Difference between revisions of "Team:Cardiff Wales/results"

 
(19 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
  
<div class="column_full_size" style="background-color:#ffffff;"/>
+
<div class="column_full_size"/>
 
<center>
 
<center>
<p style="background-color:#ffffff;"> <br><br>
+
<p> <br><br>
 +
 
 +
During our project, we had <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Cardiff_Wales/meet_the_team">three smaller teams </a> within our main team. Each of these teams had different but interlinked objectives. <br>Below we have outlined the main achievements of those projects:
 +
 
  
During our project, we had <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Cardiff_Wales/meet_the_team">three smaller teams </a> within our main team. Each of these teams had different but interlinked objectives, and consequently resulted in different sets of results. The results of each team are shown with descriptions on this page.
 
  
 
<br><br><br></p>  
 
<br><br><br></p>  
 
</center>
 
</center>
 
</div>  
 
</div>  
 +
<center>
 +
<div class="column_full_size" style="background-color:#ffffff;"/>
 +
<br><br>
 +
<h3>1.Generation of novel Phytobricks </h3><br>
 +
<p>We successful generated a range of phytobricks that have been submitted to the registry and can be utilised by future iGEM teams who are interested in using the plant expression systems in their projects. Details of these phytobricks can be found on our <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Cardiff_Wales/basicparts">Basic</a> and <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Cardiff_Wales/compositeparts">Composite</a> parts pages.<br><br>
 +
</div>
 
<div class="column_full_size"/>
 
<div class="column_full_size"/>
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
<center> <h3>Team Luciferase </h3><br><br>
+
<h3>2.Generation of a new molecular tool to test the efficacy of tobacco inflitration</h3><br>
<p> Team luficerase created the <a href="http://parts.igem.org/partsdb/part_info.cgi?part_name=BBa_K2404013"> 35S:Luc+:NosT construct </a>, and quantified the 35S promoter using a luciferase reporter assay.<br><br></p>
+
<p><a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Cardiff_Wales/Team_Luc">Team Luciferase</a> created the <a href="http://parts.igem.org/partsdb/part_info.cgi?part_name=BBa_K2404013"> 35S:Luc+:NosT construct </a>, and quantified the activity of the 35S promoter using a luciferase reporter assay. These assays are detailed on the <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2404013:Experience">Part Experience page</a>.<br><br>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/6f/T--Cardiff_Wales--35S-Luc%2Bgel.jpg"/><br><br>
+
<p> This photo shows the DNA gel that showed the level 1 reaction to create the <a href="http://parts.igem.org/partsdb/part_info.cgi?part_name=BBa_K2404013"> 35S:Luc+:NosT construct </a> had worked. The DNA solution that this was taken from was later sequenced to confirm that the construct was correct.<br><br><br><br>
+
</p>
+
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/f2/T--Cardiff_Wales--LUC-plate.png"/><br><br>
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/f2/T--Cardiff_Wales--LUC-plate.png"/><br><br>
<p> This image shows leaf discs taken from plants infiltrated with <i> Agrobacterium </i> containing the 35S:Luc+:NosT construct. The red regions show high levels of luciferase expresion.<br><br><br><br></p>
+
<p> This image shows leaf discs taken from plants infiltrated with <i> Agrobacterium </i> containing the <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2404013:Experience">35S:Luc+:NosT</a> construct. The red regions show high levels of luciferase expression. This part can now be used by other teams in the future as a control when performing luciferase reporter assays. <br><br><br><br></p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<div class="column_full_size" style="background-color:#ffffff;"/>
 
<div class="column_full_size" style="background-color:#ffffff;"/>
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
<center> <h3>Team TSH</h3><br><br>
+
<h3>3.Expression of TSHH in tobacco leaves</h3><br>
<p> Team TSH was responsible for creating constructs containing TSH or TSHH (TSH antagonist with His-tags for purification), controlled by the LexA promoter. This is part <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2404016"> BBa_K2404016 </a>. They also attempted to create a part with 35S:TSHH:NosT, but these ligations failed. Using their TSHH constructs, they infiltrated <i> N. benthamiana </i> and performed a protein extract which was ran on a protein gel to identify the presence of the antagonist.<br><br></p>
+
<p>We successful generated a range of level 1 phytobricks that included a plant promotor hooked up to TSHH. We attempted to use these constructs to express TSHH in tobacco leaves in a collaboration between <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Cardiff_Wales/Team_TSH">Team TSH</a> and <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Cardiff_Wales/Team_PlantP">Team Plant_P</a>.<br>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/87/T--Cardiff_Wales--LexA-TSHH-NosT.jpg"/><br><br>
+
Constructs were introduced into tobacco leaves and after 2 days either salicyclic acid (GST/PR2) or jasmonic acid (PDF1.2) was also inflitrated into the leaves in order to induce gene expression. We performed crude protein extracts from these leaves and then compared to agrofiltrated leaves that had not been treated with the appropriate plant hormone. We used <a href="http://www.stratech.co.uk/products/P9100-65-USB">nickel beads</a> to isolate the His-tag TSH protein and compared those samples to crude extracts in an attempt to identify bands that are specfic for the TSHH.<br><br>  
<p> This photo shows the DNA gel that showed the level 1 reaction to create the <a href="http://parts.igem.org/partsdb/part_info.cgi?part_name=BBa_K2404016"> LexA:TSHH:NosT construct </a> had worked. The DNA solution that this was taken from was later sequenced to confirm that the construct was correct.<br><br><br><br>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/27/T--Cardiff_Wales--GSTPRProteingel.png"/><br><br>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/16/T--Cardiff_Wales--LexA-TSHH-NosT.Proteingel.png"/><br><br>
+
<p> This protein gel showing the results of our protein extracts from leaves infiltrated with either GST:TSHH or PR:TSHH constructs. Following construct infiltration, they were then infiltrated with salicylic acid. A protein extract was carried out on the leaves to assess whether or not our TSHH antagonist was present. By comparing with the negative control, we could identify any specific bands corresponding to the TSHH protein. In further experiments we will attempt to optimise this expression and purification. <br><br>
<p>This image shows a protein gel that team TSH created to test whether part <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2404016"> BBa_K2404016 </a> had been expressed in <i> N. benthamiana </i>. There was no band present where we anticipated, so concluded that it had not worked.<br><br><br><br>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/20/T--Cardiff_Wales--PDFTSHHproteingel.png"/><br><br>
 +
<p> This protein gel shows the results of infiltrating PDF1.2:TSHH constructs, followed by infiltration of jasmonic acid. The lack of an obvious band in the 'beads' samples, and the fact there is no band unique to infiltrated leaves when compared to the negative control suggests that this experiment did not work as hoped.  
 +
<br><br>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<div class="column_full_size"/>
 
<div class="column_full_size"/>
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
<center> <h3>Team Plant Promoter</h3><br><br>
+
<h3>4.Modelling the Plant Expression system </h3><br>
<p> Team plant promoter were responsible for creating any constructs containing TSHH or Luc+ under the control of one of our 4 inducible promoters. They needed to isolate the promoters from <i> Arabidopsis </i> DNA, amplify them using PCR, and extract them, then put them into level 0 parts. Following that, they created level 1 constructs with these promoters, containing either TSHH or Luc+ as the CDS, and usually with the NOS terminator from <i> Agrobacterium tumefaciens </i>, but some of the final constructs somehow lacked these as shown on the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Cardiff_Wales/compositeparts"> composite parts </a> page. Some of their results are shown below.<br><br></p>
+
<p>We generated a model that investigated the potential use of the tobacco leave expression system for the purification of human therapeutic agents. Our model is outlined on our <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Cardiff_Wales/Modelling">modeling page.</a>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/16/T--Cardiff_Wales--PromotersIsolated.PNG"/><br><br>
+
<br><br>
<p> A photo of the DNA gel that showed the primers used to isolate our promoters from <i> Arabidopsis </i> had worked. We then extracted the DNA out of the gel, and used these for subsequent reactions. These are <a href="http://parts.igem.org/partsdb/part_info.cgi?part_name=BBa_K2404002"> PDF1.2, </a> <a href="http://parts.igem.org/partsdb/part_info.cgi?part_name=BBa_K2404003"> PR2, </a>, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/partsdb/part_info.cgi?part_name=BBa_K2404004">GST6, </a> and <a href="http://parts.igem.org/partsdb/part_info.cgi?part_name=BBa_K2404005">WKRKY30 </a> (not shown).<br><br><br><br>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/aa/T--Cardiff_Wales--WRKYLvl0GEL.PNG"/><br><br>
+
<p> A photo of a gel showing successful level 0 <a href="http://parts.igem.org/partsdb/part_info.cgi?part_name=BBa_K2404005">WKRKY30 </a> constructs.<br><br><br><br>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/21/T--Cardiff_Wales--PromoterLuc%2BDNA.PNG"/><br><br>
+
<p> A DNA gel confirming three of our 8 level 1 constructs. These were the only Luc+ level 1 parts that Team Plant Promoter managed to successfully create, but when <i> E. coli </i> were transformed with this constructs, they continually failed to grow. This resulted in us running out of time in the lab, so sadly it was the furthest stage that our inducible promoter:Luc+:NosT constructs got to.<br><br><br><br>
+
<img src=""/><br><br>
+
<p> <br><br><br><br>
+
<img src=""/><br><br>
+
<p> <br><br><br><br>
+
<img src=""/><br><br>
+
<p> <br><br><br><br>
+
</p>
+
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
<div class="column_full_size" style="background-color:#ffffff;"/>
 +
<br><br>
 +
<h3>5.Public Interaction and Human Practices</h3><br>
 +
<p>We conducted a <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Cardiff_Wales/Survey">survey</a> for almost 300 participants that assessed public opinion on the use of genetic modification for the production of pharmaceuticals in animals or plants.<br> We also discussed with a range of experts the scientific and economic advantages of using plants for protein production. This allowed us to perform an analysis on the benefits of the plant expression system, which integrated with our modelling work. This can be found on <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Cardiff_Wales/Our_research">Our Research</a> page.<br><br>
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="column_full_size"/>
 +
<br><br>
 +
<h3>6.Maintained an Outstanding Lab Notebook </h3><br>
 +
<p>We are very proud of maintaining our lab notebook every day of the 10 weeks that we were in the lab. This can be found on our <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Cardiff_Wales/diary">Diary</a> page. <br><br><br><br>
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 
</center>
 
</center>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</body>
 
</body>
 
</html>
 
</html>

Latest revision as of 17:02, 31 October 2017




Our Results




During our project, we had three smaller teams within our main team. Each of these teams had different but interlinked objectives.
Below we have outlined the main achievements of those projects:




1.Generation of novel Phytobricks


We successful generated a range of phytobricks that have been submitted to the registry and can be utilised by future iGEM teams who are interested in using the plant expression systems in their projects. Details of these phytobricks can be found on our Basic and Composite parts pages.



2.Generation of a new molecular tool to test the efficacy of tobacco inflitration


Team Luciferase created the 35S:Luc+:NosT construct , and quantified the activity of the 35S promoter using a luciferase reporter assay. These assays are detailed on the Part Experience page.



This image shows leaf discs taken from plants infiltrated with Agrobacterium containing the 35S:Luc+:NosT construct. The red regions show high levels of luciferase expression. This part can now be used by other teams in the future as a control when performing luciferase reporter assays.





3.Expression of TSHH in tobacco leaves


We successful generated a range of level 1 phytobricks that included a plant promotor hooked up to TSHH. We attempted to use these constructs to express TSHH in tobacco leaves in a collaboration between Team TSH and Team Plant_P.
Constructs were introduced into tobacco leaves and after 2 days either salicyclic acid (GST/PR2) or jasmonic acid (PDF1.2) was also inflitrated into the leaves in order to induce gene expression. We performed crude protein extracts from these leaves and then compared to agrofiltrated leaves that had not been treated with the appropriate plant hormone. We used nickel beads to isolate the His-tag TSH protein and compared those samples to crude extracts in an attempt to identify bands that are specfic for the TSHH.



This protein gel showing the results of our protein extracts from leaves infiltrated with either GST:TSHH or PR:TSHH constructs. Following construct infiltration, they were then infiltrated with salicylic acid. A protein extract was carried out on the leaves to assess whether or not our TSHH antagonist was present. By comparing with the negative control, we could identify any specific bands corresponding to the TSHH protein. In further experiments we will attempt to optimise this expression and purification.



This protein gel shows the results of infiltrating PDF1.2:TSHH constructs, followed by infiltration of jasmonic acid. The lack of an obvious band in the 'beads' samples, and the fact there is no band unique to infiltrated leaves when compared to the negative control suggests that this experiment did not work as hoped.



4.Modelling the Plant Expression system


We generated a model that investigated the potential use of the tobacco leave expression system for the purification of human therapeutic agents. Our model is outlined on our modeling page.



5.Public Interaction and Human Practices


We conducted a survey for almost 300 participants that assessed public opinion on the use of genetic modification for the production of pharmaceuticals in animals or plants.
We also discussed with a range of experts the scientific and economic advantages of using plants for protein production. This allowed us to perform an analysis on the benefits of the plant expression system, which integrated with our modelling work. This can be found on Our Research page.



6.Maintained an Outstanding Lab Notebook


We are very proud of maintaining our lab notebook every day of the 10 weeks that we were in the lab. This can be found on our Diary page.