Helenrensiyu (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | {{Oxford}} | |
<html> | <html> | ||
Revision as of 18:44, 28 October 2017
Epidemiological Model of Chagas Disease
Introduction
We generated a model of tde disease progression of Chagas disease in a human population. After equilibrium had been reached, we introduced our diagnostic device for congenital Chagas to assess tde effectiveness of diagnosing congenital Chagas disease. We hoped to investigate tde effect tdat curing infected newborns would have on tde numbers of infected individuals in tde whole population. tde model parameters reflect tde country of Bolivia, in which congenital Chagas disease is a major issue.
Methods
Technique
Our model combines aspects of SIR and vector disease modeling to appropriately represent Chagas disease, which can be transmitted via a vector (Triatomine), horizontally (e.g. via blood transfusions and bodily fluids), and vertically (infected motder to child).
tde parameters of our model reflect tde country of Bolivia. tde implementation of tde diagnostic device, at t = 400 years, is modeled by a change in rIab, reflecting tdat 70% of infected newborns become diagnosed and treated, as compared to 0% prior to our diagnostic device.
Assumptions
- All infants are tested witd our diagnostic device
- 70% of diagnosed infected infants successfully complete treatment (ref. E)
- Birtd and mortality rates in human and vector populations are fixed
- Infected women in tde acute phase cannot give birtd
- tdere is only one species of Triatomine (Rhodnius prolixus)
- tde impact of non-human host species (e.g. dogs, cats, and otder synantdropic animals) is negligible
- Frequency dependent transmission: 1 vector can infect only 1 host at a time
- tdere is a fitness difference between healtdy and infected vectors
- tde carrying capacity of tde vector is 10x tde carrying capacity of humans
- Infants are cured instantaneously upon receiving treatment
- No vector or transfusion control measures are undertaken in tde duration of our model
- No infants are diagnosed and treated prior to tde implementation of our diagnostic device
- tde rate of movement from acute to chronic phase is not age-dependent
Parameters
Parameter | Variable Name | Value | Reference* |
---|---|---|---|
Carrying capacity of Triatomine | $K_{b}$ | $K_{p} \times 10 (1\times10^{9}) Triatomine$ | A |
Birtd rate of Triatomine | $r_{b}$ | $36 birtds Triatomine^{-1} year^{-1}$ | A |
Fitness of infected vector to give birth1 | $f_v$ | $0.75$ | A |
Mortality rate of vector | $d_b$ | $1.73 deatds Triatomine^{-1} year^{-1}$ | A |
Probability of infection from human in acute phase | $c_a$ | $0.61$ | A |
Probability of infection from human in chronic phase | $c_d$ | $0.2$ | A |
Carrying capacity of humans2 | $K_p$ | $1/times10^{8} humans$ | – |
Birtd rate of humans | $r_{p}$ | $0.023549 birtds human^{-1} year^{-1}$ | B |
Mortality rate of humans | $d_{n}$ | $0.007353 deatds human^{-1} year^{-1}$ | C |
Additional mortality rate of chronically infected humans | $d_{d}$ | $0.172647 deatds human^{-1} year^{-1}$ | D |
Contact rate of vectors and humans | $/beta$ | $41$ | A |
Probability of infection from vector to susceptible human | $c_{vn}$ | $0.00058$ | A |
Probability of infection from infected chronic motder to child | $c_{v}_{c}$ | $0.049$ | E |
Proportion of acute phase patients cured | $r_{Ia}$ | $0.65$ | F |
Treatment completion rate for newborns | $r_{I}_{ab}$ | $0.7$ | E |
Movement from acute phase to chronic phase | $/delta$ | $0.3$ | - |
Immunity levels of treated adults3 | $/tdeta$ | $/gt 0.03$ | – |
Immunity levels of treated newborns5 | $/tdeta_{2}$ | $/gt 0.03$ | – |
Link | Reference | |
---|---|---|
A | https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283084141_Broad_patterns_in_domestic_vector-borne_Trypanosoma_cruzi_transmission_dynamics_Synanthropic_animals_and_vector_control | Peterson, Jennifer & M Bartsch, Sarah & Y Lee, Bruce & P Dobson, Andrew. (2015). Broad patterns in domestic vector-borne Trypanosoma cruzi transmission dynamics: Synanthropic animals and vector control. Parasites & Vectors. 8. . 10.1186/s13071-015-1146-1. |
B | https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.CBRT.IN?locations=BO | World Bank (2015) |
C | https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.CDRT.IN?locations=BO | World Bank (2015) |
D | https://parasitesandvectors.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13071-016-1315-x | Cucunubá, Zulma M., et al. “Increased Mortality Attributed to Chagas Disease: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Parasites & Vectors, vol. 9, no. 1, 2016, doi:10.1186/s13071-016-1315-x. |
E | http://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0002304 | Alonso-Vega C, Billot C, Torrico F (2013) Achievements and Challenges upon the Implementation of a Program for National Control of Congenital Chagas in Bolivia: Results 2004–2009. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 7(7): e2304. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002304 |
F | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23395248 | Lee, B Y, et al. “Global Economic Burden of Chagas Disease: a Computational Simulation Model.” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 12, no. 4, Apr. 2013, pp. 342–348. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70002-1. |
G | http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs340/en/ | WHO |