Line 153: | Line 153: | ||
<div class="Figure_14"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/21/T--TU-Eindhoven--Software_figurec_w500.png" width="500" height="375" alt="Figure_2_of_model_part" /> | <div class="Figure_14"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/21/T--TU-Eindhoven--Software_figurec_w500.png" width="500" height="375" alt="Figure_2_of_model_part" /> | ||
<figcaption>Figure 14: Figure c, showing the average complex size time</figcaption></div> | <figcaption>Figure 14: Figure c, showing the average complex size time</figcaption></div> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
If you look at the legends, you see that we used different methods to generate the graphs in the figures. Which method is most useful depends on the system that is implemented in the model. Therefore, it is useful to look at the data in the workspace (Figure 15) of Matlab to see which method works the best for generating your output. In our example, the results of method 1 and method 2 are the same for the total amount of complexes and for the total amount of molecules, so therefore we choose to only depict the results of method 1 and 3 in our graphs. | If you look at the legends, you see that we used different methods to generate the graphs in the figures. Which method is most useful depends on the system that is implemented in the model. Therefore, it is useful to look at the data in the workspace (Figure 15) of Matlab to see which method works the best for generating your output. In our example, the results of method 1 and method 2 are the same for the total amount of complexes and for the total amount of molecules, so therefore we choose to only depict the results of method 1 and 3 in our graphs. |
Revision as of 08:14, 31 October 2017