Line 746: | Line 746: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | <h2>Secretion</h2> | ||
+ | <h2>Synthesis</h2> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <button class="accordion"><h3><i class="fa fa-chevron-down"></i>Sodium Hypochlorite Extraction of PHB from <i>Escherichia coli</i> cells</h3></button> | ||
+ | <div class="panel"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <table border="0"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr><td> | ||
+ | <p><b>Experimental Details and Rationale</b></p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | <p>Sodium hypochlorite (bleach) chemically lyses the bacterial cells, causing them to release PHB into their media, which can then be isolated via centrifugation. This method of extraction was carried out before the Secretion subgroup had completed their parts for the secretion pathway. This protocol has been adapted from <a href= "https://2013.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College/Protocols#P3HB_production_and_extraction">Imperial College iGEM Team, 2013.</a></p> | ||
+ | </tr></td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr><td> | ||
+ | <p><b>Materials</b></p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | <p>Overnight culture of PHB-producing bacteria (>50mL)</p> | ||
+ | <p>Sodium hypochlorite (bleach)</p | ||
+ | <p>PBS</p | ||
+ | <p>Triton X-100</p> | ||
+ | <p>dH2O</p | ||
+ | <p>70% ethanol</p | ||
+ | <p>50-mL Falcon Tubes</p | ||
+ | <p>Centrifuge</p> | ||
+ | </tr></td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr><td> | ||
+ | <p><b>Protocol</b></p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </p></ol> | ||
+ | </tr></td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h2>Process</h2> | ||
</html> | </html> |
Revision as of 04:21, 16 August 2017
Our Experiments
General Protocols
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Registry DNA was rehydrated for completion of the Interlab Study. Also, Part:BBa_K934001 (phaC1-A-B1) was rehydrated and transformed into our chassis so that PHB was produced and preliminary secretion assays could be performed before the Synthesis subgroup had completed their cloning. |
Materials |
iGEM 2017 distribution kit ddH₂O |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Our genetic parts were ordered from IDT and arrived as a dry, lyophilized powder. They were resuspended in aqueous solution for cloning into pSB1c3 or pET29B vectors and to ligate multiple parts together. |
Materials |
Synthesized DNA from IDT (gBlocks) ddH₂O |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Antibiotics were added to agar to select for successful E.coli transformants. The vector pSB1c3 was selected for with chloramphenicol and pET29B was selected for with kanamycin. |
Materials |
Luria-Bertani broth with agar:
Appropriate antibiotic:
dH2O 1500-mL Erlenmeyer flask Stir bar Aluminum foil |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Culture broth was plated on agar to isolate single colonies of E.coli. |
Materials |
Luria-Bertani agar plate with appropriate antibiotic (if required) Overnight culture of desired bacteria 70% ethanol Spreading rod Bunsen burner |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Culture broth was streaked on agar to isolate single colonies of E.coli. |
Materials |
Luria-Bertani agar plate with appropriate antibiotic (if required) Overnight culture of desired bacteria or single isolated colony on agar plate Inoculation loop Bunsen burner |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
E. coli DH5ɑ and BL21(DE3) were lysed and the pSB1c3 or pET29B vectors were isolated to be used in the cloning of our genetic constructs. Bacterial clones were lysed for analysis (eg: confirmation restriction digest, genetic sequencing). |
Materials |
>2mL overnight culture of bacteria in Luria-Bertani broth with appropriate buffer in 16x125mm culture tube Resuspension buffer (stored at 4°C):
Lysis buffer:
Precipitation buffer:
Isopropanol 70% ethanol Table-top centrifuge Vacuum Centrifuge Ice bucket 2-mL microcentrifuge tubes 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tubes ddH₂O |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Our genetic parts and vectors were digested with restriction enzymes before they were ligated. Plasmids isolated from transformants (through Plasmid Miniprep) were also digested for confirmation of ligation and transformation. |
Materials |
DNA (eg: from plasmid miniprep) Restriction enzymes 10X appropriate buffer ddH₂O 100X Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) (if using PstI) 0.2-mL PCR tubes or 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tubes |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
DNA was precipitated between steps during sequential digestions in order to isolate the DNA from excess buffer and enzymes, allowing us to start “from scratch” for the subsequent digest. This protocol has been adapted from www.openwetware.org. |
Materials |
DNA sample that has already been digested once with the desired restriction enzyme(s) 3M Sodium acetate, pH 5.2 100% ethanol Table-top centrifuge Vacuum Centrifuge ddH2O |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Fragments of DNA are separated by size on the gel. This was used to visualize the results of restriction digests, particularly those done to confirm ligation or transformation. |
Materials |
TAE buffer:
Agarose 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask RedSafe Nucleic Acid Staining Solution Gel casting tray and comb Microwave 6X loading dye DNA sample |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Phosphorylated ends of DNA and RNA were removed, preventing unwanted ligation of linearized DNA. |
Materials |
Digested DNA vector 10X Antarctic phosphatase buffer Antarctic phosphatase ddH2O |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Digested registry DNA or digested genetic parts from IDT were ligated to either pSB1c3 or pET29B for propagation in E.coli DH5ɑ or protein expression in E.coli BL21(DE3). Later, our parts were ligated to pSB1c3 for submission to the iGEM registry. |
Materials |
Digested vector DNA Digested insert DNA 10X T4 DNA ligase buffer (from New England BIolabs) T4 DNA ligase (1 U/μL) (from New England Biolabs) ddH2O 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tubes |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Chemically competent DH5 Alpha and BL21(DE3) E. coli cells were prepared, which enabled them to be transformed with recombinant DNA. |
Materials |
Luria-Bertani broth:
Stock MgSO4 Stock KCl 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask 16x125 mm culture tubes Spectrophotometer Centrifuge 50-mL Falcon tubes 100mM CaCl₂ 100mM CaCl₂ + 10% glycerol Chilled 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tubes Chilled pipette tips |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Chemically competent E.coli DH5α were transformed with pSB1c3 or pET29b containing our genetic parts in order for the vector and insert to be propagated. Chemically competent E.coli BL21(DE3) was transformed with pSB1c3 or pET29B containing our genetic parts in order for those proteins to be expressed. |
Materials |
Competent E.coli aliquots (50 μL) 1M CaCl₂ DNA for transformation Luria-Bertani broth or SOC Media Agar plate with appropriate antibiotic |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Glycerol stocks of transformed E.coli were prepared for long-term storage of the cells at -80°C. |
Materials |
Overnight culture of transformed bacteria Sterile 1.5-mL cryo-tubes Sterile 50% glycerol |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Prtoeins are isolated, denatured, and separated by size on the gel. This helps to identify the proteins created from our parts and expressed by the E.coli. |
Materials |
1x SDS gel loading buffer:
1x Tris-Glycine electrophoresis buffer:
Stacking gel:
10% Resolving gel:
250-mL Erlenmeyer Flasks |
Protocol |
|
Secretion
Synthesis
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Sodium hypochlorite (bleach) chemically lyses the bacterial cells, causing them to release PHB into their media, which can then be isolated via centrifugation. This method of extraction was carried out before the Secretion subgroup had completed their parts for the secretion pathway. This protocol has been adapted from Imperial College iGEM Team, 2013. |
Materials |
Overnight culture of PHB-producing bacteria (>50mL) Sodium hypochlorite (bleach) PBSTriton X-100dH2O 70% ethanol50-mL Falcon TubesCentrifuge |
Protocol |
Process
References
Rose, C., Parker, A., Jefferson, B., & Cartmell, E. (2015). The Characterization of Feces and Urine: A Review of the Literature to Inform Advanced Treatment Technology. Critical Reviews In Environmental Science And Technology, 45(17), 1827-1879. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2014.1000761