Sven klumpe (Talk | contribs) |
Sven klumpe (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
<tr><td colspan=6 align=left valign=center> | <tr><td colspan=6 align=left valign=center> | ||
<font size=7 color=#51a7f9><b style="color: #51a7f9">Software</b></font> | <font size=7 color=#51a7f9><b style="color: #51a7f9">Software</b></font> | ||
+ | <pre> | ||
+ | ################################################################### | ||
+ | # # | ||
+ | # CascAID V1.0 # | ||
+ | # # | ||
+ | # Wed Nov 1 04:23:54 2017 # | ||
+ | # # | ||
+ | # IGEM Munich 2017 # | ||
+ | # # | ||
+ | # # | ||
+ | # # | ||
+ | # # | ||
+ | # Please send bug reports to: # | ||
+ | # # | ||
+ | # Sven Klumpe # | ||
+ | # # | ||
+ | # E-Mail: sven.klumpe@tum.de # | ||
+ | # # | ||
+ | ################################################################### | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | </pre> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 82: | Line 104: | ||
<td colspan = 6 align="left"> | <td colspan = 6 align="left"> | ||
<p class="introduction"> | <p class="introduction"> | ||
− | + | CascAID is a potentially universal tool for nucleic acid detection. | |
+ | Fast adaptation of our platform to new targets requires <i>in silico</i> verification of the crRNA design. | ||
+ | Crucial factors for the development of these crRNA designs are the binding of the crRNA to Cas13a | ||
+ | mainly determined by its secondary structure and the uniqueness of the targeting sequence in the transcriptome | ||
+ | to rule out false positive results. To ensure the integrity of the Cas13a-crRNA complex, we developed | ||
+ | a python script that uses the established program packages for secondary structures NUPACK and Mfold. | ||
+ | In order to verify the specificity of the targeting sequence, we used the BLASTN-short program to | ||
+ | check for similar structures in a transcriptome databank. Additionally, we created a database of crRNA designs | ||
+ | that have already worked and made it | ||
+ | as extensive as possible given the limited time, checking for collaboration with other teams working with Cas13a, | ||
+ | mainly TU Delft. | ||
+ | The second branch of software needed for our project we developed consists of the software for hardware control. | ||
+ | They allow user's devices such as computers and smartphones to control | ||
+ | our hardware's devices, Heatbringer and Lightbringer. | ||
+ | The repository to our software can be found <a class="myLink" href="https://github.com/igemsoftware2017/igem_munich_2017">here</a>. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Line 95: | Line 131: | ||
<h3>crRNA Design Verification</h3> | <h3>crRNA Design Verification</h3> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | There are two main problems regarding the | + | There are two main problems regarding the design of crRNA for a diagnostic test. |
+ | First, the secondary structure of the crRNA needed for Cas13a activity needs to be verified. | ||
+ | Second, the sequence targeted by the crRNA has to be specific, i.e. , there is no identical sequence in the | ||
+ | reference transcriptome of an healthy patient. Otherwise off-target effects will lead to | ||
+ | false positive results since Cas13a is activated even though the pathogen is not present. | ||
+ | To address these issues, we developed a software relying on bioinformatic principles such as | ||
+ | secondary structure prediction and Basic Local Alignment Searches Tools (BLAST). | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Line 109: | Line 151: | ||
<h3>Secondary Structure Prediction</h3> | <h3>Secondary Structure Prediction</h3> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | For secondary structure prediction of the crRNA we utilised the two | + | For secondary structure prediction of the crRNA we utilised the two established program packages |
− | + | in the field, NUPACK and Mfold to compare newly designed crRNA with secondary structures of crRNAs that | |
− | + | were already known to be active. These reference crRNA structures were either obtained from actual | |
− | + | crystallography data of crRNA in complex with Cas13a, or from structure prediction data of experimentally | |
− | + | tested crRNAs. Using secondary structure verification we were able to rule out misfolding crRNA | |
− | + | designs prior to experiment. We developed a script for the end user automatising this procedure. | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Line 142: | Line 165: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | For offline usage | + | NUPACK is a RNA Secondary Structure Prediction program package developed |
+ | by several contributors under the guidance of Prof. Niles A. Pierce at the California Insitute of Technology (Caltech). | ||
+ | The source-code is available free-of-charge for academic usage. | ||
+ | NUPACK allows the analysis of the partition function, the minimum free energy and the equillibrium base-pairing | ||
+ | probabilities of a RNA sequence. | ||
+ | For offline usage we implemented NUPACK locally. We proceeded to implement Mfold as a webserver request. | ||
+ | This decision was made because we experienced that in certain cases, only one of the program packages | ||
+ | was able to predict the secondary structure of crRNA as described in previous papers, predominantly the paper of Liu et al. published in <i>Cell</i> in 2017 | ||
+ | "Two Distant Catalytic Sites Are Responsible for C2c2 RNase Activities". Also, a local run gives you | ||
+ | the possibility of using the full spectrum of NUPACK's programs. | ||
+ | By the use of several of the the final structure prediction, we estimated whether the | ||
+ | crRNA would be active in Cas13a. | ||
+ | Furthermore, we experienced that NUPACK sometimes predicts the right secondary structure, it just doesn't represent | ||
+ | the most stable structure. With NUPACK's subopt, it is possible to predict more than just | ||
+ | the most stable structure. This enables looking at less stable structures since the protein may compensate for | ||
+ | non-ideal structures by giving the right environment for stabilisation and compare this to the | ||
+ | structure databank. The output of a suboptimal prediction | ||
+ | is given in Example 2, the explanation is added after '#' for commenting: | ||
+ | |||
<pre style="text-align: left;"> | <pre style="text-align: left;"> | ||
% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% % | % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% % | ||
− | 66 | + | 66 #### length of the sequence |
− | -9.400 | + | -9.400 #### free energy of the structure |
− | .....................(.((((((.((((....)))).)))))).)............... | + | .....................(.((((((.((((....)))).)))))).)............... #### secondary structure in Vienna notation |
− | 22 51 | + | 22 51 #### IDs of bases that form basepairs |
− | 24 49 | + | 24 49 #### this would mean base 22 pairs with base 49 |
25 48 | 25 48 | ||
26 47 | 26 47 | ||
Line 183: | Line 224: | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | From this, | + | From this, we can extract the secondary structure in Vienna notation as well as the free energies |
+ | of the RNA structure to predict the probability of formation in solution with help of the calculation | ||
+ | of the full partition function. Using these results, the user can make qualitative assumptions about | ||
+ | the activity of the corresponding Cas13a-crRNA complex. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr class="lastRow"><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center> | ||
+ | <h4>Mfold</h4> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Mfold is a webserver for RNA secondary structure prediction developed by Michael Zuker based on his paper | ||
+ | "Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction" that published in <i>Nucleic Acids Research</i> | ||
+ | in 2003. Since Mfold is not available as a locally buildable binary for every operating system, we developed a | ||
+ | script that automatically requests a standardised RNA Fold job from the server, therefore making it available | ||
+ | throughout all operating systems. Using the result obtained from this request, the secondary structure is | ||
+ | checked via a string comparison in so-called "Vienna" notation. This notation gives base pairing as a string | ||
+ | of dots and brackets where a dot represents a non-bonded base and brackets form the base-pairs, clarified by | ||
+ | a opening bracket "(" at the 5'-end of the base-pair and a closing bracket ")" at the 3'-end. An example for the output | ||
+ | of the program is given below: | ||
+ | <pre style="text-align: left;"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ####################################################################################### | ||
+ | #################### CascAID Secondary Structure Verification ######################### | ||
+ | ####################################################################################### | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ####################################################################################### | ||
+ | ##################### NUPACK Secondary Structure Verification ######################### | ||
+ | ####################################################################################### | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | GOOD NEWS! YOU'VE GOT THE RIGHT SECONDARY STRUCTURE! | ||
+ | YOUR SEQUENCE WAS: | ||
+ | |||
+ | 5' GGAUUUAGACUACCCCAAAAACGAAGGGGACUAAAACUGAUAAAGAAGACAGUCAUAAGUGCGGC 3' | ||
+ | |||
+ | (((((....((((.........)))).))))) ######## MATCHED SECONDARY STRUCTURE | ||
+ | ...(((((....((((.........)))).)))))..((((..........))))......... ######## PREDICTED SECONDARY STRUCTURE | ||
+ | ___________________________________________________________________ | ||
+ | |||
+ | YOUR BACKBONE SEQUENCE HAS BEEN FOUND IN THE DATABANK | ||
+ | IT CORRESPONDS TO THE BACKBONE SEQUENCE OF: lwaCas13a | ||
+ | ______________________________________________________________________________________ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Job ended normally. Sun Oct 29 23:46:28 2017 | ||
+ | Do you have internet connectivity? [yes/no]yes | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ####################################################################################### | ||
+ | #################### MFOLD SECONDARY STRUCTURE VERIFICATION ########################### | ||
+ | ####################################################################################### | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | #################### CAUTION! ##################### | ||
+ | mFOLD SECONDARY STRUCTURE DOES NOT FIT OUR DATA BANK | ||
+ | #################### CAUTION! ##################### | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | YOUR SEQUENCE AND MOST STABLE PREDICTED STRUCTURE IS: | ||
+ | |||
+ | 5' GGAUUUAGACUACCCCAAAAACGAAGGGGACUAAAACUGAUAAAGAAGACAGUCAUAAGUGCGG 3' | ||
+ | ..(((((((((.((((.........)))).......((.....)).....)))).))))).... | ||
+ | ______________________________________________________________________________________ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Job ended normally. Sun Oct 29 23:47:06 2017 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | </pre> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | This is also a good example to show that the case can occur that one program recognizes the | ||
+ | crRNA secondary structure while the other does not. In this case, NUPACK has predicted the structure | ||
+ | while Mfold is not able to predict the structure. Even though this is an experimental construct | ||
+ | that worked, we did not put the secondary structure prediction of this into the database for Mfold, | ||
+ | since it was unable to predict the right structure. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Line 245: | Line 366: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<pre style="text-align: left;"> | <pre style="text-align: left;"> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | ############ | + | ############ Available Detection Targets ################# |
[1] Virus | [1] Virus | ||
[2] Bacteria | [2] Bacteria | ||
− | |||
[0] Go back one step | [0] Go back one step | ||
Line 260: | Line 376: | ||
What would you like to detect?2 | What would you like to detect?2 | ||
− | ############ | + | ############ Available Detection Targets ################# |
− | [1] | + | [1] Escherichia coli |
+ | [2] Bacillus subtillis | ||
[0] Go back one step | [0] Go back one step | ||
Line 268: | Line 385: | ||
What would you like to detect?1 | What would you like to detect?1 | ||
− | ############ | + | ############ Choose your Target ################# |
− | + | [1] E. Coli 16s rRNA | |
− | + | ||
− | [1] rRNA | + | |
[0] Go back one step | [0] Go back one step | ||
Line 280: | Line 395: | ||
########### The sequence thou art looking for is : ################ | ########### The sequence thou art looking for is : ################ | ||
− | + | ACUUUACUCCCUUCCUCCCCGCUGAAA | |
+ | |||
− | |||
[9] Exit | [9] Exit | ||
[0] Go back one step | [0] Go back one step | ||
+ | |||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | However, these still need to be tested for off-target effects experimentally since <i>in silico</i> screening can only confirm specificity to a certain amount of certainty. | + | However, these still need to be tested for off-target effects experimentally since <i>in silico</i> |
+ | screening can only confirm specificity to a certain amount of certainty. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
</td> | </td> |
Revision as of 04:27, 1 November 2017
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|