Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | <b>#4: </b>We successfully <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:INSA-UPS_France/Contribution">characterised</a> 5 existing | + | <b>#4: </b>We successfully <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:INSA-UPS_France/Contribution">characterised</a> 5 existing BioBricks: |
</p> | </p> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li>For | + | <li>For <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Purdue/Collaborations">Purdue Team</a>, we determined the <i>Lactobacillus spp</i> resistance at -20°C in a sucrose and milk mix. </li> |
− | <li>Thanks to | + | <li>Thanks to <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:BOKU-Vienna/Collaborations">Vienna Team</a>, we obtained the Part pGAP-RFP in <i>P. pastoris</i>.</li> |
− | <li>We participated to the Postcard Project organized by | + | <li>We participated to the Postcard Project organized by <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Groningen/Collaborations">Gröningen Team</a> and in exchange received postcards from all around the world.</li> |
− | <li>We participated to the European Meetup organized at TU Delft and to the French Meetup organized by | + | <li> We tested the maze tool coming from <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:NAWI_Graz/Collaborations">NAWI-Graz Team</a> to help them improve it. </li> |
+ | <li> <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Greece/Collaborations">Greece Team</a> translated our survey on cholera and shared it in their country, helping us to gather more data. </li> | ||
+ | <li>We participated to the European Meetup organized at <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:TUDelft/Collaborate">TU Delft</a> and to the French Meetup organized by <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Pasteur_Paris/Collaborations">Pasteur_Paris Team</a>. In each of these meetups, we obtained helpful feedbacks for our project. </li> | ||
<li>We skyped with 5 teams around the world (Greece, Singapore, Purdue, Boston, Gröningen). Talking with teams from different backgrounds, tackling their observation on our project and trying to understand theirs was very enlightening.</li> | <li>We skyped with 5 teams around the world (Greece, Singapore, Purdue, Boston, Gröningen). Talking with teams from different backgrounds, tackling their observation on our project and trying to understand theirs was very enlightening.</li> | ||
− | <li>We filled out | + | <li>We filled out 19 surveys on various subjects.</li> |
<p> | <p> | ||
<b>#3: </b>We carried out an ethical reflexion throughout all of our project, doing bibliographical research and meeting professionals and members of NGOs. Our major discussions and decisions are listed in our <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:INSA-UPS_France/HP/Silver">Human Practices Logbook</a>. | <b>#3: </b>We carried out an ethical reflexion throughout all of our project, doing bibliographical research and meeting professionals and members of NGOs. Our major discussions and decisions are listed in our <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:INSA-UPS_France/HP/Silver">Human Practices Logbook</a>. |
Revision as of 16:38, 28 October 2017
#1: We successfully registered for the competition, had an awesome summer and proudly attended the Giant Jamboree!
#2: All the required competition deliverables were met in time for the due dates:
#3: We created an Attribution page entirely designed to thank all the people that helped us throughout our adventure.
#4: We successfully characterised 5 existing BioBricks:
#1: Out of 19 Parts, we obtained 6 new BioBricks compatible with the Registry. We successfully validated 3 of them:
#2: We are proud of all of the collaborations we made with teams around the world:
#3: We carried out an ethical reflexion throughout all of our project, doing bibliographical research and meeting professionals and members of NGOs. Our major discussions and decisions are listed in our Human Practices Logbook.
#1: Our ethical reflexion went even further with the elaboration of 7 ethical matrices. Each matrix was a representation of our personal reflection on one key step of a water treatment product lifecycle. The outcomes of each matrix was carefully integrated in our project and could reshape part of it if needed.
#2: Modeling was a big part of our project, unavoidable considering the synthetic interactions of our three chassis. After building a standardized representation of all the genetic and molecular actors involved in communications, the challenge was to verify and simulate the functioning of our system through Ordinary Differential Equations. Then, sensitivity and robustness was analyzed thanks to Metabolic Control Analysis. Finally, a user-friendly interface was created for people non familiarized with ODEs.
Medal Criteria
Bronze medal
Silver medal
Gold medal