Line 901: | Line 901: | ||
<h2>Process</h2> | <h2>Process</h2> | ||
+ | <button class="accordion"><h3><i class="fa fa-chevron-down"></i> Name </h3></button> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="panel"> | ||
+ | <table border="0"> | ||
+ | <tr><td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p ><b>Experimental Details and Rationale</b></p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>description </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </tr></td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr><td> | ||
+ | <p><b>Materials</b></p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </tr></td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr><td> | ||
+ | <p><b>Protocol</b></p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | <ol><p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <li> </li> | ||
+ | <li> </li> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </p></ol> | ||
+ | </tr></td> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <button class="accordion"><h3><i class="fa fa-chevron-down"></i> Name </h3></button> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="panel"> | ||
+ | <table border="0"> | ||
+ | <tr><td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p ><b>Experimental Details and Rationale</b></p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>description </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </tr></td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr><td> | ||
+ | <p><b>Materials</b></p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </tr></td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr><td> | ||
+ | <p><b>Protocol</b></p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | <ol><p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <li> </li> | ||
+ | <li> </li> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </p></ol> | ||
+ | </tr></td> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <button class="accordion"><h3><i class="fa fa-chevron-down"></i> Gravity driven filtration Experiement</h3></button> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="panel"> | ||
+ | <table border="0"> | ||
+ | <tr><td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p ><b>Experimental Details and Rationale</b></p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>Originally we have considered simple, low power consumption methods for solid-liquid separation. Gravity driven filtration was inspired by the sandpack filtration used in the early oil industry. We have also evaluated the effect of dilution on the efficiency of liquid recovery.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </tr></td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr><td> | ||
+ | <p><b>Materials</b></p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p> Funnel (x3) </p> | ||
+ | <p> Lab filter paper (x3) </p> | ||
+ | <p> Large beaker (500ml) (x3)<p> | ||
+ | </tr></td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr><td> | ||
+ | <p><b>Synthetic feces samples </b></p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | <p>Pure Syn Feces Sample (recipe 2) (25g)</p> | ||
+ | <p>Syn Feces Sample (recipe 2) (25g) mixed with 25g of water</p> | ||
+ | <p>Syn Feces Sample (recipe 2) (25g) mixed with 50g of water </p> | ||
+ | </tr></td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr><td> | ||
+ | <p><b>Protocol</b></p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | <ol><p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <li>Place filter paper into the funnel and then place the funnel on top of the beaker </li> | ||
+ | <li>Label the beaker with one of the three samples and then place the representative sample into the funnel </li> | ||
+ | <li>Let the sample filter under the gravitational force for 24 hours.</li> | ||
+ | <li>measure the weight of the liquid obtained</li> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </p></ol> | ||
+ | </tr></td> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <button class="accordion"><h3><i class="fa fa-chevron-down"></i> Gravity driven sedimentation </h3></button> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="panel"> | ||
+ | <table border="0"> | ||
+ | <tr><td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p ><b>Experimental Details and Rationale</b></p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p> Originally we considered using low power requirement methods for liquid (&VFA) and solid separation method. Gravity driven sedimentation appeared to be the simplest method, hence we decided to test it's efficiency first under the Earth gravitational field. We have also examined the effect of dilution on the water recovery efficiency. /p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </tr></td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr><td> | ||
+ | <p><b>Materials</b></p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p> Beaker (500ml) (x3)</p> | ||
+ | <p>1ml pipet </p> | ||
+ | <p>Scale </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </tr></td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr><td> | ||
+ | <p><b>Synthetic feces samples </b></p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | <p>Pure Syn Feces Sample (recipe 2) (25g)</p> | ||
+ | <p>Syn Feces Sample (recipe 2) (25g) mixed with 25g of water</p> | ||
+ | <p>Syn Feces Sample (recipe 2) (25g) mixed with 50g of water </p> | ||
+ | </tr></td> | ||
+ | <tr><td> | ||
+ | <p><b>Protocol</b></p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | <ol><p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <li>Place samples into the beakers and label them representatively </li> | ||
+ | <li>Leave the beakers untouched for 24 hours</li> | ||
+ | <li>Pipet the middle liquid layer out of the beaker and measure the volume of collected liquid </li> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </p></ol> | ||
+ | </tr></td> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <button class="accordion"><h3><i class="fa fa-chevron-down"></i>Centrifugation for solid-liquid separation</h3></button> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="panel"> | ||
+ | <table border="0"> | ||
+ | <tr><td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p ><b>Experimental Details and Rationale</b></p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>Centrifugation is a power intensive method for solid-liquid separation, however literature and industrial example show that it should be the most efficient method for solid-liquid extraction, hence the we decided to compare the centrifugation liquid recovery efficiency to the efficiency of other methods. We have also ested the effect of dilution on the recovery efficiency.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </tr></td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr><td> | ||
+ | <p><b>Materials</b></p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>Lab scale centrifuge (goes up to 3700rpm)</p> | ||
+ | <p> Beaker (x3)</p> | ||
+ | <p>Scale</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr><td> | ||
+ | <p><b>Synthetic feces samples </b></p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | <p>Pure Syn Feces Sample (recipe 2) (25g)</p> | ||
+ | <p>Syn Feces Sample (recipe 2) (25g) mixed with 25g of water</p> | ||
+ | <p>Syn Feces Sample (recipe 2) (25g) mixed with 50g of water </p> | ||
+ | </tr></td> | ||
+ | </tr></td> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr><td> | ||
+ | <p><b>Protocol</b></p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | <ol><p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <li>Place each of three syn feces samples into the 50ml centrifugation tubes and label them accordingly</li> | ||
+ | <li> Centrifuge at 3700rpm for 15 minutes</li> | ||
+ | <li>Collect the supernatant from each tube</li> | ||
+ | <li>Centrifuge the supernatant again at the same conditions</li> | ||
+ | <li>Measure the volume of supernatant collected after the second centrifugation</li> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </p></ol> | ||
+ | </tr></td> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<button class="accordion"><h3><i class="fa fa-chevron-down"></i> Staged Pressure Filtration Experiment</h3></button> | <button class="accordion"><h3><i class="fa fa-chevron-down"></i> Staged Pressure Filtration Experiment</h3></button> | ||
<div class="panel"> | <div class="panel"> |
Revision as of 03:06, 27 October 2017
Our Experiments
General Protocols
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Registry DNA was rehydrated for completion of the Interlab Study. Also, Part:BBa_K934001 (phaC1-A-B1) was rehydrated and transformed into our chassis so that PHB was produced and preliminary secretion assays could be performed before the Synthesis subgroup had completed their cloning. |
Materials |
iGEM 2017 distribution kit ddH₂O |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Our genetic parts were ordered from IDT and arrived as a dry, lyophilized powder. They were resuspended in aqueous solution for cloning into pSB1c3 or pET29B vectors and to ligate multiple parts together. |
Materials |
Synthesized DNA from IDT (gBlocks) ddH₂O |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Antibiotics were added to agar to select for successful E.coli transformants. The vector pSB1c3 was selected for with chloramphenicol, pET29B was selected for with kanamycin, and pSB1a3 was selected for with ampicillin. |
Materials |
Luria-Bertani broth with agar:
Appropriate antibiotic:
dH2O 1500-mL Erlenmeyer flask Stir bar Aluminum foil |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Culture broth was plated on agar to isolate single colonies of E.coli. |
Materials |
Luria-Bertani agar plate with appropriate antibiotic (if required) Overnight culture of desired bacteria 70% ethanol Spreading rod Bunsen burner |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Culture broth was streaked on agar to isolate single colonies of E.coli. |
Materials |
Luria-Bertani agar plate with appropriate antibiotic (if required) Overnight culture of desired bacteria or single isolated colony on agar plate Inoculation loop Bunsen burner |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
E. coli DH5ɑ and BL21(DE3) were lysed and the pSB1c3 or pET29B vectors were isolated to be used in the cloning of our genetic constructs. Bacterial clones were lysed for analysis (eg: confirmation restriction digest, genetic sequencing). |
Materials |
>2mL overnight culture of bacteria in Luria-Bertani broth with appropriate buffer in 16x125mm culture tube Resuspension buffer (stored at 4°C):
Lysis buffer:
Precipitation buffer:
Isopropanol 70% ethanol Table-top centrifuge Vacuum Centrifuge Ice bucket 2-mL microcentrifuge tubes 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tubes ddH₂O |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
DNA was precipitated between steps during sequential digestions in order to isolate the DNA from excess buffer and enzymes, allowing us to start “from scratch” for the subsequent digest. This protocol has been adapted from www.openwetware.org. |
Materials |
DNA sample that has already been digested once with the desired restriction enzyme(s) 3M Sodium acetate, pH 5.2 100% ethanol Table-top centrifuge Vacuum Centrifuge ddH2O |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Fragments of DNA are separated by size on the gel. This was used to visualize the results of restriction digests, particularly those done to confirm ligation or transformation. |
Materials |
TAE buffer:
Agarose 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask RedSafe Nucleic Acid Staining Solution Gel casting tray and comb Microwave 6X loading dye DNA sample |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Phosphorylated ends of DNA and RNA were removed, preventing unwanted ligation of linearized DNA. |
Materials |
Digested DNA vector 10X Antarctic phosphatase buffer Antarctic phosphatase ddH2O |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Digested registry DNA or digested genetic parts from IDT were ligated to either pSB1c3 or pET29B for propagation in E.coli DH5ɑ or protein expression in E.coli BL21(DE3). Later, our parts were ligated to pSB1c3 for submission to the iGEM registry. |
Materials |
Digested vector DNA Digested insert DNA 10X T4 DNA ligase buffer (from New England BIolabs) T4 DNA ligase (1 U/μL) (from New England Biolabs) ddH2O 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tubes |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Chemically competent DH5 Alpha and BL21(DE3) E. coli cells were prepared, which enabled them to be transformed with recombinant DNA. |
Materials |
Luria-Bertani broth:
Stock MgSO4 Stock KCl 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask 16x125 mm culture tubes Spectrophotometer Centrifuge 50-mL Falcon tubes 100mM CaCl₂ 100mM CaCl₂ + 10% glycerol Chilled 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tubes Chilled pipette tips |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Chemically competent E.coli DH5α were transformed with pSB1c3 or pET29b containing our genetic parts in order for the vector and insert to be propagated. Chemically competent E.coli BL21(DE3) was transformed with pSB1c3 or pET29B containing our genetic parts in order for those proteins to be expressed. |
Materials |
Competent E.coli aliquots (50 μL) 1M CaCl₂ DNA for transformation Luria-Bertani broth or SOC Media Agar plate with appropriate antibiotic |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Glycerol stocks of transformed E.coli were prepared for long-term storage of the cells at -80°C. |
Materials |
Overnight culture of transformed bacteria Sterile 1.5-mL cryo-tubes Sterile 50% glycerol |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Proteins are isolated, denatured, and separated by size on the gel. This helps to identify the proteins created from our parts and expressed by the E.coli. |
Materials |
1x SDS gel loading buffer:
1x Tris-Glycine electrophoresis buffer:
Stacking gel:
10% Resolving gel:
250-mL Erlenmeyer Flasks |
Protocol |
|
Secretion
PHB Synthesis
Experimental Details and Rationale |
3% glucose media (with appropriate antibiotics if required) was inoculated with PHB-producing E. coli cells and incubated overnight. Glucose was used as a carbon source for the PHB synthesis and the antibiotics are necessary to select for cells that contain the correct plasmids for PHB production. |
Materials |
300 mL Luria-Bertani broth:
Glucose Appropriate antibiotic if required:
dH2O 1500-mL Erlenmeyer flask Stir bar Aluminum foil Hot water bath Overnight culture of PHB-producing bacteria |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Nile Red LB agar plates were used to detect the presence of PHB granules inside of E.coli cells. Nile Red is lipophilic stain that binds to the PHB granules inside the cell and fluoresces once bound. Fluorescing cells on these plates strongly suggest that PHB granules are present. This protocol was adapted from the Imperial College iGEM Team, 2013. |
Materials |
Luria-Bertani broth with agar:
Appropriate antibiotic:
dH2O 1500-mL Erlenmeyer flask Stir bar Aluminum foil Nile Red stain |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Sodium hypochlorite (bleach) chemically lyses the bacterial cells, causing them to release PHB into their media, which can then be isolated via centrifugation. This method of extraction was carried out before the Secretion subgroup had completed their parts for the secretion pathway. This protocol has been adapted from Imperial College iGEM Team, 2013. |
Materials |
50mL overnight culture of PHB-producing bacteria Sodium hypochlorite (bleach) 1X PBSTriton X-10070% ethanol 50-mL Falcon TubesCentrifuge |
Protocol |
NOTE:Scale proportionally for higher volumes of overnight culture. All steps should be carried out with 1/10 volume of the overnight culture. |
Process
Experimental Details and Rationale |
description |
Materials |
|
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
description |
Materials |
|
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Originally we have considered simple, low power consumption methods for solid-liquid separation. Gravity driven filtration was inspired by the sandpack filtration used in the early oil industry. We have also evaluated the effect of dilution on the efficiency of liquid recovery. |
Materials |
Funnel (x3) Lab filter paper (x3) Large beaker (500ml) (x3)
|
Synthetic feces samples |
Pure Syn Feces Sample (recipe 2) (25g) Syn Feces Sample (recipe 2) (25g) mixed with 25g of water Syn Feces Sample (recipe 2) (25g) mixed with 50g of water |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Originally we considered using low power requirement methods for liquid (&VFA) and solid separation method. Gravity driven sedimentation appeared to be the simplest method, hence we decided to test it's efficiency first under the Earth gravitational field. We have also examined the effect of dilution on the water recovery efficiency. /p> |
Materials |
Beaker (500ml) (x3) 1ml pipet Scale |
Synthetic feces samples |
Pure Syn Feces Sample (recipe 2) (25g) Syn Feces Sample (recipe 2) (25g) mixed with 25g of water Syn Feces Sample (recipe 2) (25g) mixed with 50g of water |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Centrifugation is a power intensive method for solid-liquid separation, however literature and industrial example show that it should be the most efficient method for solid-liquid extraction, hence the we decided to compare the centrifugation liquid recovery efficiency to the efficiency of other methods. We have also ested the effect of dilution on the recovery efficiency. |
Materials |
Lab scale centrifuge (goes up to 3700rpm) Beaker (x3) Scale |
Synthetic feces samples |
Pure Syn Feces Sample (recipe 2) (25g) Syn Feces Sample (recipe 2) (25g) mixed with 25g of water Syn Feces Sample (recipe 2) (25g) mixed with 50g of water |
Protocol |
|
Experimental Details and Rationale |
Original gravity driven filtration experiments proved to recover insufficient amount of liquid and require high degree of power when a single filter paper is used due to clogging. Therefore the staged pressure filtration experiment was developed (to test how having a series of filters decreasing in ore size would affect the required power and the amount of liquid recovered) |
Materials |
25g of Syn Poop AeroPress Coffee press Strainer paper towel coffee filter 11 and 0.2 micron filter paper |
Protocol |
|