Line 799: | Line 799: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | </nav> | + | </nav> |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | |||
− | |||
Line 821: | Line 807: | ||
+ | <div class="row"> | ||
+ | <div class="col-md-6 " id="PartsCollection"> | ||
+ | <groupparts>BGIC-Union</groupparts> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<div id="BasicParts"> | <div id="BasicParts"> | ||
Line 881: | Line 873: | ||
We conducted both PCR check(VF and VR) and enzyme check(XbaI and SpeI) </br> | We conducted both PCR check(VF and VR) and enzyme check(XbaI and SpeI) </br> | ||
− | + | </br></br> | |
<img src="" width="600px" /> | <img src="" width="600px" /> | ||
Figure 4.PCR check of eforRed and amliGFP. The expected result of eforRed should be around 1000bp. The insufficient specificity of primers produce another band but the band around 1000bp can present the success of construction. The expected result of amliGFP should be around 1000bp. The control is J23119 biobrick.</h6></br></br> | Figure 4.PCR check of eforRed and amliGFP. The expected result of eforRed should be around 1000bp. The insufficient specificity of primers produce another band but the band around 1000bp can present the success of construction. The expected result of amliGFP should be around 1000bp. The control is J23119 biobrick.</h6></br></br> | ||
Line 887: | Line 879: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b0/Rdcheck.png" height="600px" /> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b0/Rdcheck.png" height="600px" /> | ||
</br></br><h6>Figure 5.RD check of eforRed and amliGFP. XbaI and SpeI were used. The expected length of both amliGFP and eforRed should be around 750bp.</h6></br></br></br></br> | </br></br><h6>Figure 5.RD check of eforRed and amliGFP. XbaI and SpeI were used. The expected length of both amliGFP and eforRed should be around 750bp.</h6></br></br></br></br> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
Line 903: | Line 886: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | <!-- +++++ Footer Section +++++ --> | |
− | + | <section> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
<div id="footer"> | <div id="footer"> | ||
<div class="container"> | <div class="container"> | ||
− | <div class="row"> | + | <div class="row lr"> |
<div class="col-lg-4"> | <div class="col-lg-4"> | ||
<p>F12 BGI-College,146 Beishan Road,Yantian District 518083 | <p>F12 BGI-College,146 Beishan Road,Yantian District 518083 | ||
Line 998: | Line 914: | ||
<div class="col-lg-4"> | <div class="col-lg-4"> | ||
− | + | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | <a href=" | + | |
− | <a href=" | + | <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:BGIC-Union/Applied_Design">Applied Design</a><br/> |
− | <a href=" | + | <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:BGIC-Union/Entrepreneurship">Entreprenuership</a><br/> |
+ | <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:BGIC-Union/Gold_Integrated">Integrated HP</a><br/> | ||
+ | <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:BGIC-Union/Engagement">Education & Public Engagement</a><br/> | ||
+ | <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:BGIC-Union/Model">Model</a><br/> | ||
+ | <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:BGIC-Union/Evaluation">EVALUATION</a> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
</div><!-- /col-lg-4 --> | </div><!-- /col-lg-4 --> | ||
Line 1,014: | Line 934: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | </ | + | </section> |
− | + | ||
− | + |
Revision as of 11:05, 1 November 2017
We create four Basic Biobricks regarding to T7-dCas9.
NT7-dCas9 BBa_K2371000
CT7-dCas9 BBa_K2371001
NT7 BBa_K2371002
CT7 BBa_K2371003
Description:
The first two Biobricks are the two split T7 polymerase sequence we adopted. We provide them for other team to leverage them through other methods. We choose the split site suggested by the team of Tiyun Han, Quan Chen and Haiyan Liu. [7] The following two Biobricks are the sequence of T7 polymerase connected to dCas9 protein. The linker between split T7 polymerase and dCas9 is GGGGSGGGGS adopted by Peking University. A 6 X His-tag is added on C terminus of dCas9 in order to purify it.
We create seven composite Biobricks regarding to sgRNA.
We created a Biobrick for each of sgRNA and insert T7 promotor and T7 terminator before and after the sequence respectively in order to utilize them to transcribe sgRNA in vitro. The sequences are synthesize through Oligo DNA bridging designed by DNAworks. The detail of synthesis method is in the
experiment.