(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
Although did not fully integrate all parts together in the time frame of our project, we could connect each unit to the next, so that we are confident that our entire platform is functional. For example, we could achieve equally sensitive bulk detection of pathogen RNA from <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> sources, and were later able to detect <i>in vitro</i> RNA with lyophilized Cas13a on paper, therefore we believe RNA from lysed cells can be detected on paper. In this overview, we list our achievements and where we faced issues, and we present a summary of the characterization of each module in the sub-pages. | Although did not fully integrate all parts together in the time frame of our project, we could connect each unit to the next, so that we are confident that our entire platform is functional. For example, we could achieve equally sensitive bulk detection of pathogen RNA from <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> sources, and were later able to detect <i>in vitro</i> RNA with lyophilized Cas13a on paper, therefore we believe RNA from lysed cells can be detected on paper. In this overview, we list our achievements and where we faced issues, and we present a summary of the characterization of each module in the sub-pages. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
− | + | <div class="captionPicture"> | |
+ | <img width=600 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/9a/T--Munich--Overview_Diagram_Results.png"> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Our modular units and the integration between them are mostly validated. Green ticks indicated full validation, yellow ticks indicated partial validation. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<h3>What worked</h3> | <h3>What worked</h3> | ||
<ul class="listResults"> | <ul class="listResults"> | ||
Line 141: | Line 146: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td align=center valign=center colspan=6> | <td align=center valign=center colspan=6> | ||
+ | <div class="captionPicture"> | ||
<img width=800 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/53/T--Munich--Results_Hardwaretime151.png"> | <img width=800 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/53/T--Munich--Results_Hardwaretime151.png"> | ||
− | <p>Detection of <i>E. coli</i> 16S rRNA from Cas13a on paper in our self-built detector</p> | + | <p>Detection of a sequence from <i>E. coli</i> 16S rRNA from Cas13a on paper in our self-built detector</p> |
+ | </div> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 169: | Line 176: | ||
We laid the groundwork for colorimetric read-outs that will add another layer of amplification in our cascade detection (gold nanoparticles, intein-extein and ssDNA amplification). Those readouts should allow for a practical readability of the diagnosis by the user without the need of digital analysis. Additionally, their amplification scheme should also lower the detection limit of the Cas13a without the need for pre-amplification of the target. </p><p> | We laid the groundwork for colorimetric read-outs that will add another layer of amplification in our cascade detection (gold nanoparticles, intein-extein and ssDNA amplification). Those readouts should allow for a practical readability of the diagnosis by the user without the need of digital analysis. Additionally, their amplification scheme should also lower the detection limit of the Cas13a without the need for pre-amplification of the target. </p><p> | ||
However, we developed in parallel a scheme for amplifying the target using isothermal amplification (RPA) and transcription. This was motivated by our modeling work, which determined a detection limit in the range of the one found experimentally (around 10nM), and quantified the improvement we could expect from a cascade amplification, from <i>in vivo</i> DNA to RNA to readout. RPA worked well from <i>in vivo</i> and <i>in vitro</i> DNA sources, and the combination of RPA and transcription on paper was efficient enough to overcome our readout detection limit.</p><p> | However, we developed in parallel a scheme for amplifying the target using isothermal amplification (RPA) and transcription. This was motivated by our modeling work, which determined a detection limit in the range of the one found experimentally (around 10nM), and quantified the improvement we could expect from a cascade amplification, from <i>in vivo</i> DNA to RNA to readout. RPA worked well from <i>in vivo</i> and <i>in vitro</i> DNA sources, and the combination of RPA and transcription on paper was efficient enough to overcome our readout detection limit.</p><p> | ||
− | We built a fluorescence detector that is to our knowledge, the cheapest and most sensitive ever built by an iGEM team, and provides a reasonable alternative to commercial plate readers. We used it successfully to detect Cas13a activity on paper, from <i>in vitro</i> transcribed RNA pathogen. However, the product itself may need to be redesigned for market distribution: in general, a fluorescence detector is not necessarily user-friendly, the extraction of the RNA on chip needs to be optimized | + | We built a fluorescence detector that is to our knowledge, the cheapest and most sensitive ever built by an iGEM team, and provides a reasonable alternative to commercial plate readers. We used it successfully to detect Cas13a activity on paper, from <i>in vitro</i> transcribed RNA pathogen. However, the product itself may need to be redesigned for market distribution: in general, a fluorescence detector is not necessarily user-friendly, the extraction of the RNA on chip needs to be optimized. </p><p> |
Nevertheless, we are glad to have created a functional platform that allows the detection of nanomolar concentrations of a pathogen's RNA within 30 minutes. With our modular approach, we have shown at least proof-of-concept results for each part, and are confident that no fundamental gap prevents our platform from being fully integrated. | Nevertheless, we are glad to have created a functional platform that allows the detection of nanomolar concentrations of a pathogen's RNA within 30 minutes. With our modular approach, we have shown at least proof-of-concept results for each part, and are confident that no fundamental gap prevents our platform from being fully integrated. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 184: | Line 191: | ||
<li><i> In vivo </i> heat lysis: During our experiments, we realized that the direct use of the RNA extracted from <i> E. coli </i> using heat lysis can lead to RNase contamination. Although our Cas13a cleavage assays are performed in presence of RNase Inhibitor to suppress the activity of the RNases that could be present, we observed that the heat lysed samples show relatively higher fluorescence activity in comparison to the phenol-chloroform extracted samples.</li> | <li><i> In vivo </i> heat lysis: During our experiments, we realized that the direct use of the RNA extracted from <i> E. coli </i> using heat lysis can lead to RNase contamination. Although our Cas13a cleavage assays are performed in presence of RNase Inhibitor to suppress the activity of the RNases that could be present, we observed that the heat lysed samples show relatively higher fluorescence activity in comparison to the phenol-chloroform extracted samples.</li> | ||
<li>RNA extraction and amplification: The RNA extracted from <i> Bacillus subtilis </i> lead to unstable results, giving sometimes higher than positive control signals, sometimes very noisy kinetics. As this is a gram positive bacteria, we think some further characterization must be done on the efficiency of heat lysis of different type of cells. In all cases, the RNA should be amplified after lysis and before detection, as pathogens are often present below our detection limit of 10nM in real samples.</li> | <li>RNA extraction and amplification: The RNA extracted from <i> Bacillus subtilis </i> lead to unstable results, giving sometimes higher than positive control signals, sometimes very noisy kinetics. As this is a gram positive bacteria, we think some further characterization must be done on the efficiency of heat lysis of different type of cells. In all cases, the RNA should be amplified after lysis and before detection, as pathogens are often present below our detection limit of 10nM in real samples.</li> | ||
− | <li>Cost of the chip: At the moment, the cost of our reusable detection unit is less than 15$ per unit. We could still try to minimize the costs by reducing the chip size and making it fully recyclable. We should characterize the life-time of the detector, to see how its cost is buffered by the number of tests that can be conducted with one detector. However, at the industrial level one could easily reduce the overall cost of CascAID by scaling up of the production.</li> | + | <li>Cost of the chip: At the moment, the cost of our reusable detection unit is less than 15$ per unit. We could still try to minimize the costs by reducing the chip size and making it fully recyclable. We should characterize the life-time of the detector, to see how its cost is buffered by the number of tests that can be conducted with one detector. However, at the industrial level one could easily reduce the overall cost of CascAID by scaling up of the production. A rough cost estimation for the setup of a 1000 reactions gave us a cost per single test of around 0.85 $.</li> |
<li>Lyophilization of Cas13a: the lyophilization protocol of the Cas13a has to be improved in order to make our paper chip portable and sustainable. We tried drying the Cas13a with the tardigrade intrinsically disordered proteins (TDPs) from Team TU Delft, as a cryoprotectant, but this lead to increased basal activity, rendering the detection less sensitive. Other cryoprotectants should be tried, and the stability of freeze-dried samples over a year should be assessed. </li> | <li>Lyophilization of Cas13a: the lyophilization protocol of the Cas13a has to be improved in order to make our paper chip portable and sustainable. We tried drying the Cas13a with the tardigrade intrinsically disordered proteins (TDPs) from Team TU Delft, as a cryoprotectant, but this lead to increased basal activity, rendering the detection less sensitive. Other cryoprotectants should be tried, and the stability of freeze-dried samples over a year should be assessed. </li> | ||
− | <li>Readouts with color and amplification: The colorimetric readouts need continued work, and possibly improved design, since we only managed to partially succeed with the assays. | + | <li>Readouts with color and amplification: The colorimetric readouts need continued work, and possibly improved design, since we only managed to partially succeed with the assays.</li> |
− | <li>Integration of all the modules of the platform: Although all our modules parts are functional, and locally integrated, we did not reach full integration into a unique object. However, we believe we only need more time to assemble a fully functional and integrated module system. | + | <li>Handling of real patient samples: Due to the safety restrictions in our lab, and our lack of experience with clinical studies, we did not work with real-world samples. The next step of this project, before thinking of market distribution, would be to test the functionality of our platform outside of the lab and under real point-of-care conditions.</li> |
+ | <li>Integration of all the modules of the platform: Although all our modules parts are functional, and locally integrated, we did not reach full integration into a unique object, which would eliminate the need for a lab environment. It would still need to be accessed that this diagnosis device works in a variety of environments, when handled by non or minimally trained users. However, we believe we only need more time to assemble a fully functional and integrated module system. | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> |
Latest revision as of 03:51, 2 November 2017
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|