|
|
| Line 148: |
Line 148: |
| | <header> | | <header> |
| | | | |
| − | <h3> Human Practices </h3> | + | <h3>Collaborations</h3> |
| | </header> | | </header> |
| | <article> | | <article> |
| − | | + | During the later half of the iGEM season, our team was fortunate enough to be able to collaborate with the UMaryland iGEM team. Together, we helped improve each other’s presentations and gave feedback on each other’s projects. |
| − | The importance of the community's perspective and impact on our project was considered in every step of our process. The Baltimore-Bio Crew assessed the ethical integrity of our project through various methods such as public engagement, outreach, surveys, and presentations. Through these techniques, we have collected a diverse set of perspectives on our work and its capacity to positively impact the world.
| + | </article> |
| − | The Baltimore-Bio Crew performed presentations in front of audiences that varied from scientific professionals and community members to an environmental advocacy organization that was all interested in learning more about our work. Each presentation given was in preparation for the iGEM competition and was presented at different stages of progress in our work. The first notable presentation was given at the Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology, which is located near the Baltimore Inner Harbor. The audience was full of scientific specialists, that was able to give educational insight on the ways in which our project could develop. By presenting to this group, we were able to gain new outlooks on our process such as the practical uses of our product, the safeness of our methods, and the bioethical concerns of our work. Another important discussion that we had was with the community, people interested in science and our work visited the lab to hear more about our project. They were able to encourage our thoughts on the people’s opinions about synthetic biology and the practical uses of our product.
| + | <article> |
| | + | On October 7th, our team presented to the public for Baltimore Innovation Week at our community lab, the Baltimore UnderGround Science Space (BUGSS). The UMaryland team came to watch us present, and gave us valuable feedback. While they were at BUGSS, they were also able to conduct outreach with the people that were there for Baltimore Innovation Week. |
| | </article> | | </article> |
| | <footer> | | <footer> |
| Line 159: |
Line 160: |
| | </footer> | | </footer> |
| | <article> | | <article> |
| − | The importance of the community's perspective and impact on our project was considered in every step of our process. The Baltimore-Bio Crew assessed the ethical integrity of our project through various methods such as public engagement, outreach, surveys, and presentations. Through these techniques, we have collected a diverse set of perspectives on our work and its capacity to positively impact the world.
| + | On October 21st, the UMaryland team came and showed us their presentation. We were able to learn more about presenting well, and they were able to get feedback on their presentation. |
| − | The Baltimore-Bio Crew performed presentations in front of audiences that varied from scientific professionals and community members to an environmental advocacy organization that was all interested in learning more about our work. Each presentation given was in preparation for the iGEM competition and was presented at different stages of progress in our work. The first notable presentation was given at the Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology, which is located near the Baltimore Inner Harbor. The audience was full of scientific specialists, that was able to give educational insight on the ways in which our project could develop. By presenting to this group, we were able to gain new outlooks on our process such as the practical uses of our product, the safeness of our methods, and the bioethical concerns of our work. Another important discussion that we had was with the community, people interested in science and our work visited the lab to hear more about our project. They were able to encourage our thoughts on the people’s opinions about synthetic biology and the practical uses of our product.
| + | |
| | </article> | | </article> |
| | <footer> | | <footer> |
| | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/5b/T--Baltimore_Bio-Crew--umaryland_team_presenting.jpg" style="width:640px; height:480px;"><!--original dimensions: 640 × 480pix--> | | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/5b/T--Baltimore_Bio-Crew--umaryland_team_presenting.jpg" style="width:640px; height:480px;"><!--original dimensions: 640 × 480pix--> |
| | </footer> | | </footer> |
| | + | <article> |
| | + | Using the allergen screening protocol that we wrote (learn more about it <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Baltimore_Bio-Crew/Experiments">here</a>), our team also helped the UMaryland team characterize their biobricks. |
| | + | </article> |
| | </section> | | </section> |
| | | | |
