or rabbit anti-Cpf1 (using dilutions of 1:2000). The secondary antibody wa      s a goat anti-mouse for the Histag and goat anti-rabbit for both Cas9 and Cpf1, with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate to verify the presence of secreted proteins.  
+
The secreted proteins were incubated with mouse anti-His6x (using dilutions of 1:2000 and 1:5000) and rabbit anti-Cas9 or rabbit anti-Cpf1 (using dilutions of 1:2000). The secondary antibody was a goat anti-mouse for the Histag and goat anti-rabbit for both Cas9 and Cpf1, with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate to verify the presence of secreted proteins.  
  
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
 
SECTION 5: PROTEIN PURIFICATION UNDER NATIVE CONDITIONS<br>
 
SECTION 5: PROTEIN PURIFICATION UNDER NATIVE CONDITIONS<br>
Proteins were purified using Ni-NTA superflow columns, according to the following protocol   [Google Drive\iGEM 2017\Experimental\Protocols\Wiki ready\Ni-NTA superflow colums protocol]. No imidazole in the pre- and washing buffers was used. Additionally, 50 ul samples were taken of the pellet, supernatant, filtered supernatant, and the runthrough.
+
Proteins were purified using Ni-NTA superflow columns, according to the following protocol <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/fa/UU_Ni-NTA_superflow_colums_protocol.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a>. No imidazole in the pre- and washing buffers was used. Additionally, 50 ul samples were taken of the pellet, supernatant, filtered supernatant, and the runthrough.
Whole cell lysates were made using protocol [Google Drive\iGEM 2017\Experimental\Protocols\Wiki ready\Purification of cells and medium secreted cpf1 and cas9.pdf] to check for possible accumulation of sCas9 or sCpf1 in Hek293t cells.  
+
Whole cell lysates were made using protocol <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/41/Purification_of_cells_and_medium_secreted_cpf1_and_cas9.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a> to check for possible accumulation of sCas9 or sCpf1 in Hek293t cells.  
  
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
 
SECTION 6: IN VITRO ENDONUCLEASE ACTIVITY ASSAY<br>
 
SECTION 6: IN VITRO ENDONUCLEASE ACTIVITY ASSAY<br>
After successful purification of sCas9-His6x and sCpf1-His6x and subsequent verification of the presence of the aforementioned proteins, an in vitro endonuclease activity assay was carried out. The in vitro endonuclease activity assay was used to assess whether or not our secreted and, in all likelihood, glycosylated sCas9-His6x and sCpf1-His6x would still exhibit sgRNA-binding- and endonuclease activity. The assay was executed according to the protocol [Google Drive\iGEM 2017\Experimental\Protocols\Wiki ready\Nuclease activity assay.pdf]. Linearized plasmid 51-dPAM (823 bp) [Google Drive\iGEM 2017\Experimental\SnapGene\Secreted Cas  or Cpf\Endonuclease Activity Assay\1_8_2017\51_dPAM 800bp.dna] was used as the target for sCas9-His6x and His6x-Cpf1. Two sgRNAs were used that were tailored to be bound by either Cas9 or Cpf1: [iGEM 2017\Experimental\SnapGene\Secreted Cas  or Cpf\Endonuclease Activity Assay\SpCas9_gRNA1_Tet-luc.dna] and [iGEM 2017\Experimental\SnapGene\Secreted Cas  or Cpf\Endonuclease Activity Assay\AsCpf1_sgRNA.dna] , respectively. Both sgRNAs were complementary to roughly the same region of the aforementioned linearized plasmid, which would result in two cut fragments of ~260 bp and ~560 bp for both His6x-Cas9 and His6x-Cpf1. The efficacy of these sgRNAs, both in binding to the target region in the linearized plasmid, and binding to either Cas9 or Cpf1 were also assessed. As positive controls we used unmodified Cas9 and Cpf1 produced by Escherichia coli, coupled with their respective sgRNAs and the linearized target plasmid. The negative controls consisted of the linearized plasmid with either Cas9 or Cpf1 without sgRNA, and a third negative control with the linearized plasmid only. Subsequently, the samples were separated by DNA gel  
+
After successful purification of sCas9-His6x and sCpf1-His6x and subsequent verification of the presence of the aforementioned proteins, an in vitro endonuclease activity assay was carried out. The in vitro endonuclease activity assay was used to assess whether or not our secreted and, in all likelihood, glycosylated sCas9-His6x and sCpf1-His6x would still exhibit sgRNA-binding- and endonuclease activity. The assay was executed according to the protocol <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/12/Nuclease_activity_assay_-_assay_UU.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a>.  
 +
Linearized plasmid 51-dPAM (823 bp) <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/3/3c/51_dPAM_800bp.zip" class="zip zip-inline"></a> was used as the target for sCas9-His6x and His6x-Cpf1. Two sgRNAs were used that were tailored to be bound by either Cas9 or Cpf1: <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/9d/SpCas9_gRNA1_Tet-luc.zip" class="zip zip-inline"></a> and <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/5e/Ascpf1_sgRNA.zip" class="zip zip-inline"></a>, respectively. Both sgRNAs were complementary to roughly the same region of the aforementioned linearized plasmid, which would result in two cut fragments of ~260 bp and ~560 bp for both His6x-Cas9 and His6x-Cpf1. The efficacy of these sgRNAs, both in binding to the target region in the linearized plasmid, and binding to either Cas9 or Cpf1 were also assessed. As positive controls we used unmodified Cas9 and Cpf1 produced by Escherichia coli, coupled with their respective sgRNAs and the linearized target plasmid. The negative controls consisted of the linearized plasmid with either Cas9 or Cpf1 without sgRNA, and a third negative control with the linearized plasmid only. Subsequently, the samples were separated by DNA gel electrophoresis.
  
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
Line 1,219: Line 1,215:
  
 
In conclusion, the MESA system still needs tuning to function in our lab. The  best option would be to use the same transfection method as the original authors did and use the exact same amounts of each plasmid. To be sure, DMEM medium could be used rather than mEF. If it does not work in spite of these changes, it is important to look for other potential reasons.  
 
In conclusion, the MESA system still needs tuning to function in our lab. The  best option would be to use the same transfection method as the original authors did and use the exact same amounts of each plasmid. To be sure, DMEM medium could be used rather than mEF. If it does not work in spite of these changes, it is important to look for other potential reasons.  
 +
 +
<br><br>
 +
<h2 class="subhead" id="subhead-7">References</h2>
  
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
Line 1,248: Line 1,247:
 
<pre>
 
<pre>
 
dCAS9 D10A fw 5’-3’: tacagcatcggcctggcaatcggcaccaactctg
 
dCAS9 D10A fw 5’-3’: tacagcatcggcctggcaatcggcaccaactctg
dCAS9 D10A rv 5’-3’: cagagttggtgccgattgccaggccgatgctgta
+
dCAS9 D10A rv 5’-3’: cagagttggtgccgattgccaggccgatgctgta
  
 
dCAS9 H840A fw 5’-3’: cgactacgatgtggacgctatcgtgcctcagagc
 
dCAS9 H840A fw 5’-3’: cgactacgatgtggacgctatcgtgcctcagagc
dCAs9 H840A rv 5’-3’: gctctgaggcacgatagcgtccacatcgtagtcg
+
dCAs9 H840A rv 5’-3’: gctctgaggcacgatagcgtccacatcgtagtcg
  
dCpf1 D908A fw 5’-3’: ctatcatcggcatcgctcggggcgagagaaa
+
dCpf1 D908A fw 5’-3’: ctatcatcggcatcgctcggggcgagagaaa
dCpf1 D908A rv 5’-3’: tttctctcgccccgagcgatgccgatgatag
+
dCpf1 D908A rv 5’-3’: tttctctcgccccgagcgatgccgatgatag
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
Line 1,692: Line 1,691:
 
#modal-content>h2 { border-bottom: 1px solid #dedede; padding-bottom: 10px; }
 
#modal-content>h2 { border-bottom: 1px solid #dedede; padding-bottom: 10px; }
  
.pdf { display: inline-block; width: 24px; height: 24px; background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/6a/Uupdf.png) no-repeat; vertical-align: bottom; }
+
.pdf { display: inline-block; font-size: 12px; margin: 10px 0 10px 0; padding-left: 30px; height: 24px; background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/6a/Uupdf.png) top left no-repeat; vertical-align: bottom; }
 +
.pdf { text-decoration: none; }
 +
.pdf:hover { text-decoration: underline; }
 +
.pdf-inline { margin: 0; padding-left: 24px; text-decoration: none !important; }
 +
 
 +
.zip { display: inline-block; font-size: 12px; margin: 10px 0 10px 0; padding-left: 30px; height: 24px; background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/c3/UUSnapGene_Viewer_24.png) top left no-repeat; vertical-align: bottom; }
 +
.zip { text-decoration: none; }
 +
.zip:hover { text-decoration: underline; }
 +
.zip-inline { margin: 0; padding-left: 24px; text-decoration: none !important; }
 
</style>
 
</style>
  
Line 3,558: Line 3,565:
 
   box-shadow: 0 1px 3px -1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.6);
 
   box-shadow: 0 1px 3px -1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.6);
 
}
 
}
.timeline a:hover, a:active, a:focus {
+
.timeline a:hover, .timeline a:active, .timeline a:focus {
 
   background: #32408f;
 
   background: #32408f;
 
   color: #FFFFFF;
 
   color: #FFFFFF;

Revision as of 16:29, 31 October 2017

<!DOCTYPE html>

Cas9 & Cpf1 secretion
and activity
Comparison of endonuclease activity for Cas9 and Cpf1 that has been produced in, and excreted by, HEK293 cells.
MESA two-component system replication
Details on the MESA two-component system, explanation of its relation to our design and the results of its reproduction.
OUTCASST system production
Detailed explanation of the OUTCASST mechanism, experimental progress and technical prospects.
Modeling and
mathematics
Ordinary differential equations, cellular automaton and an object based model for optimal linker-length estimation.
InterLab study participation
Results and details of our measurements for the iGEM 2017 InterLab Study.
Stakeholders & opinions
Interviews and dialogues with stakeholders, potential users, third parties and experts relating to pathogen detection or DNA-based diagnostics.
Risks & safety-issues
Implications and design considerations relating to safety in the usage and implementation of OUTCASST as a diagnostics tool.
Design & integration
OUTCASST toolkit and product design with factors such as bio-safety and user-friendliness taken into account.
Outreach
Videos we made for the dutch public, together with 'de Kennis van Nu'.
Meet our team
About us, our interests and roles in the team and our supervisors.
Sponsors
A listing of our sponsors, how they assisted us and our gratitude for their assistance.
Collaborations
Read about our exchanges with other iGEM teams and government agencies.
Achievements
A short description of all that we have achieved during our participation in the iGEM.
Attributions
A thank-you for everyone that assited us, both in and outside the lab.