Sven klumpe (Talk | contribs) |
|||
(13 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td id="myContent" width="20%" valign=top align=center> | <td id="myContent" width="20%" valign=top align=center> | ||
− | <a href="#"> | + | <a href="#-"> |
<div class="popup" id="cRNA_Gel"> | <div class="popup" id="cRNA_Gel"> | ||
<img style="background-color: #ffffff" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/ce/T--Munich--Targets_crRNA_all_targets.png"> | <img style="background-color: #ffffff" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/ce/T--Munich--Targets_crRNA_all_targets.png"> | ||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
<td style="background-color: #51a7f9;" colspan = 6 align="left"> | <td style="background-color: #51a7f9;" colspan = 6 align="left"> | ||
<ul class="menuList" id="menu"> | <ul class="menuList" id="menu"> | ||
+ | <li><a href="/Team:Munich/Results">Overview</a></li> | ||
<li><a href="/Team:Munich/Cas13a">Cas13a</a></li> | <li><a href="/Team:Munich/Cas13a">Cas13a</a></li> | ||
<li><a href="/Team:Munich/Readouts">Readouts</a></li> | <li><a href="/Team:Munich/Readouts">Readouts</a></li> | ||
Line 95: | Line 96: | ||
<li><a href="/Team:Munich/DetectionOnChip">Detection Chip</a></li> | <li><a href="/Team:Munich/DetectionOnChip">Detection Chip</a></li> | ||
<li><a href="/Team:Munich/Amplification">Amplification</a></li> | <li><a href="/Team:Munich/Amplification">Amplification</a></li> | ||
− | |||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
<tr><td colspan=6 align=left valign=center> | <tr><td colspan=6 align=left valign=center> | ||
<div style="margin-top: 40px"><font size=7 color=#51a7f9><b style="color: #51a7f9">Results: Targets</b></font></div> | <div style="margin-top: 40px"><font size=7 color=#51a7f9><b style="color: #51a7f9">Results: Targets</b></font></div> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td colspan="6"> | ||
+ | <h3>What worked:</h3> | ||
+ | <ul class="listResults"> | ||
+ | <li>We tested targets from <a class="myLink" href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Munich/Targets#commonpathogens">common pathogens</a> and showed the <a class="myLink" href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Munich/Targets#orthog">orthogonality</a> of virus detection versus bacterial detection. </li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td colspan="6"> | ||
+ | <h3>What presented issues:</h3> | ||
+ | <ul class="listResults"> | ||
+ | <li>Detecting Qbeta RNA.</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 120: | Line 137: | ||
<tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center> | <tr><td colspan=6 align=center valign=center> | ||
<h3>Variety of Detectable Targets</h3> | <h3>Variety of Detectable Targets</h3> | ||
− | <p>Before demonstrating if we could discriminate bacterial and viral sequences, we needed to determine if our detection circuit worked across pathogens. <i>Escherichia coli</i> 16S rRNA had been our first target, as Dr. Pardee had advised us to use the most simple and accessible RNA sequence. For other targets, we were advised different pathogens through our series of <a class="myLink" href="/Team:Munich/HP/Gold_Integrated">interviews with experts</a>, but we could not easily access most of the pathogens due to safety restrictions in our lab. We therefore looked at <i>B. subtilis</i> as a second bacterial target that shares sequence homology with <i>E. coli</i>, and we used <i>in vitro</i> transcribed RNA for viruses (Norovirus, Hepatitis C, and | + | <p>Before demonstrating if we could discriminate bacterial and viral sequences, we needed to determine if our detection circuit worked across pathogens. <i>Escherichia coli</i> 16S rRNA had been our first target, as Dr. Pardee had advised us to use the most simple and accessible RNA sequence. For other targets, we were advised different pathogens through our series of <a class="myLink" href="/Team:Munich/HP/Gold_Integrated">interviews with experts</a>, but we could not easily access most of the pathogens due to safety restrictions in our lab. We therefore looked at <i>B. subtilis</i> as a second bacterial target that shares sequence homology with <i>E. coli</i>, and we used <i>in vitro</i> transcribed RNA for viruses (Norovirus, Hepatitis C, and Qbeta). We describe quickly the sequences chosen and then present our detection results.</p> |
<h4>Noro virus</h4> | <h4>Noro virus</h4> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
Line 128: | Line 145: | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
HCV is a small single stranded RNA virus of family <i>Flaviviridae</i> which is the major cause of the Hepatitis C and liver cancer. Common setting for transmission of HCV is also intra-hospital (nosocomial) transmission, when practices of hygiene and sterilization are not correctly followed in the clinic. It is estimated that 71 million people world-wide have chronic HCV infection, and there are no known vaccines<sup><a class="myLink" href="#ref_1">1</a></sup>. For our experiments, we took the 5’ UTR of the HCV virus and did <i> in vitro </i> transcription to get the target RNA and the crRNA.</p> | HCV is a small single stranded RNA virus of family <i>Flaviviridae</i> which is the major cause of the Hepatitis C and liver cancer. Common setting for transmission of HCV is also intra-hospital (nosocomial) transmission, when practices of hygiene and sterilization are not correctly followed in the clinic. It is estimated that 71 million people world-wide have chronic HCV infection, and there are no known vaccines<sup><a class="myLink" href="#ref_1">1</a></sup>. For our experiments, we took the 5’ UTR of the HCV virus and did <i> in vitro </i> transcription to get the target RNA and the crRNA.</p> | ||
+ | <h4><i>Qbeta</i></h4> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | The Enterobacteria phage Qbeta belongs to the family of <i>Leviviridae</i> and is one of the most commonly used bacteriophage in research fields. It is an icosahedral virus which uses <i>E. coli</i> as its host. We designed crRNA for the part of this viral sequence and tested it with our Cas13a detection system, which however did not work that well. | ||
+ | <p> | ||
<h4><i>Bacillus subtilis</i></h4> | <h4><i>Bacillus subtilis</i></h4> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
Line 140: | Line 161: | ||
<tr><td class="verticalColumn" colspan=3 align=center valign=center> | <tr><td class="verticalColumn" colspan=3 align=center valign=center> | ||
− | <h3>Detection</h3> | + | <h3 id="commonpathogens">Detection</h3> |
<p> | <p> | ||
When we combined the target RNA from different pathogens and their matching crRNA, we systematically saw an increase of cleaved RNase Alert compared to our controls without targets <b>(Figure 3)</b>. It is worth noting that <i>B. subtilis</i> showed the worst on/off ratio for activation, which we assume to be caused by contamination from the <i>in vivo</i> sample treatment. The Cas13a detection circuit is effective for RNA sequences from different viruses, gram<sup>+</sup> and gram<sup>-</sup> bacteria, proving its universality. </p> | When we combined the target RNA from different pathogens and their matching crRNA, we systematically saw an increase of cleaved RNase Alert compared to our controls without targets <b>(Figure 3)</b>. It is worth noting that <i>B. subtilis</i> showed the worst on/off ratio for activation, which we assume to be caused by contamination from the <i>in vivo</i> sample treatment. The Cas13a detection circuit is effective for RNA sequences from different viruses, gram<sup>+</sup> and gram<sup>-</sup> bacteria, proving its universality. </p> | ||
Line 162: | Line 183: | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td class="verticalColumn" colspan=3 align=center valign=center> | <td class="verticalColumn" colspan=3 align=center valign=center> | ||
− | <h3>Orthogonality of Detection</h3> | + | <h3 id="orthog">Orthogonality of Detection</h3> |
<p> | <p> | ||
We then set out to differentiate viral sequences from bacterial sequences. Assuming the risk of sample contamination from the patient’s own bacteria is high, we decided to first use the crRNA from a virus to screen against different targets. We chose the Norovirus crRNA and looked at the activation of Cas13a under the presence of 30 nM of Norovirus, <i>E. coli</i> or HCV as targets <b>(Figure 4)</b>. We found that only the Norovirus target lead to a great increase in RNase Alert cleavage, and that our detection mechanism is therefore highly orthogonal and specific. | We then set out to differentiate viral sequences from bacterial sequences. Assuming the risk of sample contamination from the patient’s own bacteria is high, we decided to first use the crRNA from a virus to screen against different targets. We chose the Norovirus crRNA and looked at the activation of Cas13a under the presence of 30 nM of Norovirus, <i>E. coli</i> or HCV as targets <b>(Figure 4)</b>. We found that only the Norovirus target lead to a great increase in RNase Alert cleavage, and that our detection mechanism is therefore highly orthogonal and specific. | ||
Line 178: | Line 199: | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
CascAID<sup>+</sup> is a potentially universal tool for nucleic acid detection. Fast adaptation of our platform to new targets requires <i>in silico</i> analysis of the crRNA design. | CascAID<sup>+</sup> is a potentially universal tool for nucleic acid detection. Fast adaptation of our platform to new targets requires <i>in silico</i> analysis of the crRNA design. | ||
− | Therefore, we developed a software that verifies the presence of the right secondary structure and the absence of any off-target effects. This is realised by using established programs for secondary structure prediction, NUPACK and Mfold, as well as the BLAST program for local alignments. The secondary structure prediction of the designed crRNA is compared to structures that had already been shown to work experimentally, either in the literature or by us. This allows to rule out misfolded crRNA prior to experiment. Furthermore, we constructed a reference transcriptome databank consisting of data from organisms likely to be found in human mucus samples. We then used the BLAST algorithm to search for sequences similar to the designed target sequence in the reference transcriptome to determine possible off-target effects. This rational approach of crRNA cerification allowed us | + | Therefore, we developed a software that verifies the presence of the right secondary structure and the absence of any off-target effects. This is realised by using established programs for secondary structure prediction, NUPACK and Mfold, as well as the BLAST program for local alignments. The secondary structure prediction of the designed crRNA is compared to structures that had already been shown to work experimentally, either in the literature or by us. This allows to rule out misfolded crRNA prior to experiment. Furthermore, we constructed a reference transcriptome databank consisting of data from organisms likely to be found in human mucus samples. We then used the BLAST algorithm to search for sequences similar to the designed target sequence in the reference transcriptome to determine possible off-target effects. This rational approach of crRNA cerification allowed us to save development time and costs during the design of the crRNA for the targets described here. |
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> |
Latest revision as of 03:56, 2 November 2017
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|