Difference between revisions of "Team:Munich/Readouts"

 
(46 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 84: Line 84:
 
<img  src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/5c/T--Munich--Readouts_SplitC_Term.png">
 
<img  src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/5c/T--Munich--Readouts_SplitC_Term.png">
 
</div></a>
 
</div></a>
 +
<a href="#-">
 +
<div class="popup" id="ssDNA_Popup">
 +
<img  src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/90/T--Munich--Description_aeBlue.svg">
 +
</div></a>
 +
 
<!-- Head End -->
 
<!-- Head End -->
 
<!-- Content Begin -->
 
<!-- Content Begin -->
Line 100: Line 105:
 
<td style="background-color: #51a7f9;" colspan = 6 align="left">
 
<td style="background-color: #51a7f9;" colspan = 6 align="left">
 
<ul class="menuList" id="menu">
 
<ul class="menuList" id="menu">
 +
  <li><a href="/Team:Munich/Results">Overview</a></li>
 
   <li><a href="/Team:Munich/Cas13a">Cas13a</a></li>
 
   <li><a href="/Team:Munich/Cas13a">Cas13a</a></li>
 
   <li><a href="/Team:Munich/Readouts">Readouts</a></li>
 
   <li><a href="/Team:Munich/Readouts">Readouts</a></li>
Line 105: Line 111:
 
   <li><a href="/Team:Munich/DetectionOnChip">Detection Chip</a></li>
 
   <li><a href="/Team:Munich/DetectionOnChip">Detection Chip</a></li>
 
   <li><a href="/Team:Munich/Amplification">Amplification</a></li>
 
   <li><a href="/Team:Munich/Amplification">Amplification</a></li>
  <li><a href="/Team:Munich/Parts">Biobrick</a></li>
 
 
</ul>   
 
</ul>   
  
Line 113: Line 118:
 
<tr><td colspan=6 align=left valign=center>
 
<tr><td colspan=6 align=left valign=center>
 
<div style="margin-top: 40px;"><font size=7 color=#51a7f9><b style="color: #51a7f9; margin-top: 40px;">Results: Readouts</b></font></div>
 
<div style="margin-top: 40px;"><font size=7 color=#51a7f9><b style="color: #51a7f9; margin-top: 40px;">Results: Readouts</b></font></div>
 +
</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td colspan="6">
 +
<h3>What worked:</h3>
 +
  <ul class="listResults">
 +
<li>We designed <a class="myLink" href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Munich/Readouts#fluorescent">fluorescent</a> and  <a class="myLink" href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Munich/Readouts#color">colorimetric</a> readouts, and used a <a class="myLink" href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Munich/Readouts#aptam">synthetic aptamer</a> as a detection tool.
 +
</li>
 +
  </ul>
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  
 +
<tr>
 +
<td colspan="6">
 +
<h3>What presented issues:</h3>
 +
  <ul class="listResults">
 +
<li>Developing colorimetric read-outs.
 +
</li>
 +
  </ul>
 +
</td>
 +
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
<td  colspan = 6 align="left">
 
<td  colspan = 6 align="left">
 
<p class="introduction">
 
<p class="introduction">
For our experimental design, we used different fluorescence and colorimetric readouts as stated below.  
+
For our experimental design, we used different fluorescence and colorimetric readouts as stated below. The fluorescence read-outs worked well, and especially the RNaseAlert allowed us to characterize our Cas13a detection in a variety of contexts: native protein, lyophlized, in bulk, on paper, from virus target, bacterial target, <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> RNA. For our colorimetric read-outs, we could not reach a full integration with target RNA detection, but where able to assemble the necessary constructs and start characterizing them.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
Line 127: Line 150:
  
 
<tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center>
 
<tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center>
<h3>RNaseAlert Readout</h3>
+
<h3 id="fluorescent">RNaseAlert Readout</h3>
 
<p>   
 
<p>   
To characterize our Cas13a, we first turned to the standard of the field, namely the RNase Alert detection kit. This was used by Gootenberg and Doudna to characterize the Cas13a and detect pathogen RNA sequences<sup><a class="myLink" href="#ref_1">1</a></sup>. In the absence of Cas13a activation, the physical proximity of the quencher dampens fluorescence from the Fluor and there is no fluorescence activity. When Cas13a is activated, the RNA substrate is cleaved, and the Fluor and quencher are spatially separated in solution, emitting a bright green signal when excited by light of the appropriate wavelength. We did most of our experiments using the RNaseAlert system and the corresponding results are in the <a class="myLink" href="/Team:Munich/Cas13a">Cas13a</a> and <a class="myLink" href="/Team:Munich/Cas13a">target</a> subsections.  
+
To characterize our Cas13a, we first turned to the standard of the field, namely the RNaseAlert detection kit, which uses the short modified RNA sequence RNaseAlert. This was used in recent work to characterize Cas13a and detect pathogen RNA sequences<sup><a class="myLink" href="#ref_1">1,2</a></sup>. In the absence of Cas13a activation, there is no fluorescence detectable due to physical proximity of the quencher to the fluorophore. Upon binding of a matching target RNA to the crRNA, Cas13a develops a promiscuous RNase activity and cleaves off the quencher from the fluorophore. This spatial separation in solution now allows the fluorophore to emit light, leading to a detectable fluorescent signal. We showed that the increase in signal is a measure of the Cas13a activation by target RNA and therefore used it for most of our experiments. The corresponding results are specifically described in the <a class="myLink" href="/Team:Munich/Cas13a">Cas13a</a> and <a class="myLink" href="/Team:Munich/Targets">targets</a> subsections.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
The fluorescence signal quality of the RNaseAlert assay was very good, however one cannot use this readout system without the fluorescence detector. Also, since the RNaseAlert is a modified RNA, it is somehow expensive in comparison to other readouts.
+
In general, the RNaseAlert assay works very well, but one has to consider that a diagnostic device relying on this system is dependent on a fluorescence detector. For this reason, we built and evaluated the fluorescence detector “Lightbringer”, which is the most sensitive fluorescence detector ever built by an iGEM team to our knowledge. Since a colorimetric readout would overcome this problem by making an easy visualization possible, we also worked on different colorimetric readouts.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
</td>
 
</td>
Line 138: Line 161:
  
 
<tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center>
 
<tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center>
<h3>Spinach Aptamer Readout</h3>
+
<h3 id="aptam">Spinach Aptamer Readout</h3>
 
<p>   
 
<p>   
After the successful experimentation of the Cas13a with the RNaseAlert, we also tried out RNA aptamers for our readouts. For this, we used the Spinach aptamer which binds to the DFHBI changing its 3D structure<sup><a class="myLink" href="#ref_2">2</a></sup>. We activated the Cas13a by the specific target, which then cleaved the Spinach aptamer bound to DFHBI and were able to show that the fluorescence activity slowly decreases (Figure 1).  
+
Here, we used the Spinach aptamer (a 80-nucleotides RNA) which binds the DFHBI fluorophore, changing its spatial conformation and thereby enables fluorescence<sup><a class="myLink" href="#ref_3">3</a></sup>. Activated Cas13a cleaves the Spinach aptamer leading to the release of DFHBI. This process is detectable as a decreasing fluorescence intensity <b>(Figure 1)</b>.
 
</p>
 
</p>
<p>
+
 
Although we could see a clear decrease in the fluorescence activity as soon as the Cas13a is activated, the original level of fluorescence is lower than in case of RNaseAlert. This could be due to the fact that as soon as the spinach aptamer binds to the DFHBI, the fluorescence is already released. And regarding the time factor needed to mix all the reaction components, we lose some fluorescence before the Cas13a cleavage activity starts.</p>
+
 
<div class="captionPicture">
 
<div class="captionPicture">
<img width=900 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/49/T--Munich--Readouts_Aptamer_Activity.png" alt="Aptamer Activity">
+
<img width=760 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/49/T--Munich--Readouts_Aptamer_Activity.png" alt="Aptamer Activity">
<p><b>Figure 1:</b> The fluorescence activity of the Spinach aptamer decreased with the increase in the target concentration.</p>
+
<p><b>Figure 1:</b> The fluorescence activity of the Spinach aptamer is inversely proportional to the target concentration.</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</td>
 
</td>
Line 152: Line 174:
  
 
<tr><td colspan=3 align=center valign=center>
 
<tr><td colspan=3 align=center valign=center>
<h3>ssDNA Readout</h3>
+
<h3 id="color">ssDNA Readout</h3>
 
<p>   
 
<p>   
One of the first colorimetric readout that we tried out was the ssDNA oligo based readout. The idea is based around the formation of a RNA/DNA dimer and the freeing of the DNA oligo by digestion of the RNA part which has the poly-U loops. The overall idea of this readout was to utilize the Cas13a freed small activator DNA-oligo strand in various signal amplifying chains:
+
For this readout, we wanted to link the cleavage of an RNA strand (due to Cas13a activation) to an amplification scheme based on ssDNA. A dimer is formed between a ssDNA sequence and an inhibitor ssRNA sequence. This RNA is composed of three regions binding to the ssDNA separated by polyU loops (<b>Figure 2</b>), so that upon cleavage of the polyU loops by Cas13a, the melting temperature of the dimer is lowered and the cleaved ssRNA falls off. The ssDNA is freed and can be used into an amplification scheme: we envisioned that it would either complete a linear transcription template (known as genelet) that is single-stranded in its promoter region, and activate its transcription<sup><a class="myLink" href="#ref_4">4</a></sup>, or it would bind the PCR DNA template. In both cases, either transcription or PCR would lead to amplification of the signal. A transcription signal could be read with a nucleic acid binding dye, or could be further linked to translation, to create a colored protein read-out such as aeBlue. Using transcription translation as an detection amplification into a colorimetric readout was successfully shown by Pardee <i>et al.</i><sup><a class="myLink" href="#ref_5">5</a></sup>. Similarly, DNA amplification could be signaled with nucleic acid binding dyes and fluorescence could be read with our <a class="myLink" href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Munich/Hardware/Detector">detector</a>.
 
</p>
 
</p>
<ol>
 
<li>Completion of an in vitro transcription target (in vitro Tx</li>
 
<li>Primer for an isothermal PCR</li>
 
<li>Completion of a DNA-target for a transcription/translation system (tx/tl)</li>
 
</ol>
 
<p>
 
We used parts of an already established synthetic circuit from our lab called Circuit 3 (C3). Circuit 3 already provided us with a dsDNA target (= in vitro transcription target ds-C3) with a single stranded overhang in the promotor region and the complementary short DNA oligo, which we used as our activator (= C3 activator, C3a)( Figure 2).</p>
 
 
</td>
 
</td>
<td colspan=3 align=center valing=center>
+
<td colspan=3 align=center valign=right>
 
<div class="captionPicture">
 
<div class="captionPicture">
<img width=440 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/50/T--Munich--Readouts_ssDNA_structure.png" alt="ssDNA structure">
+
<a href="#ssDNA_Popup"><img width=360 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/90/T--Munich--Description_aeBlue.svg"></a>
<p><b>Figure 2:</b> Circuit 3 stucture with dsDNA target with teh single stranded overhang.</p>
+
<p><b>Figure 2</b>: Working principle of ssDNA</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</td>
 
</td>
</tr>
+
</tr>  
 
+
 
<tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center>
 
<tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center>
<p> 
 
The annealing of the two strands only worked to some extent, needing around 8 to 10x excess of inhibitor RNA to fully anneal with 500 nM of DNA activator oligo at room temperature. Room temperature was chosen, because it is extremely difficult to generate sharp temperature transitions on a small chip, which would be needed for good annealing results. Reasons for a bad annealing reaction of the two strands could be the mix of different length products of the inhibitor RNA in vitro transcription initially or the steady state of RNA digested with RNA in solution, resulting in a reannealing of RNA with the DNA activator.</p>
 
 
<p>
 
<p>
The RNA background brought up major problems in combination with the transcription measurement and brought up disordered results with increasing RNA background concentration not directly resulting in lower transcriptional burst differentiation. Problems for the realization of a ssDNA activator readout lie for example in the various reaction environments needed for the dimerization, the RNA digestion and the final amplification step, may it be as a transcription, PCR or in a transcription/translation system.  
+
We designed a fitting inhibitor RNA and complementary DNA activator, and confirmed with Nupack<sup><a class="myLink" href="#ref_6">6</a></sup> that cleaving of the polyU loops would cause the dimer to melt at room temperature. The functional assembly of the RNA/DNA dimer could be proved by native PAGE. We designed a double-stranded DNA template that is only single-stranded in its promoter region, so that it could be activated by the released ssDNA activator. Furthermore, the cornerstone for the transfer of the circuit to a colorimetric readout was laid by the successful cloning of aeBlue into a pSB1C3 backbone. This construct can be amplified, then cleaved with a type II restriction enzyme and a nuclease, so that the promoter region can be rendered single stranded. However, to this point we were not able to demonstrate that Cas13a activity, or even RNaseH, can successfully free the ssDNA activator. We think that the ssDNA/ssRNA ratio and the sequences could be optimized so that the dimer can be melted after RNA cleavage. We initially tried to prove that the dimer could be formed, and we may have overshot the design in the direction of dimer stability and binding efficiency. We also did not find a dye that gave us a very good read of the nucleic acids concentrations in such a dynamic system. We do not see a fundamental blockage to the possibility to develop this readout to the colorimetric readout, but we did not reach the full proof-of-concept within the time of our project.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 +
  
 
<tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center>
 
<tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center>
 
<h3>Intein-Extein Readout</h3>
 
<h3>Intein-Extein Readout</h3>
 
<p>   
 
<p>   
For the intein-extein system, we order two gblocks from IDT. These gblocks were then cloned into psB1C3 and psB4A5 respectively. The successful insertion was confirmed by Sequencing at GATC. The plasmids were then opened by BbsI and the coding sequence of beta-galactosidase was inserted via a Gibbson-Assembly. Once again, we confirmed the sequences at GATC and got full length reads for both constructs. However, the two biobricks could neither be submitted nor characterized, as the recloning to remove illegal cuts sites within the sequence was not finished prior to the deadline. The characterization was not possible, as the C-terminal fragment couldn’t be expressed in any of our E. coli expression strains, as it seemed to be toxic. The toxicity seemed to not affect E. Coli Turbo, which was used for the cloning. The N-terminal part alone couldn’t be characterized as the parts only work together.
+
The Intein-Extein-Readout consists of 2 devices. A N- and a C- Terminal fragment of beta-Gal that are both linked to the respective halfs of an inactivated split intein, that can be activated by TEV-cleavage. The sequence of the split-intein was ordered as gblocks from IDT and inserted into psB1C3 and psB4A5 respectively. The successful insertion was confirmed by sequencing at GATC. The plasmids were then opened by BbsI and the coding sequence of beta-galactosidase was inserted via a Gibson-Assembly. The coding sequence originated from W3110 and was extracted by PCR with overlap primers. Once again, we confirmed the sequences at GATC and got full length reads for both constructs. However, the two biobricks could neither be submitted nor characterized, as the recloning to remove illegal cuts sites within the sequence was not finished prior to the deadline. The characterization was not possible, as the C-terminal fragment could not be expressed in any of our <i>E. coli</i> expression strains, as it seemed to be toxic. The toxicity seemed to not affect <i>E. coli </i> Turbo, which was used for cloning. The N-terminal part alone could not be characterized as the parts only work together.
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
We plan to express the C-terminal part with an in vitro expression system and are confident, that the purified proteins will work together as planned.
+
We plan to express the C-terminal part with an <i>in vitro</i> expression system and are confident, that the purified proteins will work together as planned.
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
</td>
 
</td>
Line 194: Line 207:
 
<tr><td colspan=3 align=center valign=center>
 
<tr><td colspan=3 align=center valign=center>
 
<div  class="captionPicture">
 
<div  class="captionPicture">
<a href="#Lbu_Popup"><img width=440 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/5c/T--Munich--Readouts_SplitC_Term.png" alt="C-Term"></a>
+
<a href="#C-Term_Popup"><img width=440 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/5c/T--Munich--Readouts_SplitC_Term.png" alt="C-Term"></a>
<p><b>Figure 3</b>: Colony-PCR of C-Terminal fragment. Samples 9 and 12 had the correct length and were confirmed with sequencing. The marker used was the 2-log DNA ladder.</p>
+
<p><b>Figure 3</b>: Colony-PCR of C-Terminal fragment. Samples 9 and 12 had the correct length and were confirmed with sequencing.</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</td>
 
</td>
Line 201: Line 214:
 
<div class="captionPicture">
 
<div class="captionPicture">
 
<a href="#N-Term_Popup"><img width=440 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/bd/T--Munich--Readouts_SplitN_Term.png" alt="N-Term"></a>
 
<a href="#N-Term_Popup"><img width=440 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/bd/T--Munich--Readouts_SplitN_Term.png" alt="N-Term"></a>
<p><b>Figure 4</b>: Colony-PCR of N-Terminal fragment. Samples 8 and 9 had the correct length and were confirmed with sequencing. The marker used was the 2-log DNA ladder.</p>
+
<p><b>Figure 4</b>: Colony-PCR of N-Terminal fragment. Samples 8 and 9 had the correct length and were confirmed with sequencing.</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</td>
 
</td>
Line 208: Line 221:
 
<tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center>
 
<tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center>
 
<h3>Gold nanoparticle readout (AuNP)</h3>
 
<h3>Gold nanoparticle readout (AuNP)</h3>
<p>   
+
<p>  
When first testing AuNP cleavage on paper, a positive result, i.e a color change mediated by spread of AuNPs, was not visible for Cas13a, but for the positive control with RNaseA. In the follow-up experiment, RNA-linked and DNA-linked AuNPs were examined. Cleavage of aggregates did occur in the RNAse A-containing positive control for the RNA-linkers. These preliminary results indicate that our AuNP system can be used for selective detection of RNases.</p>
+
   
<p>
+
We designed a gold nanoparticle (AuNP)-based readout system, which consists of AuNPs of ~10 nm diameter cross-linked by DNA-labels and complementary RNA linkers which remain single-stranded in their center. In a paper-based test, upon encounter with either target-activated Cas13a or another RNAse cleaving this single-stranded segment, the aggregates are expected to partially and evenly dissolve into the surrounding area and develop a reddish color. When first testing AuNP cleavage on paper, a positive result, i.e. a color change mediated by spread of AuNPs, was not visible for Cas13a, but for the positive control with RNaseA. In the follow-up experiment, RNA-linked and DNA-linked AuNPs were examined. Cleavage of aggregates did occur in the RNAseA-containing positive control for the RNA-linkers but not in the DNA-linked negative control. These preliminary results indicate that our AuNP system can be used for selective detection of RNases.</p>
However, some improvements of the assay should be conducted. First, aggregation should be optimized to avoid any unspecific aggregation while facilitating specific aggregation trough extraction of full-length in-vitro-transcribed RNA. Second, it would be useful to quantify the kinetics of AuNP-resuspension by RNase A and Cas13a in a plate-reader based assay,
+
 
like our experiments using RNase Alert.Last, to optimize test conditions on the paper platform, a variety of paper materials, coatings and sealing materials should be tested. After all, looking at the exposed position of the Cas13a promiscuous cleavage site and our results on Cas13a and AuNPs, we are confident that an optimized version of this readout will present a functional tool for RNA detection.
+
</p>
+
 
<div class="captionPicture">
 
<div class="captionPicture">
<img width=740 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/c7/AuNP_paper_test_2.png" alt="Au nano particles">
+
<img width=740 src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/bf/AuNP_Papertest_1.2.png" alt="Au nano particles">
<p><b>Figure 5:</b> For nuclease activity for either target-activated Cas13a or RNase A, an even circular distribution of diffused, red-shifted AuNP around the spotted aggregate was expected (see left upper corner). This could be observed in the RNaseA containing positive controls for the AuNP with linkers in each lower left corner of U0, U5, U10 and U15, of varying lengths from 0, 5, 10 to 15-Uracil containing single-stranded linker segments, but not for Cas13 mixtures (upper left dots in U0,U5, U10 and U15, negative controls or DNA-linked AuNP.</p>
+
<p><b>Figure 5:</b> Upon nuclease activity for either target-activated Cas13a or RNase A , an even circular distribution of diffused, red-shifted AuNP around the spotted aggregate was expected (see left panels). This could be observed in the RNaseA-containing positive controls (upper panels) for the AuNPs with RNA-linkers U5, U10 and U15, containing either 5, 10 or 15 Uracil-containing single-stranded linker segments, but not for Cas13a (lower panels) or negative control with DNA-linked AuNP.</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
 +
<p>
 +
However, some improvements of the assay should be conducted. First, aggregation should be optimized to avoid any unspecific aggregation, while facilitating specific aggregation trough extraction of full-length <i>in-vitro</i>-transcribed RNA. Second, it would be useful to quantify the kinetics of AuNP-resuspension by RNaseA and Cas13a in a plate-reader based assay,
 +
like our experiments using RNaseAlert. Last, to optimize test conditions on the paper platform, a variety of paper materials, coatings and sealing materials should be tested. After all, looking at the exposed position of the Cas13a promiscuous cleavage site and our results on Cas13a and AuNPs, we are confident that an optimized version of this readout will present a functional tool for RNA detection.
 +
</p>
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 +
  
 
<tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center>
 
<tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center>
 
<h3>Reproducibility</h3>
 
<h3>Reproducibility</h3>
 
<p>   
 
<p>   
We successfully integrated the fluorescence readouts RNaseAlert and Spinach Aptamer in our Cas13a detection system for different bacterial and viral targets. We also successfully tested different Cas13a proteins namely Lbu, Lwa and Lsh with RNaseAlert and in parallel we also successfully tested the Spinach Aptamer with the Lbu Cas13a. Since we repeated the experiments with the RNAseAlert and Spinach Aptamer multiple times and with different parameters, we can say that the fluorescence readouts are well designed and can be implemented in variety of systems and is highly reproducible.  
+
We successfully integrated the fluorescence readouts RNaseAlert and Spinach Aptamer in our Cas13a detection system for different bacterial and viral targets. We successfully tested Cas13a Lbu and Lwa with RNaseAlert and in parallel the Spinach Aptamer with the Cas13a Lbu. Based on our extensive experience with RNaseAlert, we can say that this fluorescence readouts can be implemented in variety of systems and is highly reproducible. However, our work on colorimetric readouts was too preliminary to discuss reproducibility of those circuits.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
</td>
 
</td>
Line 232: Line 249:
 
<h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3>
 
<h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3>
 
<p>   
 
<p>   
The results we obtained using the RNAseAlert and Spinach Aptamer with our Cas13a system conclude that having a fluorescence readout is an efficient system. We also successfully used the RNaseAlert in our self-made fluorescence detector to characterize the Cas13a activity. Additionally, we were also able to try out different colorimetric readouts which were partially successful. The AuNp readout could be the potential colorimetric readout which could be further optimized, taking into account the positive result it gave with the RNaseA. The combination of all these challenges during the colorimetric readout leads us to believe, that there are more elegant ways to realize the colorimetric readout of an RNA digestion on a paper strip.  
+
The results we obtained using the RNaseAlert and Spinach Aptamer with our Cas13a system conclude that having a fluorescence readout is an efficient system. This is why we constructed our <a class="myLink" href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Munich/Hardware/Detector">detector</a>, and we successfully used it to characterize Cas13a activity with RNaseAlert. Additionally, we were also able to try explore different colorimetric readouts and lay the groundwork for their success. The idea of using AuNP for a colorimetric readout is quite promising, taking into account the positive result it gave us with the RNaseA.
 +
</p>
 +
</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
 
 +
<tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center>
 +
<h3>References</h3>
 +
<p>
 +
    <ol style="text-align: left">
 +
      <li id="ref_1">Gootenberg, J. S., Abudayyeh, O. O., Lee, J. W., Essletzbichler, P., Dy, A. J., Joung, J., ... & Myhrvold, C. (2017). Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2. Science, eaam9321.</li>
 +
      <li id="ref_2">East-Seletsky, A., O’Connell, M. R., Knight, S. C., Burstein, D., Cate, J. H., Tjian, R., & Doudna, J. A. (2016). Two distinct RNase activities of CRISPR-C2c2 enable guide-RNA processing and RNA detection. Nature, 538(7624), 270-273.</li>
 +
      <li id="ref_3">Paige, J. S., Wu, K. Y., & Jaffrey, S. R. (2011). RNA mimics of green fluorescent protein. Science, 333(6042), 642-646.</li>
 +
<li id="ref_4">Franco, E., Friedrichs, E. Kim, J., Jungmann, R., Murray, R., Winfree, E., Simmel, F.C. (2011). Timing molecular motion and production with a synthetic transcriptional clock. PNAS, 108(40), E784-E793.</li>
 +
<li id="ref_5">Pardee, K., Green, A.A., Takahashi, M.K., Braff, D., Lambert, G., Lee, J.W., Ferrante, T., Ma, D., Donghia, N., Fan, M., Daringer, B.M., Bosch, I., Dudley, D.M., O'Connor, D.H., Gehrke, L., Collins, J.J. (2016). Rapid, Low-Cost Detection of Zika Virus Using Programmable Biomolecular Components. Cell, 165, 1255-1266.</li>
 +
<li id="ref_6">J. N. Zadeh, C. D. Steenberg, J. S. Bois, B. R. Wolfe, M. B. Pierce, A. R. Khan, R. M. Dirks, N. A. Pierce. NUPACK: analysis and design of nucleic acid systems. J Comput Chem, 32:170–173, 2011.</li>
 +
    </ol>
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
</td>
 
</td>

Latest revision as of 03:54, 2 November 2017


Results: Readouts

What worked:

What presented issues:

  • Developing colorimetric read-outs.

For our experimental design, we used different fluorescence and colorimetric readouts as stated below. The fluorescence read-outs worked well, and especially the RNaseAlert allowed us to characterize our Cas13a detection in a variety of contexts: native protein, lyophlized, in bulk, on paper, from virus target, bacterial target, in vitro and in vivo RNA. For our colorimetric read-outs, we could not reach a full integration with target RNA detection, but where able to assemble the necessary constructs and start characterizing them.

RNaseAlert Readout

To characterize our Cas13a, we first turned to the standard of the field, namely the RNaseAlert detection kit, which uses the short modified RNA sequence RNaseAlert. This was used in recent work to characterize Cas13a and detect pathogen RNA sequences1,2. In the absence of Cas13a activation, there is no fluorescence detectable due to physical proximity of the quencher to the fluorophore. Upon binding of a matching target RNA to the crRNA, Cas13a develops a promiscuous RNase activity and cleaves off the quencher from the fluorophore. This spatial separation in solution now allows the fluorophore to emit light, leading to a detectable fluorescent signal. We showed that the increase in signal is a measure of the Cas13a activation by target RNA and therefore used it for most of our experiments. The corresponding results are specifically described in the Cas13a and targets subsections.

In general, the RNaseAlert assay works very well, but one has to consider that a diagnostic device relying on this system is dependent on a fluorescence detector. For this reason, we built and evaluated the fluorescence detector “Lightbringer”, which is the most sensitive fluorescence detector ever built by an iGEM team to our knowledge. Since a colorimetric readout would overcome this problem by making an easy visualization possible, we also worked on different colorimetric readouts.

Spinach Aptamer Readout

Here, we used the Spinach aptamer (a 80-nucleotides RNA) which binds the DFHBI fluorophore, changing its spatial conformation and thereby enables fluorescence3. Activated Cas13a cleaves the Spinach aptamer leading to the release of DFHBI. This process is detectable as a decreasing fluorescence intensity (Figure 1).

Aptamer Activity

Figure 1: The fluorescence activity of the Spinach aptamer is inversely proportional to the target concentration.

ssDNA Readout

For this readout, we wanted to link the cleavage of an RNA strand (due to Cas13a activation) to an amplification scheme based on ssDNA. A dimer is formed between a ssDNA sequence and an inhibitor ssRNA sequence. This RNA is composed of three regions binding to the ssDNA separated by polyU loops (Figure 2), so that upon cleavage of the polyU loops by Cas13a, the melting temperature of the dimer is lowered and the cleaved ssRNA falls off. The ssDNA is freed and can be used into an amplification scheme: we envisioned that it would either complete a linear transcription template (known as genelet) that is single-stranded in its promoter region, and activate its transcription4, or it would bind the PCR DNA template. In both cases, either transcription or PCR would lead to amplification of the signal. A transcription signal could be read with a nucleic acid binding dye, or could be further linked to translation, to create a colored protein read-out such as aeBlue. Using transcription translation as an detection amplification into a colorimetric readout was successfully shown by Pardee et al.5. Similarly, DNA amplification could be signaled with nucleic acid binding dyes and fluorescence could be read with our detector.

Figure 2: Working principle of ssDNA

We designed a fitting inhibitor RNA and complementary DNA activator, and confirmed with Nupack6 that cleaving of the polyU loops would cause the dimer to melt at room temperature. The functional assembly of the RNA/DNA dimer could be proved by native PAGE. We designed a double-stranded DNA template that is only single-stranded in its promoter region, so that it could be activated by the released ssDNA activator. Furthermore, the cornerstone for the transfer of the circuit to a colorimetric readout was laid by the successful cloning of aeBlue into a pSB1C3 backbone. This construct can be amplified, then cleaved with a type II restriction enzyme and a nuclease, so that the promoter region can be rendered single stranded. However, to this point we were not able to demonstrate that Cas13a activity, or even RNaseH, can successfully free the ssDNA activator. We think that the ssDNA/ssRNA ratio and the sequences could be optimized so that the dimer can be melted after RNA cleavage. We initially tried to prove that the dimer could be formed, and we may have overshot the design in the direction of dimer stability and binding efficiency. We also did not find a dye that gave us a very good read of the nucleic acids concentrations in such a dynamic system. We do not see a fundamental blockage to the possibility to develop this readout to the colorimetric readout, but we did not reach the full proof-of-concept within the time of our project.

Intein-Extein Readout

The Intein-Extein-Readout consists of 2 devices. A N- and a C- Terminal fragment of beta-Gal that are both linked to the respective halfs of an inactivated split intein, that can be activated by TEV-cleavage. The sequence of the split-intein was ordered as gblocks from IDT and inserted into psB1C3 and psB4A5 respectively. The successful insertion was confirmed by sequencing at GATC. The plasmids were then opened by BbsI and the coding sequence of beta-galactosidase was inserted via a Gibson-Assembly. The coding sequence originated from W3110 and was extracted by PCR with overlap primers. Once again, we confirmed the sequences at GATC and got full length reads for both constructs. However, the two biobricks could neither be submitted nor characterized, as the recloning to remove illegal cuts sites within the sequence was not finished prior to the deadline. The characterization was not possible, as the C-terminal fragment could not be expressed in any of our E. coli expression strains, as it seemed to be toxic. The toxicity seemed to not affect E. coli Turbo, which was used for cloning. The N-terminal part alone could not be characterized as the parts only work together.

We plan to express the C-terminal part with an in vitro expression system and are confident, that the purified proteins will work together as planned.

C-Term

Figure 3: Colony-PCR of C-Terminal fragment. Samples 9 and 12 had the correct length and were confirmed with sequencing.

N-Term

Figure 4: Colony-PCR of N-Terminal fragment. Samples 8 and 9 had the correct length and were confirmed with sequencing.

Gold nanoparticle readout (AuNP)

We designed a gold nanoparticle (AuNP)-based readout system, which consists of AuNPs of ~10 nm diameter cross-linked by DNA-labels and complementary RNA linkers which remain single-stranded in their center. In a paper-based test, upon encounter with either target-activated Cas13a or another RNAse cleaving this single-stranded segment, the aggregates are expected to partially and evenly dissolve into the surrounding area and develop a reddish color. When first testing AuNP cleavage on paper, a positive result, i.e. a color change mediated by spread of AuNPs, was not visible for Cas13a, but for the positive control with RNaseA. In the follow-up experiment, RNA-linked and DNA-linked AuNPs were examined. Cleavage of aggregates did occur in the RNAseA-containing positive control for the RNA-linkers but not in the DNA-linked negative control. These preliminary results indicate that our AuNP system can be used for selective detection of RNases.

Au nano particles

Figure 5: Upon nuclease activity for either target-activated Cas13a or RNase A , an even circular distribution of diffused, red-shifted AuNP around the spotted aggregate was expected (see left panels). This could be observed in the RNaseA-containing positive controls (upper panels) for the AuNPs with RNA-linkers U5, U10 and U15, containing either 5, 10 or 15 Uracil-containing single-stranded linker segments, but not for Cas13a (lower panels) or negative control with DNA-linked AuNP.

However, some improvements of the assay should be conducted. First, aggregation should be optimized to avoid any unspecific aggregation, while facilitating specific aggregation trough extraction of full-length in-vitro-transcribed RNA. Second, it would be useful to quantify the kinetics of AuNP-resuspension by RNaseA and Cas13a in a plate-reader based assay, like our experiments using RNaseAlert. Last, to optimize test conditions on the paper platform, a variety of paper materials, coatings and sealing materials should be tested. After all, looking at the exposed position of the Cas13a promiscuous cleavage site and our results on Cas13a and AuNPs, we are confident that an optimized version of this readout will present a functional tool for RNA detection.

Reproducibility

We successfully integrated the fluorescence readouts RNaseAlert and Spinach Aptamer in our Cas13a detection system for different bacterial and viral targets. We successfully tested Cas13a Lbu and Lwa with RNaseAlert and in parallel the Spinach Aptamer with the Cas13a Lbu. Based on our extensive experience with RNaseAlert, we can say that this fluorescence readouts can be implemented in variety of systems and is highly reproducible. However, our work on colorimetric readouts was too preliminary to discuss reproducibility of those circuits.

Discussion and conclusion

The results we obtained using the RNaseAlert and Spinach Aptamer with our Cas13a system conclude that having a fluorescence readout is an efficient system. This is why we constructed our detector, and we successfully used it to characterize Cas13a activity with RNaseAlert. Additionally, we were also able to try explore different colorimetric readouts and lay the groundwork for their success. The idea of using AuNP for a colorimetric readout is quite promising, taking into account the positive result it gave us with the RNaseA.

References

  1. Gootenberg, J. S., Abudayyeh, O. O., Lee, J. W., Essletzbichler, P., Dy, A. J., Joung, J., ... & Myhrvold, C. (2017). Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2. Science, eaam9321.
  2. East-Seletsky, A., O’Connell, M. R., Knight, S. C., Burstein, D., Cate, J. H., Tjian, R., & Doudna, J. A. (2016). Two distinct RNase activities of CRISPR-C2c2 enable guide-RNA processing and RNA detection. Nature, 538(7624), 270-273.
  3. Paige, J. S., Wu, K. Y., & Jaffrey, S. R. (2011). RNA mimics of green fluorescent protein. Science, 333(6042), 642-646.
  4. Franco, E., Friedrichs, E. Kim, J., Jungmann, R., Murray, R., Winfree, E., Simmel, F.C. (2011). Timing molecular motion and production with a synthetic transcriptional clock. PNAS, 108(40), E784-E793.
  5. Pardee, K., Green, A.A., Takahashi, M.K., Braff, D., Lambert, G., Lee, J.W., Ferrante, T., Ma, D., Donghia, N., Fan, M., Daringer, B.M., Bosch, I., Dudley, D.M., O'Connor, D.H., Gehrke, L., Collins, J.J. (2016). Rapid, Low-Cost Detection of Zika Virus Using Programmable Biomolecular Components. Cell, 165, 1255-1266.
  6. J. N. Zadeh, C. D. Steenberg, J. S. Bois, B. R. Wolfe, M. B. Pierce, A. R. Khan, R. M. Dirks, N. A. Pierce. NUPACK: analysis and design of nucleic acid systems. J Comput Chem, 32:170–173, 2011.