Difference between revisions of "Team:Exeter/HP/Fieldtrips"

(Created page with "{{Exeter/header}} {{Exeter/navbar}} <html> <head> div { margin-bottom: 100px; margin-right: 50px; margin-left: 50px; } </head> <h2> Wheal Maid field tr...")
 
 
(191 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
{{Exeter/navbar}}
 
{{Exeter/navbar}}
 
<html>
 
<html>
 +
<script>
  
<head>
+
$(document).ready(function(){
 +
$('a[href^="#"]').on('click',function (e) {
 +
    e.preventDefault();
  
div {
+
    var target = this.hash;
 
+
    var $target = $(target);
    margin-bottom: 100px;
+
    margin-right: 50px;
+
    margin-left: 50px;
+
 
+
}
+
 
+
</head>
+
 
+
<h2> Wheal Maid field trip </h2>
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/0c/T--Exeter--wheal_maid_background.jpeg" alt=" lagoon 2" width="1000" height="700">
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/45/T--Exeter--orange_mine.jpeg" alt=" toxic pool" width="1000" height="700">
+
 
+
 
+
</div>
+
  
 +
    $('html, body').stop().animate({
 +
        'scrollTop': $target.offset().top - $('#top_menu_14').height() - $('#top_menu_14').height() - $('#navbar-top').height()
 +
    }, 900, 'swing');
 +
});
 +
});
  
 +
</script>
 
<p>
 
<p>
The Consolidation Mine, also known as the Consols, forms part of the Cornwall and West Devon Mining Landscape World Heritage Site. The Mine used to be several smaller mines until underground workings of these mines that amalgamated in 1782 (Anon., n.d.).
 
</p>
 
  
 +
<!-- Row & container for main content of the page -->
 +
<div class="container-fluid">
 +
  <div class="row">
 +
    <div class="col-2">
 +
      <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Exeter"><img id="logo-top-left" width="100%;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/29/T--Exeter--startpage_logo.png"></a>
 +
      <nav id="navbar-page" class="navbar"> <!-- classes removed from template: navbar-light bg-light-->
 +
        <!-- <a class="navbar-brand" href="#navbar-top">Back to top</a> -->
 +
        <nav class="nav nav-pills flex-column">
 +
          <a class="nav-link" href="#h1">Our aim</a>
 +
          <a class="nav-link" href="#h2">Methods</a>
 +
          <a class="nav-link" href="#h3">Results</a>
 +
          <a class="nav-link" href="#h4">Discussion and <br> Conclusion</a>
 +
          <a class="nav-link" href="#pageHeader">back to top</a>
 +
        </nav>
 +
      </nav>
 +
    </div>
 +
    <div class="col-10" id="pageContent">
 +
 +
  <img class="w-25 d-block mx-auto" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/f3/T--Exeter--Fieldtrip_logo.png">
  
<p>
+
  <h1 id="pageHeader"> Wheal Maid Field Trip </h1>
The Consols was a massively successful copper mine. Such was its fame that many other mines were opened using their name, with the hope to profit by association with the success story. Our field trip studied one of the Consols sites which is one of the largest causes of pollution in the area.
+
Wheal Maid is an abandoned site that is owned by the Gwennap Parish Council, having been purchased for £1 from Carnon Enterprises (Anon., 2008).
+
</p>
+
  
<p>
+
  <h2 id="h1"> Our aim </h2>
  
The site was mined while the Consols were in operation until the 1870s, and then became site for taking fine-grained mineral processing wastes (tailings) from the mill facilities at the former Mount Wellington tin mine during the 1970s and 80s. A valley infill at Wheal Maid consists of two lagoons separated by three dams and contains approximately 220,000m3 of tailings. After pressure locally, the Carrick District Council asked the Environmental Agency to conduct an environmental quality inspection in 2007 (Council, 2008).
+
<p> It was important to us that the design of both our parts, our filter and the intended implementation for the project  was a reflection of a real-world problem. This insight was largely given to us by stakeholders and the field trip, guided by <a href="  https://2017.igem.org/Team:Exeter/HP/Intro"> Responsible Research and Innovation</a> and the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Exeter/HP/Silver"> AREA framework</a>, as it stressed the significance of society's role in science and it underlined the problem with innovating in an isolated manner. We organised a field trip to Wheal Maid mine to collect metal ion water composition data to tailor our synthetic biology project to real world conditions.  We were motivated by our desire to base our science on our own data collected outside of the lab. </p>
</p>
+
  
 +
<p>  Wheal Maid forms part of the Consolidation Mine, part of the Cornwall and West Devon Mining Landscape World Heritage Site. Wheal Maid was mined until the 1870s, and then became a site for taking fine-grained mineral processing waste (tailings) from the mill facilities at the former Mount Wellington tin mine during the 1970s and 80s. The waste was taken to a valley infill at Wheal Maid consisting of two lagoons, separated by three dams and contains approximately 220,000m<sup>3</sup> of tailings. An investigation by the Environmental Agency to conduct an inspection into environmental quality, which took place in 2007, concluded that Wheal Maid is a contaminated site. It was also shown that the site is causing pollution of the St. Day Stream by leaching of arsenic, cadmium, copper, chromium, iron, lead, nickel and zinc through the toe of the lower lagoon. (Carrick District Council, 2008). For this reason we decided to conduct our primary field work at this site, collecting water samples from these lagoons.</p>
  
<p>
 
  
The investigation concluded that Wheal Maid is a contaminated site, due to the levels of arsenic in the soil. The investigation stated that there is a significant possibility of significant harm to young children using the site for BMX/mountain biking from exposure to arsenic through the inhalation, ingestion and dermal absorption pathways from soil. The controlled waters risk assessment show that the site is causing pollution of controlled waters by leaching of arsenic, cadmium, copper, chromium, iron, lead, nickel and zinc through the toe of the lower lagoon into the St. Day Stream. It further concludes that pollution of controlled waters is likely to be caused by leaching of the above pollutants into groundwater beneath the site and through the culvert wall into the St. Day Stream (Council, 2008).
+
<figure class="w-100 mx-auto d-block border border-dark rounded">
</p>
+
<img class="w-50 d-float d-block mx-auto" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/50/T--Exeter--wheal_maid_background2.jpeg">
 +
<img class="w-50 d-float d-block mx-auto" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/45/T--Exeter--orange_mine.jpeg">
 +
<figcaption class="d-block">
 +
  <b>Figure 1:</b> One of the lagoons (top) and the pond (bottom) at the Wheal Maid mine site. (Photographed by Sean Large.)
 +
</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
  
  
  
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/fc/T--Exeter--zoomed_in_site_near_river.png">
+
  <h2 id="h2"> Methods </h2>
  
<p>
+
  <p>
The diagrams above and below show the nature of the land and indicate that a stream runs through or under the Wheal Maid site and joins up with the Carnon river. This river contributes to the Restronguet creek, leading to the Carrick Roads before ending in the English ChannelThis highlights the issue of potential contaminants and pollutants leeching out of the waste site and into the water that will be carried out through the land and to the sea.  
+
  In order to conduct our data collection safely, we completed the appropriate risk assessment forms. We used protocols designed to enable efficient collection and filtration of the samples at the site before they were to be transported back and placed in a cold store for analysis. Sample analysis was performed using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), a capability offered to us through the use of equipment given to us by Greenpeace, which identifies the metal ion concentrations within water samplesDetails of the protocols and risk assessments can be found on our <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Exeter/Safety#coshh">safety page.</a>
  
</p>
+
  <p>
 +
  On 14th July 2017 we arrived at Wheal Maid with a PhD student from the Cambourne School of Mines at the University of Exeter, Miss Tomasa Sbaffi. She met us in order to help us with taking water samples due to her experience with the process and knowledge of the site. We sampled one of the lagoons and the pond shown in Figure 2.
 +
  </p>
 +
  <p>
 +
  The water bodies were sampled by taking 1L of water from each of the 4 sites at the lagoon (A-D) and the pond (E-H) as labelled in Figure 2.
 +
  </p>
  
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/0f/T--Exeter--wm_river_zoom_out.png ">
+
<figure class="w-100 mx-auto d-block border border-dark rounded">
 +
  <img class="w-75 d-float d-block mx-auto" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b9/T--Exeter--whealmaidsatellite.png">
 +
  <figcaption style="text-align:center">
 +
  <b>Figure 2: </b> Satellite map of Wheal Maid site with the lagoon marked A-D and the pond marked E-H.
 +
  </figcaption>
 +
</figure>
  
 +
  <p>
 +
    Figure 3 was created using Vidana software to determine the percentage decrease in size of the lagoon and the pond since the Google Maps satellite photo was taken in January 2017. This reduction in surface area could be due to a number of factors, such as seasonality, which is likely to have caused an increase in the concentration of metal ions.
 +
  </p>
  
 +
<figure class="w-100 d-float d-block mx-auto border border-dark rounded">
 +
  <img class="w-50 float-left" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/e8/T--Exeter--lagoondiagram.png" width="500">
 +
  <img class="w-50 float-right" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/8c/T--Exeter--extentponddd.png " width="500">
 +
    <p class="d-block w-100">
 +
  <figcaption><b>Figure 3:</b> The percentage cover of the lagoon (left) and pond (right), sampled on 14th July 2017, has reduced by 78% and 77% respectively  since January 2017. This area was determined from the location of the sampling sites around the edge of the lake and visually from Figure 2 (Geoplaner.com, 2017; Hedkey, 2017)
 +
  </figcaption>
 +
  </p>
 +
</figure>
  
<h3>
 
Planning
 
</h3>
 
  
<p>
+
  <p>
The aim of the field trip was to investigate the metal ion composition of the acid mine wastewater at Wheal Maid.
+
We then filtered 150 ml of each sample into three falcon tubes using a yellow 100 µm filter and then preceded to filter them further through a smaller 0.2 µm filter. We treated the blanks containing MiliQ water as controls and processed them the same way as the samples. The pH of all of the samples was tested using litmus paper which all came out as ~pH 3. The samples were sealed in bags and transported back to Exeter to be placed in a cold room to await further analysis.
The hypothesis is that the results from this investigation will show that the water is polluted and give us a focus for which heavy metals we would like to extract from the acid mine waste using our genetically modified E.coli model.
+
  </p>
Risk assessment forms were filled out to think about the possible hazards of the trip.
+
</p>
+
  
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/aa/T--Exeter--Field_work_risk_assessment.pdf"> Field work risk assessment </a>
+
<figure class="w-100 d-block mx-auto border border-dark rounded">
   
+
<div class="w-50 mx-auto">
<p>
+
  <img class="w-50 float-left" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/2b/T--Exeter--_laura_sampling2.jpeg">
A protocol was designed to enable efficient collection and filtration of the samples at the site before they were to be transported back and placed in a cold store for analysis.
+
  <img class="w-50 float-right" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/af/Litmus2.jpeg">
</p>
+
  </div>
 +
<figcaption style="text-align:center">
 +
  <b>Figure 4:</b> Laura and Jake B preparing and analysing the samples at Wheal Maid. (Photographed by Sean Large.)
 +
</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
  
  
  
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/e3/T--Exeter--sop_sample_collection.pdf"> Field work protocol </a>
 
  
 +
 
 +
  <h2 id="h3"> Results </h2>
  
<h4>
+
  <h4>
 +
    pH of the Water Bodies
 +
  </h4>
  
The field trip
+
  <p style = "clear:left">
</h4>
+
    The pH of our samples can be found in table 1. An ANOVA (analysis of variance) was performed on the pH of the samples after storage from the different water bodies to see if there was a statistical difference between the two, shown in table 2.
 
+
  </p>
<p>
+
14th Jully 2017 12:35am – arrived at the site
+
A PhD student from the School of Mines at Falmouth University, Tomasa Sbaffi, met us to help us with sampling as she had regularly sampled this site and knew it well.  We sampled one of the lagoons and the pond in the East.
+
 
+
</p>
+
  
  
 
<p>
 
<p>
We sampled Lagoon 2 by taking 1L of water from each of the 4 sites (1-4) as shown by the diagram.
+
<table style="width:90%; margin:0 auto; border-collapse: collapse;  border: 2px solid black" border="1" >
 +
  <tr>
 +
<th rowspan="2">Site</th>
 +
<th colspan="2">pH</th>
 +
  </tr>
 +
  <tr>
 +
 +
<th>Lagoon</th>
 +
<th>Pond</th>
  
Additionally sampled the Pond by taking 1L from each of the 4 sites (5-8).
+
  </tr>
</p>
+
  <tr>
 +
<th>N</th>
 +
<td>24</td>
 +
<td>11</td>
 +
  </tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<th>Mean</th>
 +
<td>2.80</td>
 +
<td>2.77</td>
 +
  </tr>
 +
    <tr>
 +
<th>Standard deviation</th>
 +
<td>0.155</td>
 +
<td>0.180</td>
 +
  </tr>
 +
    <tr>
 +
<th>Standard error</th>
 +
<td>0.0317</td>
 +
<td>0.0514</td>
 +
  </tr>
 +
                  <caption style = "color:black">Table 1: pH of the lagoon and pond sites at Wheal Maid.</caption>
 +
</table>
  
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/c7/T--Exeter--sampling_sites.png">
 
 
 
<p>
 
We then filtered 150ml of each sample in to 3 falcon tubes using yellow 100 um filter and then preceded to filter them further through a smaller 0.2 um filter.  We treated the blanks containing Mili Q water as controls and processed them the same way as the samples.  The pH of all of the samples was tested using litmus paper which all came out as ~pH 3.  The samples were sealed in bags and transported back to Exeter to be placed in a cold room to await further analysis.
 
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
 +
  <p>
 +
<table style="width:90%; margin:0 auto; border-collapse: collapse;  border: 2px solid black" border="1" >
 +
  <tr>
 +
<th>Comparison</th>
 +
<th>ANOVA p-value</th>
 +
<th>Significant</th>
 +
  </tr>
 +
  <tr>
 +
<td>Lagoon pH vs pond pH </td>
 +
<td>0.640</td>
 +
<td>No</td>
 +
                                  </tr>
  
<div class="column half_size">
+
            <caption style = "color:black">Table 2: ANOVA statistic output testing the variation in pH of the lagoon and pond sites at Wheal Maid.</caption>
 
+
</table>
 
+
    </p>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/63/T--Exeter--_laura_sampling.jpeg " alt="laura samling" width="450" height="700">
+
 
+
 
+
</div>
+
<div class="column half_size">
+
 
+
 
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/3/36/Litmus.jpg " alt="litmus" width="450" height="700">
+
 
+
 
+
</div>
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
  
 
<p>
 
<p>
The diagrams below were created using Vidana software to determine the percentage decrease in size of the lagoon and pond since the Google Maps satellite photo was taken in 2017.
+
The ANOVA statistical test shows that there is no significant difference in pH between the pond and lagoon 2.
 
+
The percentage cover of the lagoon in the photo (below, left), taken in 2017, is 23%.  The percentage cover of the lagoon when it was sampled on 14th July 2017 was 5%.  This was determined from the location of the sampling sites around the edge of the lake.
+
Therefore the lake has declined by around 78% in SA since the picture was taken.  This could be due to a number of factors such as seasonality.  This is likely to concentrate the metal ions and pollutants in the water making the water more harmful to the environment.  Similarly in the photo of the pool (below, right), the percentage cover changed from 22% to 4%, shows the pond has declined by around 81% in SA since the last picture was taken.  Again, this could be due to factors such as seasonality.
+
 
+
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
 +
  <h4>
 +
    Metal ion composition ICP-OES results
 +
  </h4>
 +
<table style="width:90%; margin:0 auto; border-collapse: collapse;  border: 2px solid black" border="1" >
 +
  <tr>
 +
<th>Dissolved Metals</th>
 +
<th>Standards (mg/L)</th> 
 +
<th>Lagoon (mg/L)</th>
 +
<th>Pond (mg/L)</th>
 +
 +
  </tr>
 +
  <tr>
 +
                                <td> Aluminium (Al) </td>
 +
<td>0.200</td>
 +
<td>6.726</td>
 +
<td>50.584</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td> Boron (B)</td> 
 +
<td>0.300</td>
 +
<td>0.090</td> 
 +
<td>0.246</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
 +
 +
<tr>
 +
<td> Cadmium (Cd) </td>
 +
<td> 0.003 </td>
 +
<td> 0.007 </td>
 +
<td> 0.027 </td>
 +
</tr>
 +
 +
 +
<tr>
 +
<td> Copper (Cu) </td>
 +
<td> 2.000 </td>
 +
<td> 1.065 </td>
 +
<td> 4.334 </td>
 +
</tr>
 +
 +
<tr>
 +
<td> Iron (Fe) </td>
 +
<td> 0.200 </td>
 +
<td> 3.445 </td>
 +
<td> 16.307 </td>
 +
</tr>
 +
 +
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Nickle (Ni)</td>
 +
<td> 0.020</td>
 +
<td> 0.023 </td>
 +
<td> 0.197 </td>
 +
</tr>
 +
 +
 +
<tr>
 +
<td> Thallium (Ti) </td>
 +
<td> 0.0005 </td>
 +
<td> 0.0280 </td>
 +
<td> 0.0004</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
 +
<tr>
 +
<td> Zinc (Zn)</td>
 +
<td> 3.000 </td>
 +
<td> 2.897 </td>
 +
<td> 25.738 </td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<caption style = "color:black">Table 3:  Dissolved metal ion composition of samples taken from the Lagoon and Pond sites at Wheal Maid and analysed using the ICP-OES.  Stars indicate which elements are found to have higher concentrations than the drinking water standards.  (Defra, 2017; Lenntech.com , 2017; US EPA, 2015)</caption>
 +
 +
</table>
  
<div class="column half_size">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/7e/T--Exeter--wm_lagoon_decline.png";margin-top:15%;margin-bottom:15%;">
 
</div>
 
<div class="column half_size">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/c8/T--Exeter--wm_pond_decline.png ";margin-top:15%;margin-bottom:15%;">
 
</div>
 
  
  
 
 
 
<h5>
 
 
Analysis of samples
 
</h5>
 
  
 
<p>
 
<p>
We prepared the samples and ran them on the ICP-OES machine in the Geography department at the University of Exeter.
+
     
 +
  </p>
  
</p>
 
<p>
 
  
 +
<figure class="d-block w-100 mx-auto border border-dark rounded">
 +
<img class="mx-auto w-50 d-block" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/d/d3/T--Exeter--whealmaiddDM.png">
 +
<figcaption style="text-align:center">
 +
<b>Figure 5:</b> Metal ion concentrations at Wheal Maid showing those exceeding drinking water standards represented by the stars above the bars.
 +
</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
  
  
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/0e/T--Exeter--sop_icp_sample_analysis.pdf"> Standard Operating Procedures for sample analysis using the ICP-OES </a>
 
  
 +
  <h2 id="h4">Discussion and Conclusion</h2>
  
</p>
 
 
<p>
 
<p>
  
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/fb/T--Exeter--COSHHdilutingacids.pdf"> Risk assessment for diluting acids used in  SOP </a>
+
Analysis of the results from the field trip to Wheal Jane helped inform our work in the laboratory. Specifically it allowed us to identify which of the metal binding proteins we wanted to use in our constructs in order to bind to metal ions that were significantly above their standards. The proteins we chose to investigate were; Mouse Metallothionein that binds to Cd, Cu and Zn), <I>Synechococcus</I> Metallothionein that binds to Cd and Zn, <I>Synechococcus</I> Plastocyanin that binds to Cu and a poly-Histidine tag inserted into the FimH protein to bind Ni.
  
</p>
 
  
<p>
 
 
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/54/T--Exeter--COSHHmetalionstandards.pdf"> Risk assessment for handling metal ion standard solution used in  SOP </a>
 
 
</p>
 
</p>
<p>
 
  
 
+
  <h4>
 
+
    References
 
+
  </h4>
 
+
<p id="referenceList">
 
+
Carrick District Council, <i>Record of Determination of Wheal Maid Tailings Lagoons</i> (2008)
*** Results***
+
Available at: https://www.cornwall.gov.uk/media/3625647/2008-09-16-Record-of-Determination.pdf
 
+
[Accessed 7 August 2017]<br><br>
</p>
+
    Screen shots of % cover credit:  Hedkey, J. (2017). Vidana.  Marine spatial ecology lab.<br><br>
 
+
    Screenshots of maps credit:  Geoplaner.com. (2017). GPS Geoplaner online. [online] Available at: http://www.geoplaner.com/ [Accessed 07 Aug. 2017]<br><br>
<h5>
+
Defra (2017). Drinking water inspectorate. [ebook] London, pp.1-5. Available at: http://Dwi.defra.gov.uk/consumers/advice-leaflet/standards.pdf.<br><br>
References
+
  Lenntech.com. (2017). WHO's drinking water standards. [online] Available at: http://www.lenntech.com/applications/drinking/standards/who-s-drinking-water-standards.htm [Accessed 12 Sep. 2017].<br><br>
</h5>
+
US EPA. (2015). National Primary Drinking Water Regulations | US EPA. [online] Available at: HTTPS://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/national-primary-drinking-water-regulations [Accessed 12 Sep. 2017].
 
+
 
+
<p>
+
Anon., n.d. Cornwall in Focus. [Online]
+
Available at: http://www.cornwallinfocus.co.uk/mining/consols.php
+
[Accessed 07 2017].
+
</p>
+
 
+
<p>
+
Anon., 2008. Gwenap Parish.net. [Online]  
+
Available at: http://www.gwennap-parish.net/wheal_maid.html
+
[Accessed 07 2017].
+
</p>  
+
 
+
 
+
<p>
+
Council, C. D., 2008. Cornwall.gov.uk. [Online]  
+
Available at: https://www.cornwall.gov.uk/media/3625647/2008-09-16-Record-of-Determination.pdf
+
[Accessed 07 2017].
+
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
  
 +
</div>
  
</div>
+
</div>
 
</html>
 
</html>

Latest revision as of 14:02, 29 November 2017

Wheal Maid Field Trip

Our aim

It was important to us that the design of both our parts, our filter and the intended implementation for the project was a reflection of a real-world problem. This insight was largely given to us by stakeholders and the field trip, guided by Responsible Research and Innovation and the AREA framework, as it stressed the significance of society's role in science and it underlined the problem with innovating in an isolated manner. We organised a field trip to Wheal Maid mine to collect metal ion water composition data to tailor our synthetic biology project to real world conditions. We were motivated by our desire to base our science on our own data collected outside of the lab.

Wheal Maid forms part of the Consolidation Mine, part of the Cornwall and West Devon Mining Landscape World Heritage Site. Wheal Maid was mined until the 1870s, and then became a site for taking fine-grained mineral processing waste (tailings) from the mill facilities at the former Mount Wellington tin mine during the 1970s and 80s. The waste was taken to a valley infill at Wheal Maid consisting of two lagoons, separated by three dams and contains approximately 220,000m3 of tailings. An investigation by the Environmental Agency to conduct an inspection into environmental quality, which took place in 2007, concluded that Wheal Maid is a contaminated site. It was also shown that the site is causing pollution of the St. Day Stream by leaching of arsenic, cadmium, copper, chromium, iron, lead, nickel and zinc through the toe of the lower lagoon. (Carrick District Council, 2008). For this reason we decided to conduct our primary field work at this site, collecting water samples from these lagoons.

Figure 1: One of the lagoons (top) and the pond (bottom) at the Wheal Maid mine site. (Photographed by Sean Large.)

Methods

In order to conduct our data collection safely, we completed the appropriate risk assessment forms. We used protocols designed to enable efficient collection and filtration of the samples at the site before they were to be transported back and placed in a cold store for analysis. Sample analysis was performed using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), a capability offered to us through the use of equipment given to us by Greenpeace, which identifies the metal ion concentrations within water samples. Details of the protocols and risk assessments can be found on our safety page.

On 14th July 2017 we arrived at Wheal Maid with a PhD student from the Cambourne School of Mines at the University of Exeter, Miss Tomasa Sbaffi. She met us in order to help us with taking water samples due to her experience with the process and knowledge of the site. We sampled one of the lagoons and the pond shown in Figure 2.

The water bodies were sampled by taking 1L of water from each of the 4 sites at the lagoon (A-D) and the pond (E-H) as labelled in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Satellite map of Wheal Maid site with the lagoon marked A-D and the pond marked E-H.

Figure 3 was created using Vidana software to determine the percentage decrease in size of the lagoon and the pond since the Google Maps satellite photo was taken in January 2017. This reduction in surface area could be due to a number of factors, such as seasonality, which is likely to have caused an increase in the concentration of metal ions.

Figure 3: The percentage cover of the lagoon (left) and pond (right), sampled on 14th July 2017, has reduced by 78% and 77% respectively since January 2017. This area was determined from the location of the sampling sites around the edge of the lake and visually from Figure 2 (Geoplaner.com, 2017; Hedkey, 2017)

We then filtered 150 ml of each sample into three falcon tubes using a yellow 100 µm filter and then preceded to filter them further through a smaller 0.2 µm filter. We treated the blanks containing MiliQ water as controls and processed them the same way as the samples. The pH of all of the samples was tested using litmus paper which all came out as ~pH 3. The samples were sealed in bags and transported back to Exeter to be placed in a cold room to await further analysis.

Figure 4: Laura and Jake B preparing and analysing the samples at Wheal Maid. (Photographed by Sean Large.)

Results

pH of the Water Bodies

The pH of our samples can be found in table 1. An ANOVA (analysis of variance) was performed on the pH of the samples after storage from the different water bodies to see if there was a statistical difference between the two, shown in table 2.

Site pH
Lagoon Pond
N 24 11
Mean 2.80 2.77
Standard deviation 0.155 0.180
Standard error 0.0317 0.0514
Table 1: pH of the lagoon and pond sites at Wheal Maid.

Comparison ANOVA p-value Significant
Lagoon pH vs pond pH 0.640 No
Table 2: ANOVA statistic output testing the variation in pH of the lagoon and pond sites at Wheal Maid.

The ANOVA statistical test shows that there is no significant difference in pH between the pond and lagoon 2.

Metal ion composition ICP-OES results

           
Dissolved Metals Standards (mg/L)Lagoon (mg/L) Pond (mg/L)
Aluminium (Al) 0.200 6.726 50.584
Boron (B)0.300 0.0900.246
Cadmium (Cd) 0.003 0.007 0.027
Copper (Cu) 2.000 1.065 4.334
Iron (Fe) 0.200 3.445 16.307
Nickle (Ni) 0.020 0.023 0.197
Thallium (Ti) 0.0005 0.0280 0.0004
Zinc (Zn) 3.000 2.897 25.738
Table 3: Dissolved metal ion composition of samples taken from the Lagoon and Pond sites at Wheal Maid and analysed using the ICP-OES. Stars indicate which elements are found to have higher concentrations than the drinking water standards. (Defra, 2017; Lenntech.com , 2017; US EPA, 2015)

Figure 5: Metal ion concentrations at Wheal Maid showing those exceeding drinking water standards represented by the stars above the bars.

Discussion and Conclusion

Analysis of the results from the field trip to Wheal Jane helped inform our work in the laboratory. Specifically it allowed us to identify which of the metal binding proteins we wanted to use in our constructs in order to bind to metal ions that were significantly above their standards. The proteins we chose to investigate were; Mouse Metallothionein that binds to Cd, Cu and Zn), Synechococcus Metallothionein that binds to Cd and Zn, Synechococcus Plastocyanin that binds to Cu and a poly-Histidine tag inserted into the FimH protein to bind Ni.

References

Carrick District Council, Record of Determination of Wheal Maid Tailings Lagoons (2008) Available at: https://www.cornwall.gov.uk/media/3625647/2008-09-16-Record-of-Determination.pdf [Accessed 7 August 2017]

Screen shots of % cover credit: Hedkey, J. (2017). Vidana. Marine spatial ecology lab.

Screenshots of maps credit: Geoplaner.com. (2017). GPS Geoplaner online. [online] Available at: http://www.geoplaner.com/ [Accessed 07 Aug. 2017]

Defra (2017). Drinking water inspectorate. [ebook] London, pp.1-5. Available at: http://Dwi.defra.gov.uk/consumers/advice-leaflet/standards.pdf.

Lenntech.com. (2017). WHO's drinking water standards. [online] Available at: http://www.lenntech.com/applications/drinking/standards/who-s-drinking-water-standards.htm [Accessed 12 Sep. 2017].

US EPA. (2015). National Primary Drinking Water Regulations | US EPA. [online] Available at: HTTPS://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/national-primary-drinking-water-regulations [Accessed 12 Sep. 2017].