Difference between revisions of "Team:Munich/Amplification"

(Created page with "<!-- #919191 Grau1 --> <!-- #787878 Grau2 --> <!-- #51A7f9 Blau1 --> <!-- #3c7cb9 Blau2 --> <!-- #ffffff weiss --> <html> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://...")
 
Line 119: Line 119:
 
<tr class="lastRow">
 
<tr class="lastRow">
 
<td colspan=4>
 
<td colspan=4>
<h3> Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) </h3>
+
<h3> Recombinase Polymerase Amplification </h3>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<p>
 
<p>
The Recombinase Polymerase Amplification developed by TwistDx is an isothermal amplification method for DNA.  
+
The Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) developed by TwistDx is an isothermal amplification method for DNA.  
 
Rather than melting the double strand and annealing the primers through temperature cycles, it uses a recombinase
 
Rather than melting the double strand and annealing the primers through temperature cycles, it uses a recombinase
 
that binds the primers and assists them in the annealing process. Another protein, single-strand DNA binding protein (SSB)  
 
that binds the primers and assists them in the annealing process. Another protein, single-strand DNA binding protein (SSB)  
Line 139: Line 139:
 
The next step was to bring the RPA reaction on paper. For this, we lyophilised the reaction mixture provided by TwistDx  
 
The next step was to bring the RPA reaction on paper. For this, we lyophilised the reaction mixture provided by TwistDx  
 
on paper and tried to run RPA reactions directly from it by inserting the blotting paper into the PCR tube.  
 
on paper and tried to run RPA reactions directly from it by inserting the blotting paper into the PCR tube.  
This did work out fine but first time stability experiments showed that the activity decreases quickly.  
+
Activity could be shown on an agarose gel but first time stability experiments showed that the activity decreases quickly.
Also in the user's manual, it is said that after breaking the seal one should use up the reaction mix in the next hour.  
+
In the user's manual, it is stated that after breaking the seal one should use up the reaction mix in the next hour.  
We could underline this statement since activity declined rapidly after as little as two hours and was non-existent after  
+
We can confirm this statement since activity declined rapidly after as little as two hours and was non-existent after  
24 hours.  
+
24 hours. <br>
 +
Furthermore, temperature seems to be a very important factor during amplification using RPA. As observable in Figure 2,
 +
the sample without any prior storage at a reaction temperature of 20 °C, though still active, showed dramatically decreased activity.
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
For usage of RPA on a detection device that does not require purification of the sample, the reaction needs to take
 +
place in the environment of a lysate with cell debris and released protein from the cell. In order to see whether this
 +
is achievable, we performed a colony-PCR like setting of RPA using a <i>E. Coli</i> culture in LB-medium with OD=1.0
 +
and ran a normal RPA of purified plasmid as a control. We observed that the yield measured by on-gel concentration
 +
determination was approximately the same.
 +
 
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
<td colspan=2>
 
<td colspan=2>
Line 154: Line 164:
 
<img alt="LightbringerReal" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/07/T--Munich--RPAPagePicture_gel2.png" width="300">
 
<img alt="LightbringerReal" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/07/T--Munich--RPAPagePicture_gel2.png" width="300">
 
<p>
 
<p>
<i>Figure 2: RPA reaction at 37 °C of Control by TwistDx and His<sub>6</sub>-TEV using VF2 and VR primers. </i>
+
<i>Figure 2: RPA reaction of lyophilised RPA mixture at 37 °C or 20 °C of His<sub>6</sub>-TEV using VF2 and VR primers.
 +
The control is a reaction mixture without the lyophilisation step.</i>
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
</td>
 
</td>
Line 182: Line 193:
 
Exposure to humidity and temperature. So we tested both of these factors in an experiment and found out, that the bottleneck  
 
Exposure to humidity and temperature. So we tested both of these factors in an experiment and found out, that the bottleneck  
 
is mainly presented by exposure to air, presumably humidity. We could dramatically increase stability when covering the  
 
is mainly presented by exposure to air, presumably humidity. We could dramatically increase stability when covering the  
paperstrip in a plastic Petri dish and sealing it with Parafilm. <br><br>
+
paperstrip in a plastic Petri dish and sealing it with Parafilm. The results are shown in Figure 3. <br><br>
  
  

Revision as of 22:52, 31 October 2017


Bringing RPA and In-Vitro Transcription on paper


The final step is bringing all the prior tested work on paper and stabilise it on their so it could be sealed into the PDMS chip developed by the Hardware Team to automatise the amplification process and be able to subsequently detect on a paperstrip using Cas13a from a simulated real-life sample. For this we ran tests and it did seem that the RPA-Tx on paper could have worked judged by the 15%-Urea-PAGE. The gel showed two bands around the size of the construct of 200 bp, one larger in size and less intense and one smaller in size and more intense. This could quite possibly be the couple of DNA sample and derived RNA sample. Nevertheless, Cas13a-activity based on these samples could not be shown.

Amplification Methods

Since real-world patient's sample contain only traces of pathogens, detection with any kind of read-out system will be difficult without prior amplification of the detected substance. After we saw that the detection limit of Cas13a is in the nM region, we had to tackle the problem of low target concentrations in medical samples. This is why we explored different amplification methods. Our main idea was to keep things simple, transportable and stable by incorporating isothermal reactions on paper with lyophilized reaction mixes. Therefore, we explored isothermal PCR methods coupled to In-Vitro Transcription . The final idea was to be able to detect both DNA and RNA samples by using either a Reverse Transcriptase coupled Recombinase Polymerase Amplification and subsequent In-Vitro Transcription for RNA targets or leaving out the step of reverse transcription for DNA targets.

Why isothermal PCR?


Classical Polymerase Chain Reactions We chose to explore isothermal methods for signal amplification since isothermal techniques come with the potential of simplified hardware design which would lead to decreased production and development costs.

Recombinase Polymerase Amplification


The Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) developed by TwistDx is an isothermal amplification method for DNA. Rather than melting the double strand and annealing the primers through temperature cycles, it uses a recombinase that binds the primers and assists them in the annealing process. Another protein, single-strand DNA binding protein (SSB) promotes the binding of the primers to the recombinase in this process. Hence, the first step in the development of an isothermal amplification method of an RNA signal via RT-RPA-Tx was testing the Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) itself in bulk. For this, we took our previously cloned His-tagged TEV Protease and ran dummy PCR reactions using the TwistDx RPA Kit. We tested this with standard Biobrick primers VF2 and VR and ran the provided test reaction of the TwistDx RPA Kit as a positive control. The results are shown in Figure 1. This approach is connected to some risk, since it is not said that PCR primers will work just as fine in RPA reactions. The affinity of Recombinase to the primers is important to get an efficient binding of the primers to the template DNA. For this reason PCR primers tend to be longer and have less GC% than RPA primers in general. In addition, the tested construct was approximately 1500 bp long, which is also quite far from RPA's optimum of 500 bp. Nevertheless, we could show that product is formed, though only up to the size of 500 bp. After that, it seems that the Polymerase falls off the strand and was not able to produce longer amplicons. This is why one can see small bands for longer constructs, just with a much lower yield.

The next step was to bring the RPA reaction on paper. For this, we lyophilised the reaction mixture provided by TwistDx on paper and tried to run RPA reactions directly from it by inserting the blotting paper into the PCR tube. Activity could be shown on an agarose gel but first time stability experiments showed that the activity decreases quickly. In the user's manual, it is stated that after breaking the seal one should use up the reaction mix in the next hour. We can confirm this statement since activity declined rapidly after as little as two hours and was non-existent after 24 hours.
Furthermore, temperature seems to be a very important factor during amplification using RPA. As observable in Figure 2, the sample without any prior storage at a reaction temperature of 20 °C, though still active, showed dramatically decreased activity.

For usage of RPA on a detection device that does not require purification of the sample, the reaction needs to take place in the environment of a lysate with cell debris and released protein from the cell. In order to see whether this is achievable, we performed a colony-PCR like setting of RPA using a E. Coli culture in LB-medium with OD=1.0 and ran a normal RPA of purified plasmid as a control. We observed that the yield measured by on-gel concentration determination was approximately the same.

LightbringerReal

Figure 1: RPA reaction at 37 °C of Control by TwistDx and His6-TEV using VF2 and VR primers.

LightbringerReal

Figure 2: RPA reaction of lyophilised RPA mixture at 37 °C or 20 °C of His6-TEV using VF2 and VR primers. The control is a reaction mixture without the lyophilisation step.

LightbringerReal

Figure 3: RPA reaction after freeze-dried storage on paper at different conditions. Conditions that were taken into consideration are temperature and air accessibility. Air determines the samples that were accessible to air. The other samples were stored in a Petri dish sealed with parafilm.

RPA on paper time-stability optimisation

Since stability is an important question when developing a diagnostic test, we examined the bottleneck to the stability of RPA reaction mix on paper. Basically, there is only two possible, though obvious, factors affecting the stability: Exposure to humidity and temperature. So we tested both of these factors in an experiment and found out, that the bottleneck is mainly presented by exposure to air, presumably humidity. We could dramatically increase stability when covering the paperstrip in a plastic Petri dish and sealing it with Parafilm. The results are shown in Figure 3.

Coupling RPA to In-Vitro Transcription


The fact that Cas13a is a RNA-guided RNAse made it necessary to not only amplify a DNA signal but also transcribe it into RNA. Thus, coupling the RPA reaction to In-Vitro Transcription was necessary. For this, we developed a reaction mix in bulk that would perform both steps at a time. This is achievable since both reaction happen at 37 °C.

Benchmark construct for Cas13a


Since the T7 RNA Polymerase only binds double-stranded DNA, transcription would never work form the His6-TEV construct we initially tested RPA on, because the amplicon was too long. An option would have been to order a different primer. It comes with the risk of losing RPA activity due to the strict dependency on the primer mentioned above and would need additional time for optimization. Thus, we decided against that option and constructed a benchmark target RNA plasmid for Cas13a. This construct consists of target sequences we took for 16s rRNA of E. Coli , 16s rRNA of B. subtilis and the 5'-UTR of the norovirus. It is flanked by VF2 and VR. Upstream of the target sequences is a T7 promoter that allows In-Vitro Transcription. After cloning this into a plasmid, we had a system with which we could test our coupled RPA-Tx and check whether it works on paper.

Bringing RPA and In-Vitro Transcription on paper


The final step was bringing all the prior tested work on paper and stabilise it on there so it could be sealed into the PDMS chip developed by the Hardware Team to automatise the amplification process and enable subsequent detection on a paperstrip using Cas13a. For this we ran test experiment and we showed that RPA-Tx on paper worked judged by the 15%-Urea-PAGE. The gel showed a band at the approximate size of 130 bp of the Benchmark construct that increased in concentration during the RPA-Tx reaction. This could quite possibly be the couple of DNA sample and derived RNA sample. Nevertheless, Cas13a-activity based on these samples could not be shown.

Discussion


We showed here the first steps of establishing an amplification circuit for our detection device. Since we were able to screen for storage conditions and do colony PCR-like experiments with the RPA mixture on paper, the reproducibility of the RPA reaction after dry-freezing it on paper is proven. Time-stability has also been shown for 24 hours, though this will need to be extended to longer time-scales to provide it to the customer.
One issue that can still occur is that so far, the coupled RPA-Tx reaction was only tested for purified samples. The fact of having lysate in the sample is likely have distorting effects on the efficiency on both reactions. Since RPA worked in a colony PCR-like set up with prior lysis of the cells, that is already a good start but the In-Vitro Transcription is usually more delicate, therefore bringing this on paper in a lysate environment might prove to be more difficult.

References