Difference between revisions of "Team:Calgary/Human Practices"

 
(20 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
<div id="Caption">Click on the icons to learn more!</div>
 
<div id="Caption">Click on the icons to learn more!</div>
 
<p></p>
 
  
 
<div class="map map900">
 
<div class="map map900">
Line 27: Line 25:
  
 
<map name="applicationMap900">
 
<map name="applicationMap900">
  <a href="#Wastewater"> <area shape="circle" coords="450,95,50" href="#Wastewater" alt="WasteWater"> </a>
+
  <area shape="circle" coords="450,95,50" href="#Wastewater" alt="WasteWater">  
<a href="#Landfills"> <area shape="circle" coords="208,253,50" href="#Landfills" alt="Landfills"> </a>
+
<area shape="circle" coords="208,253,50" href="#Landfills" alt="Landfills">  
  <a href="#Developing"> <area shape="circle" coords="450,409,50" href="#Developing" alt="DevelopingCountries"> </a>
+
<area shape="circle" coords="450,409,50" href="#Developing" alt="DevelopingCountries">  
  <a href="#Space">  <area shape="circle" coords="691,253,50" href="#Space" alt="Space"> </a>
+
<area shape="circle" coords="691,253,50" href="#Space" alt="Space">  
 
</map>
 
</map>
  
 
<map name="applicationMap700">
 
<map name="applicationMap700">
  <a href="#Wastewater"> <area shape="circle" coords="350,74,40" href="#Wastewater" alt="WasteWater"> </a>
+
  <area shape="circle" coords="350,74,40" href="#Wastewater" alt="WasteWater">  
  <a href="#Landfills">  <area shape="circle" coords="161,196,40" href="#Landfills" alt="Landfills"> </a>
+
  <area shape="circle" coords="161,196,40" href="#Landfills" alt="Landfills">  
  <a href="#Developing">  <area shape="circle" coords="350,318,40" href="#Developing" alt="DevelopingCountries"> </a>
+
<area shape="circle" coords="350,318,40" href="#Developing" alt="DevelopingCountries">  
   <a href="#Space">    <area shape="circle" coords="538,196,40" href="#Space" alt="Space"> </a>
+
   <area shape="circle" coords="538,196,40" href="#Space" alt="Space">  
 
</map>
 
</map>
  
 
<map name="applicationMap400">
 
<map name="applicationMap400">
  <a href="#Wastewater">  <area shape="circle" coords="76,356,40" href="#Wastewater" alt="WasteWater"></a>
+
<area shape="circle" coords="76,356,40" href="#Wastewater" alt="WasteWater">
<a href="#Landfills">  <area shape="circle" coords="200,164,40" href="#Landfills" alt="Landfills"></a>
+
  <area shape="circle" coords="200,164,40" href="#Landfills" alt="Landfills">
  <a href="#Developing"> <area shape="circle" coords="324,356,40" href="#Developing" alt="DevelopingCountries"></a>
+
<area shape="circle" coords="324,356,40" href="#Developing" alt="DevelopingCountries">
  <a href="#Space">   <area shape="circle" coords="200,546,40" href="#Space" alt="Space"></a>
+
   <area shape="circle" coords="200,546,40" href="#Space" alt="Space">
 
</map>
 
</map>
  
 
<map name="applicationMap300">
 
<map name="applicationMap300">
  <a href="#Wastewater"> <area shape="circle" coords="46,266,30" href="#Wastewater" alt="WasteWater"></a>
+
  <area shape="circle" coords="46,266,30" href="#Wastewater" alt="WasteWater">
  <a href="#Landfills">  <area shape="circle" coords="149,123,30" href="#Landfills" alt="Landfill"></a>
+
  <area shape="circle" coords="149,123,30" href="#Landfills" alt="Landfill">
  <a href="#Developing">  <area shape="circle" coords="242,266,30" href="#Developing" alt="DevelopingCountries"></a>
+
<area shape="circle" coords="242,266,30" href="#Developing" alt="DevelopingCountries">
  <a href="#Space">    <area shape="circle" coords="149,408,30" href="#Space" alt="Space"></a>
+
<area shape="circle" coords="149,408,30" href="#Space" alt="Space">
 
</map>
 
</map>
  
 +
<p>The team focused on evaluating the feasibility of four proposed project applications: integrating PHB production with landfill leachate treatment, integrating PHB production in a wastewater treatment plant, integrating PHB production in developing countries, and the production of PHB on Mars from human waste.</p>
 +
 +
<br>
  
 
<a class="anchor" id="Landfills"></a>
 
<a class="anchor" id="Landfills"></a>
 
<p><h2><div id="Icons"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/23/Calgary2017_LandfillsIcon.png"> </div> &ensp; Landfills</h2></p>
 
<p><h2><div id="Icons"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/23/Calgary2017_LandfillsIcon.png"> </div> &ensp; Landfills</h2></p>
<div id="Caption"><b>Figure 1 and 2: </b> Photos from the tour of the wastewater treatment facilities in Calgary in June.</div>
 
  
<p>The integration of PHB production in leachate treatment would likely be unfeasible due to low volumes of leachate that are usually produced at landfills. In Calgary, a single landfill generates about 100,000 L of leachate per day. Although COD content in leachate is higher than in wastewater, the estimated amount of PHB produced in Calgary was about 8000 kg/year, based on COD content of 1977 mg/L in Calgary leachate (Kashef & Lungue, 2016). This would result in about $40,000 in revenue, assuming a price of $5 per kg of PHB (Manufacturing and properties of PHB, 2017) . Another member of the team performed similar calculations assuming 0.38 grams of PHB produced per gram of VFA, which resulted in 22,250 kg of PHB per year and a potential revenue of $111,126 per year.The cost of implementing a PHB production process will likely be magnitudes larger. Leachate treatment in China is a more promising alternative. China generates a larger amount of leachate compared to many other countries .("Leachate treatment in China: Technologies and Import Opportunities", 2015) Additionally, the COD content in Hong Kong, China ranges from 15,700 to 50,000 mg/L for young landfills ("Leachate treatment in China: Technologies and Import Opportunities", 2015), which is 8 to 25 times greater than in Calgary. We estimated that about 900,000 - 3,000,000 kg of PHB can be produced per year in Hong Kong depending on COD content and using PHA yield of 0.11 kg of PHA per kg of COD. PHB production from leachate was also considered for Vancouver, which generates 2,225,978 cubic meters of leachate per year (Vancouver landfill 2016 annual report, 2017). Based on our estimates, about 3,100,000 kg of PHB can be produced per year assuming the COD content of about 13,000 mg/L (Tao, Hall & Masbough, 2005)</p>
+
<p>Landfill leachate treatment is an avenue that we considered when looking at possible applications of our project on Earth. Leachate is the fermented runoff liquid that accumulates underground at landfills, and as a feedstock, it is rich in organic matter. It is highly toxic and becomes dangerous to the environment when left untreated as it  can leak into nearby groundwater, causing contamination.</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>Conventional technologies used in leachate treatment do not include the production of value-added products, and current technologies appear to be concerned with the simple removal of toxic, undesired components. Leachate transfer methods include recycling and combining it with the treatment of domestic sewage, biodegradation for waste decomposition, and chemical and physical methods involving oxidation, adsorption, chemical precipitation, coagulation/flocculation, sedimentation/flotation and air stripping. Integrating a PHB-producing stage into conventional leachate treatment would facilitate the production of PHB out of the waste, cutting down the cost of treatment and allowing the facilities to become profitable. One problem associated with this feedstock is can be contaminated with heavy metals, which decreases the rate of growth and PHB production in our bacteria. This would mean that the leachate would have to be treated to remove heavy metals prior to fermentation with our bacteria, and is a costly process.</p>
 +
 
 +
<br>
  
 
<a class="anchor" id="Wastewater"></a>
 
<a class="anchor" id="Wastewater"></a>
Line 65: Line 69:
  
 
<div id="TwoCols"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/00/Calgary2017_WastewaterPhoto1.png"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/ee/Calgary2017_WastewaterPhoto2.png"></div>
 
<div id="TwoCols"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/00/Calgary2017_WastewaterPhoto1.png"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/ee/Calgary2017_WastewaterPhoto2.png"></div>
 +
<div id="Caption"><b>Figures 1 and 2: </b> Photos from a tour of the Pine Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant in Calgary in June, 2017.</div>
  
<p>Our project was initially aimed at providing a method by which <b>wastewater treatment facilities</b> could take biological material in wastewater and transform it into value-added product in the form of bioplastic. Part of our integrated human practices included a visit to our local wastewater treatment facility.</p>
+
<p>Our project also had the potential to provide a method by which wastewater treatment facilities could take the biological material in wastewater and transform it into a value-added product. Part of our Integrated Human Practices included a visit to our local wastewater treatment facility. Pine Creek is a new wastewater treatment facility in Calgary, which treats sludge to produce methane and uses the treated sludge as a fertilizer.</p>
<p>For the wastewater treatment plant, we estimated 28,100,000 kg of PHB produced per year. The Pine Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant in Calgary processes about 1 million cubic meters of waste per day. The COD content and PHA yield were assumed to be 1000 mg/L and 0.11 kg of PHA per kg of COD, respectively, for the calculations.</p>
+
 
 +
<p>This tour served the purpose to gather information regarding this application. Sludge produced during conventional municipal wastewater treatment is a nutrient-rich material that looks promising for the PHB production industry. Currently, sludge is treated to remove organic matter and toxins. Removal of organic matter is achieved by fermentation, where the organic matter is broken down into volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and is afterward digested by bacteria to produce methane and carbon dioxide. We researched on the use of sludge as a feedstock for PHB production and showed the process to be feasible, but not yet economical. One of the major downsides of industrial-scale PHB production is the use of toxic chemicals - chloroform in the extraction and purification of PHB bioplastic. We also found that along with the extraction and purification expenses, the profitability of this option was not ideal.</p>
 +
 
 +
<br>
  
 
<a class="anchor" id="Developing"></a>
 
<a class="anchor" id="Developing"></a>
 
<p><h2><div id="Icons"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/f6/Calgary2017_DevelopingCountriesIcon.png"> </div> &ensp; Developing Countries</h2></p>
 
<p><h2><div id="Icons"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/f6/Calgary2017_DevelopingCountriesIcon.png"> </div> &ensp; Developing Countries</h2></p>
  
<p>In developing countries, we envisioned PHB production incorporated into scaled-down wastewater treatment systems in small communities that lacked established treatment methods. Selling PHB would provide monetary incentive to construct a wastewater treatment system, which, in turn, will reduce diseases due to poor sanitation. Additionally, we wanted to compare PHB production between genetically engineered bacteria and natural bacterial communities in sludge, which have been previously used to feasibly produce PHB. Assuming a community size of 2000 people, solid waste generation of 3.113 x 10-3 m3 /day/person (Palanivel & Sulaiman, 2014), COD content of 601 mg/L [14], COD to PHB conversion of 0.11 for mixed cultures and 0.88 for pure cultures  (Rhu, Lee, Kim & Choi, 2003) and a price of $5 per kg of PHB (Choi & Lee, 1997), we found that using pure cultures results in additional $2,000 in revenues. However, the cost of sterilization of waste stream before inoculation with pure culture was estimated at $100,000 (Choi & Lee, 1997).</p>
+
<p>After learning that wastewater treatment was not profitable, we turned our focus to developing countries. Since the first two applications we considered were of greater concern in the developing world than in areas where effective wastewater treatment and plastic recycling already exist, we decided to look into implementing our system as a small-scale wastewater treatment option for communities in the developing world. Selling PHB would provide a monetary incentive to construct a wastewater treatment system, which, in turn, will reduce the incidence of water-borne disease. Challenges arise concerning the cost of our product and the lack of a user-friendly platform.</p>
 +
 
 +
<br>
  
 
<a class="anchor" id="Space"></a>
 
<a class="anchor" id="Space"></a>
 
<p><h2><div id="Icons"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/41/Calgary2017_MarsIcon.png"> </div>&ensp; Space</h2></p>
 
<p><h2><div id="Icons"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/41/Calgary2017_MarsIcon.png"> </div>&ensp; Space</h2></p>
  
<p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, eu neque ultricies sem primis id dignissim. Et vitae pellentesque enim varius, ligula nascetur sem laoreet eget, luctus quis vitae hendrerit, ut tincidunt ac eget lobortis lorem. Eros purus metus, commodi rutrum vulputate sed, dui odio neque tellus. Adipiscing cursus nisl sit faucibus dolor, pede suspendisse enim, at amet sodales cras vestibulum proin id, libero facilisis faucibus bibendum nonummy enim. Vestibulum eget torquent commodo faucibus.
+
<p>While the previously-mentioned wastewater feedstock is a promising source of VFAs, the cost of implementation in current treatment facilities is high. In addition, the control of naturally-existing bacteria in the wastewater is inadequate, meaning a pure culture of our engineered <i>E. coli</i> would be outcompeted.
Quis scelerisque ipsum integer, faucibus lacus, convallis eros nunc in justo, ac a libero diam a amet leo, aenean nonummy. Vivamus in, per congue, molestie fringilla nibh ut rutrum leo vestibulum, risus vitae sit cras etiam leo, egestas exercitationem mi ipsum. Nunc quam vitae elit vitae libero, integer libero velit, in sit felis cursus. Tincidunt amet orci etiam nam, nec ultricies, ipsum porta sed, rerum leo sit ut, est magna. Vulputate ut nostra quis tortor, sit metus nec aliquam nec eros per, libero vivamus turpis elit. Feugiat dolor ligula integer interdum mattis, dignissim felis ullamcorper.
+
 
Nonummy vel orci pede hac, euismod pellentesque eget vitae neque. Volutpat consequat tristique sapien. Metus integer urna justo a, maecenas dolor nibh, in orci, vitae nulla aptent vitae vitae, nec vel amet. Curabitur quisque, aliquam sodales commodi in, proin lacus lobortis feugiat, quis condimentum phasellus dui in elementum integer, class nullam amet. Sit nam non tempus non pellentesque rutrum. Dui pellentesque pharetra ante lobortis aliquet potenti. Justo commodo quam, nascetur posuere ultricies, integer arcu nec magna ullamcorper elementum. Cubilia lacus ac integer nunc platea. Consectetuer et enim, nullam sed velit enim, elit fringilla dui integer laoreet commodo, mauris diam, tellus semper id et tortor mus. Ligula aenean consectetuer platea aenean sit, donec aliquet, urna mollitia, vitae ligula ut odio enim diam. Eros augue in sed.
+
<p>The implementation of our PHB production process in space is a novel solution in the treatment of the solid human waste. Currently, human waste is left untreated and is transported back to Earth where it burns upon re-entering the Earth's atmosphere. NASA has been investigating different ways of utilizing human waste during space expeditions and on Mars, yet the use of human stool in the production of PHB was not yet discussed. This encouraged us to look at the project idea as a novel idea worthy of investigation. Furthermore, the high level of sterility of the process supports the growth of pure bacterial culture. Even more, the PHB produced in space can then be used in Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) 3D printing necessary tools on demand. </p>
Arcu vivamus, tincidunt porta, a suspendisse aliquam suscipit suspendisse nunc. Ultrices tempor quis egestas donec ut, ut vestibulum libero risus feugiat quis justo. Vehicula vehicula pede libero donec laoreet ut. Sagittis habitasse nisl. Vitae et justo. Sed auctor magnis et, augue sodales tellus consectetuer quisque, est feugiat quis orci scelerisque, et nunc bibendum sed orci et, feugiat integer auctor nulla lectus.</p>
+
  
  

Latest revision as of 03:45, 2 November 2017

Header

Human Practices

Click on the icons to learn more!
WasteWater Landfills DevelopingCountries Space WasteWater Landfills DevelopingCountries Space WasteWater Landfills DevelopingCountries Space WasteWater Landfill DevelopingCountries Space

The team focused on evaluating the feasibility of four proposed project applications: integrating PHB production with landfill leachate treatment, integrating PHB production in a wastewater treatment plant, integrating PHB production in developing countries, and the production of PHB on Mars from human waste.


  Landfills

Landfill leachate treatment is an avenue that we considered when looking at possible applications of our project on Earth. Leachate is the fermented runoff liquid that accumulates underground at landfills, and as a feedstock, it is rich in organic matter. It is highly toxic and becomes dangerous to the environment when left untreated as it can leak into nearby groundwater, causing contamination.

Conventional technologies used in leachate treatment do not include the production of value-added products, and current technologies appear to be concerned with the simple removal of toxic, undesired components. Leachate transfer methods include recycling and combining it with the treatment of domestic sewage, biodegradation for waste decomposition, and chemical and physical methods involving oxidation, adsorption, chemical precipitation, coagulation/flocculation, sedimentation/flotation and air stripping. Integrating a PHB-producing stage into conventional leachate treatment would facilitate the production of PHB out of the waste, cutting down the cost of treatment and allowing the facilities to become profitable. One problem associated with this feedstock is can be contaminated with heavy metals, which decreases the rate of growth and PHB production in our bacteria. This would mean that the leachate would have to be treated to remove heavy metals prior to fermentation with our bacteria, and is a costly process.


  Wastewater Treatment Plants

Figures 1 and 2: Photos from a tour of the Pine Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant in Calgary in June, 2017.

Our project also had the potential to provide a method by which wastewater treatment facilities could take the biological material in wastewater and transform it into a value-added product. Part of our Integrated Human Practices included a visit to our local wastewater treatment facility. Pine Creek is a new wastewater treatment facility in Calgary, which treats sludge to produce methane and uses the treated sludge as a fertilizer.

This tour served the purpose to gather information regarding this application. Sludge produced during conventional municipal wastewater treatment is a nutrient-rich material that looks promising for the PHB production industry. Currently, sludge is treated to remove organic matter and toxins. Removal of organic matter is achieved by fermentation, where the organic matter is broken down into volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and is afterward digested by bacteria to produce methane and carbon dioxide. We researched on the use of sludge as a feedstock for PHB production and showed the process to be feasible, but not yet economical. One of the major downsides of industrial-scale PHB production is the use of toxic chemicals - chloroform in the extraction and purification of PHB bioplastic. We also found that along with the extraction and purification expenses, the profitability of this option was not ideal.


  Developing Countries

After learning that wastewater treatment was not profitable, we turned our focus to developing countries. Since the first two applications we considered were of greater concern in the developing world than in areas where effective wastewater treatment and plastic recycling already exist, we decided to look into implementing our system as a small-scale wastewater treatment option for communities in the developing world. Selling PHB would provide a monetary incentive to construct a wastewater treatment system, which, in turn, will reduce the incidence of water-borne disease. Challenges arise concerning the cost of our product and the lack of a user-friendly platform.


  Space

While the previously-mentioned wastewater feedstock is a promising source of VFAs, the cost of implementation in current treatment facilities is high. In addition, the control of naturally-existing bacteria in the wastewater is inadequate, meaning a pure culture of our engineered E. coli would be outcompeted.

The implementation of our PHB production process in space is a novel solution in the treatment of the solid human waste. Currently, human waste is left untreated and is transported back to Earth where it burns upon re-entering the Earth's atmosphere. NASA has been investigating different ways of utilizing human waste during space expeditions and on Mars, yet the use of human stool in the production of PHB was not yet discussed. This encouraged us to look at the project idea as a novel idea worthy of investigation. Furthermore, the high level of sterility of the process supports the growth of pure bacterial culture. Even more, the PHB produced in space can then be used in Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) 3D printing necessary tools on demand.

Engagement

Collaborations