Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
</section> | </section> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <section> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | As a descriptive ethical matrix, its purpose is to highlight the decision process done by the team at every step of the project in the respect and integrity of stakeholders. During the conception of our device, three conditions are emphasized from the crossings between stakeholders and values (well-being, autonomy, fairness): | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>material conditions: taking into account the resources, to compensate their unequal repartition)</li> | ||
+ | <li>moral conditions: responsibility in design, responsibility of the intermediate actors )</li> | ||
+ | <li>cultural conditions: acceptability by users.</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | As a normative ethical matrix towards the members of the team, it is a way to compel our social responsibility in this project. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
<div class="hp-container"> | <div class="hp-container"> | ||
Line 161: | Line 175: | ||
.red-cell{ | .red-cell{ | ||
background-color:#f4cccc; | background-color:#f4cccc; | ||
+ | border:none; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | .white-cell{ | ||
+ | background-color:#eee; | ||
border:none; | border:none; | ||
} | } | ||
Line 248: | Line 266: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<th>iGEM team</th> | <th>iGEM team</th> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="white-cell">Quality control; respect of the specifications</td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="green-cell">Choice of technical production solutions</td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="orange-cell">Respect of environment and labour in the production process</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<th>NGO</th> | <th>NGO</th> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="orange-cell">Respect of their quality and traceability norms</td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="red-cell">Collaboration; possibility of inspection </td> |
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<th>Users</th> | <th>Users</th> | ||
+ | <td class="green-cell">Quality and performance controls</td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
− | <td> | + | <td class="red-cell">Fair production price </td> |
− | + | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<th>Environment</th> | <th>Environment</th> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="orange-cell">Eco-friendly process; use a cluster structure to limit the transport between the factories (ie device production, Membrane production) </td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="orange-cell">Respect biodiversity; re-use exploitation facilities</td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="white-cell">Durable production process; value protection of ecosystems as much as workers</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<th>Government</th> | <th>Government</th> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="red-cell">Employement of workers in the production process</td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="green-cell">Right of review </td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="green-cell">Respect of the state legislation in terms work condition and GMO</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<th>WHO</th> | <th>WHO</th> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="green-cell">Right of review </td> |
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 290: | Line 308: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<th>Non stakeholders</th> | <th>Non stakeholders</th> | ||
+ | <td class="white-cell">No impact on their quality of life</td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th>Future generations</th> | ||
+ | <td class="red-cell">Constant optimization of the production process</td> | ||
+ | <td class="white-cell">Review the production process when new technologies</td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 308: | Line 332: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<th>iGEM team</th> | <th>iGEM team</th> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="white-cell">Acceptance of product by stakeholders</td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="white-cell">No commercial constraints; freedom to offer product</td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="orange-cell">Fair evaluation of product by stakeholders</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<th>NGO</th> | <th>NGO</th> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="orange-cell">Proven added value compared to existing solutions</td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="green-cell">No lobbying; freedom of choice</td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="orange-cell">Fair price; homogeneity in price around the world</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<th>Users</th> | <th>Users</th> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="green-cell">Product integrity at delivery</td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="red-cell">Discussion about the product, inclusion in the NGO's choice</td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="red-cell">Distribution to different NGOs in the world</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<th>Environment</th> | <th>Environment</th> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="green-cell">Easily transportable; reduction of transport pollution</td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="white-cell">No disturbance of natural ecosystems</td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="white-cell">No unnecessary transport</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<th>Government</th> | <th>Government</th> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="green-cell">Right of review </td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="white-cell">Financial help of governments towards the best existing solution</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<th>WHO</th> | <th>WHO</th> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="green-cell">Proven added value compared to existing solutions</td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="green-cell">Right of review </td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="red-cell">Distribution to different NGOs in the world</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
− | <th> | + | <th>Non stakeholders</th> |
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
Line 349: | Line 373: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
− | <th> | + | <th>Future generations</th> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="orange-cell">Evaluation of long term business plan, viability of the project</td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="green-cell">Freedom to change for another solution</td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td class="white-cell">Regular evaluation of selling price</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
Line 655: | Line 679: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <section> | ||
+ | <h1>Presentation of the stakeholders in the development of our technology</h1> | ||
+ | <p><b>Actors:</b> any person or group of people who can make a decision concerning the right way to act and who can have an impact on that decision. As actors, we also wanted to introduce non-humans, in our case the environment. </p> | ||
+ | <p>→ iGEM Team, environment, non stakeholders, future generation</p> | ||
+ | <p><b>Users:</b> people who use a technology and who may formulate certain wishes or requirements for the functioning of a technology.</p> | ||
+ | <p>→ Users local, NGO</p> | ||
+ | <p><b>Regulators:</b> organizations who formulate rules or regulations that engineered products have to meet. It can be norms concerning health and safety, but also guidelines linked to relations between competitors and fair trade.</p> | ||
+ | <p>→ NGO, government, WHO</p> | ||
+ | <p style="font-family:'Quicksand',sans-serif;">Ref.: Van de Poel, I. and Royakkers L. (2011). <i>Ethics, Technology and Engineering. An introduction.</i></p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | <span class="red-cell">Remains to be examined</span> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p><span class="orange-cell">Currently being examined</span></p> | ||
+ | <p><span class="green-cell">Already examined or inherently true</span></p> | ||
+ | <p><span style="border:solid 1px #eee">No control possible for now</span></p> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <section> | ||
+ | <h1>1 - Brainstorming</h1> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | This ethical matrix is the one describing the important points taken in consideration to choose the subject. As an iGEM team we wanted a technological and innovative challenge, to surpass ourselves. We also wanted to help resolve a concrete worldwide problem, having a positive impact on social and environmental aspects. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <section> | ||
+ | <h1>2- Production</h1> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | The key element emerging from this ethical matrix is that our production process needs to be <b>as eco-friendly as possible</b>. Thus applying all the classical rules of production as follows: <b>use a cluster structure to reduce the transport, re-use facilities, treat production waste properly, choose the most optimized solution for each step of the process, from plant heating to final packaging</b>. As the technologies are evolving rapidly, is seems then obvious that all the decisions taken need to be <b>re-assessed regularly</b> to ensure that the processes in place are the more efficient ones in terms of resource comsumption and secondary products production. Another important point is the <b>respect of the workers</b>, we need to make sure that the health standards for working in the factories will be respected at all times during the production. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <section> | ||
+ | <h1>3- </h1> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | The total freedom of choice and transparency of our selling process is intrisinc to our apporach and pose no problem. For the future we have to work on communication around our product, to be sure that the <b>stakeholders know what is it and can take an enlightened decision</b>. These stakeholders will then also be included in the setting of commercial deals. Then to respond to most of the challenges of this matrice, <b>a business plan and a SWOT analysis were carried</b>. Currently, an evaluation of the final price of the product is carried to ensure its <b>long term economic viability in comparison to existing systems</b> offered to NGOs. Furthermore tests are done to <b>ensure the added value of our product</b>. A problem that still exists for this step is that for now we only contacted NGO doing actions in the African continent and thus thought our device to fit in their organisations. To further develop our product we need to ensure that we are <b>not creating inequailities in the world</b>, and making our device accessible et each place where cholera is a problem. For that we need to widen our contacts and think of <b>adapting the selling process to different NGOs</b>. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <section> | ||
+ | <h1></h1> | ||
+ | <p></p> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <section> | ||
+ | <h1></h1> | ||
+ | <p></p> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <section> | ||
+ | <h1></h1> | ||
+ | <p></p> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <section> | ||
+ | <h1></h1> | ||
+ | <p></p> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <section> | ||
+ | <h1></h1> | ||
+ | <p></p> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 11:41, 25 October 2017
As a descriptive ethical matrix, its purpose is to highlight the decision process done by the team at every step of the project in the respect and integrity of stakeholders. During the conception of our device, three conditions are emphasized from the crossings between stakeholders and values (well-being, autonomy, fairness):
As a normative ethical matrix towards the members of the team, it is a way to compel our social responsibility in this project.
Actors: any person or group of people who can make a decision concerning the right way to act and who can have an impact on that decision. As actors, we also wanted to introduce non-humans, in our case the environment. → iGEM Team, environment, non stakeholders, future generation Users: people who use a technology and who may formulate certain wishes or requirements for the functioning of a technology. → Users local, NGO Regulators: organizations who formulate rules or regulations that engineered products have to meet. It can be norms concerning health and safety, but also guidelines linked to relations between competitors and fair trade. → NGO, government, WHO Ref.: Van de Poel, I. and Royakkers L. (2011). Ethics, Technology and Engineering. An introduction.
Remains to be examined
Currently being examined Already examined or inherently true No control possible for now
This ethical matrix is the one describing the important points taken in consideration to choose the subject. As an iGEM team we wanted a technological and innovative challenge, to surpass ourselves. We also wanted to help resolve a concrete worldwide problem, having a positive impact on social and environmental aspects.
The key element emerging from this ethical matrix is that our production process needs to be as eco-friendly as possible. Thus applying all the classical rules of production as follows: use a cluster structure to reduce the transport, re-use facilities, treat production waste properly, choose the most optimized solution for each step of the process, from plant heating to final packaging. As the technologies are evolving rapidly, is seems then obvious that all the decisions taken need to be re-assessed regularly to ensure that the processes in place are the more efficient ones in terms of resource comsumption and secondary products production. Another important point is the respect of the workers, we need to make sure that the health standards for working in the factories will be respected at all times during the production.
The total freedom of choice and transparency of our selling process is intrisinc to our apporach and pose no problem. For the future we have to work on communication around our product, to be sure that the stakeholders know what is it and can take an enlightened decision. These stakeholders will then also be included in the setting of commercial deals. Then to respond to most of the challenges of this matrice, a business plan and a SWOT analysis were carried. Currently, an evaluation of the final price of the product is carried to ensure its long term economic viability in comparison to existing systems offered to NGOs. Furthermore tests are done to ensure the added value of our product. A problem that still exists for this step is that for now we only contacted NGO doing actions in the African continent and thus thought our device to fit in their organisations. To further develop our product we need to ensure that we are not creating inequailities in the world, and making our device accessible et each place where cholera is a problem. For that we need to widen our contacts and think of adapting the selling process to different NGOs.
Integrated Human Practices
Well-being
Autonomy
Fairness
iGEM team
Technological and innovative challenge; responsible design
Design choices; no ideological/financial constraints
Respond to a worldwide problem
NGO
Users
Inclusion in the conception process
Transparency of design
Improving everyday life
Environment
Early risk management
Respect of biodiversity
Eco-friendly by design
Government
Safe in accordance with public policies
Transparency of design
Social inclusion
WHO
Water treatment firm
No long term negative impact
Transparency of design
No long term inequalities
Non stakeholders
No long term negative impact
Discussion about synthetic biology
No long term inequalities
Well-being
Autonomy
Fairness
iGEM team
Quality control; respect of the specifications
Choice of technical production solutions
Respect of environment and labour in the production process
NGO
Respect of their quality and traceability norms
Collaboration; possibility of inspection
Users
Quality and performance controls
Fair production price
Environment
Eco-friendly process; use a cluster structure to limit the transport between the factories (ie device production, Membrane production)
Respect biodiversity; re-use exploitation facilities
Durable production process; value protection of ecosystems as much as workers
Government
Employement of workers in the production process
Right of review
Respect of the state legislation in terms work condition and GMO
WHO
Right of review
Water treatment firm
Non stakeholders
No impact on their quality of life
Future generations
Constant optimization of the production process
Review the production process when new technologies
Well-being
Autonomy
Fairness
iGEM team
Acceptance of product by stakeholders
No commercial constraints; freedom to offer product
Fair evaluation of product by stakeholders
NGO
Proven added value compared to existing solutions
No lobbying; freedom of choice
Fair price; homogeneity in price around the world
Users
Product integrity at delivery
Discussion about the product, inclusion in the NGO's choice
Distribution to different NGOs in the world
Environment
Easily transportable; reduction of transport pollution
No disturbance of natural ecosystems
No unnecessary transport
Government
Right of review
Financial help of governments towards the best existing solution
WHO
Proven added value compared to existing solutions
Right of review
Distribution to different NGOs in the world
Non stakeholders
Future generations
Evaluation of long term business plan, viability of the project
Freedom to change for another solution
Regular evaluation of selling price
Well-being
Autonomy
Fairness
iGEM team
NGO
Users
Environment
Government
WHO
Water treatment firm
Non stakeholders
Well-being
Autonomy
Fairness
iGEM team
NGO
Users
Environment
Government
WHO
Water treatment firm
Non stakeholders
Well-being
Autonomy
Fairness
iGEM team
NGO
Users
Environment
Government
WHO
Water treatment firm
Non stakeholders
Well-being
Autonomy
Fairness
iGEM team
NGO
Users
Environment
Government
WHO
Water treatment firm
Non stakeholders
Well-being
Autonomy
Fairness
iGEM team
NGO
Users
Environment
Government
WHO
Water treatment firm
Non stakeholders
Presentation of the stakeholders in the development of our technology
1 - Brainstorming
2- Production
3-