Difference between revisions of "Team:Fudan China/Parts"

Line 19: Line 19:
 
<div class="row" style="margin:80px;">
 
<div class="row" style="margin:80px;">
 
<p>For this year’s iGEM competition, our team has chosen to submit three integrases CDS and their corresponding attB and attP sites. We have also submitted the attB and attP sites of phiC31 as improved parts. In our experiments, we tested all 5 integrases, phiBT1(<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2460001">BBa_K2460001</a>), phiC31 and TG1(<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2460007">BBa_K2460007</a>) from Steptomyces phage and Bxb1, phiRv1(<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2460004">BBa_K2460004</a>) from Mycobacterium phage, for their effiency and orthogonality. Among these integrases, phiBT1 showed the best performance.</p>
 
<p>For this year’s iGEM competition, our team has chosen to submit three integrases CDS and their corresponding attB and attP sites. We have also submitted the attB and attP sites of phiC31 as improved parts. In our experiments, we tested all 5 integrases, phiBT1(<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2460001">BBa_K2460001</a>), phiC31 and TG1(<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2460007">BBa_K2460007</a>) from Steptomyces phage and Bxb1, phiRv1(<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2460004">BBa_K2460004</a>) from Mycobacterium phage, for their effiency and orthogonality. Among these integrases, phiBT1 showed the best performance.</p>
−
 
+
</div>
 +
<h3>List of our submitted parts</h3>
 +
<table rules="all" frame="box">
 +
<tr>
 +
  <th>Name</th>
 +
  <th>Description</th>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
  <td><p><a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2460001">BBa_K2460001</a></p></td>
 +
  <td>phiBT1 integrase</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
  <td><p><a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2460002">BBa_K2460002</a></p></td>
 +
  <td>phiBT1 attB</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
  <td><p><a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2460003">BBa_K2460003</a></p></td>
 +
  <td>phiBT1 attP</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
  <td><p><a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2460004">BBa_K2460004</a></p></td>
 +
  <td>phiBT1 attB</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</table>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<div id="footer" style="top:800px;">
 
<div id="footer" style="top:800px;">

Revision as of 15:22, 31 October 2017

For this year’s iGEM competition, our team has chosen to submit three integrases CDS and their corresponding attB and attP sites. We have also submitted the attB and attP sites of phiC31 as improved parts. In our experiments, we tested all 5 integrases, phiBT1(BBa_K2460001), phiC31 and TG1(BBa_K2460007) from Steptomyces phage and Bxb1, phiRv1(BBa_K2460004) from Mycobacterium phage, for their effiency and orthogonality. Among these integrases, phiBT1 showed the best performance.

List of our submitted parts

Name Description

BBa_K2460001

 phiBT1 integrase

BBa_K2460002

 phiBT1 attB

BBa_K2460003

 phiBT1 attP

BBa_K2460004

 phiBT1 attB