Revision as of 02:24, 2 November 2017

Modelling the Behavior of CATE inside Tumor

We developed a model to gauge the behavior of our circuit in the real life conditions of solid tumor colonization.

This page gives details about the 3D model we developed to simulate the behavior of CATE inside the tumor and healthy tissue with different colonization patterns. This section presents details about the following:

The Geometry used in our 3D model.
The domain-wise Partial Differential Equations used for modelling the Growth, AND-gate Tumor sensing Switch and the Lysis & Diffusion effects.
Values of the Parameters used
Simulation Results for the AND-Gate tumor sensing switch in the different environmental conditions to validate its functioning in context of the intended application.

The 3D model presented here is used to model the behavior in conditions as close as possible to real-life scenario of tumor colonization by including the partial differential equations for diffusion of AHL and Azuin, which also helps validate the assumptions and simplifications used in the in-vitro model. Since in experiments, there is no diffusion, our 3D model helps us model scenarios that CATE will encounter, as close as possible to reality. We are also able to test the behavior of our tumor sensor in the different environmental conditions using the parameters obtained by fitting our experimental data and also finally integrating our self-designed hybrid promoter. Finally we are also able to estimate the killing area and to test the robustness of our circuit, we also simulated different colonization patterns.

Go to RESULTS: Initial Test of our 3D Model.

Go to RESULTS: AND-Gate Tumor Sensor Characterization.

Go to RESULTS: Estimation of the Killing Area.

Go to RESULTS: Bacterial Colonization Patterns.

Go to RESULTS: Final Conclusions.

Geometry

Our model structure consists of 2 domains - Tumor and Layer.

As mentioned in system specifications, the tumour has been chosen as a solid sphere of radius 20 mm and the bactierial colonization pattern as a homogenous distribution in a spherical shell-shaped 0.5 mm thick layer in the tumour at a distance of 10 mm from the centre of the tumor, as shown in Figure 1.

Geometry of tumor and bacterial colony — Figure 1: Geometry of the tumor and bacteria colony (green area: colonized by E. coli Nissle)

Details about the geometry

Due to the spherical symmetry of the system, a 2D axisymmetric COMSOL model was used as shown in Figure 2 - a semicircle of radius 20 mm represents the tumor and the 0.5 mm thick layer at a distance of 10 mm from the center of the tumor represents the bacteria colonization pattern as explained in the system specifications. COMSOL then sweeps the semi-circle between 0° and 360 ° to simulate the entire 3D problem. The symmetry helps decrease the computational time and space requirements, without having to apply simplifications based on assumptions.

FIXME — Figure 2: Geometry of the COMSOL Model - 2D Axisymmetric; *Coordinate system: (r,z); axes in mm*; Tumor is a solid sphere of radius 20 mm located at (0,0), Bacterial colonization is in a spherical layer of thickness 0.5 mm at a distance of 10 mm from the center of the tumor.

Equations

Transport of Diluted Species physics was used in COMSOL to integrate diffusion into our model. The partial differential equation for diffusion of a species C with reaction source rate R_C is \[\frac{\partial \text{[C]}}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot (-D_{\text{C}} \nabla \text{[C]})= R_{\text{C}}\]. The reaction rates of the species depends on the domain – tumor: no production and only extracellular degradation, and bacterial layer: production and intracellular degradation.

Expand the sections below for more details about the domain-wise reaction rates for each species (AHL, LuxI and azurin) and equations used.

The concentration of LuxI, LuxR and LuxR-AHL modelled above represents the intracellular concentration i.e. the concentration at a point had a bacteria been there.

However, since AHL diffuses everywhere rapidly and freely through the cell-memberane, a rapid equilibrium between the intercellular and extracellular concentration of AHL is reached, and thus we multiply the LuxI controlled AHL production rate by d_cell, since the layer has all the bacteria colonizing the tumor.

Similarly, since we are interested in the azurin concentration after lysis, we have a d_cell multiplication factor in its reaction rate, as after lysis azurin from all the cells diffused out of the layer. This is also then used to find the effective killing area to estimate the percentage of volume of the tumor treated.

Growth Model

An exponential growth model is used, as shown below.

\[\begin{aligned} \frac{\mathrm{d} d_{\text{cell}}}{\mathrm{d} t} &= \frac{1}{\tau} d_{\text{cell}} \left ( 1-\frac{d_{\text{cell}}}{d_{\text{cell,ss}}} \right ) \\ \Rightarrow d_{\text{cell}} &= \frac{ d_{\text{cell,0}} \, e^{\frac{t}{\tau}}}{1 - \frac{d_{\text{cell,0}}}{d_{\text{cell,ss}}} + \frac{d_{\text{cell,0}}}{d_{\text{cell,ss}}}e^{\frac{t}{\tau}}} \end{aligned}\]

Diffusion Model

Transport of Diluted Species physics of COMSOL was used to model the diffusion of AHL and azurin. The equations below represent the diffusion models in both the Tumor and Layer domains. For simulating the effect of lysis, the diffusion of azurin is triggered when temperature reaches 42°C, while AHL diffuses all the time. The value of the diffusion coefficients of AHL, D and azurin, D_Azu are given in the parameter list below.

\[\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial \text{[AHL]}}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot (-D_{\text{AHL}} \nabla\text{[AHL]}) &= R_{\text{AHL}} \\ \frac{\partial \text{[Azu]}}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot (-D_{\text{Azu}} \nabla\text{[Azu]}) &= R_{\text{Azu}} \end{aligned}\]

Reaction Rates, R_C = d[C]/dt

Inside the Layer domain: AHL, LuxI and azurin are both produced and degraded. This is modelled as:

\[\begin{aligned} R_{\text{AHL}} &= d_{\text{cell}}(t)\, a_{\text{AHL}} \text{[LuxI]} - d_{\text{AHL,out}}\text{[AHL]} \\ R_{\text{LuxI}} &= a_{\text{LuxI}} \, [k_{\text{LuxI}}+(1-k_{\text{LuxI}})P_{\text{Lux-}\text{Lac}}] - d_{\text{LuxI}}\text{[LuxI]} \\ R_{\text{Azu}} &= d_{\text{cell}}(t)\, k_{\text{Azu-LuxI}}\,(R_{\text{LuxI}}+d_{\text{LuxI}}\text{[LuxI]}-d_{\text{Azu}}\text{[Azu]} ) \\ \end{aligned}\]

where P_Lux-Lac is given by:

\[\begin{aligned} P_{\text{Lux-}\text{Lac}} &= P_{\text{Lux}}P_{\text{Lac}} \\ \text{where } P_{\text{Lux}} &= \frac{\left(\frac{[\text{LuxR-AHL}]}{K_{\text{LuxR}}} \right)^{n_{\text{LuxR}}}}{1 + \left(\frac{[\text{LuxR-AHL}]}{K_{\text{LuxR}}} \right)^{n_{\text{LuxR}}}} \\ \text{and } P_{\text{Lac}} &= \frac{\left(\frac{\text{[Lac]}}{K_{\text{Lac}}} \right)^{n_{\text{Lac}}}}{1 + \left(\frac{[\text{Lac}]}{K_{\text{Lac}}} \right)^{n_{\text{Lac}}}} \end{aligned}\]

where [Lac] is 1 mM in a healthy tissue and 5 mM in a tumor, as already mentioned in the system specifications.

[LuxR-AHL] is obtained by soliving the following 2 equations:

\[\begin{aligned} \text{[LuxR-AHL]} &= K_{\text{LuxR-AHL}} [\text{LuxR}]^2 [\text{AHL}]^2 &\text{(rapid binding equilibrium)} \\ \text{[LuxR]} &= [\text{LuxR}]_0 - 2 [\text{LuxR-AHL}] &\text{(mass conservation)} \end{aligned} \]

Inside the Tumor domain: AHL, LuxI and azurin are not produced and only degraded. This is modelled as:

\[\begin{aligned} R_{\text{AHL}} &= - \, d_{\text{AHL,out}}\text{[AHL]} \\ R_{\text{LuxI}} &= 0 \\ R_{\text{Azu}} &= - \, d_{\text{Azu}}\text{[Azu]} ) \\ \end{aligned}\]

Parameters

The parameters that were used in our 3D model were obtained partly from literature, partly from characterizations of previous iGEM teams and finally the most important ones were estimated by fitting our experimental data and tuning the fitted-results in the context of the intended applciation, as explained in detail by the Functional Parameter Search.

Expand the details section to read more about the different parameters and their values used.

Learn more about the parameters in the Functional Parameter Search.

The steady state cell density for growth, d_cell,ss is chosen to be 0.05 in colonized tumor and 0.0005 in healthy tissue, based on the conclusions derived in the System Specifications. Also, [Lac] is chosen to be 1 mM for a healthy tissue and 5 mM for a tumor, and the initial cell density d_cell,0 is taken to be a very small non-zero value.

Parameters fitted to our experimental data and tuned with respect to the context of the intended application

Symbol	Description	Value	Reference
a_LuxR	Maximum expression of LuxR	1x10² nM min^-1	iGEM ETH 2014
a_LuxI	Maximum expression of LuxI	1x10⁴ nM min^-1	[3]
K_Lac	Half-activation [Lac] of the hybrid promoter, P_Lux-Lac	2 mM	Characterized lactate sensing part on which our AND-gate is based
k_LuxI	Leakiness of the hybrid promoter	0.01	Characterized lactate sensing part on which our AND-gate is based
K_LuxR	Half-activation [LuxR-AHL] of the hybrid promoter P_Lux-Lac	10 nM	iGEM ETH 2013
n_LuxR	Hill coefficient of the hybrid promoter, P_Lux-Lac regarding [LuxR-AHL]	1.7	iGEM ETH 2015
n_Lac	Hill coefficient of the hybrid promoter, P_Lux-Lac regarding [Lac]	1.7	iGEM ETH 2015
τ	Doubling time of E. coli Nissle	80 min	Fitted from our growth experiments
k_Azu-LuxI	Relative expression of azurin compared to LuxR	10	estimated

Fixed parameters - well known

Symbol	Description	Value	Reference
a_AHL	AHL synthesis rate by LuxI	0.01 min^-1	[1]
d_AHL,out	AHL extracellular degradation rate	5x10^-4 min^-1	[2]
D_AHL	AHL diffusion coefficient in water	3x10^-8 m²min^-1	[2]
K_LuxR-AHL	LuxR-AHL quadrimer binding constant	5x10^-10 nM^-3	[3]

Fixed parameters - not very well known but redundant with respect to other parameters

Symbol	Description	Value	Reference
d_LuxI	LuxI degradation rate	0.0167 min^-1	[2]
d_LuxR	LuxR degradation rate	0.023 min^-1	[2]
d_Azu	azurin degradation rate	0.046 min^-1	estimated
D_Azu	Diffusion coefficient of azurin	1x10^-6 cm²s^-1	estimated
[LuxR]₀	Total initial concentration of LuxR	a_LuxR/d_LuxR	chosen same as steady state value

RESULTS: Initial Test of our 3D Model

To test our model, we simulated it for a given set of parameters that describe the conditions of tumor colonization as close as possible to a reality. This is given bsy the relative criteria for azurin production. The 3D model enabled us to use exact partial differential equations to model diffusion of the different species and helped us bridge the gap between experiments and reality, as it was not feasible to conduct experiments for tumor colonization in the lab. This also helped us to validate the assumptions used in the in-vitro model.

Our 3D model helped us to simulate the three main phases of the CATE treatment: Growth, AND-Gate Switching (Environment sensing) and finally Lysis & azurin Diffusion. For details see CATE in Action.

Phase 1: Growth

The growth is modelled using the exponential growth rate \[\frac{\mathrm{d} d_{\text{cell}}}{\mathrm{d} t} = \frac{1}{\tau} d_{\text{cell}} \left ( 1-\frac{d_{\text{cell}}}{d_{\text{cell,ss}}} \right )\], where τ is the doubling time, that we obtained by fitting E. coli Nissle growth curves from our lab experiments. Read more in details for the equations.

Phase 2: AND-Gate Tumor Sensing Switch

The AND gate Switch senses the environment based on Quorum sensing (d_cell) and Lactatae concentration ([Lac]), as explained in detail in the description of the Tumor Sensing circuit. Based on the different combinations of d_cell and [Lac], as mentioned in the system specifications, the AND gate switches 'ON' or 'OFF'. For detailed equations see the equation details.

ON state:: Rapid and high-fold increase in [LuxI] or [Azu]
OFF state:: Slow and negligible-fold increase in LuxI] or [Azu]

Phase 3: Lysis and azurin Diffusion

The effect of lysis is simulated by a temperature controlled trigger of the diffusion of azurin that is produced in the cells. The temperature is increased from 0 to 42°C as a step function and when the temperature reaches 42°C, the production of azurin and AHL stops, since the cells are lysed, and diffusion of azurin begins which depletes azurin out of the cell into the tumor, effectively inducing apoptosis of the tumor cells.

We simulated our model to test the working of the Tumor Sensing circuit for the case of tumor colonization i.e. High d_cell AND High [Lac]. The three phases, as described above were simulated and the results for the case of bacteria colonization of tumor are shown in Figures 3, 4 and 5. In Figure 6, d_cell shows the growth of the cell density inside the layer and P_Lux-Lac shows the switching based on the environmental conditions of d_cell and lactate.

During the growth phase, our sensing circuit is OFF (visible in Figure 3), and is triggered to turn ON once the desired cell density for quorum sensing is reached at around 40 hr, as shown in Figure 6 and 2. Then once steady state is reached, the temperature step triggers the cell-lysis and stops the production of azurin and AHL. Finally as is visible in Figure 5, all the azurin diffuses out of the layer very rapidly, thus completing the last phase of the treatment.

Figure 5: Cell Lysis and azurin Diffusion phase: 69 hr to 100 hr

HighDHighL_norm — Figure 6: Normalized concentration of AHL and azurin, Cell density (as a ratio of its steady state value), P_Lux-Lac and Temperature (as a ratio of its steady state value 42°C) probe plots at a point inside the layer of bacterial colonization in the tumor.

Conclusions: From this simulation, we can conclude that our model simulates the functioning of our circuit as expected and intended. We use the parameters that we obtained from fitting of our experimental data and tuning them with regards to the intended application context. The above results verify the functioning of the Tumor Sensing circuit and thus validate CATE's behavior in a tumor.

Since now we have confirmed that our circuit works as expected, we do an AND-Gate Sensor Characterization, by gauging the behavior of CATE in different environmental conditions, to verify its functioning in the context of the intended application.

RESULTS: AND-Gate Tumor Sensor Characterization

To test the specificity and functionality of our tumour sensing AND-Gate switch in all the possible real-life scenarios that CATE might encounter in context of the intended application, we use the relative criteria set in the system specifications for evaluation: since our AND-Gate switch has 2 inputs for environment sensing viz. d_cell and [Lac], there are 4 possible binary combinations that CATE can encounter in real-life scenario, viz.:

Case 'Tumor Colonization': High d_cell AND High [Lac] → Switch FULLY ON.
Case 'Healthy tissue Colonization': High d_cell AND Low [Lac] → Switch FULLY OFF (in the ideal case).
Case 'Tumor NOT fully colonized': Low d_cell AND High [Lac] → Switch FULLY OFF.
Case 'Healthy tissue NOT fully colonized': Low d_cell AND Low [Lac] → Switch FULLY OFF

The simulation results between 35 hr and 75 hr for all the 4 possible scenarios that CATE can encounter, are shown below. Around 40 hr, the quorum sensing triggers the switch ON of the AND-gate when in tumor, after which azurin concentration rises rapidly and once it reaches steady state, a temperature step signal is used to trigger lysis at around 70 hr.

Case1_HighDHighL — Figure 7: Case 'Tumor Colonization': High d_cell AND High [Lac]; AND-gate Switch is FULLY ON.

Case1_HighDLowL — Figure 8: Case: 'Healthy tissue Colonization': High d_cell AND Low [Lac]; AND-gate Switch is PARTIALLY ON.

Case1_LowDHighL — Figure 9: Case: 'Tumor NOT fully colonized': Low d_cell AND High [Lac]; AND-gate Switch is FULLY OFF..

Case1_LowDLowL — Figure 10: Case: 'Healthy tissue NOT fully colonized' - Low d_cell AND Low [Lac]; AND-gate Switch is FULLY OFF.

As is clear from the Figures 7-10, the AND-gate switch is FULLY ON for the case of tumor colonization with steady state azurin concentration reaching around 75000 nM (shown in Figure 11). For the case of colonization of healthy tissue, the AND-gate switch is PARTIALLY ON with steady state azurin concentration at about 22000 nM. This is about 3.5 times lower than when the switch is FULLY ON, however in the ideal case it should be FULLY OFF, to avoid any off-target effects from CATE-treatment. In the case of tumor and healthy tissue not colonized, the steady state azurin concentrations are around 20 nM and 17 nM, respectively, which represents a FULLY OFF AND-gate switch.

Azu_t — Figure 11: [Azu] vs Time; Shows the behavior of our tumor sensing circuit in the different d_cell and [Lac] conditions and thus verifying the correct functioning of the tumor sensing circuit.

Conclusions: From these simulation results, we can conclude that our circuit works as expected in the real-life scenario of tumor colonization and is specific enough to avoid any off-target effects. Moreover, these results validate the assumptions made in our in-vitro model, which was used for fitting our experimental data to obtain the parameters used.

In the next step, we try to estimate the killing area that we can achieve using CATE as a bacteria cancer-therapy.

RESULTS: Estimation of the Killing Area

To simulate the effect of lysis, our 3D model stops the production of azurin and starts its diffusion when temperature reaches 42°C. This simulates the effect of increase in temperature with FUS to cause cell lysis. Using our own experimental quantitative determinations of the amount of azurin that can be produced by our bacteria (ie an intracellular concentration of 140 µM) as well as the killing curve performed on tumor cell (we observed an effective killing at a concentration of 1.8 nM), we were able to estimate the killing area and the time duration of the treatment.

For this simulation, we assumed that every point in the tumor that has been in contact with a concentration of azurin greater than 1.8 nM at some time point during the diffusion of azurin (which follow the cell lysis). Thus, we determined the temporal-maximum concentrations of azurin at each point in the tumor, and deduced the area of the tumor that gets treated with effective amount of azurin from the obtained maximum concentration over time profile .

Using the data obtained from our simulation results as shown in Figure 12a, the maximum azurin concentration over time was found for every point in the system, as shown in Figure 12b using which then we could estimate the effective killing area (points where temporal-maximum azurin concentration > 1.8 nM) as shown in Figure 13.

Figure 12a: Diffusion of [Azu] (nM) with 1.8 nM contour.

Azu_max — Figure 12b: Maximum [Azu] (nM) over time at all points.

Kill_area — Figure 13: Killing Area: Points where maximum [Azu] over time exceeds 1.8 nM.

The effective killing area can be estimated from our experimental data in combination with our most advanced model. By choosing the points in the (r,z) plane that have [Azu]_max|t > 1.8 µM. Figure 16 shows that the maximum effective killing area is between r = 6 and 13 mm at z = 0. This amounts to approximately 25 % (by vol.) of the tumor being treated. We can therefore conclude that our bacterial system can have a very significant impact on the tumor and bring an effective treatment.

Bacterial colonization patterns

The next step was to test the robustness of our system. For this, we tested the environment sensing AND-gate switching circuit in different colonization patterns. Although any possible colonization pattern can be simulated, we simulated the following ones:

Case 1: Homogeneous distribution in a Single spherical shell layer in tumour: already simulated as shown in previous results
Case 2: Heterogeneous distribution (Partitions) in a Single spherical shell layer in tumour: another possible feasible scenario
Case 3: Heterogeneous distribution (Partitions) in Double spherical shell layer in tumour: introducing some more heterogenity in the system
Case 4: Homogeneous distribution throughout Healthy tissue: with d_cell = 0.0005, as in this geometry the AND-gate is more easily activated as comparaed to other geometries, since difusion can not occur within the inner region where bacteria colonize, and thus this colonized inner region acts as a huge source, with no diffusion between the cells, as shown in the Figure 17.

The simulation results between 35 hr and 75 hr for all the 4 possible scenarios, are shown below.

Sph_Nopartition — Figure 14: Case 1: Tumor colonized in a single spherical shell-shaped layer; AND-gate Switch is FULLY ON.

Sph_partition — Figure 15: Case 2: Tumor is colonized in partitions in the shape of a single shell-shaped layer; AND-gate Switch is FULLY ON.

DoubleSph_partition — Figure 16: Case 3: Tumor is colonized in alternative paritions in two spherical shell-shaped layers; AND-gate Switch is FULLY ON.

Figure 17: Case 4: Homogeneous colonization (d_cell) of a healthy tissue; AND-gate switch is PARTIALLY ON.

The above figures show that our Tumor sensing circuit functions properly in the different colonization patterns simulated. According to Figure 17, in case of colonization of a healthy tissue, the switch is only partially triggered i.e. slower rise and lesser final steady state [Azu], when compared to Figure 14, that has a FULLY ON switch indicated by the rapid rise and approximately 3.5 times higher-fold increase in [Azu]

RESULTS: Final Conclusions - VOILÀ!

Our model finally helped us to implement a comprehensive in-silico test to prove that our system already exhibits an excellent performance for the clinical application it has been designed for. This helped us to take into account the fitting of the parameters using our experimental data and integrate our own hybrid promoter which was tuned in reference to the intended application context, to verify the functioning of our environment sensing function.

Limitations of our Model

Our model has some limitations. We do not model protein E production and cell lysis caused by it. Instead lysis is just simulated in effect as the end of production of AHL and azurin and start of diffusion of azurin. Moreover, a step signal is used as a trigger for the lysis. As mentioned in the parameters description, azurin production is taken to be 10 times proportional to LuxI production. Also, killing mechanism of azurin has not been modelled since that was not necessary to demonstrate the working of our project CATE in the scope of iGEM.

Tools used

COMSOL Multiphysics 5.2a by COMSOL Inc.
MATLAB R2016b by MathWorks

References

Jordi Garcia-Ojalvo, Michael B. Elowitz, and Steven H. Strogatz Modeling a synthetic multicellular clock: Repressilators coupled by quorum sensing PNAS 2004 101 (30) 10955-10960 | doi:10.1073/pnas.0307095101
A.B. Goryachev, D.J. Toh T.Lee, Systems analysis of a quorum sensing network: Design constraints imposed by the functional requirements, network topology and kinetic constants Biosystems, Volume 83, Issues 2–3, February–March 2006, Pages 178-187 | doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2005.04.006
A synthetic multicellular system for programmed pattern formation Subhayu Basu, Yoram Gerchman, Cynthia H. Collins, Frances H. Arnold & Ron WeissNature 434, 1130-1134 (28 April 2005) | doi:10.1038/nature03461

@@ Line 88: / Line 88: @@
              Transport of Diluted Species physics was used in COMSOL to integrate diffusion into our model. The <em>partial differential equation</em> for diffusion of a species <em>C</em> with reaction source rate <em>R<sub>C</sub></em>  is <span class="math">\[\frac{\partial \text{[C]}}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot (-D_{\text{C}} \nabla \text{[C]})= R_{\text{C}}\]</span>. The reaction rates of the species depends on the domain – tumor: no production and only extracellular degradation, and bacterial layer: production and intracellular degradation.
          </p>
-         <p>Expand the sections below for more details about the domain-wise reaction rates for each species (AHL, LuxI and Azurin) and equations used.</p>
+         <p>Expand the sections below for more details about the domain-wise reaction rates for each species (AHL, LuxI and azurin) and equations used.</p>
      </section>
      <section class="emphasize">
@@ Line 94: / Line 94: @@
          <p>The concentration of LuxI, LuxR and LuxR-AHL modelled above represents the intracellular concentration i.e. the concentration at a point had a bacteria been there.<p>
          <p>However, since AHL diffuses everywhere rapidly and freely through the cell-memberane, a rapid equilibrium between the intercellular and extracellular concentration of AHL is reached, and thus we multiply the LuxI controlled AHL production rate by <em>d</em><sub>cell</sub>, since the layer has all the bacteria colonizing the tumor.</p>
-         <p>Similarly, since we are interested in the Azurin concentration after lysis, we have a <em>d</em><sub>cell</sub> multiplication factor in its reaction rate, as after lysis Azurin from all the cells diffused out of the layer. This is also then used to find the effective killing area to estimate the percentage of volume of the tumor treated.</p>
+         <p>Similarly, since we are interested in the azurin concentration after lysis, we have a <em>d</em><sub>cell</sub> multiplication factor in its reaction rate, as after lysis azurin from all the cells diffused out of the layer. This is also then used to find the effective killing area to estimate the percentage of volume of the tumor treated.</p>
      </section>
      <section>
@@ Line 112: / Line 112: @@
              <details>
                  <summary>Diffusion Model</summary>
-                 <p class="description">Transport of Diluted Species physics of COMSOL was used to model the diffusion of AHL and Azurin. The equations below represent the diffusion models in both the Tumor and Layer domains. For simulating the effect of lysis, the diffusion of Azurin is triggered when temperature reaches 42&deg;C, while AHL diffuses all the time. The value of the diffusion coefficients of AHL, <em>D</em> and Azurin, <em>D</em><sub>Azu</sub> are given in the parameter list below.</p>
+                 <p class="description">Transport of Diluted Species physics of COMSOL was used to model the diffusion of AHL and azurin. The equations below represent the diffusion models in both the Tumor and Layer domains. For simulating the effect of lysis, the diffusion of azurin is triggered when temperature reaches 42&deg;C, while AHL diffuses all the time. The value of the diffusion coefficients of AHL, <em>D</em> and azurin, <em>D</em><sub>Azu</sub> are given in the parameter list below.</p>
                  <span class="math">
                      \[\begin{aligned}
@@ Line 123: / Line 123: @@
                  <summary>Reaction Rates, <em>R</em><sub>C</sub> = d[C]/dt</summary>
-                 <p class="description">Inside the Layer domain: AHL, LuxI and Azurin are both produced and degraded. This is modelled as:</p>
+                 <p class="description">Inside the Layer domain: AHL, LuxI and azurin are both produced and degraded. This is modelled as:</p>
                  <span class="math">
                      \[\begin{aligned}
@@ Line 165: / Line 165: @@
                  </span>
-                 <p class="description">Inside the Tumor domain: AHL, LuxI and Azurin are not produced and only degraded. This is modelled as:</p>
+                 <p class="description">Inside the Tumor domain: AHL, LuxI and azurin are not produced and only degraded. This is modelled as:</p>
                  <span class="math">
                      \[\begin{aligned}
@@ Line 249: / Line 249: @@
                      <tr>
                          <td>k<sub>Azu-LuxI</sub></td>
-                         <td>Relative expression of Azurin compared to LuxR</td>
+                         <td>Relative expression of azurin compared to LuxR</td>
                          <td>10</td>
                          <td>estimated</td>
@@ Line 317: / Line 317: @@
                      <tr>
                          <td>d<sub>Azu</sub></td>
-                         <td>Azurin degradation rate</td>
+                         <td>azurin degradation rate</td>
                          <td>0.046 min<sup>-1</sup></td>
                          <td>estimated</td>
@@ Line 323: / Line 323: @@
                      <tr>
                          <td>D<sub>Azu</sub></td>
-                         <td>Diffusion coefficient of Azurin</td>
+                         <td>Diffusion coefficient of azurin</td>
                          <td>1x10<sup>-6</sup> cm<sup>2</sup>s<sup>-1</sup></td>
                          <td>estimated</td>
@@ Line 340: / Line 340: @@
      <section id="InVivo_Treatment">
          <h1>RESULTS: Initial Test of our 3D Model</h1>
-         <p>To test our model, we simulated it for a given set of parameters that describe the conditions of tumor colonization as close as possible to a reality. This is given bsy the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Model/Environment_Sensing/system_specifications#rel_criteria_sys_specs">relative criteria</a> for Azurin production. The 3D model enabled us to use exact partial differential equations to model diffusion of the different species and helped us bridge the gap between experiments and reality, as it was not feasible to conduct experiments for tumor colonization in the lab. This also helped us to validate the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Model/Environment_Sensing/model">assumptions</a> used in the <em>in-vitro</em> model. </p>
+         <p>To test our model, we simulated it for a given set of parameters that describe the conditions of tumor colonization as close as possible to a reality. This is given bsy the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Model/Environment_Sensing/system_specifications#rel_criteria_sys_specs">relative criteria</a> for azurin production. The 3D model enabled us to use exact partial differential equations to model diffusion of the different species and helped us bridge the gap between experiments and reality, as it was not feasible to conduct experiments for tumor colonization in the lab. This also helped us to validate the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Model/Environment_Sensing/model">assumptions</a> used in the <em>in-vitro</em> model. </p>
-         <p>Our 3D model helped us to simulate the three main phases of the CATE treatment: Growth, AND-Gate Switching (Environment sensing) and finally Lysis & Azurin Diffusion. For details see <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Applied_Design</p>">CATE in Action</a>.</p>
+         <p>Our 3D model helped us to simulate the three main phases of the CATE treatment: Growth, AND-Gate Switching (Environment sensing) and finally Lysis & azurin Diffusion. For details see <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Applied_Design</p>">CATE in Action</a>.</p>
          <div class="multi-summary">
@@ Line 362: / Line 362: @@
              </details>
              <details>
-                 <summary>Phase 3: Lysis and Azurin Diffusion</summary>
+                 <summary>Phase 3: Lysis and azurin Diffusion</summary>
-                 <p class="description">The effect of lysis is simulated by a temperature controlled trigger of the diffusion of azurin that is produced in the cells. The temperature is increased from 0 to 42&deg;C as a step function and when the temperature reaches 42&deg;C, the production of Azurin and AHL stops, since the cells are lysed, and diffusion of Azurin begins which depletes Azurin out of the cell into the tumor, effectively inducing apoptosis of the tumor cells.</p>
+                 <p class="description">The effect of lysis is simulated by a temperature controlled trigger of the diffusion of azurin that is produced in the cells. The temperature is increased from 0 to 42&deg;C as a step function and when the temperature reaches 42&deg;C, the production of azurin and AHL stops, since the cells are lysed, and diffusion of azurin begins which depletes azurin out of the cell into the tumor, effectively inducing apoptosis of the tumor cells.</p>
              </details>
          </div>
@@ Line 369: / Line 369: @@
          <p class="description">We simulated our model to test the working of the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Circuit/Fa_Tumor_Sensor">Tumor Sensing circuit</a> for the case of tumor colonization i.e. High <em>d</em><sub>cell</sub> AND High [Lac]. The three phases, as described above were simulated and the results for the case of bacteria colonization of tumor are shown in Figures 3, 4 and 5. In Figure 6, <em>d</em><sub>cell</sub> shows the growth of the cell density inside the layer and <em>P</em><sub>Lux-Lac</sub> shows the switching based on the environmental conditions of <em>d</em><sub>cell</sub> and lactate.</p>
-         <p>During the growth phase, our sensing circuit is OFF (visible in Figure 3), and is triggered to turn ON once the desired cell density for quorum sensing is reached at around 40 hr, as shown in Figure 6 and 2. Then once steady state is reached, the temperature step triggers the cell-lysis and stops the production of Azurin and AHL. Finally as is visible in Figure 5, all the Azurin diffuses out of the layer very rapidly, thus completing the last phase of the treatment.</p></p>
+         <p>During the growth phase, our sensing circuit is OFF (visible in Figure 3), and is triggered to turn ON once the desired cell density for quorum sensing is reached at around 40 hr, as shown in Figure 6 and 2. Then once steady state is reached, the temperature step triggers the cell-lysis and stops the production of azurin and AHL. Finally as is visible in Figure 5, all the azurin diffuses out of the layer very rapidly, thus completing the last phase of the treatment.</p></p>
          <figure class="fig-float">
@@ Line 381: / Line 381: @@
          <figure class="fig-float">
              <img alt="Lysis" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/1e/T--ETH_Zurich--Azu69To100h.gif" style="width: 200px;" />
-             <figcaption>Figure 5: Cell Lysis and Azurin Diffusion phase: 69 hr to 100 hr</figcaption>
+             <figcaption>Figure 5: Cell Lysis and azurin Diffusion phase: 69 hr to 100 hr</figcaption>
          </figure>
          <figure class="fig-nonfloat">
              <img alt="HighDHighL_norm" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/03/T--ETH_Zurich--HighDHighL_norm.png" />
-             <figcaption>Figure 6: Normalized concentration of AHL and Azurin, Cell density (as a ratio of its steady state value), P<sub>Lux-Lac</sub> and Temperature (as a ratio of its steady state value 42&deg;C) probe plots at a point inside the layer of bacterial colonization in the tumor.</figcaption>
+             <figcaption>Figure 6: Normalized concentration of AHL and azurin, Cell density (as a ratio of its steady state value), P<sub>Lux-Lac</sub> and Temperature (as a ratio of its steady state value 42&deg;C) probe plots at a point inside the layer of bacterial colonization in the tumor.</figcaption>
          </figure>
      </section>
@@ Line 411: / Line 411: @@
          </dl>
-         <p>The simulation results between 35 hr and 75 hr for all the 4 possible scenarios that CATE can encounter, are shown below. Around 40 hr, the quorum sensing triggers the switch ON of the AND-gate when in tumor, after which Azurin concentration rises rapidly and once it reaches steady state, a temperature step signal is used to trigger lysis at around 70 hr.</p>
+         <p>The simulation results between 35 hr and 75 hr for all the 4 possible scenarios that CATE can encounter, are shown below. Around 40 hr, the quorum sensing triggers the switch ON of the AND-gate when in tumor, after which azurin concentration rises rapidly and once it reaches steady state, a temperature step signal is used to trigger lysis at around 70 hr.</p>
          <figure class="fig-float">
@@ Line 430: / Line 430: @@
          </figure>
-         <p>As is clear from the Figures 7-10, the AND-gate switch is <span style="color:green">FULLY ON</span> for the case of tumor colonization with steady state Azurin concentration reaching around 75000 nM (shown in Figure 11). For the case of colonization of healthy tissue, the AND-gate switch is <span style="color:red">PARTIALLY ON</span> with steady state Azurin concentration at about 22000 nM. <em>This is about 3.5 times lower than when the switch is FULLY ON, however in the ideal case it should be FULLY OFF, to avoid any off-target effects from CATE-treatment</em>. In the case of tumor and healthy tissue not colonized, the steady state Azurin concentrations are around 20 nM and 17 nM, respectively, which represents a <span style="color:green">FULLY OFF</span> AND-gate switch.</p>
+         <p>As is clear from the Figures 7-10, the AND-gate switch is <span style="color:green">FULLY ON</span> for the case of tumor colonization with steady state azurin concentration reaching around 75000 nM (shown in Figure 11). For the case of colonization of healthy tissue, the AND-gate switch is <span style="color:red">PARTIALLY ON</span> with steady state azurin concentration at about 22000 nM. <em>This is about 3.5 times lower than when the switch is FULLY ON, however in the ideal case it should be FULLY OFF, to avoid any off-target effects from CATE-treatment</em>. In the case of tumor and healthy tissue not colonized, the steady state azurin concentrations are around 20 nM and 17 nM, respectively, which represents a <span style="color:green">FULLY OFF</span> AND-gate switch.</p>
          <!--<figure class="fig-nonfloat">
              <img alt="SemiLog_Azu_t" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/2a/T--ETH_Zurich--AzuTime_allCases.png" />
@@ Line 451: / Line 451: @@
          <p>For this simulation, we assumed that every point in the tumor that has been in contact with a concentration of azurin greater than 1.8 nM at some time point during the diffusion of azurin (which follow the cell lysis). Thus, we determined the temporal-maximum concentrations of azurin at each point in the tumor, and deduced the area of the tumor that gets treated with effective amount of azurin from the obtained maximum concentration over time profile .</p>
-         <p class="description">Using the data obtained from our simulation results as shown in Figure 12a, the maximum azurin concentration over time was found for every point in the system, as shown in Figure 12b using which then we could estimate the effective killing area (points where temporal-maximum Azurin concentration > 1.8 nM) as shown in Figure 13. </p>
+         <p class="description">Using the data obtained from our simulation results as shown in Figure 12a, the maximum azurin concentration over time was found for every point in the system, as shown in Figure 12b using which then we could estimate the effective killing area (points where temporal-maximum azurin concentration > 1.8 nM) as shown in Figure 13. </p>
          <figure class="fig-nonfloat">
@@ Line 522: / Line 522: @@
      <section>
          <h1>Limitations of our Model</h1>
-         <p>Our model has some limitations. We do not model protein E production and cell lysis caused by it. Instead lysis is just simulated in effect as the end of production of AHL and Azurin and start of diffusion of Azurin. Moreover, a step signal is used as a trigger for the lysis. As mentioned in the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Model/In_Vivo#InVivo_Parameters">parameters description</a>, Azurin production is taken to be 10 times proportional to LuxI production. Also, killing mechanism of Azurin has not been modelled since that was not necessary to demonstrate the working of our project CATE in the scope of iGEM. <!--Moreover, Azurin is not potent enough to kill the tumor but CATE allows it to be replaced with any powerful cytotoxic agent.--></p>
+         <p>Our model has some limitations. We do not model protein E production and cell lysis caused by it. Instead lysis is just simulated in effect as the end of production of AHL and azurin and start of diffusion of azurin. Moreover, a step signal is used as a trigger for the lysis. As mentioned in the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Model/In_Vivo#InVivo_Parameters">parameters description</a>, azurin production is taken to be 10 times proportional to LuxI production. Also, killing mechanism of azurin has not been modelled since that was not necessary to demonstrate the working of our project CATE in the scope of iGEM. <!--Moreover, azurin is not potent enough to kill the tumor but CATE allows it to be replaced with any powerful cytotoxic agent.--></p>
      </section>

Difference between revisions of "Team:ETH Zurich/Model/In Vivo"