Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/0d/5home.svg" alt="Home" id="home" onclick="location.href='https://2017.igem.org/Team:TAS_Taipei';" style="cursor: pointer;"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/0d/5home.svg" alt="Home" id="home" onclick="location.href='https://2017.igem.org/Team:TAS_Taipei';" style="cursor: pointer;"> | ||
</box> | </box> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<div class="cv" id="cv"> | <div class="cv" id="cv"> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
Line 116: | Line 107: | ||
<ul class="nav"> | <ul class="nav"> | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
− | <a href="# | + | <a href="#bioethics" class="pageNavSm">Bioethics Panel</a> |
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li> | ||
+ | <a href="#Apex" class="pageNavSm">Apex Nanotek</a> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
Line 125: | Line 119: | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
− | <a href="# | + | <a href="#EPA" class="pageNavSm">Thomas J. Brown</a> |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
Line 151: | Line 130: | ||
<header> | <header> | ||
<div class="row" id="HPSummary"> | <div class="row" id="HPSummary"> | ||
− | <h1 class="name col-lg-12"> | + | <h1 class="name col-lg-12">HP GOLD INTEGRATED</h1> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
− | <h4 class="para col-lg-12"> | + | <h4 class="para col-lg-12">At the beginning of our project, we visited local and foreign wastewater treatment plants and learned that there are currently very few water purification methods that specifically target nanoparticle waste. We designed our constructs, prototype and modeling based directly from information given by these treatment plants. Our biofilm parts collection was designed to be able to control biofilm production in sedimentation tanks. Our proteorhodopsin construct is designed to be used in aeration tanks where other microbes are already breaking down organic substances. We also use the pre-existing biosafety aspect of the wastewater plants. Additionally, we reached out to several nanoparticle manufacturers, researchers, disposal services and wastewater experts who provided us with information on the advantages and potential consequences of nanoparticle usage, as well as where to target cleaning nanoparticle waste. The feedback we received guided the direction of our project and confirmed the importance of our project to our community. |
</h4> | </h4> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 160: | Line 139: | ||
</header> | </header> | ||
<section class="main"> | <section class="main"> | ||
− | + | <div class="row" id="bioethics"> | |
− | <h1 class="section-title col-lg-12"> | + | <h1 class="section-title col-lg-12">Bioethics Panel</h1> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
<h4 class="para col-lg-12"> | <h4 class="para col-lg-12"> | ||
− | We | + | We hosted a Bioethics Panel, where we invited students and teachers to discuss the moral, social and environmental concerns of our project. To encourage participants to consider the problems from multiple perspectives, we created a role-playing game and assigned different roles to participants. We then asked for their opinions on nanoparticle usage and disposal from the perspective of their assigned role. (Whole team activity) |
+ | <br><br> For instance, one of our questions was: | ||
+ | <br><br> “Dihua WWTP has no nanoparticle removal plan. Should this be the job of the wastewater plant? Or the nanoparticle manufacturer?” | ||
+ | <br><br> The following roles were assigned: | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Wastewater plant manager </li> | ||
+ | <li>Nanoparticle manufacturer </li> | ||
+ | <li>Citizen</li> | ||
+ | <li>Fisherman</li> | ||
+ | <li>Fish</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
</h4> | </h4> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
− | < | + | <div class="para col-lg-12"> |
− | + | Most of the wastewater plant managers thought that nanoparticle manufacturers should be responsible for removing nanoparticles, because they have more information (e.g., solubility, toxicity, etc.) about their own products. <b>However, many other participants were skeptical that manufacturers could be trusted to remove their own contamination and agreed that WWTPs should ultimately be responsible for cleaning water contaminated with nanoparticles.</b> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
− | <div class=" | + | <div class="para col-lg-12"> |
− | + | This activity gave us great insight on how the public perceives nanoparticle usage and regulation in society. This also gave us a chance to talk to people about both the benefits and the dangers of using nanoparticles. | |
− | + | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
− | < | + | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/76/T--TAS_Taipei--bioethics_panel_results_pdf.pdf" type="button" class="btn btn-info col-lg-6 col-lg-offset-3"> |
− | + | Click here to see the compiled results from all participants | |
− | </ | + | </a> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
<div class="image_container col-lg-10 col-lg-offset-1"> | <div class="image_container col-lg-10 col-lg-offset-1"> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/97/T--TAS_Taipei--general_questionsPic.JPG" alt="test" id="group"> |
− | + | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <div class="row" id=" | + | <div class="row" id="apex"> |
− | <h1 class="section-title col-lg-12"> | + | <h1 class="section-title col-lg-12">Apex Nanotek</h1> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
− | <h4 class="para col-lg- | + | <h4 class="para col-lg-8"> |
− | + | To learn more about the applications of nanoparticles, we visited a nanotech company that uses silver nanoparticles to make various antimicrobial products. The researcher and manager of Apex Nanotek, Chery Yang, introduced us to their main product, which is antimicrobial nanosilver activated carbon. Pure activated carbon, commonly used to treat sewage and industrial exhaust, is prone to bacterial growth. To overcome this problem, they integrate crystallized nanosilver into the activated carbon for their antimicrobial effects. One of their products is a showerhead, with nanosilver activated carbon filters to kill bacteria when water flows through the showerhead. | |
+ | <br><br> We tested the product by comparing SEM images between tap water and filtered water from the showerhead. The showerhead decreased the number of bacteria and larger particles from tap water! However, we also observed the release of nanoparticles from the filter, which will flow into wastewater. (Interviewed by Christine C., Kelly C., Yvonne W., Chansie Y., and Justin Y.) | ||
</h4> | </h4> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<div class="image_container col-lg-4"> | <div class="image_container col-lg-4"> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/07/T--TAS_Taipei--Group_Pic_Apex-min.jpg" alt="test" id="group"> |
− | <h4 class="subtitle"> | + | <h4 class="subtitle">Chery Yang (third person from the left), the main researcher of Apex Nanotek Corporation<span class="subCred"></span></h4> |
</div> | </div> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
− | + | <div class="image_container col-lg-4"> | |
− | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b3/T--TAS_Taipei--Shower_Head-min.jpg" alt="test" id="group"> | |
− | + | <h4 class="subtitle">Product of Apex Nanotek: Silver Spring Shower Head.<span class="subCred"></span></h4> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | <div class="image_container col-lg- | + | |
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/ | + | |
</div> | </div> | ||
− | + | <div class="image_container_big col-lg-8"> | |
− | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/1e/T--TAS_Taipei--SEM_comparison_Tap_vs._Showerhead.png" alt="test" id="group2"> | |
− | + | <h4 class="subtitle"><b>Figure 1-3 Tap water under SEM.</b><span class="subCred"></span></h4> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/ | + | |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div><br> | </div><br> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
<h4 class="para col-lg-12"> | <h4 class="para col-lg-12"> | ||
− | + | The image on the left shows a tap water sample under the SEM, in which we observed some bacteria (round objects that are approximately 1 μm in diameter). The SEM image on the left shows water that was filtered by the showerhead from Apex nanotek. There is less bacteria as the showerhead uses embedded nanosilver antibacterial filters. (SEM images: Christine C. and Florence L.) | |
</h4> | </h4> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <div class="row" id=" | + | <div class="row" id="Dihua"> |
− | <h1 class="section-title col-lg-12"> | + | <h1 class="section-title col-lg-12">WWTP -- Dihua Wastewater Treatment Plant</h1> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
<h4 class="para col-lg-8"> | <h4 class="para col-lg-8"> | ||
− | + | In order to learn firsthand about the effect of nanoparticles in WWTPs, we visited the Dihua WWTP (迪化污水處理廠). Here, we were given a tour around the plant, and were able to ask questions to the managers and people that work there. They confirmed that the current facilities are unable to remove nanoparticles from wastewater mainly due to their small size. In addition to this information, they kindly provided us with samples of sludge, effluent water, and the polymers they add during wastewater processing. Throughout the year we visited and talked to the Dihua WWTP several times about where and how our project could be implemented in their current system. These conversations and visits played a huge role in shaping our construct design, prototype design, mathematical modeling and overall purpose for our project. (Whole team activity) | |
</h4> | </h4> | ||
<div class="image_container col-lg-4"> | <div class="image_container col-lg-4"> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/ce/T--TAS_Taipei--Dihua_Tank-min.jpg" alt="test" id="group"> |
</div> | </div> | ||
− | </div | + | </div> |
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
− | < | + | <div class="image_container col-lg-10 col-lg-offset-1"> |
− | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/e1/T--TAS_Taipei--DihuaDiagram-new.jpg" alt="test" id="group"> | |
− | + | <h4 class="subtitle">We plan to add our bacteria either in the deep aeration tanks or the secondary sedimentation tanks. The disinfection tank will kill the bacteria used in previous tanks.<span class="subCred">Figure: Christine C.</span></h4> | |
+ | </div> | ||
</div><br> | </div><br> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
<video controls="" class="col-lg-10 col-lg-offset-1"> | <video controls="" class="col-lg-10 col-lg-offset-1"> | ||
− | <source src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/ | + | <source src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/97/T--TAS_Taipei--Dihua_WWTP_%281%29.mp4" type="video/mp4"> Your browser does not support the video tag. |
</video> | </video> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <div class="row" id=" | + | <div class="row" id="Boswell"> |
− | <h1 class="section-title col-lg-12"> | + | <h1 class="section-title col-lg-12">Boswell Wastewater Treatment Plant</h1> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
<h4 class="para col-lg-12"> | <h4 class="para col-lg-12"> | ||
− | + | Not all WWTPs are as large as the one in Taipei. One of our advisors (Jude Clapper) went to visit the Boswell WWTP in rural southwestern Pennsylvania. We learned that the same processes that occur in the Taipei Dihua WWTP also occur in the Boswell WWTP, but with different water flow rates and waste quantities. Because of the similarities in how both WWTPs process their wastewater, It inspired us to create our current prototype design that is a rotating polymeric bioreactor coated in biofilm. This prototype will be placed in the secondary sedimentation tank, where the majority of organic solids have been removed and only smaller particles exist. The Boswell WWTP also confirmed that since our project is bacteria-based, it will be killed by UV light and chlorine in the disinfection tank, similar to the Dihua WWTP, before the water turns into effluent and goes to the rivers and oceans. | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</h4> | </h4> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
<div class="image_container col-lg-10 col-lg-offset-1"> | <div class="image_container col-lg-10 col-lg-offset-1"> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/2f/T--TAS_Taipei--BoswellDiagram-new.jpg" alt="test" id="group"> |
− | <h4 class="subtitle"> | + | <h4 class="subtitle">We plan to add our bacteria either in the deep aeration tanks or the secondary sedimentation tanks. The disinfection tank will kill the bacteria used in previous tanks.<span class="subCred">Figure: Christine C.</span></h4> |
</div> | </div> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <div class="row | + | <div class="row" id="EPA"> |
− | + | <h1 class="section-title col-lg-12">Thomas J. Brown</h1> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | <h1 class="section-title col-lg-12"> | + | |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
<h4 class="para col-lg-12"> | <h4 class="para col-lg-12"> | ||
− | + | Thomas J. Brown, the Water Program Specialist of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) occasionally helps with the Boswell Wastewater Treatment Plant. He has also worked with the EPA in Taiwan on wastewater treatments. We interviewed Mr. Brown about our methods to clean nanoparticles in wastewater treatment plants and how to achieve our goal of implementation. With his expertise in the field of wastewater treatment, he provided us some suggestions as to how we could turn our project into reality. | |
</h4> | </h4> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
<h4 class="para col-lg-12"> | <h4 class="para col-lg-12"> | ||
− | + | For example, we asked him if there were differences between rural and urban plants that we should take into consideration when thinking about implementing our project. He responded that the biological processes used for treatment remains the same regardless of facility size. This helped us think about and design our final prototype, which can potentially be used in both rural and urban treatment plants. | |
</h4> | </h4> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
− | <a href="https:// | + | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/15/T--TAS_Taipei--TomBrownResponse.pdf" type="button" class="btn btn-info col-lg-4 col-lg-offset-4"> |
− | + | Click here to see Tom Brown’s full response | |
</a> | </a> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 08:22, 18 October 2017
X
Project
Experiments
Modeling
Prototype
Human Practices
Safety
About Us
Attributions
Project
Experiment
Modeling
Prototype
Human Practice
Biosafety
About Us
Attributions
hi
HP GOLD INTEGRATED
At the beginning of our project, we visited local and foreign wastewater treatment plants and learned that there are currently very few water purification methods that specifically target nanoparticle waste. We designed our constructs, prototype and modeling based directly from information given by these treatment plants. Our biofilm parts collection was designed to be able to control biofilm production in sedimentation tanks. Our proteorhodopsin construct is designed to be used in aeration tanks where other microbes are already breaking down organic substances. We also use the pre-existing biosafety aspect of the wastewater plants. Additionally, we reached out to several nanoparticle manufacturers, researchers, disposal services and wastewater experts who provided us with information on the advantages and potential consequences of nanoparticle usage, as well as where to target cleaning nanoparticle waste. The feedback we received guided the direction of our project and confirmed the importance of our project to our community.
Bioethics Panel
We hosted a Bioethics Panel, where we invited students and teachers to discuss the moral, social and environmental concerns of our project. To encourage participants to consider the problems from multiple perspectives, we created a role-playing game and assigned different roles to participants. We then asked for their opinions on nanoparticle usage and disposal from the perspective of their assigned role. (Whole team activity)
For instance, one of our questions was:
“Dihua WWTP has no nanoparticle removal plan. Should this be the job of the wastewater plant? Or the nanoparticle manufacturer?”
The following roles were assigned:
- Wastewater plant manager
- Nanoparticle manufacturer
- Citizen
- Fisherman
- Fish
Most of the wastewater plant managers thought that nanoparticle manufacturers should be responsible for removing nanoparticles, because they have more information (e.g., solubility, toxicity, etc.) about their own products. However, many other participants were skeptical that manufacturers could be trusted to remove their own contamination and agreed that WWTPs should ultimately be responsible for cleaning water contaminated with nanoparticles.
This activity gave us great insight on how the public perceives nanoparticle usage and regulation in society. This also gave us a chance to talk to people about both the benefits and the dangers of using nanoparticles.