Difference between revisions of "Team:CU-Boulder/Model"

Line 240: Line 240:
  
 
<body>
 
<body>
−
<div class = "mainhead"><h><i> &#8226; InterLab &#8226;</i></h></div>
+
<div class = "mainhead"><h><i> &#8226; Modeling &#8226;</i></h></div>
  
 
</section>
 
</section>
Line 249: Line 249:
  
 
<p>  
 
<p>  
−
This year our team decided to participate in the 2017 Interlab study, a multi-lab study in standardization for instrument measurements. More information can be found at the<a href="https://2017.igem.org/Competition/InterLab_Study"> 2017 iGEM Website</a>. Our interlab notebook can be found at <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:CU-Boulder/InterLabNoteBook"> here</a>. Our instrument was a BioTek Synergy 2 plate reader. </p>
+
In order to increase our efficiency, while saving time and resources, the team undertook various techniques in molecular modeling in order to discern the best places to perform point mutations. These three separate mechanisms are discussed in detail below. </p>
 
</span>
 
</span>
  

Revision as of 14:51, 1 November 2017

• Modeling •

In order to increase our efficiency, while saving time and resources, the team undertook various techniques in molecular modeling in order to discern the best places to perform point mutations. These three separate mechanisms are discussed in detail below.