Difference between revisions of "Team:DTU-Denmark/Description"

Line 17: Line 17:
  
 
<p>
 
<p>
We aim to develop a detection-assay that enables us to determine what kind of snake the patient is envenomed by. The strategy is to target distinguishable enzymatic features in the different snake venoms by developing suitable substrates. As a result, we can investigate the relative composition of specific venom components in a blood sample and thereby infer the responsible type of venomous snake.  
+
We aim to create a novel diagnostic platform by using synthetic biology derived protease activity assay to identify specific venom enzymes that, by developing suitable substrates, can investigate the relative composition of specific venom components in a blood sample. Our goal is to create a diagnostic tool that would make it possible for a clinician to quickly determine which antivenom is necessary, or if it is necessary at all.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
Line 23: Line 23:
 
References:<br>
 
References:<br>
 
[1] Chippaux JP (1998). Snake-bites: appraisal of the global situation. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 76(5),515-24.<br>
 
[1] Chippaux JP (1998). Snake-bites: appraisal of the global situation. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 76(5),515-24.<br>
[2] Gutiérrez, JM et al. (2011). Antivenoms for Snakebite Envenomings. Inflammation and Allergy - Drug Targets 10(5): 369–80.<br>
+
[2] Gutiérrez JM, León G, Lomonte B, Angulo Y (2011). Antivenoms for Snakebite Envenomings. Inflammation and Allergy - Drug Targets 10(5), 369–80.<br>
[3] World Health Organization. "Guidelines for the prevention and clinical management of snakebite in Africa." (2010): 62
+
[3] Warrell D, Gutierrez JM, Padilla A (2007). Rabies and Envenomings: a  Neglected Public Health Issue: Report of a Consultative Meeting. World Health Organization, Geneva.
 
</p>
 
</p>
  

Revision as of 07:50, 30 June 2017

Description

Envenomation by snakebite is one of the most neglected diseases with an estimated 5 million bites. These result in about 100,000 deaths and 400,000 disabilities annually [1]. The only effective treatment is animal derived antivenoms, which frequently causes adverse reactions [2]. As a result they are often only administered as a last resort.

One of the major problems related to treatment of snake bites concerns the lack of identification of the snake. When bitten, it is difficult for most people to remember details about the snake, which makes it almost impossible to confidently administer the correct specific antivenom. Currently, if the snake cannot be identified, multispecies antivenom is used in a consequently higher dose leading to more severe side effects. By solving the venom identification problem it could potentially increase the survival rate of snake bite victims. This is due to decreased diagnosis time and less amount of antivenom necessary for treatment, thereby causing fewer adverse reactions in the patient [3].

We aim to create a novel diagnostic platform by using synthetic biology derived protease activity assay to identify specific venom enzymes that, by developing suitable substrates, can investigate the relative composition of specific venom components in a blood sample. Our goal is to create a diagnostic tool that would make it possible for a clinician to quickly determine which antivenom is necessary, or if it is necessary at all.

References:
[1] Chippaux JP (1998). Snake-bites: appraisal of the global situation. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 76(5),515-24.
[2] Gutiérrez JM, León G, Lomonte B, Angulo Y (2011). Antivenoms for Snakebite Envenomings. Inflammation and Allergy - Drug Targets 10(5), 369–80.
[3] Warrell D, Gutierrez JM, Padilla A (2007). Rabies and Envenomings: a Neglected Public Health Issue: Report of a Consultative Meeting. World Health Organization, Geneva.

What should this page contain?
  • A clear and concise description of your project.
  • A detailed explanation of why your team chose to work on this particular project.
  • References and sources to document your research.
  • Use illustrations and other visual resources to explain your project.
Advice on writing your Project Description

We encourage you to put up a lot of information and content on your wiki, but we also encourage you to include summaries as much as possible. If you think of the sections in your project description as the sections in a publication, you should try to be consist, accurate and unambiguous in your achievements.

Judges like to read your wiki and know exactly what you have achieved. This is how you should think about these sections; from the point of view of the judge evaluating you at the end of the year.

References

iGEM teams are encouraged to record references you use during the course of your research. They should be posted somewhere on your wiki so that judges and other visitors can see how you thought about your project and what works inspired you.

Inspiration

See how other teams have described and presented their projects: