Cas9 & Cpf1 secretion
and activity
Line 974: | Line 974: | ||
<b>AsCpf1:</b> | <b>AsCpf1:</b> | ||
<ol> | <ol> | ||
− | <li>PCR was performed using the following plasmid and primers, to create a fragment containing Cpf1 with a C-terminal Histag and overlap region for the final backbone plasmid.<br> | + | <li>PCR was performed using the following plasmid and primers, to create a fragment containing Cpf1 with a C-terminal Histag and overlap region for the final backbone plasmid <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b4/Cpf1_PCR_protocol.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a>.<br> |
− | + | <pre style="margin-top: 10px;">Plasmid: Lenti-AsCpf1-Blast (from Addgene, nr: 84750) | |
− | + | Fw primer 5’-3’: TCATCGAGGAGGACAAGGCCC | |
− | + | Rv primer 5’-3’: GCCGCTTACTTGTACTTAATGATGATGATGATGATGGCCG CCGCCGTTGCGCAGCTCCTGGATGTAG</pre><br> | |
− | + | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
− | <li>gBlock containing a kozak sequence, signal sequence and overlap regions with the backbone and Cpf1 was ordered from IDT. See snapgene file below for sequence</li> | + | <li>gBlock containing a kozak sequence, signal sequence and overlap regions with the backbone and Cpf1 was ordered from IDT. See snapgene file below for sequence.</li> |
− | <li>In-Fusion Cloning was then performed using AgeI and BsrGI to linearize the backbone plasmid and the two previously created fragments.<br> | + | <li>In-Fusion Cloning was then performed using AgeI and BsrGI to linearize the backbone plasmid and the two previously created fragments <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/c9/UU_InFusion_protocol_v2.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a>.<br> |
− | + | <pre style="margin-top: 10px;">Plasmid: pCAGGS_eGFP</per><br> | |
− | + | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
</ol> | </ol> | ||
Line 991: | Line 989: | ||
<b>Cas9:</b> | <b>Cas9:</b> | ||
<ol> | <ol> | ||
− | <li>PCR was performed using the following plasmid and primers, to create a fragment containing Cas9 with a C-terminal Histag and overlap region for the final backbone plasmid.<br> | + | <li>PCR was performed using the following plasmid and primers, to create a fragment containing Cas9 with a C-terminal Histag and overlap region for the final backbone plasmid <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/cd/UU_Cas9_PCR_protocol.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a>.<br> |
− | + | <pre style="margin-top: 10px;">Plasmid: Lenti-Cas9-Blast (from Addgene, nr: 52962) | |
− | + | Fw primer 5’-3’: ATTCAAGGTGCTGGGCAACAC | |
− | + | Rv primer 5’-3’: GCCGCTTACTTGTACTTAATGATGATGATGATGATGGCCG CCGCCGTCGCCTCCCAGCTGAGACA</pre><br> | |
− | + | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
− | <li>PCR was performed to create a second fragment containing a kozak region, the signal sequence and the first part of Cas9 (without its methionine).<br> | + | <li>PCR was performed to create a second fragment containing a kozak region, the signal sequence and the first part of Cas9 (without its methionine) <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/81/UU_-_PCR_Cas9_gBlock.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a>.<br> |
− | + | <pre style="margin-top: 10px;">Plasmid: Lenti-Cas9-Blast (from Addgene) | |
− | + | Fw primer 5’-3’: CCCGGGATCCACCGGTGCCGCCACCATGGCGTGG ACCAGCCTGATTCTGAGCCTGCTGGCGCTGTGCAGCGGCGCGAGCAGCG ACAAGAAGTACAGCATCGGCCTG | |
− | + | Rv primer 5’-3’: CCCAGCACCTTGAATTTCTTGCTG</pre><br> | |
− | + | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
− | <li>In-Fusion Cloning was then performed using AgeI and BsrGI to linearize the backbone plasmid and the two previously created fragments.<br> | + | <li>In-Fusion Cloning was then performed using AgeI and BsrGI to linearize the backbone plasmid and the two previously created fragments <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/c9/UU_InFusion_protocol_v2.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a>.<br> |
− | + | <pre style="margin-top: 10px;">Plasmid: pCAGGS_eGFP</pre><br> | |
− | + | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
</ol> | </ol> | ||
Line 1,012: | Line 1,007: | ||
SECTION 2: TRANSFECTION INTO HEK293T CELLS<br> | SECTION 2: TRANSFECTION INTO HEK293T CELLS<br> | ||
− | HEK293t cells were cultured according to cell culture protocol | + | HEK293t cells were cultured according to the cell culture protocol <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/2e/UU_Cell_culture_protocol.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a>. We transfected the cells with the midiprepped plasmids according to the Lipofectamine 2000 transfection protocol [Experimental\Protocols\Wiki ready\Lipofectamine 2000 transfection protocol.pdf]. |
For protein purification under denaturing conditions, HEK cells in 6 wellplate wells were transfected. For protein purification under native conditions, HEK cells in 10 cm petridishes were cotransfected (9:1 plasmid of interest : plasmid containing GFP). | For protein purification under denaturing conditions, HEK cells in 6 wellplate wells were transfected. For protein purification under native conditions, HEK cells in 10 cm petridishes were cotransfected (9:1 plasmid of interest : plasmid containing GFP). | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
SECTION 3: PROTEIN PURIFICATION UNDER DENATURING CONDITIONS<br> | SECTION 3: PROTEIN PURIFICATION UNDER DENATURING CONDITIONS<br> | ||
− | Secreted and His-tagged Cas9 and Cpf1, which will be referred to as sCas9 and sCpf1, respectively, were purified from the medium using Ni-bead purification, according to protocol | + | Secreted and His-tagged Cas9 and Cpf1, which will be referred to as sCas9 and sCpf1, respectively, were purified from the medium using Ni-bead purification, according to protocol <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/41/Purification_of_cells_and_medium_secreted_cpf1_and_cas9.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a>. Also, whole-cell lysates were made, following the same protocol, to check for possible accumulation of sCas9 or sCpf1 in HEK293t cells. |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
SECTION 4: VERIFYING THE PRESENCE OF HIS-TAGGED PROTEINS IN THE MEDIUM<br> | SECTION 4: VERIFYING THE PRESENCE OF HIS-TAGGED PROTEINS IN THE MEDIUM<br> | ||
− | The presence of sCas9 and sCpf1 was verified using SDS-PAGE and Western Blots. Proteins were separated using SDS-PAGE using the following protocol | + | The presence of sCas9 and sCpf1 was verified using SDS-PAGE and Western Blots. Proteins were separated using SDS-PAGE using the following protocol <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/ab/General_Protocol_SDS-PAGE_Western_Blot.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a>. |
− | 10% acrylamide running gels, and stacking gels were made according to the following protocol | + | 10% acrylamide running gels, and stacking gels were made according to the following protocol <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b1/Preparing_SDS-PAGE_gels.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a>. Western Blots were carried out according to the same protocol as for the SDS-PAGE. |
− | The secreted proteins were incubated with mouse anti-His6x (using dilutions of 1:2000 and 1:5000) and rabbit anti-Cas9 or rabbit anti-Cpf1 (using dilutions of 1:2000). The secondary antibody | + | The secreted proteins were incubated with mouse anti-His6x (using dilutions of 1:2000 and 1:5000) and rabbit anti-Cas9 or rabbit anti-Cpf1 (using dilutions of 1:2000). The secondary antibody was a goat anti-mouse for the Histag and goat anti-rabbit for both Cas9 and Cpf1, with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate to verify the presence of secreted proteins. |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
SECTION 5: PROTEIN PURIFICATION UNDER NATIVE CONDITIONS<br> | SECTION 5: PROTEIN PURIFICATION UNDER NATIVE CONDITIONS<br> | ||
− | Proteins were purified using Ni-NTA superflow columns, according to the following protocol | + | Proteins were purified using Ni-NTA superflow columns, according to the following protocol <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/fa/UU_Ni-NTA_superflow_colums_protocol.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a>. No imidazole in the pre- and washing buffers was used. Additionally, 50 ul samples were taken of the pellet, supernatant, filtered supernatant, and the runthrough. |
− | Whole cell lysates were made using protocol | + | Whole cell lysates were made using protocol <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/41/Purification_of_cells_and_medium_secreted_cpf1_and_cas9.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a> to check for possible accumulation of sCas9 or sCpf1 in Hek293t cells. |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
SECTION 6: IN VITRO ENDONUCLEASE ACTIVITY ASSAY<br> | SECTION 6: IN VITRO ENDONUCLEASE ACTIVITY ASSAY<br> | ||
− | After successful purification of sCas9-His6x and sCpf1-His6x and subsequent verification of the presence of the aforementioned proteins, an in vitro endonuclease activity assay was carried out. The in vitro endonuclease activity assay was used to assess whether or not our secreted and, in all likelihood, glycosylated sCas9-His6x and sCpf1-His6x would still exhibit sgRNA-binding- and endonuclease activity. The assay was executed according to the protocol | + | After successful purification of sCas9-His6x and sCpf1-His6x and subsequent verification of the presence of the aforementioned proteins, an in vitro endonuclease activity assay was carried out. The in vitro endonuclease activity assay was used to assess whether or not our secreted and, in all likelihood, glycosylated sCas9-His6x and sCpf1-His6x would still exhibit sgRNA-binding- and endonuclease activity. The assay was executed according to the protocol <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/12/Nuclease_activity_assay_-_assay_UU.pdf" class="pdf pdf-inline"></a>. |
+ | Linearized plasmid 51-dPAM (823 bp) <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/3/3c/51_dPAM_800bp.zip" class="zip zip-inline"></a> was used as the target for sCas9-His6x and His6x-Cpf1. Two sgRNAs were used that were tailored to be bound by either Cas9 or Cpf1: <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/9d/SpCas9_gRNA1_Tet-luc.zip" class="zip zip-inline"></a> and <a target=_BLANK href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/5e/Ascpf1_sgRNA.zip" class="zip zip-inline"></a>, respectively. Both sgRNAs were complementary to roughly the same region of the aforementioned linearized plasmid, which would result in two cut fragments of ~260 bp and ~560 bp for both His6x-Cas9 and His6x-Cpf1. The efficacy of these sgRNAs, both in binding to the target region in the linearized plasmid, and binding to either Cas9 or Cpf1 were also assessed. As positive controls we used unmodified Cas9 and Cpf1 produced by Escherichia coli, coupled with their respective sgRNAs and the linearized target plasmid. The negative controls consisted of the linearized plasmid with either Cas9 or Cpf1 without sgRNA, and a third negative control with the linearized plasmid only. Subsequently, the samples were separated by DNA gel electrophoresis. | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
Line 1,219: | Line 1,215: | ||
In conclusion, the MESA system still needs tuning to function in our lab. The best option would be to use the same transfection method as the original authors did and use the exact same amounts of each plasmid. To be sure, DMEM medium could be used rather than mEF. If it does not work in spite of these changes, it is important to look for other potential reasons. | In conclusion, the MESA system still needs tuning to function in our lab. The best option would be to use the same transfection method as the original authors did and use the exact same amounts of each plasmid. To be sure, DMEM medium could be used rather than mEF. If it does not work in spite of these changes, it is important to look for other potential reasons. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | <h2 class="subhead" id="subhead-7">References</h2> | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
Line 1,248: | Line 1,247: | ||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
dCAS9 D10A fw 5’-3’: tacagcatcggcctggcaatcggcaccaactctg | dCAS9 D10A fw 5’-3’: tacagcatcggcctggcaatcggcaccaactctg | ||
− | dCAS9 D10A rv 5’-3’: | + | dCAS9 D10A rv 5’-3’: cagagttggtgccgattgccaggccgatgctgta |
dCAS9 H840A fw 5’-3’: cgactacgatgtggacgctatcgtgcctcagagc | dCAS9 H840A fw 5’-3’: cgactacgatgtggacgctatcgtgcctcagagc | ||
− | dCAs9 H840A rv 5’-3’: | + | dCAs9 H840A rv 5’-3’: gctctgaggcacgatagcgtccacatcgtagtcg |
− | dCpf1 D908A fw 5’-3’: | + | dCpf1 D908A fw 5’-3’: ctatcatcggcatcgctcggggcgagagaaa |
− | dCpf1 D908A rv 5’-3’: | + | dCpf1 D908A rv 5’-3’: tttctctcgccccgagcgatgccgatgatag |
</pre> | </pre> | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
Line 1,692: | Line 1,691: | ||
#modal-content>h2 { border-bottom: 1px solid #dedede; padding-bottom: 10px; } | #modal-content>h2 { border-bottom: 1px solid #dedede; padding-bottom: 10px; } | ||
− | .pdf { display: inline-block; | + | .pdf { display: inline-block; font-size: 12px; margin: 10px 0 10px 0; padding-left: 30px; height: 24px; background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/6a/Uupdf.png) top left no-repeat; vertical-align: bottom; } |
+ | .pdf { text-decoration: none; } | ||
+ | .pdf:hover { text-decoration: underline; } | ||
+ | .pdf-inline { margin: 0; padding-left: 24px; text-decoration: none !important; } | ||
+ | |||
+ | .zip { display: inline-block; font-size: 12px; margin: 10px 0 10px 0; padding-left: 30px; height: 24px; background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/c3/UUSnapGene_Viewer_24.png) top left no-repeat; vertical-align: bottom; } | ||
+ | .zip { text-decoration: none; } | ||
+ | .zip:hover { text-decoration: underline; } | ||
+ | .zip-inline { margin: 0; padding-left: 24px; text-decoration: none !important; } | ||
</style> | </style> | ||
Line 3,558: | Line 3,565: | ||
box-shadow: 0 1px 3px -1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.6); | box-shadow: 0 1px 3px -1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.6); | ||
} | } | ||
− | .timeline a:hover, a:active, a:focus { | + | .timeline a:hover, .timeline a:active, .timeline a:focus { |
background: #32408f; | background: #32408f; | ||
color: #FFFFFF; | color: #FFFFFF; |
Revision as of 16:29, 31 October 2017
<!DOCTYPE html>
×