Difference between revisions of "Team:Munich/DetectionOnChip"

Line 74: Line 74:
 
<h3>Portable Fluorescence Detector</h3>
 
<h3>Portable Fluorescence Detector</h3>
 
<p>   
 
<p>   
  Having our RNaseAlert based readout functioning on paper, we created a portable paper-based fluorescence detector to make this readout fit for in field usage. Our detector costs less than 15$ and can measure time lapses with a sensitivity competitive to a commercial plate reader. As a first proof of principle we reproduced the time lapse measurements made with the plate reader. We were able to measure a time trace of Cas13a digesting RNaseAlert with our detector. For comparison we also measured a positive control containing RNase A and a negative control containing only RNaseAlert. The data are displayed in the figure below.  
+
  Having our RNaseAlert based readout functioning on paper, we created a portable paper-based fluorescence detector to make this readout fit for in field usage. Our detector costs less than 15$ and can measure time lapses with a sensitivity competitive to a commercial plate reader. We calibrated our detector by measuring dilution series of fluorescein with our detector to be able to measure fluorescence in equivalent fluorescein concentrations. As a first proof of principle we reproduced the plate reader experiments for Cas13a on Paper. We were able to measure a time trace of Cas13a digesting RNaseAlert with our detector. For comparison we also measured a positive control containing RNase A and a negative control containing only RNaseAlert. The data are displayed in the figure below.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<div class="captionPicture">
 
<div class="captionPicture">
Line 85: Line 85:
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<p>
 
<p>
The data show typical curves of enzyme kinetics. It can be seen that RNaseA is more active than Cas13a. The negative control shows that our detector was free of RNase contaminations. This shows that our detector is in fact able to quantitatively measure different levels of enzyme activity and can easily distinguish between the negative control and active Cas13a.
+
The data show typical curves of enzyme kinetics. It can be seen that RNaseA is more active than Cas13a. The negative control shows that our detector was free of RNase contaminations. This shows that our detector is in fact able to quantitatively measure different levels of enzyme activity and can easily distinguish between the negative control and active Cas13a.  By assuming that RNase A digested all RNaseAlert, we conclude that 185 nM of RNaseAlert have an equivalent fluorescence to 10 µM fluorescein. Our detection limit for RNaseAlert is therefore around 50 times lower which corresponds to a RNaseAlert concentration lower than 10 nM.  
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>

Revision as of 11:08, 1 November 2017


Results: Detection on Chip

Portable Fluorescence Detector

Having our RNaseAlert based readout functioning on paper, we created a portable paper-based fluorescence detector to make this readout fit for in field usage. Our detector costs less than 15$ and can measure time lapses with a sensitivity competitive to a commercial plate reader. We calibrated our detector by measuring dilution series of fluorescein with our detector to be able to measure fluorescence in equivalent fluorescein concentrations. As a first proof of principle we reproduced the plate reader experiments for Cas13a on Paper. We were able to measure a time trace of Cas13a digesting RNaseAlert with our detector. For comparison we also measured a positive control containing RNase A and a negative control containing only RNaseAlert. The data are displayed in the figure below.

Time lapse measurement of Cas13a digesting RNaseAlert on paper using our detector. The positive control contains RNaseA and RNaseAlert. The negative control contains only RNaseAlert. Data points are connected with lines for the convenience of the eye. Error bars represent the measurement uncertainties of the detector.

The data show typical curves of enzyme kinetics. It can be seen that RNaseA is more active than Cas13a. The negative control shows that our detector was free of RNase contaminations. This shows that our detector is in fact able to quantitatively measure different levels of enzyme activity and can easily distinguish between the negative control and active Cas13a. By assuming that RNase A digested all RNaseAlert, we conclude that 185 nM of RNaseAlert have an equivalent fluorescence to 10 µM fluorescein. Our detection limit for RNaseAlert is therefore around 50 times lower which corresponds to a RNaseAlert concentration lower than 10 nM.

Reproducibility

Discussion and conclusion

References

  1. Gootenberg, J. S., Abudayyeh, O. O., Lee, J. W., Essletzbichler, P., Dy, A. J., Joung, J., ... & Myhrvold, C. (2017). Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2. Science, eaam9321.
  2. Esfandiari, L., Wang, S., Wang, S., Banda, A., Lorenzini, M., Kocharyan, G., ... & Schmidt, J. J. (2016). PCR-Independent Detection of Bacterial Species-Specific 16S rRNA at 10 fM by a Pore-Blockage Sensor. Biosensors, 6(3), 37.