Difference between revisions of "Team:Chalmers-Gothenburg/InterLab"

Line 1,641: Line 1,641:
 
           <nav>
 
           <nav>
 
             <a href="#intro" class="active">Introduction</a>
 
             <a href="#intro" class="active">Introduction</a>
             <a href="#background">Title 1</a>
+
             <a href="#results">Results</a>
             <a href="#biosensor">Title2</a>
+
             <a class="sub-level" href="#ODref">OD reference point</a>
             <a class="sub-level" href="#signal">Subtitle 1</a>
+
            <a class="sub-level" href="#fluorescein">Fluorescein Standard Curve</a>
 +
            <a class="sub-level" href="#fluorescein_log">Fluorescein Standard Curve (log scale)</a>
 +
            <a class="sub-level" href="#OD_m">OD measurements</a>
 +
             <a class="sub-level" href="#fluorescence_m">Fluorescence measurements</a>
 
           </nav>
 
           </nav>
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
Line 1,652: Line 1,655:
 
          
 
          
 
          
 
          
        <div class="target" id="intro">
+
 
 
         <div class="dashed_line_left_first">
 
         <div class="dashed_line_left_first">
 +
        <div class="target" id="intro">
 
           <h4 class="subtitle">Introduction</h4>
 
           <h4 class="subtitle">Introduction</h4>
           
 
 
         <p class="text">
 
         <p class="text">
Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus
+
The Interlab study aims to improve the tools for measurements that are available in both the iGEM community but also the whole synthetic biology community. One of the biggest challenges in synthetic biology is the fluorescence data that is often hard to compare since it is reported in different units or that the data is processed in different ways. The goal of the InterLab study is to address this issue by providing researchers with a detailed protocol and data analysis form for measuring GFP in a plate reader. This is done by comparing results obtained by various iGEM teams in order to quantify the expression of different constructs with fluorescence, both with a positive and a negative control.
        et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Sed consequat
+
        mattis interdum. Aliquam et velit fermentum velit imperdiet
+
        rhoncus. Donec accumsan molestie ornare. Duis eu odio in tortor
+
        ullamcorper aliquam. Vivamus molestie fermentum urna, vitae
+
        commodo mauris consequat in. Curabitur porttitor pulvinar purus,
+
        ut varius nibh tempus id. Nulla dictum lectus ut erat condimentum,
+
        sit amet euismod nibh eleifend. Maecenas molestie efficitur urna
+
        vel semper. Nullam in turpis eleifend, venenatis ex tincidunt,
+
        tristique sapien. Suspendisse eget facilisis dolor. Integer congue
+
        nisi eu magna consectetur, a bibendum nibh accumsan. Vivamus
+
        fermentum metus id lectus porttitor congue. Pellentesque habitant morbi
+
        tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Nulla
+
        metus quam, dapibus ac volutpat ut, dapibus sit amet felis.
+
 
         </p>
 
         </p>
          </div>
 
        </div>
 
       
 
       
 
        <div class="target" id="background">
 
        <div class="dashed_line_right"> 
 
        <h4 class="sidetitle">Title 1</h4>
 
 
         <p class="text">
 
         <p class="text">
        Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus
+
In the iGEM interlab study of 2017 6 different fluorescent protein expression plasmids were tested; J364000, J364001, J364002, J364003, J364004, J364005, a positive I20270, and a negative R0040 control plasmid. The plasmids were transformed into DH5alpha E.coli with the team’s own transformation protocol. All of the fluorescence devices that were tested were in the pSB1C3 plasmid backbone and the transformed E.coli were streaked and cultured on/in LB+chloramphenicol. To measure the difference in expression of fluorescence by the different plasmids, a plate reader that both measured the absorbance and fluorescence intensity was used.
        et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Sed consequat
+
        </p>
        mattis interdum. Aliquam et velit fermentum velit imperdiet
+
        rhoncus. Donec accumsan molestie ornare. Duis eu odio in tortor
+
        ullamcorper aliquam. Vivamus molestie fermentum urna, vitae
+
        commodo mauris consequat in. Curabitur porttitor pulvinar purus,
+
        ut varius nibh tempus id. Nulla dictum lectus ut erat condimentum,
+
        sit amet euismod nibh eleifend. Maecenas molestie efficitur urna
+
        vel semper. Nullam in turpis eleifend, venenatis ex tincidunt,
+
        tristique sapien. Suspendisse eget facilisis dolor. Integer congue
+
        nisi eu magna consectetur, a bibendum nibh accumsan. Vivamus
+
        fermentum metus id lectus porttitor congue. Pellentesque habitant morbi
+
        tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Nulla
+
        metus quam, dapibus ac volutpat ut, dapibus sit amet felis.          </p>
+
 
           </div>
 
           </div>
      <div class="dashed_line_left"> 
 
          <p class="text">
 
Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus
 
        et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Sed consequat
 
        mattis interdum. Aliquam et velit fermentum velit imperdiet
 
        rhoncus. Donec accumsan molestie ornare. Duis eu odio in tortor
 
        ullamcorper aliquam. Vivamus molestie fermentum urna, vitae
 
        commodo mauris consequat in. Curabitur porttitor pulvinar purus,
 
        ut varius nibh tempus id. Nulla dictum lectus ut erat condimentum,
 
        sit amet euismod nibh eleifend. Maecenas molestie efficitur urna
 
        vel semper. Nullam in turpis eleifend, venenatis ex tincidunt,
 
        tristique sapien. Suspendisse eget facilisis dolor. Integer congue
 
        nisi eu magna consectetur, a bibendum nibh accumsan. Vivamus
 
        fermentum metus id lectus porttitor congue. Pellentesque habitant morbi
 
        tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Nulla
 
        metus quam, dapibus ac volutpat ut, dapibus sit amet felis.
 
        </p>
 
        <p class="text">
 
Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus
 
        et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Sed consequat
 
        mattis interdum. Aliquam et velit fermentum velit imperdiet
 
        rhoncus. Donec accumsan molestie ornare. Duis eu odio in tortor
 
        ullamcorper aliquam. Vivamus molestie fermentum urna, vitae
 
        commodo mauris consequat in. Curabitur porttitor pulvinar purus,
 
        ut varius nibh tempus id. Nulla dictum lectus ut erat condimentum,
 
        sit amet euismod nibh eleifend. Maecenas molestie efficitur urna
 
        vel semper. Nullam in turpis eleifend, venenatis ex tincidunt,
 
        tristique sapien. Suspendisse eget facilisis dolor. Integer congue
 
        nisi eu magna consectetur, a bibendum nibh accumsan. Vivamus
 
        fermentum metus id lectus porttitor congue. Pellentesque habitant morbi
 
        tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Nulla
 
        metus quam, dapibus ac volutpat ut, dapibus sit amet felis.
 
        </div>
 
      <div class="dashed_line_right"> 
 
        </p>
 
        <p class="text">
 
Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus
 
        et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Sed consequat
 
        mattis interdum. Aliquam et velit fermentum velit imperdiet
 
        rhoncus. Donec accumsan molestie ornare. Duis eu odio in tortor
 
        ullamcorper aliquam. Vivamus molestie fermentum urna, vitae
 
        commodo mauris consequat in. Curabitur porttitor pulvinar purus,
 
        ut varius nibh tempus id. Nulla dictum lectus ut erat condimentum,
 
        sit amet euismod nibh eleifend. Maecenas molestie efficitur urna
 
        vel semper. Nullam in turpis eleifend, venenatis ex tincidunt,
 
        tristique sapien. Suspendisse eget facilisis dolor. Integer congue
 
        nisi eu magna consectetur, a bibendum nibh accumsan. Vivamus
 
        fermentum metus id lectus porttitor congue. Pellentesque habitant morbi
 
        tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Nulla
 
        metus quam, dapibus ac volutpat ut, dapibus sit amet felis.
 
        </p>
 
        </div>
 
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
       
+
        <div class="dashed_line_right">        
        <div class="target" id="biosensor">
+
         <div class="target" id="results">
         <div class="dashed_line_left">
+
           <h4 class="subtitle">Results</h4>
           <h4 class="sidetitle">Title 2</h4>
+
 
         <p class="text">
 
         <p class="text">
Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus
+
The results from the measurements are shown below. First the results for the OD reference point and the fluorescein standard curve is shown. After that the results from the main experiments is presented.  
        et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Sed consequat
+
        mattis interdum. Aliquam et velit fermentum velit imperdiet
+
        rhoncus. Donec accumsan molestie ornare. Duis eu odio in tortor
+
        ullamcorper aliquam. Vivamus molestie fermentum urna, vitae
+
        commodo mauris consequat in. Curabitur porttitor pulvinar purus,
+
        ut varius nibh tempus id. Nulla dictum lectus ut erat condimentum,
+
        sit amet euismod nibh eleifend. Maecenas molestie efficitur urna
+
        vel semper. Nullam in turpis eleifend, venenatis ex tincidunt,
+
        tristique sapien. Suspendisse eget facilisis dolor. Integer congue
+
        nisi eu magna consectetur, a bibendum nibh accumsan. Vivamus
+
        fermentum metus id lectus porttitor congue. Pellentesque habitant morbi
+
        tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Nulla
+
        metus quam, dapibus ac volutpat ut, dapibus sit amet felis.
+
 
         </p>
 
         </p>
          </div>
 
           
 
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
       
+
 
         <div class="target" id="signal">
+
         <div class="target" id="ODref">
        <div class="dashed_line_right_last">
+
           <h2 class="h2style">OD reference point</h2>  
           <h2 class="h2style">Subtitle 1</h2>  
+
 
           <p class="text">
 
           <p class="text">
Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus
+
The OD at wavelength 600nm was measured for LUDOX-HS40 and water to get OD reference point for the following OD measurements, see Table 1.
        et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Sed consequat
+
        mattis interdum. Aliquam et velit fermentum velit imperdiet
+
        rhoncus. Donec accumsan molestie ornare. Duis eu odio in tortor
+
        ullamcorper aliquam. Vivamus molestie fermentum urna, vitae
+
        commodo mauris consequat in. Curabitur porttitor pulvinar purus,
+
        ut varius nibh tempus id. Nulla dictum lectus ut erat condimentum,
+
        sit amet euismod nibh eleifend. Maecenas molestie efficitur urna
+
        vel semper. Nullam in turpis eleifend, venenatis ex tincidunt,
+
        tristique sapien. Suspendisse eget facilisis dolor. Integer congue
+
        nisi eu magna consectetur, a bibendum nibh accumsan. Vivamus
+
        fermentum metus id lectus porttitor congue. Pellentesque habitant morbi
+
        tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Nulla
+
        metus quam, dapibus ac volutpat ut, dapibus sit amet felis.
+
 
           </p>
 
           </p>
 +
 +
          <figure>
 +
            <figcaption class="table-caption"><b>Table 1.</b> OD measurements of LUDOX-HS40 and Water. </figcaption>
 +
            <table>
 +
                <tr>
 +
                  <th></th> <th>LUDOX-HS40</th>  <th>H<sub>2</sub>O</th>
 +
                </tr>
 +
                <tr>
 +
                    <td>Replicate 1</td> <td>0,031</td> <td>0,022</td>
 +
                </tr>
 +
                <tr>
 +
                    <td>Replicate 2</td> <td>0,030</td> <td>0,023</td>
 +
                </tr>
 +
                <tr>
 +
                    <td>Replicate 3</td> <td>0,034</td> <td>0,024</td>
 +
                </tr>
 +
                <tr>
 +
                    <td>Replicate 4</td> <td>0,032</td> <td>0,024</td>
 +
                </tr>
 +
                <tr>
 +
                    <td>Arith. Mean</td> <td>0,032</td> <td>0,023</td>
 +
                </tr>
 +
                <tr>
 +
                    <td> Corrected Abs600</td> <td>0,009</td> <td></td>
 +
                </tr>
 +
                <tr>
 +
                    <td> Reference OD600</td> <td>0,043</td> <td></td>
 +
                </tr>
 +
                <tr>
 +
                    <td> OD600/Abs600</td> <td>5</td> <td></td>
 +
                </tr>
 +
            </table>
 +
          </figure>
 +
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
         </div>  
 
         </div>  
 
          
 
          
 +
        <div class="target" id="fluorescein">
 +
        <div class="dashed_line_left">
 +
          <h2 class="h2style">Fluorescein Standard Curve</h2>
 +
          <p class="text">
 +
Different concentrations of fluorescein was measured with four replications in order to be able to relate the GFP expression to a concentration for the following fluorescence measurements in the main experiment. Below the standard curve of the measured values can be seen, both with the actual values and logarithmed.
 +
          </p>
 +
<figure>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/9a/T--Chalmers-Gothenburg--Fluorescein_SC.png" alt="Fluorescein standrad curve" style="height:50%; width:50%;">
 +
<div><b>Figure 1.</b> The Fluorescein standard curve was measured and prepared using 1x Fluorescein and PBS in a serial dilution on day 2.</div>
 +
</figure>
 +
            </div>
 +
        </div>
 +
 +
        <div class="target" id="fluorescein_log">
 +
        <div class="dashed_line_right">
 +
          <h2 class="h2style">Fluorescein Standard Curve  (log scale)</h2>
 +
 +
<figure>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/9b/T--Chalmers-Gothenburg--Fluorescein_SC_log.png" alt="Fluorescein standrad curve (log scaled)" style="height:100%; width:100%;">
 +
<div><b>Figure 2.</b> The Fluorescein standard curve in log scale.</div>
 +
</figure>
 +
            </div>
 +
        </div>
 +
 +
        <div class="target" id="OD_m">
 +
        <div class="dashed_line_left">
 +
          <h2 class="h2style">OD measurements</h2>
 +
<figure>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/17/T--Chalmers-Gothenburg--Absorbance.png" alt="OD measurements" style="height:50%; width:50%;">
 +
<div><b>Figure 3.</b> Absorbance of the six different devices together with one negative, one positive control and the blank. The values of the devices are an averages of the the two colonies for each device and their four replicates.</div>
 +
</figure>
 +
            </div>
 +
        </div>
 +
 +
        <div class="target" id="fluorescence_m">
 +
        <div class="dashed_line_right_last">
 +
          <h2 class="h2style">Fluorescence measurements</h2>
 +
<figure>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/5c/T--Chalmers-Gothenburg--Fluoresence.png" alt="Fluorescence measurements" style="height:50%; width:50%;">
 +
<div><b>Figure 4.</b> Fluorescence of the six different devices together with one negative, one positive control and the blank. The values of the devices are an averages of the the two colonies for each device and their four replicates.</div>
 +
</figure>
 +
            </div>
 +
        </div>
  
 
</div>  <!--------------------------- Project_theory_170803.html STOP -------------------------------->
 
</div>  <!--------------------------- Project_theory_170803.html STOP -------------------------------->

Revision as of 08:45, 14 October 2017

Chalmers Gothenburg iGEM 2017

Achievements
Interlab study

Introduction

The Interlab study aims to improve the tools for measurements that are available in both the iGEM community but also the whole synthetic biology community. One of the biggest challenges in synthetic biology is the fluorescence data that is often hard to compare since it is reported in different units or that the data is processed in different ways. The goal of the InterLab study is to address this issue by providing researchers with a detailed protocol and data analysis form for measuring GFP in a plate reader. This is done by comparing results obtained by various iGEM teams in order to quantify the expression of different constructs with fluorescence, both with a positive and a negative control.

In the iGEM interlab study of 2017 6 different fluorescent protein expression plasmids were tested; J364000, J364001, J364002, J364003, J364004, J364005, a positive I20270, and a negative R0040 control plasmid. The plasmids were transformed into DH5alpha E.coli with the team’s own transformation protocol. All of the fluorescence devices that were tested were in the pSB1C3 plasmid backbone and the transformed E.coli were streaked and cultured on/in LB+chloramphenicol. To measure the difference in expression of fluorescence by the different plasmids, a plate reader that both measured the absorbance and fluorescence intensity was used.

Results

The results from the measurements are shown below. First the results for the OD reference point and the fluorescein standard curve is shown. After that the results from the main experiments is presented.

OD reference point

The OD at wavelength 600nm was measured for LUDOX-HS40 and water to get OD reference point for the following OD measurements, see Table 1.

Table 1. OD measurements of LUDOX-HS40 and Water.
LUDOX-HS40 H2O
Replicate 1 0,031 0,022
Replicate 2 0,030 0,023
Replicate 3 0,034 0,024
Replicate 4 0,032 0,024
Arith. Mean 0,032 0,023
Corrected Abs600 0,009
Reference OD600 0,043
OD600/Abs600 5

Fluorescein Standard Curve

Different concentrations of fluorescein was measured with four replications in order to be able to relate the GFP expression to a concentration for the following fluorescence measurements in the main experiment. Below the standard curve of the measured values can be seen, both with the actual values and logarithmed.

Fluorescein standrad curve
Figure 1. The Fluorescein standard curve was measured and prepared using 1x Fluorescein and PBS in a serial dilution on day 2.

Fluorescein Standard Curve (log scale)

Fluorescein standrad curve (log scaled)
Figure 2. The Fluorescein standard curve in log scale.

OD measurements

OD measurements
Figure 3. Absorbance of the six different devices together with one negative, one positive control and the blank. The values of the devices are an averages of the the two colonies for each device and their four replicates.

Fluorescence measurements

Fluorescence measurements
Figure 4. Fluorescence of the six different devices together with one negative, one positive control and the blank. The values of the devices are an averages of the the two colonies for each device and their four replicates.