Difference between revisions of "Team:Harvard/Notebook"

 
(18 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
 
<div class="panel-group">
 
<div class="panel-group">
 
     <div class="panel panel-default">
 
     <div class="panel panel-default">
Line 15: Line 14:
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
       <div id="collapse1" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
       <div id="collapse1" class="panel-collapse collapse">
         <div class="panel-body">Panel Body</div>
+
         <div class="panel-body">
 +
<h3>Wetlab</h3><br>
 +
Got familiar with the protocols we would be using.
 +
<h3>Model</h3><br>
 +
Started to work on the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Harvard/Model">mathematical model</a> for strain engineering parameters.
 +
        <br>
 +
<h3>Bioreactor</h3>
 +
CAD Model and first 3D printed prototypes for Bioreactor
 +
<br>
 +
<h3>Microfluidics</h3><br>
 +
Set foundational parameters for the device.
 +
<br>
 +
</div>
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
Line 26: Line 37:
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
       <div id="collapse2" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
       <div id="collapse2" class="panel-collapse collapse">
         <div class="panel-body">Panel Body</div>
+
         <div class="panel-body">
 +
<h3>Wetlab</h3><br>
 +
In order to screen the best assay for our intended project, we tried multiple protocols to measure the quantity of produced curli, the desired polymer to optimize the production of. <br><br>
 +
 
 +
<center>
 +
<b>Growing curli producing <i>E. coli</i> on plates with congo red:*</b><br>
 +
<img src ="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/c8/Harvard--CR.png"></center> <br><br>
 +
 
 +
<center><b>Isolating curli by vacuum filtration:*</b> <br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/ef/Harvard--Vacuum.png"></center><br><br>
 +
 
 +
<center><b>Running a congo red pull down assay:*</b><br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/41/Harvard--Pulldown.png">
 +
</center>
 +
 
 +
<br><br>
 +
 
 +
From running the protocols in parallel we decided that the pull down assay served as the most consistent proxy for curli production. It was difficult to quantify the "redness" of the cultures on the red plates, and we did not notice significant difference between controls. For the vacuum filtration, it required large volumes of culture and small quantities of the yield product.
 +
<br><br>
 +
*Detailed procedure found on our <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Harvard/Protocols">protocol page</a>.
 +
 
 +
<br>
 +
<h3>Bioreactor</h3><br>
 +
Created CAD model of bioreactor culture chamber and lid.
 +
 +
</div>
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
Line 37: Line 73:
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
       <div id="collapse3" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
       <div id="collapse3" class="panel-collapse collapse">
         <div class="panel-body">Panel Body</div>
+
         <div class="panel-body">
 +
<h3>Wetlab</h3><br>
 +
To ensure consistency of results, we ran through multiple iterations of congo red pull down assays with multiple aliquots of the same liquid culture.
 +
In the beginning we had different absorbance readings for the same liquid cultures, suggesting procedural error.
 +
<br>
 +
<h3>Interlab</h3><br>
 +
Data was collected for the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Harvard/InterLab">interlab study</a>.
 +
<br>
 +
<h3>Model</h3><br>
 +
Started to develop the mathematical model to see which gene we wanted to edit in the wild type strain of <i>E. coli</i>. This involved reading many papers on measurements of relevant parameters, such as secretion rate, rates of translation, transcription, etc.
 +
<br>
 +
<h3>Bioreactor</h3><br>
 +
Created CAD model for bioreactor impeller module.
 +
<br>
 +
<h3>Microfluidics</h3><br>
 +
Mill prototype designs on polycarbonate pieces using CNC micro-milling machine
 +
<br><br>
 +
<center>
 +
<b>First prototype of microfluidic design</b><br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/70/Harvard--LienD1.png" width=50% height=50%>
 +
</center>
 +
<br><br>
 +
</div>
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
Line 48: Line 106:
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
       <div id="collapse4" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
       <div id="collapse4" class="panel-collapse collapse">
         <div class="panel-body">Panel Body</div>
+
         <div class="panel-body">
      </div>
+
<h3>Wetlab</h3><br>
 +
We continued to repeat the pull down assay. Throughout the week, we focused on troubleshooting and minimizing performance errors.
 +
<br><br>
 +
<center>
 +
<b>Inconsistencies among triplicates</b><br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/1d/Harvard--variable.png">
 +
</center>
 +
<br><br>
 +
<center>
 +
<b>Consistent samples at the end of the week</b><br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/95/Harvard--Clear.jpeg">
 +
</center>
 +
<br>
 +
<h3>Bioreactor</h3><br>
 +
Fabricated initial 3D printing prototypes and applied waterproofing sealant.
 +
<br>
 +
<h3>Microfluidics</h3><br>
 +
Characterized optical sensors and design circuits.
 +
<br><br>
 +
<center>
 +
<b>Waveforms generated by the optical sensor</b><br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/4d/Harvard--LienD2.jpeg" width=50% height=50%>
 +
</center>
 +
<br><br>
 +
</div>
 +
    </div>
 +
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
 
<div class="panel panel-default">
 
<div class="panel panel-default">
Line 58: Line 142:
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
       <div id="collapse5" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
       <div id="collapse5" class="panel-collapse collapse">
         <div class="panel-body">Panel Body</div>
+
         <div class="panel-body">
 +
<h3>Bioreactor</h3><br>
 +
Created CAD model for motor mount.<br>
 +
Performed water retention tests.
 +
 
 +
<br>
 +
<h3>Microfluidics</h3><br>
 +
Tested prototypes of mixing mechanisms using food coloring.
 +
<br><br>
 +
<center>
 +
<b>Waveforms generated by the optical sensor</b><br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/8c/MARS_Harvard_MillTest.JPEG" width=50% height=50%>
 +
</center>
 +
<br><br>
 +
</div>
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
 +
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
 +
 
<div class="panel panel-default">
 
<div class="panel panel-default">
 
       <div class="panel-heading">
 
       <div class="panel-heading">
Line 69: Line 169:
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
       <div id="collapse6" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
       <div id="collapse6" class="panel-collapse collapse">
         <div class="panel-body">Panel Body</div>
+
         <div class="panel-body">
      </div>
+
<h3>Wetlab</h3><br>
 +
Focused on generating the RBS library for strain engineering. Once we received the DNA parts, we used selection markers to appropriately transform, clone, and sequence the optimized strain.
 +
        <br>
 +
<h3>Model</h3><br>
 +
Continuous progress on the model development.
 +
    <br>
 +
<h3>Microfluidics</h3><br>
 +
Proof of concept for the microfluidic device.
 +
</div>
 +
  </div>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
<!--
+
 
 
<div class="panel panel-default">
 
<div class="panel panel-default">
 
       <div class="panel-heading">
 
       <div class="panel-heading">
Line 79: Line 188:
 
         </h4>
 
         </h4>
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
       <div id="collapse7 class="panel-collapse collapse">
+
       <div id="collapse7" class="panel-collapse collapse">
         <div class="panel-body">Panel Body</div>
+
         <div class="panel-body">
 +
<h3>Wetlab</h3><br>
 +
Designed an RBS library for csgG using the <a href="https://salislab.net/software/">Salis Lab RBS Library Calculator,</a>as well as the appropriate PCR primers to construct the library and ordered these sequences from IDT.
 +
<br>
 +
<h3>Microfluidics</h3><br>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li>Suspended <i>E. coli</i> strain in pbs and measured optical density using cuvettes and nanodrop machine.</li>
 +
<ol>
 +
<li>Spun down the liquid culture at max speed for 4 minutes.</li>
 +
<li>Removed the liquid media.</li>
 +
<li>Added Pbs and diluted the culture into different concentrations.</li>
 +
</ol>
 +
<li>Vapor polished surface of the milled polycarbonate: heat up methylene chloride in a bunsen flask and place the milled area over the vapor. This was done inside a fume hood.</li>
 +
<li>Tested OD readings from vapor polished surface</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
<br><br>
 +
<center>
 +
<b>Setup for sensor calibration</b><br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/thumb/1/14/Harvard--LienD3.png/800px-Harvard--LienD3.png" width=50% height=50%>
 +
</center>
 +
<br><br>
 +
</div>
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
     </div>-->
+
     </div>
 
 
 
<div class="panel panel-default">
 
<div class="panel panel-default">
Line 91: Line 221:
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
       <div id="collapse8" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
       <div id="collapse8" class="panel-collapse collapse">
         <div class="panel-body">Panel Body</div>
+
         <div class="panel-body">
 +
<h3>Wetlab</h3>
 +
<h4>Day 1</h4>
 +
Our DNA parts ordered the previous week arrived and we conducted PCRs with the primers we designed and a plasmid containing the sequences for csgA, csgB, csgC, csgE, csgF, and csgG obtained from the Joshi Lab to modify the RBS sequence in front of csgG.
 +
<br>
 +
<h4>Day 2</h4>
 +
After verifying our PCR products with a gel, we used Gibson Assembly to put our cloned parts in an expression vector with kanamycin resistance. We then transformed our newly formed plasmids into competent cells using heat shock and plated them on agar plates with kanamycin.
 +
<br><br>
 +
<center>
 +
<b>PCR banding patterns indicated successful Gibson Assembly</b><br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/9a/Harvard--PCR.jpeg">
 +
</center>
 +
<br>
 +
<h4>Day 3</h4><br>
 +
After leaving our plates in an incubator overnight, we imaged the plates FluorChem E and ran an image analysis script on the images to determine the brightest colonies, which correspond to the colonies with highest curli production. We then picked the 2 brightest colonies on each plate, as well as 2 other randomly chosen colonies, and cultured them in 5 mL falcon tubes with liquid LB and kanamycin.
 +
<br><br>
 +
<center>
 +
<b>Example of imaged plates: Brightest colonies related to higher curli production</b><br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/52/Harvard--Plate1.png">
 +
</center>
 +
<br>
 +
</div>
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
Line 102: Line 253:
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
       <div id="collapse9" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
       <div id="collapse9" class="panel-collapse collapse">
         <div class="panel-body">Panel Body</div>
+
         <div class="panel-body">
 +
<h3>Wetlab</h3><br>
 +
We ran a congo red pulldown assay on the cultures from the previous week to quantitatively measure the amount of curli produced. Then, we miniprepped the cell cultures to send out our parts for sequencing.
 +
<br>
 +
<h3>Microfluidics</h3><br>
 +
Milled new designs of microfluidic device.
 +
<br>
 +
</div>
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
Line 114: Line 272:
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
       <div id="collapse10" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
       <div id="collapse10" class="panel-collapse collapse">
         <div class="panel-body">Panel Body</div>
+
         <div class="panel-body">
 +
<h3>Microfluidics</h3><br>
 +
Suspend cultures in Pbs for another round of OD calibration.
 +
<br>Vapor polished surface of the milled polycarbonate by heating up methylene chloride in a bunsen flask and placing the milled area over the vapor. This was done inside a fume hood.
 +
 
 +
<br>
 +
</div>
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
 +
 +
<br><br>
 
 
 
     <div class="panel panel-default">
 
     <div class="panel panel-default">
 
       <div class="panel-heading">
 
       <div class="panel-heading">
 
         <h4 class="panel-title">
 
         <h4 class="panel-title">
           <a data-toggle="collapse" href="#collapse11"><b>Month 3 October Overview</b></a>
+
           <a data-toggle="collapse" href="#collapse11"><b>Month 3: October Overview</b></a>
 
         </h4>
 
         </h4>
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
       <div id="collapse11" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
       <div id="collapse11" class="panel-collapse collapse">
         <div class="panel-body">Panel Body</div>
+
         <div class="panel-body">
 +
<h3>Wetlab</h3><br>
 +
We prepared parts for submission to the parts registry, as well as sequence verified our constructs.
 +
<br>
 +
<br>Bioreactor</h3><br>
 +
Cultured <i>E. coli</i> cultures in the bioreactor.
 +
<br>
 +
<h3>Microfluidics</h3><br>
 +
Continuity of proofs of concept for the microfluidic device. Strong focus on optical sensor data analysis.
 +
<br>
 +
</div>
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
<br><br>
+
 
<div class="panel panel-default">
 
<div class="panel panel-default">
 
       <div class="panel-heading">
 
       <div class="panel-heading">
Line 136: Line 312:
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
       <div id="collapse12" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
       <div id="collapse12" class="panel-collapse collapse">
         <div class="panel-body">Panel Body</div>
+
         <div class="panel-body">
 +
<h3>Wetlab</h3><br>
 +
We ran the congo red pulldown assay again for our constructs. <br>
 +
We sequenced our constructs, and analyzed the sequence in context of our model and other parameters. Refer to our <a href ="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Harvard/Results">results</a> for a detailed analysis.
 +
<br>
 +
<h3>Interlab</h3><br>
 +
We prepared our interlab data for submission. We also collected additional data for the <a href = "https://2017.igem.org/Team:Harvard/InterLab">interlab study</a> and ran the congo red pulldown assay again.
 +
<br>
 +
<h3>Bioreactor</h3><br>
 +
Cultured cells in the bioreactor, but observed minimal growth.
 +
<br>
 +
<h3>Microfluidics</h3><br>
 +
Cultured PQN4 pBAD-CsgBACEFG (curli-producing positive control) in Kan (+) liquid media to prepare for experiments with surface treatment of microfluidic device. <br>
 +
Ensured OD calibration by pumping the cell cultures into microfluidic chambers via inlets of the device.<br>
 +
Prepared Pbs-suspended cell cuture with dilution from OD600 0.1 to OD600 1.
 +
<br>Used syringe pump to pump the liquid cultures in.
 +
<br><br>
 +
<center>
 +
<b>Image credit to Boston U Harvardware team</b><br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/95/MARS_Harvard_Validation2.png" width=50% height=50%>
 +
</center>
 +
<br>
 +
 
 +
<br>
 +
</div>
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
Line 147: Line 347:
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
       <div id="collapse13" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
       <div id="collapse13" class="panel-collapse collapse">
         <div class="panel-body">Panel Body</div>
+
         <div class="panel-body">
 +
<h3>Wetlab</h3><br>
 +
We ran the congo red assay for a third time. We also sent more of our constructs to be sequenced since not all of the parts were able to be sequenced the first time.
 +
<br><br>
 +
<center>
 +
<b>Final data refer to <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Harvard/Results" width="50%" height="50%"> results</a> for more details</b><br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/ef/Harvard--figure2.jpeg">
 +
</center>
 +
<br>
 +
</div>
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
Line 158: Line 367:
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
       <div id="collapse14" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
       <div id="collapse14" class="panel-collapse collapse">
         <div class="panel-body">Panel Body</div>
+
         <div class="panel-body"><h3>Wetlab</h3><br>
 +
            Miniprepped DNA. </div>
 +
<br>
 +
<h3>Bioreactor</h3><br>
 +
<center>
 +
<b>Final Cad Model</b><br>
 +
<img src ="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/4e/Harvard--Reggggie.jpeg"></center> <br><br>
 +
</center>
 +
 
 +
<br><br>
 +
<br>
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
Line 170: Line 389:
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
       <div id="collapse15" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
       <div id="collapse15" class="panel-collapse collapse">
         <div class="panel-body">Panel Body</div>
+
         <div class="panel-body">
 +
<h3>Wetlab</h3><br>
 +
We conducted PCR on each of our miniprepped parts and cloned them into the pSB1C3 backbone for sample submission according to the <a href="http://parts.igem.org/DNA_Submission"> submission guidelines</a>.
 +
<br>
 +
</div>
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
  </div>
+
</div>
 
    
 
    
 
    
 
    
 
 
<br><br><br>
 
<br><br><br>
 
</div>
 
</div>

Latest revision as of 03:59, 2 November 2017

Lab Notebook


Wetlab


Got familiar with the protocols we would be using.

Model


Started to work on the mathematical model for strain engineering parameters.

Bioreactor

CAD Model and first 3D printed prototypes for Bioreactor

Microfluidics


Set foundational parameters for the device.

Wetlab


In order to screen the best assay for our intended project, we tried multiple protocols to measure the quantity of produced curli, the desired polymer to optimize the production of.

Growing curli producing E. coli on plates with congo red:*


Isolating curli by vacuum filtration:*


Running a congo red pull down assay:*


From running the protocols in parallel we decided that the pull down assay served as the most consistent proxy for curli production. It was difficult to quantify the "redness" of the cultures on the red plates, and we did not notice significant difference between controls. For the vacuum filtration, it required large volumes of culture and small quantities of the yield product.

*Detailed procedure found on our protocol page.

Bioreactor


Created CAD model of bioreactor culture chamber and lid.

Wetlab


To ensure consistency of results, we ran through multiple iterations of congo red pull down assays with multiple aliquots of the same liquid culture. In the beginning we had different absorbance readings for the same liquid cultures, suggesting procedural error.

Interlab


Data was collected for the interlab study.

Model


Started to develop the mathematical model to see which gene we wanted to edit in the wild type strain of E. coli. This involved reading many papers on measurements of relevant parameters, such as secretion rate, rates of translation, transcription, etc.

Bioreactor


Created CAD model for bioreactor impeller module.

Microfluidics


Mill prototype designs on polycarbonate pieces using CNC micro-milling machine

First prototype of microfluidic design


Wetlab


We continued to repeat the pull down assay. Throughout the week, we focused on troubleshooting and minimizing performance errors.

Inconsistencies among triplicates


Consistent samples at the end of the week

Bioreactor


Fabricated initial 3D printing prototypes and applied waterproofing sealant.

Microfluidics


Characterized optical sensors and design circuits.

Waveforms generated by the optical sensor


Bioreactor


Created CAD model for motor mount.
Performed water retention tests.

Microfluidics


Tested prototypes of mixing mechanisms using food coloring.

Waveforms generated by the optical sensor




Wetlab


Focused on generating the RBS library for strain engineering. Once we received the DNA parts, we used selection markers to appropriately transform, clone, and sequence the optimized strain.

Model


Continuous progress on the model development.

Microfluidics


Proof of concept for the microfluidic device.

Wetlab


Designed an RBS library for csgG using the Salis Lab RBS Library Calculator,as well as the appropriate PCR primers to construct the library and ordered these sequences from IDT.

Microfluidics


  • Suspended E. coli strain in pbs and measured optical density using cuvettes and nanodrop machine.
    1. Spun down the liquid culture at max speed for 4 minutes.
    2. Removed the liquid media.
    3. Added Pbs and diluted the culture into different concentrations.
  • Vapor polished surface of the milled polycarbonate: heat up methylene chloride in a bunsen flask and place the milled area over the vapor. This was done inside a fume hood.
  • Tested OD readings from vapor polished surface


Setup for sensor calibration


Wetlab

Day 1

Our DNA parts ordered the previous week arrived and we conducted PCRs with the primers we designed and a plasmid containing the sequences for csgA, csgB, csgC, csgE, csgF, and csgG obtained from the Joshi Lab to modify the RBS sequence in front of csgG.

Day 2

After verifying our PCR products with a gel, we used Gibson Assembly to put our cloned parts in an expression vector with kanamycin resistance. We then transformed our newly formed plasmids into competent cells using heat shock and plated them on agar plates with kanamycin.

PCR banding patterns indicated successful Gibson Assembly

Day 3


After leaving our plates in an incubator overnight, we imaged the plates FluorChem E and ran an image analysis script on the images to determine the brightest colonies, which correspond to the colonies with highest curli production. We then picked the 2 brightest colonies on each plate, as well as 2 other randomly chosen colonies, and cultured them in 5 mL falcon tubes with liquid LB and kanamycin.

Example of imaged plates: Brightest colonies related to higher curli production

Wetlab


We ran a congo red pulldown assay on the cultures from the previous week to quantitatively measure the amount of curli produced. Then, we miniprepped the cell cultures to send out our parts for sequencing.

Microfluidics


Milled new designs of microfluidic device.

Microfluidics


Suspend cultures in Pbs for another round of OD calibration.
Vapor polished surface of the milled polycarbonate by heating up methylene chloride in a bunsen flask and placing the milled area over the vapor. This was done inside a fume hood.


Wetlab


We prepared parts for submission to the parts registry, as well as sequence verified our constructs.

Bioreactor
Cultured E. coli cultures in the bioreactor.

Microfluidics


Continuity of proofs of concept for the microfluidic device. Strong focus on optical sensor data analysis.

Wetlab


We ran the congo red pulldown assay again for our constructs.
We sequenced our constructs, and analyzed the sequence in context of our model and other parameters. Refer to our results for a detailed analysis.

Interlab


We prepared our interlab data for submission. We also collected additional data for the interlab study and ran the congo red pulldown assay again.

Bioreactor


Cultured cells in the bioreactor, but observed minimal growth.

Microfluidics


Cultured PQN4 pBAD-CsgBACEFG (curli-producing positive control) in Kan (+) liquid media to prepare for experiments with surface treatment of microfluidic device.
Ensured OD calibration by pumping the cell cultures into microfluidic chambers via inlets of the device.
Prepared Pbs-suspended cell cuture with dilution from OD600 0.1 to OD600 1.
Used syringe pump to pump the liquid cultures in.

Image credit to Boston U Harvardware team


Wetlab


We ran the congo red assay for a third time. We also sent more of our constructs to be sequenced since not all of the parts were able to be sequenced the first time.

Final data refer to results for more details

Wetlab


Miniprepped DNA.

Bioreactor


Final Cad Model





Wetlab


We conducted PCR on each of our miniprepped parts and cloned them into the pSB1C3 backbone for sample submission according to the submission guidelines.