Difference between revisions of "Team:Exeter/HP/Fieldtrips"

 
(146 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
{{Exeter/navbar}}
 
{{Exeter/navbar}}
 
<html>
 
<html>
 +
<script>
 +
 +
$(document).ready(function(){
 +
$('a[href^="#"]').on('click',function (e) {
 +
    e.preventDefault();
 +
 +
    var target = this.hash;
 +
    var $target = $(target);
 +
 +
    $('html, body').stop().animate({
 +
        'scrollTop': $target.offset().top - $('#top_menu_14').height() - $('#top_menu_14').height() - $('#navbar-top').height()
 +
    }, 900, 'swing');
 +
});
 +
});
 +
 +
</script>
 
<p>
 
<p>
  
Line 12: Line 28:
 
         <!-- <a class="navbar-brand" href="#navbar-top">Back to top</a> -->
 
         <!-- <a class="navbar-brand" href="#navbar-top">Back to top</a> -->
 
         <nav class="nav nav-pills flex-column">
 
         <nav class="nav nav-pills flex-column">
           <a class="nav-link" href="#h1">Determination of chassis</a>
+
           <a class="nav-link" href="#h1">Our aim</a>
           <a class="nav-link" href="#h2">Part construction</a>
+
           <a class="nav-link" href="#h2">Methods</a>
           <a class="nav-link" href="#h3">Part testing</a>
+
           <a class="nav-link" href="#h3">Results</a>
           <a class="nav-link" href="#navbar-top">back to top</a>
+
           <a class="nav-link" href="#h4">Discussion and <br> Conclusion</a>
 +
          <a class="nav-link" href="#pageHeader">back to top</a>
 
         </nav>
 
         </nav>
 
       </nav>
 
       </nav>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
 
     <div class="col-10" id="pageContent">
 
     <div class="col-10" id="pageContent">
  <h2> Wheal Maid field trip </h2>
+
   
 +
  <img class="w-25 d-block mx-auto" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/f3/T--Exeter--Fieldtrip_logo.png">
  
<h3> Our aim </h3>
+
  <h1 id="pageHeader"> Wheal Maid Field Trip </h1>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/2b/T--Exeter--_laura_sampling2.jpeg " alt="laura samling" width="450" height="700">
+
<div class="column half_size">
+
  <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/af/Litmus2.jpeg " alt="litmus" width="450" height="700">
+
<img src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/f4/T--Exeter--wheal_maid_metal_ions_graph.png ", width= 1300>
+
<p> It was important to us that the design of both our parts, and our filter, and the intended implementation for the project  was a reflection of a real-world problem. This insight was largely given to us by the RRI framework, as it stressed the significance of society's role in science and it underlined the problem with innovating in an isolated manner. Motivated by our desire to base our science on our own data taken outside of the lab, we went on a field trip. </p>
+
  <p>
+
  Mine waste has detrimental environmental effects by limiting vegetation growth (Craw & Rufaut, 2017), impacting
+
  species diversity and leaching into nearby water bodies and the environment (Leung, et al., 2017).  Toxic metals affect the surrounding environment and can bioaccumulate in food chains.  Affected organisms
+
  could be those used for human consumption such as fish, molluscs and crustaceans.  This will in turn affect
+
  human health if consumed, highlighting this as an important issue that needs to be addressed.  The water bodies
+
  at the Wheal maid mine site were investigated to understand the metal ion composition and pH of the water.  The pH was found to be acidic and a number of metal ions were found in the samples.
+
  </p>
+
  
 +
  <h2 id="h1"> Our aim </h2>
  
   
+
<p> It was important to us that the design of both our parts, our filter and the intended implementation for the project was a reflection of a real-world problem. This insight was largely given to us by stakeholders and the field trip, guided by <a href=" https://2017.igem.org/Team:Exeter/HP/Intro"> Responsible Research and Innovation</a> and the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Exeter/HP/Silver"> AREA framework</a>, as it stressed the significance of society's role in science and it underlined the problem with innovating in an isolated manner. We organised a field trip to Wheal Maid mine to collect metal ion water composition data to tailor our synthetic biology project to real world conditions.  We were motivated by our desire to base our science on our own data collected outside of the lab. </p>
  <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/50/T--Exeter--wheal_maid_background2.jpeg" alt=" lagoon 2" width="500">
+
+
<h5> <u>Figure 1:</u> Wheal maid Lagoon.</h5>
+
  
  <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/70/T--Exeter--orange_mine2.jpeg" alt=" toxic pool" width="500" >
+
<p>  Wheal Maid forms part of the Consolidation Mine, part of the Cornwall and West Devon Mining Landscape World Heritage Site. Wheal Maid was mined until the 1870s, and then became a site for taking fine-grained mineral processing waste (tailings) from the mill facilities at the former Mount Wellington tin mine during the 1970s and 80s. The waste was taken to a valley infill at Wheal Maid consisting of two lagoons, separated by three dams and contains approximately 220,000m<sup>3</sup> of tailings. An investigation by the Environmental Agency to conduct an inspection into environmental quality, which took place in 2007, concluded that Wheal Maid is a contaminated site. It was also shown that the site is causing pollution of the St. Day Stream by leaching of arsenic, cadmium, copper, chromium, iron, lead, nickel and zinc through the toe of the lower lagoon. (Carrick District Council, 2008). For this reason we decided to conduct our primary field work at this site, collecting water samples from these lagoons.</p>
 
+
 
<h5> <u> Figure 2:</u> Wheal maid pond.</h5>
+
 
 +
<figure class="w-100 mx-auto d-block border border-dark rounded">
 +
<img class="w-50 d-float d-block mx-auto" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/50/T--Exeter--wheal_maid_background2.jpeg">
 +
<img class="w-50 d-float d-block mx-auto" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/45/T--Exeter--orange_mine.jpeg">
 +
<figcaption class="d-block">
 +
  <b>Figure 1:</b> One of the lagoons (top) and the pond (bottom) at the Wheal Maid mine site. (Photographed by Sean Large.)
 +
</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
  <h2 id="h2"> Methods </h2>
  
 
   <p>
 
   <p>
   The Consolidation Mine, also known as the Consols, forms part of the Cornwall and West Devon Mining Landscape World
+
   In order to conduct our data collection safely, we completed the appropriate risk assessment forms. We used protocols designed to enable efficient collection and filtration of the samples at the site before they were to be transported back and placed in a cold store for analysis. Sample analysis was performed using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), a capability offered to us through the use of equipment given to us by Greenpeace, which identifies the metal ion concentrations within water samples. Details of the protocols and risk assessments can be found on our <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Exeter/Safety#coshh">safety page.</a>
  Heritage Site. The Mine used to be several smaller mines until underground workings of these mines were amalgamated
+
  in 1782 (Anon., n.d.).
+
  </p>
+
  
 
   <p>
 
   <p>
   The Consols was a massively successful copper mine. Such was its fame that many other mines were opened using
+
   On 14th July 2017 we arrived at Wheal Maid with a PhD student from the Cambourne School of Mines at the University of Exeter, Miss Tomasa Sbaffi. She met us in order to help us with taking water samples due to her experience with the process and knowledge of the site. We sampled one of the lagoons and the pond shown in Figure 2.
  the same name, with the hope to profit by association. Our field trip studied one of the
+
  Consols sites which is one of the largest sources of pollution in the area. Wheal Maid is an abandoned site that
+
  is owned by the Gwennap Parish Council, having been purchased for £1 from Carnon Enterprises (Anon., 2008).
+
 
   </p>
 
   </p>
 
   <p>
 
   <p>
   The site was mined while the Consols were in operation until the 1870s, and then became site for taking
+
   The water bodies were sampled by taking 1L of water from each of the 4 sites at the lagoon (A-D) and the pond (E-H) as labelled in Figure 2.
  fine-grained mineral processing wastes (tailings) from the mill facilities at the former Mount Wellington tin
+
  mine during the 1970s and 80s.  Tailings are known to limit plant establishment as they form an impermeable
+
  substrate, dune erosion removes juvenile plants and plant growth is limited by the phosphorus bioavailability
+
  (Craw & Rufaut, 2017).  There is some vegetation at Wheal Maid, as shown in Figures 1 and 2, but the cover is
+
  patchy and incomplete as the colonisation has been hindered by the impact of the mine waste on soil nutrient levels.
+
  </p>
+
  <p>
+
  A valley infill at Wheal Maid consists of two lagoons separated by three dams and contains approximately
+
  220,000m<sup>3</sup> of tailings. In response to local pressure, the Carrick District Council asked the Environmental
+
  Agency to conduct an environmental quality inspection in 2007 (Council, 2008).
+
  </p>
+
  <p>
+
  The investigation concluded that Wheal Maid is a contaminated site, due to the levels of arsenic in the soil.
+
  The investigation stated that there is a significant possibility of significant harm to young children using the
+
  site for BMX/mountain biking from exposure to arsenic through the inhalation, ingestion and dermal absorption
+
  pathways from the soil. The controlled waters risk assessment show that the site is causing pollution of controlled
+
  waters by leaching of arsenic, cadmium, copper, chromium, iron, lead, nickel and zinc through the toe of the
+
  lower lagoon into the St. Day Stream. It further concludes that pollution of controlled waters is likely to be
+
  caused by leaching of the above pollutants into groundwater beneath the site and through the culvert wall into
+
  the St. Day Stream (Council, 2008).
+
 
   </p>
 
   </p>
  
   <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/fc/T--Exeter--zoomed_in_site_near_river.png">
+
<figure class="w-100 mx-auto d-block border border-dark rounded">
    
+
   <img class="w-75 d-float d-block mx-auto" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b9/T--Exeter--whealmaidsatellite.png">
<h5> <u>Figure 3:</u> OSM map of Wheal Maid site with plotted sampling sites(Geoplaner.com , 2017)</h5>
+
   <figcaption style="text-align:center">
 +
  <b>Figure 2: </b> Satellite map of Wheal Maid site with the lagoon marked A-D and the pond marked E-H.
 +
  </figcaption>
 +
  </figure>
  
  <p>
+
  <p>
  Figure 3 and 4 show the nature of the land and indicate that a stream runs through or under the Wheal Maid site
+
    Figure 3 was created using Vidana software to determine the percentage decrease in size of the lagoon and the pond since the Google Maps satellite photo was taken in January 2017. This reduction in surface area could be due to a number of factors, such as seasonality, which is likely to have caused an increase in the concentration of metal ions.
  and joins up with the Carnon river. This river contributes to the Restronguet creek, leading to the Carrick Roads
+
  before ending in the English Channel. This highlights the issue of potential contaminants and pollutants leaching
+
  out of the waste site and into the water that will be carried out through the land and to the sea.
+
 
   </p>
 
   </p>
  
  <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/0f/T--Exeter--wm_river_zoom_out.png ">
+
<figure class="w-100 d-float d-block mx-auto border border-dark rounded">
 
+
  <img class="w-50 float-left" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/e8/T--Exeter--lagoondiagram.png" width="500">
<h5> <u> Figure 4:</uZoomed out OSM map of Wheal Maid site with plotted sampling sites(Geoplaner.com , 2017)</h5>
+
  <img class="w-50 float-right" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/8c/T--Exeter--extentponddd.png " width="500">
 +
    <p class="d-block w-100">
 +
  <figcaption><b>Figure 3:</b> The percentage cover of the lagoon (left) and pond (right), sampled on 14th July 2017, has reduced by 78% and 77% respectively since January 2017. This area was determined from the location of the sampling sites around the edge of the lake and visually from Figure 2 (Geoplaner.com, 2017; Hedkey, 2017)  
 +
  </figcaption>
 +
  </p>
 +
</figure>
  
  <p>
 
  The aim of the field trip was to investigate the metal ion composition of the acid mine wastewater at Wheal Maid.
 
  The hypothesis is that the results from this investigation will show that the water is polluted.If correct, the readings would give us
 
  focus for which heavy metals we should extract from the acid mine waste water using our genetically modified
 
  <i>E. coli</i>. Risk assessment forms were filled out to think about the possible hazards of the trip.
 
  </p>
 
  
 
   <p>
 
   <p>
  The aim of the field trip was to investigate the metal ion composition of the acid mine wastewater at Wheal Maid.
+
We then filtered 150 ml of each sample into three falcon tubes using a yellow 100 µm filter and then preceded to filter them further through a smaller 0.2 µm filter. We treated the blanks containing MiliQ water as controls and processed them the same way as the samples. The pH of all of the samples was tested using litmus paper which all came out as ~pH 3. The samples were sealed in bags and transported back to Exeter to be placed in a cold room to await further analysis.
  The hypothesis is that the results from this investigation will show that the water is polluted and give us a
+
  focus for which heavy metals we would like to extract from the acid mine waste using our genetically modified
+
  <i>E. coli</i> model. Risk assessment forms were filled out to think about the possible hazards of the trip.
+
 
   </p>
 
   </p>
  
   <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/aa/T--Exeter--Field_work_risk_assessment.pdf"> Field work risk assessment </a>
+
<figure class="w-100 d-block mx-auto border border-dark rounded">
 +
<div class="w-50 mx-auto">
 +
   <img class="w-50 float-left" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/2b/T--Exeter--_laura_sampling2.jpeg">
 +
  <img class="w-50 float-right" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/af/Litmus2.jpeg">
 +
</div>
 +
<figcaption style="text-align:center">
 +
  <b>Figure 4:</b> Laura and Jake B preparing and analysing the samples at Wheal Maid. (Photographed by Sean Large.)
 +
</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
  
  <p>
 
  A protocol was designed to enable efficient collection and filtration of the samples at the site before they were
 
  to be transported back and placed in a cold store for analysis.
 
  </p>
 
  
  <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/e3/T--Exeter--sop_sample_collection.pdf"> Field work protocol </a>
 
  
  <h3> Methods </h3>
 
  <h4>The field trip</h4>
 
  <p>
 
  14th July 2017 12:35am – arrived at the site A PhD student from the School of Mines at Falmouth University,
 
  Tomasa Sbaffi, met us to help us with sampling as she had regularly sampled this site and knew it well. We
 
  sampled one of the lagoons and the pond in the East.
 
  </p>
 
  <p>
 
  We sampled the lagoon by taking 1L of water from each of the 4 sites (A-D) as shown by the diagram. Additionally
 
  sampled the Pond by taking 1L from each of the 4 sites (E-H).
 
  </p>
 
  
   <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/e6/T--Exeter--sampling_sites2.jpeg">
+
 
 +
   <h2 id="h3"> Results </h2>
  
  <h5><u> Figure 5:</u>  Satellite map of Wheal Maid site with plotted sampling sites.  (Geoplaner.com , 2017)</h5>
+
  <h4>
 +
    pH of the Water Bodies
 +
  </h4>
  
  <p>
+
  <p style = "clear:left">
    We then filtered 150ml of each sample in to 3 falcon tubes using yellow 100 um filter and then preceded to
+
    The pH of our samples can be found in table 1. An ANOVA (analysis of variance) was performed on the pH of the samples after storage from the different water bodies to see if there was a statistical difference between the two, shown in table 2.
    filter them further through a smaller 0.2 um filter. We treated the blanks containing Mili Q water as controls
+
   </p>
    and processed them the same way as the samples. The pH of all of the samples was tested using litmus paper
+
    which all came out as ~pH 3. The samples were sealed in bags and transported back to Exeter to be placed in
+
    a cold room to await further analysis.
+
  </p>
+
  <div class="column half_size">
+
  <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/2b/T--Exeter--_laura_sampling2.jpeg " alt="laura samling" width="450" height="700">
+
    
+
<h5><u> Figure 6:</u>  Laura Simpson filtering samples from the lagoon using a syringe, filter and falcon tubes.  (Photo credit: Sean Large)</h5>
+
  </div>
+
  
  <div class="column half_size">
 
  <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/af/Litmus2.jpeg " alt="litmus" width="450" height="700">
 
 
 
<h5><u> Figure 7:</u>  Jake Binsley using litmus paper to measure the pH of the water samples from the different sites.
 
  
</h5>
+
<p>
  </div>
+
<table style="width:90%; margin:0 auto; border-collapse: collapse;  border: 2px solid black" border="1" >
 +
  <tr>
 +
<th rowspan="2">Site</th>
 +
<th colspan="2">pH</th>
 +
  </tr>
 +
  <tr>
 +
 +
<th>Lagoon</th>
 +
<th>Pond</th>
  
  <h3> Results </h3>
+
  </tr>
  <p>
+
  <tr>
    The Figures 8 and 9 were created using Vidana software to determine the percentage decrease in size of
+
<th>N</th>
    the lagoon and the pond since the Google Maps satellite photo was taken in 2017. This could be due to a number of
+
<td>24</td>
    factors such as seasonality which is likely to concentrate the metal ions and pollutants in the water making
+
<td>11</td>
    the water more harmful to the environment.
+
  </tr>
  </p>
+
<tr>
  <div class="column half_size">
+
<th>Mean</th>
  <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/e8/T--Exeter--lagoondiagram.png">
+
<td>2.80</td>
 
+
<td>2.77</td>
<h5> <u> Figure 8:</u> The percentage cover of the lagoon, sampled on 14th July 2017, is 22% of the percentage cover of the lagoon in the 2017 Google Maps image.  The lake has therefore declined by around 78% in area (and therefore in volume) since the picture was taken. This area was determined from the location of the sampling sites around the edge of the lake and visually from Figure 2.  (Geoplaner.com , 2017) (Vidana, 2017)</h5>
+
  </tr>
  </div>
+
    <tr>
  <div class="column half_size">
+
<th>Standard deviation</th>
  <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/d/df/T--Exeter--ponddiagram.png ">
+
<td>0.155</td>
 
+
<td>0.180</td>
<h5><u> Figure 9:</u> The percentage cover of the pond sampled on 14th July 2017, is 23% of the percentage cover of the lagoon in the Google Maps 2017 image.  The lake has therefore declined by around 77% in area since the picture was taken. This area was determined from the location of the sampling sites around the edge of the lake and visually from Figure 2. (Geoplaner.com , 2017) (Vidana, 2017)
+
  </tr>
</h5>
+
    <tr>
  </div>
+
<th>Standard error</th>
 +
<td>0.0317</td>
 +
<td>0.0514</td>
 +
  </tr>
 +
                  <caption style = "color:black">Table 1: pH of the lagoon and pond sites at Wheal Maid.</caption>
 +
</table>
  
  <h5>Analysis of samples</h5>
+
</p>
  <p>
+
    We prepared the samples and ran them on the ICP-OES machine in the Geography department at the University of
+
    Exeter.
+
  </p>
+
  <p>
+
    <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/0e/T--Exeter--sop_icp_sample_analysis.pdf"> Standard Operating
+
      Procedures for sample analysis using the ICP-OES </a>
+
  </p>
+
  <p>
+
    <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/fb/T--Exeter--COSHHdilutingacids.pdf"> Risk assessment for diluting acids used in  SOP </a>
+
  </p>
+
  <p>
+
    <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/54/T--Exeter--COSHHmetalionstandards.pdf"> Risk assessment for handling metal ion standard solution used in  SOP </a>
+
  </p>
+
  
 
   <p>
 
   <p>
    Results
+
<table style="width:90%; margin:0 auto; border-collapse: collapse;  border: 2px solid black" border="1" >
  </p>
+
  <tr>
  <div class="column half_size">
+
<th>Comparison</th>
    <img src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/6d/T--Exeter--phwhealmaid.png ">
+
<th>ANOVA p-value</th>
  </div>
+
<th>Significant</th>
  <p> <u> Table 1:</u> pH of the lagoon and pond sites at Wheal Maid </p>
+
  </tr>
 +
  <tr>
 +
<td>Lagoon pH vs pond pH </td>
 +
<td>0.640</td>
 +
<td>No</td>
 +
                                  </tr>
  
  <h5>
+
            <caption style = "color:black">Table 2: ANOVA statistic output testing the variation in pH of the lagoon and pond sites at Wheal Maid.</caption>
    Statistical test
+
</table>
  </h5>
+
     </p>
  <p>
+
     An ANOVA (analysis of variance) was performed on the pH of the samples after storage from the different water bodies to see if there was a statistical difference between the two.
+
  </p>
+
  
  <div class="column half_size">
+
<p>
    <img src="  https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/3/34/T--Exeter--anovastatstest.png">
+
The ANOVA statistical test shows that there is no significant difference in pH between the pond and lagoon 2.
  </div>
+
</p>
  <p>
+
    <u> Table 2:</u>  ANOVA statistic output testing the variation in pH of the lagoon and pond sites at Wheal Maid.
+
  </p>
+
  <p>
+
    The ANOVA test (p=0.640) was not significant, therefore we can accept the null hypothesis that the there is no variation in the mean pH of the two sites as p>0.05.  This means that these sites are of a similar pH and can be used as replicates when determining the metal ion composition or mine waste water, as they are so similar.
+
  </p>
+
  
 
   <h4>
 
   <h4>
 
     Metal ion composition ICP-OES results
 
     Metal ion composition ICP-OES results
 
   </h4>
 
   </h4>
 +
<table style="width:90%; margin:0 auto; border-collapse: collapse;  border: 2px solid black" border="1" >
 +
  <tr>
 +
<th>Dissolved Metals</th>
 +
<th>Standards (mg/L)</th> 
 +
<th>Lagoon (mg/L)</th>
 +
<th>Pond (mg/L)</th>
 +
 +
  </tr>
 +
  <tr>
 +
                                <td> Aluminium (Al) </td>
 +
<td>0.200</td>
 +
<td>6.726</td>
 +
<td>50.584</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td> Boron (B)</td> 
 +
<td>0.300</td>
 +
<td>0.090</td> 
 +
<td>0.246</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
 +
 +
<tr>
 +
<td> Cadmium (Cd) </td>
 +
<td> 0.003 </td>
 +
<td> 0.007 </td>
 +
<td> 0.027 </td>
 +
</tr>
 +
 +
 +
<tr>
 +
<td> Copper (Cu) </td>
 +
<td> 2.000 </td>
 +
<td> 1.065 </td>
 +
<td> 4.334 </td>
 +
</tr>
 +
 +
<tr>
 +
<td> Iron (Fe) </td>
 +
<td> 0.200 </td>
 +
<td> 3.445 </td>
 +
<td> 16.307 </td>
 +
</tr>
 +
 +
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Nickle (Ni)</td>
 +
<td> 0.020</td>
 +
<td> 0.023 </td>
 +
<td> 0.197 </td>
 +
</tr>
 +
 +
 +
<tr>
 +
<td> Thallium (Ti) </td>
 +
<td> 0.0005 </td>
 +
<td> 0.0280 </td>
 +
<td> 0.0004</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
 +
<tr>
 +
<td> Zinc (Zn)</td>
 +
<td> 3.000 </td>
 +
<td> 2.897 </td>
 +
<td> 25.738 </td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<caption style = "color:black">Table 3:  Dissolved metal ion composition of samples taken from the Lagoon and Pond sites at Wheal Maid and analysed using the ICP-OES.  Stars indicate which elements are found to have higher concentrations than the drinking water standards.  (Defra, 2017; Lenntech.com , 2017; US EPA, 2015)</caption>
 +
 +
</table>
 +
  
  
<img src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/f4/T--Exeter--wheal_maid_metal_ions_graph.png ", width= 1300>
 
  
 
<p>
 
<p>
    <u> Figure 10:</u>  Dissolved metal ion composition of samples taken from the Lagoon and Pond sites at Wheal Maid.  Stars indicate which elements are found to have higher concentrations than the drinking water standards.  (Defra, 2017) (Lenntech.com , 2017) (US EPA, 2015)
+
     
 
   </p>
 
   </p>
  
<h3>
 
Discussion and Conclusion
 
</h3>
 
  
 +
<figure class="d-block w-100 mx-auto border border-dark rounded">
 +
<img class="mx-auto w-50 d-block" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/d/d3/T--Exeter--whealmaiddDM.png">
 +
<figcaption style="text-align:center">
 +
<b>Figure 5:</b> Metal ion concentrations at Wheal Maid showing those exceeding drinking water standards represented by the stars above the bars.
 +
</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
  
  
  
<p>
+
  <h2 id="h4">Discussion and Conclusion</h2>
  
Metals we have binding proteins for that are above drinking water standards
 
 
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
• Copper
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
o DM Pond
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
o TRM Lagoon 2 & pond
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
• Cobalt
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
 no known standard
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
• Iron
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
o TRM Lagoon 2 & pond
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
• Magnesium
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
 no known standard
 
</p>
 
 
<p>
 
<p>
  
• Nickel
+
Analysis of the results from the field trip to Wheal Jane helped inform our work in the laboratory. Specifically it allowed us to identify which of the metal binding proteins we wanted to use in our constructs in order to bind to metal ions that were significantly above their standards. The proteins we chose to investigate were; Mouse Metallothionein that binds to Cd, Cu and Zn), <I>Synechococcus</I> Metallothionein that binds to Cd and Zn, <I>Synechococcus</I> Plastocyanin that binds to Cu and a poly-Histidine tag inserted into the FimH protein to bind Ni.
</p>
+
<p>
+
o DM Lagoon 2 & pond
+
</p>
+
<p>
+
o TRM Lagoon 2 & pond
+
  
</p>
 
<p>
 
 
These results will be used to inform which metal binding proteins we can use in our constructs.
 
  
 
</p>
 
</p>
Line 288: Line 281:
 
     References
 
     References
 
   </h4>
 
   </h4>
  <p>
+
<p id="referenceList">
    CornwallinFocus.co.uk (2017) Mining in cornwall database - mine, cornwall.  [Online] Available at: http://www.cornwallinfocus.co.uk/mining/consols.php [Accessed 07 2017].
+
Carrick District Council, <i>Record of Determination of Wheal Maid Tailings Lagoons</i> (2008)
  </p>
+
Available at: https://www.cornwall.gov.uk/media/3625647/2008-09-16-Record-of-Determination.pdf  
  <p>
+
[Accessed 7 August 2017]<br><br>
    Gwennap-Parish.net. ( 2008) wheal maid :: Gwennap Parish. [Online] Available at: http://www.gwennap-parish.net/wheal_maid.html [Accessed 07 2017].
+
     Screen shots of % cover credit:  Hedkey, J. (2017). Vidana.  Marine spatial ecology lab.<br><br>
  </p>
+
     Screenshots of maps credit:  Geoplaner.com. (2017).  GPS Geoplaner online. [online] Available at: http://www.geoplaner.com/ [Accessed 07 Aug. 2017]<br><br>
  <p>
+
Defra (2017). Drinking water inspectorate. [ebook] London, pp.1-5. Available at: http://Dwi.defra.gov.uk/consumers/advice-leaflet/standards.pdf.<br><br>
    Carrick District Council (1990). Environmental Protection Act 1990, Part2A – Section 78B Record of Determination of Wheal Maid Tailings Lagoons, Gwennap, Cornwall as Contaminated Land pp. 1-8 [Online] Available at: ttps://www.cornwall.gov.uk/media/3625647/2008-09-16-Record-of-Determination.pdf [Accessed 07 2017].
+
   Lenntech.com. (2017). WHO's drinking water standards. [online] Available at: http://www.lenntech.com/applications/drinking/standards/who-s-drinking-water-standards.htm [Accessed 12 Sep. 2017].<br><br>
  </p>
+
  <p>
+
    Craw, D. and Rufaut, C., (2017). Geochemical and mineralogical controls on mine tailings rehabilitation and vegetation, Otago Schist, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 60(-), p. 176–187.
+
  </p>
+
  <p>
+
    Leung, H, Duzgoren-Aydin, N., Au, C., Krupanidhi, S., Fung, K., Cheung, K., Wong, Y., Peng, X., Ye, Z., Yung, K. and Tsui, M.  (2016). Monitoring and assessment of heavy metal contamination in a constructed wetland in Shaoguan (Guangdong Province, China): bioaccumulation of Pb, Zn, Cu and Cd in aquatic and terrestrial components. Environ Science and Pollution Research, 24, p. 9079–9088.
+
 
+
  <p>
+
     Screen shots of % cover credit:  Hedkey, J. (2017). Vidana.  Marine spatial ecology lab.
+
  </p>
+
  <p>
+
     Screenshots of maps credit:  Geoplaner.com. (2017).  GPS Geoplaner online. [online] Available at: http://www.geoplaner.com/ [Accessed 07 Aug. 2017]
+
  </p>
+
 
+
<p>
+
Defra (2017). Drinking water inspectorate. [ebook] London, pp.1-5. Available at: http://Dwi.defra.gov.uk/consumers/advice-leaflet/standards.pdf.
+
</p>
+
<p>
+
   Lenntech.com. (2017). WHO's drinking water standards. [online] Available at: http://www.lenntech.com/applications/drinking/standards/who-s-drinking-water-standards.htm [Accessed 12 Sep. 2017].
+
</p>
+
 
+
<p>
+
 
US EPA. (2015). National Primary Drinking Water Regulations | US EPA. [online] Available at: HTTPS://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/national-primary-drinking-water-regulations [Accessed 12 Sep. 2017].
 
US EPA. (2015). National Primary Drinking Water Regulations | US EPA. [online] Available at: HTTPS://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/national-primary-drinking-water-regulations [Accessed 12 Sep. 2017].
 
</p>
 
</p>

Latest revision as of 14:02, 29 November 2017

Wheal Maid Field Trip

Our aim

It was important to us that the design of both our parts, our filter and the intended implementation for the project was a reflection of a real-world problem. This insight was largely given to us by stakeholders and the field trip, guided by Responsible Research and Innovation and the AREA framework, as it stressed the significance of society's role in science and it underlined the problem with innovating in an isolated manner. We organised a field trip to Wheal Maid mine to collect metal ion water composition data to tailor our synthetic biology project to real world conditions. We were motivated by our desire to base our science on our own data collected outside of the lab.

Wheal Maid forms part of the Consolidation Mine, part of the Cornwall and West Devon Mining Landscape World Heritage Site. Wheal Maid was mined until the 1870s, and then became a site for taking fine-grained mineral processing waste (tailings) from the mill facilities at the former Mount Wellington tin mine during the 1970s and 80s. The waste was taken to a valley infill at Wheal Maid consisting of two lagoons, separated by three dams and contains approximately 220,000m3 of tailings. An investigation by the Environmental Agency to conduct an inspection into environmental quality, which took place in 2007, concluded that Wheal Maid is a contaminated site. It was also shown that the site is causing pollution of the St. Day Stream by leaching of arsenic, cadmium, copper, chromium, iron, lead, nickel and zinc through the toe of the lower lagoon. (Carrick District Council, 2008). For this reason we decided to conduct our primary field work at this site, collecting water samples from these lagoons.

Figure 1: One of the lagoons (top) and the pond (bottom) at the Wheal Maid mine site. (Photographed by Sean Large.)

Methods

In order to conduct our data collection safely, we completed the appropriate risk assessment forms. We used protocols designed to enable efficient collection and filtration of the samples at the site before they were to be transported back and placed in a cold store for analysis. Sample analysis was performed using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), a capability offered to us through the use of equipment given to us by Greenpeace, which identifies the metal ion concentrations within water samples. Details of the protocols and risk assessments can be found on our safety page.

On 14th July 2017 we arrived at Wheal Maid with a PhD student from the Cambourne School of Mines at the University of Exeter, Miss Tomasa Sbaffi. She met us in order to help us with taking water samples due to her experience with the process and knowledge of the site. We sampled one of the lagoons and the pond shown in Figure 2.

The water bodies were sampled by taking 1L of water from each of the 4 sites at the lagoon (A-D) and the pond (E-H) as labelled in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Satellite map of Wheal Maid site with the lagoon marked A-D and the pond marked E-H.

Figure 3 was created using Vidana software to determine the percentage decrease in size of the lagoon and the pond since the Google Maps satellite photo was taken in January 2017. This reduction in surface area could be due to a number of factors, such as seasonality, which is likely to have caused an increase in the concentration of metal ions.

Figure 3: The percentage cover of the lagoon (left) and pond (right), sampled on 14th July 2017, has reduced by 78% and 77% respectively since January 2017. This area was determined from the location of the sampling sites around the edge of the lake and visually from Figure 2 (Geoplaner.com, 2017; Hedkey, 2017)

We then filtered 150 ml of each sample into three falcon tubes using a yellow 100 µm filter and then preceded to filter them further through a smaller 0.2 µm filter. We treated the blanks containing MiliQ water as controls and processed them the same way as the samples. The pH of all of the samples was tested using litmus paper which all came out as ~pH 3. The samples were sealed in bags and transported back to Exeter to be placed in a cold room to await further analysis.

Figure 4: Laura and Jake B preparing and analysing the samples at Wheal Maid. (Photographed by Sean Large.)

Results

pH of the Water Bodies

The pH of our samples can be found in table 1. An ANOVA (analysis of variance) was performed on the pH of the samples after storage from the different water bodies to see if there was a statistical difference between the two, shown in table 2.

Site pH
Lagoon Pond
N 24 11
Mean 2.80 2.77
Standard deviation 0.155 0.180
Standard error 0.0317 0.0514
Table 1: pH of the lagoon and pond sites at Wheal Maid.

Comparison ANOVA p-value Significant
Lagoon pH vs pond pH 0.640 No
Table 2: ANOVA statistic output testing the variation in pH of the lagoon and pond sites at Wheal Maid.

The ANOVA statistical test shows that there is no significant difference in pH between the pond and lagoon 2.

Metal ion composition ICP-OES results

           
Dissolved Metals Standards (mg/L)Lagoon (mg/L) Pond (mg/L)
Aluminium (Al) 0.200 6.726 50.584
Boron (B)0.300 0.0900.246
Cadmium (Cd) 0.003 0.007 0.027
Copper (Cu) 2.000 1.065 4.334
Iron (Fe) 0.200 3.445 16.307
Nickle (Ni) 0.020 0.023 0.197
Thallium (Ti) 0.0005 0.0280 0.0004
Zinc (Zn) 3.000 2.897 25.738
Table 3: Dissolved metal ion composition of samples taken from the Lagoon and Pond sites at Wheal Maid and analysed using the ICP-OES. Stars indicate which elements are found to have higher concentrations than the drinking water standards. (Defra, 2017; Lenntech.com , 2017; US EPA, 2015)

Figure 5: Metal ion concentrations at Wheal Maid showing those exceeding drinking water standards represented by the stars above the bars.

Discussion and Conclusion

Analysis of the results from the field trip to Wheal Jane helped inform our work in the laboratory. Specifically it allowed us to identify which of the metal binding proteins we wanted to use in our constructs in order to bind to metal ions that were significantly above their standards. The proteins we chose to investigate were; Mouse Metallothionein that binds to Cd, Cu and Zn), Synechococcus Metallothionein that binds to Cd and Zn, Synechococcus Plastocyanin that binds to Cu and a poly-Histidine tag inserted into the FimH protein to bind Ni.

References

Carrick District Council, Record of Determination of Wheal Maid Tailings Lagoons (2008) Available at: https://www.cornwall.gov.uk/media/3625647/2008-09-16-Record-of-Determination.pdf [Accessed 7 August 2017]

Screen shots of % cover credit: Hedkey, J. (2017). Vidana. Marine spatial ecology lab.

Screenshots of maps credit: Geoplaner.com. (2017). GPS Geoplaner online. [online] Available at: http://www.geoplaner.com/ [Accessed 07 Aug. 2017]

Defra (2017). Drinking water inspectorate. [ebook] London, pp.1-5. Available at: http://Dwi.defra.gov.uk/consumers/advice-leaflet/standards.pdf.

Lenntech.com. (2017). WHO's drinking water standards. [online] Available at: http://www.lenntech.com/applications/drinking/standards/who-s-drinking-water-standards.htm [Accessed 12 Sep. 2017].

US EPA. (2015). National Primary Drinking Water Regulations | US EPA. [online] Available at: HTTPS://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/national-primary-drinking-water-regulations [Accessed 12 Sep. 2017].