Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
<p align="left" style="font-size:115%; font-family:'Courier New', Courier, monospace; z-index:3;"> </p> | <p align="left" style="font-size:115%; font-family:'Courier New', Courier, monospace; z-index:3;"> </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | + | <div id="ch2o"> | |
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/f1/T-Nanjing-China-project-ch2o.png" width="35%" /> | + | <div style="position:relative; top:-40px; z-index:3;"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/f1/T-Nanjing-China-project-ch2o.png" width="35%" /></div> |
<table width="80%" border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1"> | <table width="80%" border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
− | <td colspan="2"><p> | + | <td colspan="2"><p>As is shown to all of us, the whole sequence is about 1500 base-pairs while the vector is 2000 base-pairs. SDS-PAGE analysis also showed the expression of the regulator, protein FRMR, around 15kd. Therefore, we moved forward to further property study.</p></td> |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
− | <td | + | <td><div align="center"> |
− | + | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/ca/T-Nanjing-China-ch2o-6.png" width="310" height="403" /></p> | |
+ | <p><font size="-1">Figure1.Whole-cell sequence dual-enzyme digestion</font></p> | ||
+ | </div></td> | ||
+ | <td><div align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/ae/T-Nanjing-China-ch2o-7.png" width="400" height="366" /> | ||
+ | <p><font size="-1">Figure2.SDS-PAGE analysis of recombinant E.coli expressing FrmR</font></p></div></td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td colspan="2"><blockquote> | <td colspan="2"><blockquote> | ||
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
− | <p> | + | </blockquote> |
− | + | <p>This diagram illustrates the fluorescence intensity change induced by formaldehyde along with interval time 2 hours. The peak value occurs after 6 hours, that is, only requiring 6 hours, the detecting results can be seen with naked-eyes. Compared to the blank control, experimental group with formaldehyde induction turns to pink apparently, meaning the designed reporter pathway have worked. </p></td> | |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
− | <td | + | <td><div align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/88/T-Nanjing-China-ch2o-8.png" width="350" height="251" /><p><font size="-1">Figure 3. Influence of Formaldehyde Induce Time on Fluorescence Expression</font></p></div></td> |
− | <td> | + | <td><div align="center"> |
+ | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/04/T-Nanjing-China-ch2o-9.png" width="350" height="245" /></p> | ||
+ | <p><font size="-1">Figure4.A photograph of E.coli cells containing the formaldehyde-induced RFP expression plasmid, or without formaldehyde induction, and re-suspended in PBS buffer(pH7.4)</font></p> | ||
+ | </div></td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
− | <td | + | <td colspan="2"><p> </p> |
− | + | <p>Moreover, in order to set up the corresponding relationship between the quantity of formaldehyde and the fluorescence value, we prepared a series of gradient concentrations of formaldehyde. We found out that from the concentrations of 300 micromole to 600 micromole, a preferable equation of linear regression could be obtained, which laid the cornerstone for creating precise and sensitive detecting devices. | |
− | + | </p></td> | |
− | + | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><div align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/76/T-Nanjing-China-ch2o-10.png" width="350" height="265" /></div></td> | ||
+ | <td><div align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/98/T-Nanjing-China-ch2o-11.png" width="350" height="265" /></div></td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td colspan="2"><p align="center"><font size="-1">Figure5.Fluorescence measurement of E.coli cells containing the formaldehyde-induced RFP expression plasmid after gradient concentrations of formaldehyde induction and re-suspended in PBS buffer(pH7.4)</font></p></td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td colspan="2"><div align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/76/T-Nanjing-China-ch2o-l2.png" width="600" /> | ||
+ | <p><font size="-1">Figure6. Optical density(600nm) of (a) Escherichia coli BL21 and (b) recombinant bioluminescent Escherichia coli BL21 harboring frmR-RFP fusion after 10 hours’ incubation with 800uM different aldehydes</font></p></div></td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td colspan="2"><div align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/0e/T-Nanjing-China-ch2o-l1.png" width="600" /> | ||
+ | <p><font size="-1">Figure7.Response growth curve for recombinant bioluminescent Escherichia coli BL21 to different concentration of formaldehyde</font></p></div></td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><div align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/6a/T-Nanjing-China-ch2o-l3.png" width="350" /> | ||
+ | <p><font size="-1">Figure8.Fluorescence test of various aldehydes using recombinant bioluminescent Escherichia coli BL21</font></p></div></td> | ||
+ | <td><div align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/22/T-Nanjing-China-ch2o-l4.png" width="350" /> | ||
+ | <p><font size="-1">Figure9.The tolerance of recombinant bioluminescent Escherichia coli BL21 to various concentration of formaldehyde</font></p></div></td></tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td colspan="2">It is worth to be mentioned that the team <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Nanjing-China/Collaborations">OUC</a> help us demonstrate the result.</td></tr> | <td colspan="2">It is worth to be mentioned that the team <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Nanjing-China/Collaborations">OUC</a> help us demonstrate the result.</td></tr> | ||
Line 180: | Line 198: | ||
<table width="80%" border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1"> | <table width="80%" border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
− | + | <td colspan="2"><p>A plate sensitive assay measuring S2– tolerance of E. coli cells with constructed probe pathway. All plates were incubated at 37℃ for 18 h before being read. No significant influence appeared to the growth of E. coli at a concentration lower than 10mmol/L.</p></td> | |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
− | <td colspan="2"><div align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/ | + | <td colspan="2"><div align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/3/3c/T-Nanjing-China-h2s-4-1.jpg" width="524" height="400" /></div></td> |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
− | <td | + | <td><p>We analysised the product by dual-enzyme digestion and electrophoresis.</p></td> |
+ | <td><div align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/c6/T-Nanjing-China-h2s-5.png" width="400" /> | ||
<p><font size="-1">Figure1.Whole-cell sequence dual-enzyme digestion</font></p></div></td> | <p><font size="-1">Figure1.Whole-cell sequence dual-enzyme digestion</font></p></div></td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
− | <td><p><font size="-1">a)</font></p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/63/T-Nanjing-China-h2s-6.png" width=" | + | <td><p><font size="-1">a)</font></p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/63/T-Nanjing-China-h2s-6.png" width="350" /></td> |
− | + | <td><p><font size="-1">b)</font></p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/4d/T-Nanjing-China-h2s-8.png" width="350" /><p><font size="-1"></td> | |
− | <td><p><font size="-1">b)</font></p | + | |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><p><font size="-1">c)</font></p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/bc/T-Nanjing-China-h2s-9.png" width="400" /><p><font size="-1"></p></p></td> | <td><p><font size="-1">c)</font></p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/bc/T-Nanjing-China-h2s-9.png" width="400" /><p><font size="-1"></p></p></td> | ||
− | <td><p><font size="-1"> | + | <td><p><font size="-1">Figure2.a)RFP responsiveness of the detector system.<br /> |
b) A visible photograph of a).<br /> | b) A visible photograph of a).<br /> | ||
c) Test of selectivity.</font></p></td> | c) Test of selectivity.</font></p></td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td colspan="2"><p>RFP responsiveness of the detector system. Cells were grown to midlog phase under aerobic conditions and 0 ~ 250 μM Na2S. Cells were harvest after 17h and assayed for fluorescence intensity. Error bars indicate SD of the mean.</p></td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
Line 210: | Line 228: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/09/T-Nanjing-China-project-h2.png" width="30%"/> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/09/T-Nanjing-China-project-h2.png" width="30%"/> | ||
<table width="80%" border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1"> | <table width="80%" border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1"> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
− | <td colspan="2"> | + | <td colspan="2"><p>Now we’ve succefully detected the protein expression by SDS-Page analysis and Western blot analysis.</p></td> |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><div align="center"> | <td><div align="center"> | ||
Line 239: | Line 245: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
− | <td colspan="2"><div align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/69/T-Nanjing-China-h2-9.png" width=" | + | <td colspan="2"><div align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/69/T-Nanjing-China-h2-9.png" width="500" height="250" /> |
<p><font size="-1">Figure 3. Influence of H2 concentration on fluorescence expression</font></p> | <p><font size="-1">Figure 3. Influence of H2 concentration on fluorescence expression</font></p> | ||
</div></td> | </div></td> |
Revision as of 00:30, 1 November 2017
In the part of lab work, we have designed three biosensor sequence and improved an old part, J23000. What's more, all the three design have been demonstrate by us.
As is shown to all of us, the whole sequence is about 1500 base-pairs while the vector is 2000 base-pairs. SDS-PAGE analysis also showed the expression of the regulator, protein FRMR, around 15kd. Therefore, we moved forward to further property study. |
|
Figure1.Whole-cell sequence dual-enzyme digestion |
Figure2.SDS-PAGE analysis of recombinant E.coli expressing FrmR |
This diagram illustrates the fluorescence intensity change induced by formaldehyde along with interval time 2 hours. The peak value occurs after 6 hours, that is, only requiring 6 hours, the detecting results can be seen with naked-eyes. Compared to the blank control, experimental group with formaldehyde induction turns to pink apparently, meaning the designed reporter pathway have worked. |
|
Figure 3. Influence of Formaldehyde Induce Time on Fluorescence Expression |
Figure4.A photograph of E.coli cells containing the formaldehyde-induced RFP expression plasmid, or without formaldehyde induction, and re-suspended in PBS buffer(pH7.4) |
Moreover, in order to set up the corresponding relationship between the quantity of formaldehyde and the fluorescence value, we prepared a series of gradient concentrations of formaldehyde. We found out that from the concentrations of 300 micromole to 600 micromole, a preferable equation of linear regression could be obtained, which laid the cornerstone for creating precise and sensitive detecting devices. |
|
Figure5.Fluorescence measurement of E.coli cells containing the formaldehyde-induced RFP expression plasmid after gradient concentrations of formaldehyde induction and re-suspended in PBS buffer(pH7.4) |
|
Figure6. Optical density(600nm) of (a) Escherichia coli BL21 and (b) recombinant bioluminescent Escherichia coli BL21 harboring frmR-RFP fusion after 10 hours’ incubation with 800uM different aldehydes | |
Figure7.Response growth curve for recombinant bioluminescent Escherichia coli BL21 to different concentration of formaldehyde | |
Figure8.Fluorescence test of various aldehydes using recombinant bioluminescent Escherichia coli BL21 |
Figure9.The tolerance of recombinant bioluminescent Escherichia coli BL21 to various concentration of formaldehyde |
It is worth to be mentioned that the team OUC help us demonstrate the result. |
A plate sensitive assay measuring S2– tolerance of E. coli cells with constructed probe pathway. All plates were incubated at 37℃ for 18 h before being read. No significant influence appeared to the growth of E. coli at a concentration lower than 10mmol/L. |
|
We analysised the product by dual-enzyme digestion and electrophoresis. |
Figure1.Whole-cell sequence dual-enzyme digestion |
a) |
b) |
c) |
Figure2.a)RFP responsiveness of the detector system. |
RFP responsiveness of the detector system. Cells were grown to midlog phase under aerobic conditions and 0 ~ 250 μM Na2S. Cells were harvest after 17h and assayed for fluorescence intensity. Error bars indicate SD of the mean. |
Now we’ve succefully detected the protein expression by SDS-Page analysis and Western blot analysis. |
|
Figure1. Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250-stained SDS-Page analysis of recombinant E.coli expressing hoxABCJ-terminator-hoxp-gfp |
Fingure 2. Western blot analysis of recombinant E.coli expressing his-hoxA |
Fluorescence intensity remains stationary when IPTG is added. |
|
Figure 3. Influence of H2 concentration on fluorescence expression |