(23 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
<!-- Head End --> | <!-- Head End --> | ||
<!-- Content Begin --> | <!-- Content Begin --> | ||
− | <img id="TopPicture" width="960" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/ | + | <img id="TopPicture" width="960" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/10/T--Munich--FrontProfilPicture_Application.jpg"> |
<table width="960" border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=10> | <table width="960" border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=10> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
<tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center> | <tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center> | ||
− | <h1> | + | <h1>Diagnosis of infectious diseases and public health</h1> |
<p> | <p> | ||
− | Traditionally, infectious diseases are diagnosed by cell culture or PCR-based methods. As these techniques require expensive infrastructure, trained personal, and time, the current practice suffers from three main problems. First, diagnosis is not available everywhere, and therefore pathogens are usually detected in central clinics, rather than at the point-of-care(POC). Second, diagnosis is not accessible to everyone. Especially in developing countries proper medical supply is often lacking, due to the high costs. And third, diagnosis is not available within a few hours, which can lead to negligence of laboratory tests, resulting in premature prescription of antibiotics, the primary reason for the recrudescence of resistant bacteria strains.</p> | + | Traditionally, infectious diseases are diagnosed by cell culture or PCR-based methods. As these techniques require expensive infrastructure, trained personal, and time, the current practice suffers from three main problems. First, diagnosis is not available everywhere, and therefore pathogens are usually detected in central clinics<sup><a class="myLink" href="#ref_2">2</a></sup>, rather than at the point-of-care (POC). Second, diagnosis is not accessible to everyone. Especially in developing countries proper medical supply is often lacking, due to the high costs. And third, diagnosis is not available within a few hours, which can lead to negligence of laboratory tests, resulting in premature prescription of antibiotics, the primary reason for the recrudescence of resistant bacteria strains<sup><a class="myLink" href="#ref_3">3</a></sup>.</p> |
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center> | <tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center> | ||
− | <h1>Current solutions</h1> | + | <h1>Current solutions for rapid testing</h1> |
<p> | <p> | ||
− | Most point-of-care tests that are currently established on the market, like pregnancy tests, are based on antibodies targeting certain metabolites. These tests are therefore restricted to one specific application and require long and expensive design cycles for the development of new tests for other applications or changing pathogen epitopes as in case of endemic virus strains with high mutation rate. | + | Most point-of-care tests that are currently established on the market, like pregnancy tests, are based on antibodies targeting certain metabolites<sup><a class="myLink" href="#ref_4">4</a></sup>. These tests are therefore restricted to one specific application and require long and expensive design cycles for the development of new tests for other applications or changing pathogen epitopes as in case of endemic virus strains with high mutation rate. |
<p> | <p> | ||
− | According to our contact person at Médecins Sans Frontières ( | + | According to our contact person at Médecins Sans Frontières (<a class="myLink" href="http://msf.org">MSF</a>), already existing low-cost POC-test for infectious diseases are mostly based on antibody-based lateral flow tests such as <a class="myLink" href="http://www.biomerieux-diagnostics.com/bionexia-rota-adeno-rapid-test">BIONEXIA® Rota Adeno</a> or <a class="myLink" href="http://nhdiag.com/cholera_bt.shtml">SMART™II Cholera O1</a>. Recently, qPCR-based systems were developed that provide a more universal solution for highly automated nucleic-acid detection. According to our contact person at MSF, also cartridge-based systems are currently employed as POC diagnostics for in-field applications. <a class="myLink" href="http://www.cepheid.com/us/cepheid-solutions/systems/genexpert-systems/genexpert-iv">GeneXpert</a> allows the detection of MRSA in patient samples, and <a class="myLink" href="https://www.alere.com/en/home/search.html?searchtext=alereq&c=WW&%3Acq_csrf_token=undefined">Alere™ q</a> provides an automated bench top platform for nucleic acid testing in any healthcare setting. |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | These qPCR- and ELISA-based methods represent a significant advance in the portability and usability of point-of-care testing. However, these tests | + | These qPCR- and ELISA-based methods represent a significant advance in the portability and usability of point-of-care testing. However, these tests include plenty of plastic waste and cost around 10$ for consumables and several thousands of dollars for the main device. This is too high for applications in developing countries for which doctors without borders calls a price of less than 1$ per test. |
</p> | </p> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
<tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center> | <tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center> | ||
− | <h1> | + | <h1>CascAID as an ultimate solution</h1> |
<p> | <p> | ||
We developed CascAID to combine the portability, affordability, and usability of point-of-care tests with the universality and sensitivity of PCR-based nucleic acid detection. We achieve this by using the tools of synthetic biology to minimize hardware requirements and by supplying CascAID in a low-cost paper-based format. | We developed CascAID to combine the portability, affordability, and usability of point-of-care tests with the universality and sensitivity of PCR-based nucleic acid detection. We achieve this by using the tools of synthetic biology to minimize hardware requirements and by supplying CascAID in a low-cost paper-based format. | ||
Due to the rapid, software-aided design of crRNA, CascAID can be easily adapted to a variety of targets - from bacterial infections and rapidly evolving viral epidemics to cancer-associated mutations. | Due to the rapid, software-aided design of crRNA, CascAID can be easily adapted to a variety of targets - from bacterial infections and rapidly evolving viral epidemics to cancer-associated mutations. | ||
− | Additionally, the Cas13a enzyme was shown to find targets with a single-nucleotide specificity, superior to PCR-based methods. CascAID can be entirely conducted on-site by the doctor or patient and therefore reduces the logistic complexity, drastically hastening the diagnostic process. | + | Additionally, the Cas13a enzyme was shown to find targets with a single-nucleotide specificity, superior to PCR-based methods<sup><a class="myLink" href="#ref_1">1</a></sup>. CascAID can be entirely conducted on-site by the doctor or patient and therefore reduces the logistic complexity, drastically hastening the diagnostic process. |
</p> | </p> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Line 117: | Line 117: | ||
<h3>At home testing</h3> | <h3>At home testing</h3> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | CascAID is accessible to everyone. Designed with an open-source philosophy, the hardware, like our fluorescence detector Lightbringer, can be assembled from common low-cost components by anyone. We did a poll, to address the question of whether people would use CascAID to diagnose themselves for infectious diseases at home, without going to a doctor. Although we received a good resonance from the public, we think that a universal tool for nucleic acid testing is very powerful and therefore raises ethical issues. If applied for detection of, e.g., severe genetic diseases or HIV, the presence of a doctor is also essential for guidance and psychological aid , which is why usage of such tests must be debated and regulated appropriately. | + | CascAID is accessible to everyone. Designed with an open-source philosophy, the hardware, like our fluorescence detector Lightbringer, can be assembled from common low-cost components by anyone. We did a poll, to address the question of whether people would use CascAID to diagnose themselves for infectious diseases at home, without going to a doctor. Although we received a good resonance from the public, we think that a universal tool for nucleic acid testing is very powerful and therefore raises ethical issues. If applied for detection of, e.g., severe genetic diseases or HIV, the presence of a doctor is also essential for guidance and psychological aid, which is why usage of such tests must be debated and regulated appropriately. More information on risks of self-tests can be found on our <a class="myLink" href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Munich/Safety">Safety page</a>. |
</p> | </p> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Line 125: | Line 125: | ||
<h3>Antibiotics resistance</h3> | <h3>Antibiotics resistance</h3> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | CascAID is fast. This is crucial to enable a timely and appropriate therapy. For instance, the ability to distinguish between viral and bacterial infections would be of great importance for lowering antibiotics over-prescription. This way a misuse of antibiotics as a leading reason for multi-resistant bacteria strains would be significantly reduced. | + | CascAID is fast and high-sensitive. This is crucial to enable a timely and appropriate therapy. For instance, the ability to distinguish between viral and bacterial infections would be of great importance for lowering antibiotics over-prescription. This way a misuse of antibiotics as a leading reason for multi-resistant bacteria strains would be significantly reduced. |
</p> | </p> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center> | ||
+ | <h3>References</h3> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | <ol style="text-align: left"> | ||
+ | <li id="ref_1">Gootenberg, J. S., et al. (2017). "Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2." <i>Science</i> 356(6336): 438-442. | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li id="ref_2">St John, A. and C. P. Price (2014). "Existing and Emerging Technologies for Point-of-Care Testing." <i>Clin Biochem Rev</i> 35(3): 155-167. | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li id="ref_3">Llor, C., & Bjerrum, L. (2014). "Antimicrobial resistance: risk associated with antibiotic overuse and initiatives to reduce the problem." <i>Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety</i>, 5(6), 229–241.</li> | ||
+ | <li id="ref_4">Peeling, R. W. and R. McNerney (2014). "Emerging technologies in point-of-care molecular diagnostics for resource-limited settings." <i>Expert Rev Mol Diagn</i> 14(5): 525-534.</li> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | </ol> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
Latest revision as of 00:43, 2 November 2017
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|