Line 1,719: | Line 1,719: | ||
<br><h2 id="pfont"> | <br><h2 id="pfont"> | ||
It is evident from Figs., 1 and 2 that the range of degradation rate over which the system oscillates increasing with increasing cooperativity. Thus, selecting a higher cooperativity would make the system more robust to variation in the degradation rate of the system.<br><br> | It is evident from Figs., 1 and 2 that the range of degradation rate over which the system oscillates increasing with increasing cooperativity. Thus, selecting a higher cooperativity would make the system more robust to variation in the degradation rate of the system.<br><br> | ||
− | To assess the extent to which the system response is close to a square wave, we define a | + | To assess the extent to which the system response is close to a square wave, we define a ‘squareness’ metric. To compute the metric, we calculate the correlation between the system response and an ideal square wave with same period as the system. This correlation value is compared against the extent of squareness of a sinusoidal wave. The final squareness value captures the extent to which the system response is squarer than a sinusoidal signal.<br></h2> |
<img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/96/T--IIT_Delhi--bifurcation_squareness.png" style='border:3px solid #000000' width = "95%"><br> | <img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/96/T--IIT_Delhi--bifurcation_squareness.png" style='border:3px solid #000000' width = "95%"><br> | ||
<h6> Fig.3: Colour map representing squareness </h6><br> | <h6> Fig.3: Colour map representing squareness </h6><br> |
Revision as of 22:08, 1 November 2017
Bifurcation and Squareness