Difference between revisions of "Team:Duke/Design"
IanCFMiles (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
</button> | </button> | ||
| − | <br> | + | <br> <br> <br> |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/ | + | <center><p> |
| + | With these design criteria in mind, we developed the following lateral flow assay. | ||
| + | <br> <br><br> <h1> Solution: Lateral Flow Assay </h1> | ||
| + | </p> </center> | ||
| + | <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> | ||
| + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/8a/T--Duke--LFA_DesignTry3.jpg" width="900"> | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
| − | + | <p> In order to achieve this lateral flow assay our team focused on engineering a thermostable variant of griffithsin which would be needed to create the assay and allow the diagnostic to have a longer shelf life. If this part were to be produced, then the rest of the assay would only require an assembly of the required parts. The major focus of our wet lab was focused on developing this thermostable variant of griffithsin.</p> | |
</div> | </div> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
| + | {{Duke/footer}} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:06, 2 November 2017
Design
To design criteria for a lateral flow assay, we developed an outline of important design specifications determined via a simple market analysis.
With these design criteria in mind, we developed the following lateral flow assay.
Solution: Lateral Flow Assay
In order to achieve this lateral flow assay our team focused on engineering a thermostable variant of griffithsin which would be needed to create the assay and allow the diagnostic to have a longer shelf life. If this part were to be produced, then the rest of the assay would only require an assembly of the required parts. The major focus of our wet lab was focused on developing this thermostable variant of griffithsin.
